SRM working plan. La Cristalera, 5-6 November 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mining Association Rules from Microarray Gene Expression Data.
Advertisements

Original Figures for "Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring"
Protein Quantitation II: Multiple Reaction Monitoring
Protein Quantitation II: Multiple Reaction Monitoring
CAVEAT 1 MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS ARE EXPENSIVE AND COMPLICATED. MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS ARE THE STARTING POINT FOR RESEARCH. MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS CANNOT.
Generalized Protein Parsimony and Spectral Counting for Functional Enrichment Analysis Nathan Edwards Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular.
ONCOMINE: A Bioinformatics Infrastructure for Cancer Genomics
Modeling Functional Genomics Datasets CVM Lesson 1 13 June 2007Bindu Nanduri.
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
Applications of protomic Presented By: Muhammad Rizwan Roll no: Department of Bioinformatics.
Proteomics Informatics – Protein identification II: search engines and protein sequence databases (Week 5)
5 th Spanish Human Proteome Project (SpHPP) Workshop La Cristalera, Miraflores de la Sierra, Madrid, November 5-6th, 2013 SpHPP Council, La Cristalera,
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Director David Fenyö Contact information
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Director David Fenyö Contact information
---- Mark Borodovsky a short intro Position open: Scientist - Pathway Informatics (June 2009) THE POSITION The successful candidate will join the Computational.
NCI’s Clinical Proteomic Technologies for Cancer: “Restructuring Proteomics to Succeed in Discovering Cancer Biomarkers” Joe.
DEMO CSE fall. What is GeneMANIA GeneMANIA finds other genes that are related to a set of input genes, using a very large set of functional.
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part III: Protein Quantitation
Thoughts on Biomarker Discovery and Validation Karla Ballman, Ph.D. Division of Biostatistics October 29, 2007.
Comprehensive Gene Expression Analysis of Prostate Cancer Reveals Distinct Transcriptional Programs Associated With Metastatic Disease Kevin Paiz-Ramirez.
Presented by Karen Xu. Introduction Cancer is commonly referred to as the “disease of the genes” Cancer may be favored by genetic predisposition, but.
The Human Transcription Factor Proteome Andrew Stergachis Stamatoyannopoulos Lab Dept. of Genome Sciences University of Washington.
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part II: Protein Characterization David Fenyö February 18, 2011 Top-down/bottom-up proteomics Post-translational modifications.
Daniel C. Liebler Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Vanderbilt, Tennessee Performance and Optimization of LC-MS/MS Platforms for Unbiased Discovery.
Simoa Accelerator Laboratory
The CCE 5 th Annual Retreat Global Proteomics & Determination of Vitamin D Metabolites Update Jiri Adamec.
Proteomics Informatics – Data Analysis and Visualization (Week 13)
2007 GeneSpring MS GeneSpring for Metabolite BioMarker Analysis using Mass Spectrometry data Agilent Q-TOF VIP Visit Jan 16-17, 2007 Santa Clara, CA Thon.
Human Proteome Project? Màster en bioquímica, biologia molecular i biomedicina Mòdul 4: Genòmica i Proteòmica Núria Colomé Calls.
HPP Preliminary Results La Cristalera, August 2012 Montserrat Carrascal, Joan Villanueva, Joaquín Abián LP-CSIC/UAB.
Center for Human Health and the Environment
Finish up array applications Move on to proteomics Protein microarrays.
WG workplan 1.Expression of 60 missing proteins Adquisition of clones from the ASU collection 1.2. Subcloning in the pANT-cGST vector if necessary.
BIOMARKERS Diagnostics and Prognostics. OMICS Molecular Diagnostics: Promises and Possibilities, p. 12 and 26.
La Cristalera, Miraflores de la Sierra, December 2012 HPPHPP Use of SEQUEST search results with ProteoRed.org MIAPE Extractor.
Outline Selection of candidate proteins for the multiplex analysis of DBS via targeted proteomics The currently employed strategies for the selection.
HUMAN-MOUSE CONSERVED COEXPRESSION NETWORKS PREDICT CANDIDATE DISEASE GENES Ala U., Piro R., Grassi E., Damasco C., Silengo L., Brunner H., Provero P.
Laboratori de Proteòmica Vall d’Hebron Institut d’Oncologia Francesc Canals Madrid 28/08/2012 Human Proteome Project – CHR16 SRM Analysis of selected proteins.
Decoding the Network Footprint of Diseases With increasing availability of data, there is significant activity directed towards correlating genomic, proteomic,
EBI is an Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. UniProtKB Sandra Orchard.
FIRST APPROACH TO THE SHOTGUN UNKNOWN PROTEINS sHPP CHROMOSOME 16 MEETING August, 28, 2012 La Cristalera, Miraflores de la Sierra.
CBioPortal Web resource for exploring, visualizing, and analyzing multidimentional cancer genomics data.
NCode TM miRNA Analysis Platform Identifies Differentially Expressed Novel miRNAs in Adenocarcinoma Using Clinical Human Samples Provided By BioServe.
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Directors David Fenyö Kelly Ruggles Beatrix Ueberheide Contact information
Information Representation Working Group WG Meeting September 5, 2008.
What is proteomics? Richard Mbasu and Ben Richards.
University of Pavia Dep. of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Mathematical Modelling and Synthetic Biology.
Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics Chromosome 10 Joshua LaBaer, M.D., Ph.D. Konstantinos Petritis, Ph.D. Virginia G. Piper Center for.
KEY CONCEPT Entire genomes are sequenced, studied, and compared.
Bottom-Up Proteomics Data collection
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Mining the human urine proteome for monitoring renal transplant injury
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Loyola Marymount University
Transcriptional Signature of Histone Deacetylases in Breast cancer
A perspective on proteomics in cell biology
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
KEY CONCEPT Entire genomes are sequenced, studied, and compared.
Global Proteome Analysis of the NCI-60 Cell Line Panel
Impact of Alternative Splicing on the Human Proteome
Global Proteome Analysis of the NCI-60 Cell Line Panel
Loyola Marymount University
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Genome‐scale metabolic models (GEMs) provide a scaffold for integrative analysis of clinical data. Genome‐scale metabolic models (GEMs) provide a scaffold.
Loyola Marymount University
Loyola Marymount University
Loyola Marymount University
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Presentation transcript:

