Students’ involvement in QA processes: Pierre Mendès France University experience SAMAGANOVA Asel Assistant Professor, UPMF –Grenoble II 23 septembre 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EFFECTS OF BOLOGNA PROCESS ON GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENTS IN TURKISH UNIVERSITIES Dr. Yilmaz Ari Department of Geography, Balikesir University, Turkey. Future.
Advertisements

CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN BOLOGNA PROCESS Vlasta Vizek Vidović Vicerector for international relations University of Zagreb Zagreb, November, 2004.
BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
The Modernisation of Higher Education Introduction Anthony Vickers 27 th June 2012.
Towards true students’ participation in QA (institutional level) Karina Ufert European Students’ Union Executive committee member,
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Fernando M Galán Palomares (Vice-Chairperson) Creativity, learning and academic freedom Creativity.
The role of students alongside other stakeholders in the Bologna Process Colin Tück 26/27 May 2008, Baku Council of Europe seminar.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Employability in context of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat Yerevan, May 2014.
Per Lundgren1 A Facilitation Vehicle to Promote Master’s Programme Development.
Changes in the educational system- Implementation of Bologna Oslo October 2009.
STUDENTS INPUT INTO THE EVALUATION OF THEIR EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE Vjenceslav Pejša Vjenceslav Pejša.
Prof. Dr. Andrä Wolter Permeability between Vocational Training and Higher Education New Opportunities for Non-traditional Students and Lifelong Learners.
The “Bologna Process” and the European Higher Education Area in the global setting. Donatella Palomba - Università di Roma “Tor Vergata ” YICGG 2008 –
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Bologna Process  A co-ordinated reform process in more than 30 signatory countries.  Co-ordinated by the common platform in the Bologna Declaration of.
Student participation in higher education institutions governance Regional Meeting of Ministers of Education on the Implementation of the European Higher.
Statistics curricula at Italian Universities and other schools Antonio Giusti.
Page 1 Internationalization Strategies beyond Bologna.
The Bologna Process The UK HE Europe Unit Tish Bourke.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
BOLOGNA PROCESS - A Challenging Process for Albanian Universities Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lindita MILO (LATI), Vice-Rector of University of Tirana, ALBANIA.
CHANGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF THE SS. CYRIL AND METHODIUS UNIVERSITY IN SKOPJE Prof. Dr. Velimir Stojkovski Rector Ss. Cyril and Methodius University.
Globalization of Higher Education
Conference on the Bologna Process: European Higher Education Policies and Reform Baku, April 2005 The Social Dimension of Higher Education in Europe-Current.
Expanding Europe Rectors Conference New Cultural Environment in the European Higher Education Area: Degree equivalence as a driving force for the international.
BOLOGNA PROCESSES On June 19, 1999, 29 European Ministers of Education signed a declaration in the oldest town of Bologna. By signing the document the.
Ministry of Education and Youth Republic of Moldova 1 Implementing the Bologna Process in the Republic of Moldova: Achievements and Problems Viorelia Moldovan-Batrinac,
Universities UK How will the Bologna Process and EU initiatives affect higher education worldwide? Diana Warwick 1.
The Bologna Declaration and its implementation at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium) JEP UM Zagreb, 28 October 2004 An Huts International.
The student perspective in the EHEA The European Students’ Union Bert Vandenkendelaere Chairperson Istanbul, 15 th of June 2011 back to basics !
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Why “organise”? Karina Ufert European Students’ Union, Chairperson.
ENQA a key player in the European Higher Education Area Meeting of the Belarus University System representatives Minsk, March 2013 Josep Grifoll / Жузэп.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
The Bologna Process and studying with a disability esdon / Gasmeterlaan 134 B-9000 Gent Belgium 1 Gilles Verschoore Coordinator.
Bologna – a top-down and bottom-up process at the University of Helsinki? Markku Kivinen Director Aleksanteri-insitute.
Bologna Process Based on Sorbonne Declaration (1998) Signed in Bologna (1999) Currently 33 voluntary signatories Progress reviewed in Prague (2001) and.
Internationalizing the Undergraduate Psychology Curriculum Anna Laura Comunian University of Padua, Italy.
Bologna process and its implementation in France: Pierre Mendès France University experience SAMAGANOVA Asel Assistant Professor, UPMF –Grenoble II 23.
Experiences with TEMPUS projects Carolina Madeleine, International Project Manager Tempus National Info Day February 7th 2010, Syria.
„Doctoral candidates as a link between EHEA and ERA- challenges for the 21st century “ Izabela Stanisławiszyn President, EURODOC Bologna.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
1 FIRST STAGE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN CROATIA – TASKS OF AUTHORISED BODIES.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
University of Rijeka QUASYS, Dubrovnik – October 11-12, 2003 Petar Bezinović Quality Promotion Office QUALITY PROMOTION AT RIJEKA UNIVERSITY.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
QUALITY, ICTs AND « LICENCE-MASTER- DOCTORATE »(LMD) REFORMS Juma SHABANI Abuja, September 22nd, 2015.
Ministry of Education and Science Republic of Armenia Levon Mkrtchyan Minister of Education and Science of Armenia IMPLEMENTATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BOLOGNA.
Bologna Process The students’ perspective Tblisi, 9 November 2005 Nicolaas Heerens Bologna Process Committee ESIB.
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE nd UNICA EduLab Budapest, 3rd December, 2015 Taina Moisander Bologna With Student Eyes 2015.
Bologna Declaration Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assessment in SSH (PHOENIX) Bishkek,
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
Bologna Declaration: Professional Education for Landscape Architects LE:NOTRE Spring Workshop, Budapest, DRAFT, Summary 1. Bologna.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 What have we learnt from Bologna? Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONALISATION IN B&H HIGHER EDUCATION / STINT FMON’s competencies, organization, role in the project, expectations from the project.
European Higher Education Area: focus from structures to better learning Head of Higher Education Unit Helka Kekäläinen, PhD.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
PEOPLES’ FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR
1.
Involving students to promote employability of higher education
Presentation transcript:

Students’ involvement in QA processes: Pierre Mendès France University experience SAMAGANOVA Asel Assistant Professor, UPMF –Grenoble II 23 septembre 2009 Tempus Project "Developing an Internal Quality Assurance System at Telavi State University, Georgia"

2 Students’ involvement in QA processes I.Bologna process: QA and students involvement II.Why is students involvement needed? III.Forms of students participation in QA processes IV.Problems related to students participation

3 I. Bologna process: QA and students involvement  Easily readable and comparable degrees  Three cycle system (Bachelor-Master- Doctorate structure)  European Credit Transfer System  Promotion of mobility of students and staff  Cooperation in quality assurance  European dimensions in higher education Bologna Declaration (1999): Main Objectives

4 I. Bologna process: QA and students involvement

5  1998: Sorbonne Declaration (France, Italy, Germany, UK)  Harmonisation of the architecture of the European Higher Education System  1999: Bologna Declaration (30 European countries)  Establishing the European Area of Higher Education by 2010  2001: Prague (+Croatia, Cyprus, Turkey)  promotion of life long learning,  involvement of students,  enhancing attractiveness and competitiveness of the European Higher Education Area to other parts of the world) Bologna Process I. Bologna process: QA and students involvement

6  “students are full members of the higher education community”  recognition of students as “competent, active and constructive partners” in the establishment and shaping of a European Higher Education Area. Prague Communiqué (May 2001) I. Bologna process: QA and students involvement student ‐ orientated education system

7 In this regard, four types of needs can be identified:  needs of policy makers, charged with implementing national, regional or local policy;  needs of institution heads and institution staff;  needs of employers  needs of students. Why do we need QA? II. Why is students involvement needed in QA?

8 STUDENTS PARTNERSCONSUMERS ??

9  Students are important part of the academic community  Students have a unique inside perspective in education  Expert capacity of student unions and other stakeholder organisations  Informed and motivated students are often the driving force behind changes.  Consensual decisions and activities are broadly accepted and supported  Education as a key element in the development of democratic societies - “Universities as Sites of Citizenship” II. Why is students involvement needed in QA?

10 III. Forms of students participation in QA processes Quality assurance externalinternal

11 III. Forms of students participation in QA processes UPMF – Human and Social sciences University Law, Economics, Management, Political sciences, Psychology, Sociology, Urbanism, Education sciences, Philosophy, History, Musicology…  students  foreign students 1339 : Foundation of the University 1970 : Transformation into Social Sciences University (Law on Universities Specialisation, 1968) 1991 : June, 17, 1991, Renaming into Pierre Mendès France University

12 III. Forms of students participation in QA processes UPMF – Human and Social sciences University Law, Economics, Management, Political sciences, Psychology, Sociology, Urbanism, Education sciences, Philosophy, History, Musicology…  students  foreign students 1339 : Foundation of the University 1970 : Transformation into Social Sciences University (Law on Universities Specialisation, 1968) 1991 : June, 17, 1991, Renaming into Pierre Mendès France University Pierre Mendes France, French politician (1907 – 1982)

13 III. Forms of students participation in QA processes

14 III. Forms of students participation in QA processes Internal Quality Assurance Processes providing feedback on the courses they have taken, contributing to the development of learning and teaching in their subject area, representing student views in any number of ways through a student union or other representative body, participating in university decision making processes

15 III. Forms of students participation in QA processes

16 III. Forms of students participation in QA processes Internal Quality Assurance Processes Decision-making process Board of Administration Scientific Board Board of Studies 57 members (12 students) 40 members (16 students) 40 membres (4 PhD students)

17 III. Forms of students participation in QA processes Internal Quality Assurance Processes Decision-making process Board of Administration Scientific Board Students Board

18 European Students' Union [ Since its creation in 1982, ESU massively expanded its membership and today acts on behalf of 45 National Unions of Students from 34 countries, representing over 10 million students in Europe. With involvement in the Bologna process, ESIB transformed from a "sleeping giant" to a major player and a "representative voice of students in Europe" in European higher education politics. II. Why is students involvement needed in QA?

19 European Students' Union [ ESU’s contribution to the Bologna process was twofold: to defend student interests into the process. to coordinate information campaigns, so- called Bologna student days, to provide students with information about the Bologna Declaration so that they could pressure institutions and national governments to take up the reforms. II. Why is students involvement needed in QA?

20 IV. Problems related to students participation Internal Quality Assurance Processes  Weak dissemination of information about the rights of the students, how they can influence the governance of higher education and the results of decisions and discussions relevant to them.  Sometimes students’ representatives and the students that they represent differ on opinion, but this is possibly because students’ representatives tend to have the long turn vision while the individual student is more immediate.  Quite often the involvement is seen only as a mere source of feedback, treating students as costumers of a service.

21 II.Different levels of Quality Assurance