SRM working plan. La Cristalera, 5-6 November 2013.

To deliver reliable SRM methods, we proposed a stepwise strategy that involves data sharing and cross-validation across different laboratories and this process must be optimized under standard conditions An initial set of 120 Chr-16 proteins was selected on the basis of their GPMDB scores, log e in the range -175 to -6000, belonging to the group defined as “known” Chr16 proteins. Each laboratory explored the detectability by SRM of the assigned proteins in digests from at least three cell lines : MCF7, CCD18, and Ramos. For 106 out of the 120 proteins selected (88.3%) a minimum of three co-eluting SRM transition signals were observed for a number of peptides ranging from 1-10 per protein, with an average of 4.16 peptides/protein. After the initial round of SRM method development at the six laboratories, a second round of cross-validation was performed, assigning each of the final 51 proteins detected to two laboratories different from the laboratory that initially developed the SRM method. After this second round of analysis validation, a total of 149 peptides from 49 proteins. Previous SRM analysis

48 proteins/group Working plan for MRM WP All proteins identified by SG analyses will be distributed in packages of 48 protein across 8 labs. Analysis will be also performed by pseudoSRM in additional 8 labs. A minimum of 25 proteins must be analysed. Development of absolute quantitation methods. Design of SRM mehods. Peptides and transitions. October 2013 May 2014 Nov 2013 Dec 2013 April2014 March 2014 Feb2014 Jan 2014 Excell with the proteins assigned to each group will be distributed Assays in biological matrices (at least 1 cell line) Preliminary assays based on experimental data Matching with SG data. Ranking by difficulty. Troubleshooting. Follow up meeting (SRM-psSRM) Consolidation of SRM methods (1-n cell lines) Follow up meeting (SRM-psSRM) Validation of assays in at least 2 labs Chr16 SRM Database MIAPE for SRM experiments Follow up meeting (SRM-psSRM) Topics for discussion MIDAS, Synthetic peptides Acceptance criteria. Reporting data. SRM database. Missing/difficult proteins. Gene expression data for cell line selection. Analysis of subcellular fractions. Analysis of plasma. PTMs by SRM. CRG

Searching for missing proteins Definition of the missing protein group is already made (NextProt) but it may be worth to consider low abundance proteins which detection will be challenging. If so, define criterion. Identify which tissues or cell lines should be explored to identify chr16 missing proteins based on transcriptomic profiles and HPA evidences (for 95 chr16 missing proteins). Primary cells should be considered, in particular PBL. Study of secretome and body fluids. In some cases, subcellular fractionation or any other enrichment procedure should be considered. The case of plasma. Searching on cells upon stimulation. Cell lines, type of stimuli and conditions should be defined. Revise the biological function of the missing proteins, if known, to infer potential localizations.

neXtProt v ENSEMBL v73 UniProtKB v 2013_09 HPA v11 neXtProt v ENSEMBL v73 UniProtKB v 2013_09 HPA v genes 840 protein coding genes 143 missing proteins 2360 genes 840 protein coding genes 143 missing proteins 120 OMIM hits Obesity Neurodegenerative diseases Cancer 120 OMIM hits Obesity Neurodegenerative diseases Cancer Coverage of 73% gene products in Lymphoid cells Epitelial cells Fibroblasts Coverage of 73% gene products in Lymphoid cells Epitelial cells Fibroblasts Shotgun Proteomic analysis Shotgun Proteomic analysis Transcriptomic analysis Transcriptomic analysis 626 HPA antibodies for Chr16 proteins, 95 for missing Protein profile Gene expression profile Data integration Global and cell type specific outcomes Correlation proteome/transcriptome Proteome coverage and chromosome distribution Chr16 proteome coverage Global and cell type specific outcomes Correlation proteome/transcriptome Proteome coverage and chromosome distribution Chr16 proteome coverage Protein expression vectors for 64 Chr16 missing proteins

Tissue specific expression pattern of genes coding for missing proteins. HBM

Targeting disease related proteins.  Identify proteins of chr16 involved in B/D conditions within the consortium.  Configuration of disease related protein lists within the different B/D areas of the SpHPP. Targeted monitoring of proteins of cellular pathways of particular relevance (metabolic or signaling pathways, etc). PTMs? Proposals from B/D related groups Integration with transcriptomic, metabolomics, others. B/D oriented strategy

B/D-SpHPP Coordinator: FJ. Blanco Biology Biomarkers (D/P/P/T) 1ª Phase: Known Proteins 2ª Phase: Unknown Proteins Biobanks-ISCIII CAIBER-ISCIII (clinical research) Cancer Chair: C. Belda Co-Chair: I. Casal Neurologic Disorders Chair: A. López-Munain Co-chair: JM. Arizmendi Rheumatic Diseases Chair: FJ. Blanco Co-Chair: JP. Albar Obesity Chair: J. Prieto Co-Chair:F. Corrales Cardiovascular Diseases Chair: L. Rguez.-Padial Co-Chair: F. Vivanco Infectious Diseases Chair: J. Fortun Co-Chair: C. Gil Muscular dystrophy Parkinson diseases Brain tumors Breast cancer Colon cancer Osteoarthritis Rheumatoid arthritis SLE Obesity NAFLD Artherosclerosis Valvular diseases Candidiasis Red RECAVA

Data management Data reporting, MIAPE. A common SRM database

Other topics for discussion. Analytical procedures Standardization of LC conditions. Reference peptides for retention time normalization. Acceptance criteria:  number of peptides and transitions  MIDAS  Synthetic peptides for validation Validation across labs (2-3). SOPs.

SRM for SG proteins. All, according with the proposed pipeline. Results warranted. Reduce the workload if we agree to tackle missing proteins and B/D. SRM for missing proteins  Biological analysis of chr16 missing proteins (databases). Groups  Biophysical features of chr16 missing proteins (Pino’s work).  Identification of tissues and cell lines for missing proteins search. Transcriptomic, HPA, others. CIMA.  Development of SRM assays. SRM for B/D  Specific proteins, drivers of disease, already described by B/D groups.  Configuration of disease related lists of proteins (form datasets of B/D groups), any of them from chr16?  Analysis of all lists and identification of cellular pathways and corresponding proteins of special interest (biological, belong to chr16, common across lists, etc.)  Development of SRM assays. Proposal for extended working plan