EOS-Aura MLS Validation Using Radiosonde Profiles During the WAVES Campaign Cassie Stearns August 10,2006 Dr. Bojan Bojkov and Dr. David Whiteman, Advisors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Upper Tropospheric Humidity: A Comparison of Satellite, Radiosonde, Lidar and Aircraft Measurements Satellite Lidar Aircraft Radiosonde.
Advertisements

1 This is the footer Ozone in the Tropical Tropopause Layer Geraint Vaughan What determines the ozone concentration in the tropical upper troposphere?
Holger Vömel NCAR Science Day 17 April 2015 Exploration of the tropical tropopause region during Strateole-2.
Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir stare ozone profiles using ozonesonde measurements during Arctic Research on the Composition.
Interpreting MLS Observations of the Variabilities of Tropical Upper Tropospheric O 3 and CO Chenxia Cai, Qinbin Li, Nathaniel Livesey and Jonathan Jiang.
ISSI Working Group on Atmospheric Water Vapor, 11 Feb 2008 Holger Vömel Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado.
Lecture 1 Geraint Vaughan. Radiosondes Vaisala RS80 Vaisala RS92 Launching a radiosonde European radiosonde stations (launch 00 and 12 UTC) Data available.
Comparisons of TES v002 Nadir Ozone with GEOS-Chem by Ray Nassar & Jennifer Logan Thanks to: Lin Zhang, Inna Megretskaia, Bob Yantosca, Phillipe LeSager,
NDACC Water Vapor Workshop, 5 July 2006 Holger Vömel Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado Water vapor observations.
Ben Kravitz November 12, 2009 Limb Scanning and Occultation.
Lecture 3 Vertical Structure of the Atmosphere. Average Vertical Temperature profile.
Assimilation of EOS-Aura Data in GEOS-5: Evaluation of ozone in the Upper Troposphere - Lower Stratosphere K. Wargan, S. Pawson, M. Olsen, J. Witte, A.
Bomin Sun 1,2, A. Reale 2, and M. Divakarla 1,2 (1) I.M. Systems Group, Inc., Rockville, MD (2) NOAA NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research.
Variability of TTL water vapor A filtered CFH climatology and MLS water vapor for Ticosonde/Costa Rica Rennie Selkirk, NASA GSFC/GESTAR Mark Schoeberl,
Rigel Kivi (1), Holger Vömel (2), Franz Immler (2), Terhi Lehtola (3), Niklaus Kämpfer (4), Corinne Straub (4), Vladimir Yushkov (5), Sergey Khaykin (5),
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
Assimilation of TES ozone into the GEOS-Chem and GFDL AM2 models: implications for chemistry-climate coupling Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of.
Herman G.J. Smit/FZJ-COST723-WG-I Overview Noordwijk March 2004 COST723-WG1- Working Group I: Data and Measurement Techniques Overview Herman G.J.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
Methods Results Abstract Materials References Contributors: Aviance Carter, Marlon Doyle, AveriSeelig, AyannaStukes Dr. Shermane Austin, Dr. Leon Johnson.
Water vapour soundings in the upper troposphere Geraint Vaughan University of Wales, Aberystwyth With thanks to: Clare Cambridge, Alan Phillips, Les Dean,
“Cold trap” dehydration in the TTL estimated from the water vapor MATCH Yoichi Inai, Fumio Hasebe and SOWER sonde team 18, 7, 2006.
EOS CHEM. EOS CHEM Platform Orbit: Polar: 705 km, sun-synchronous, 98 o inclination, ascending 1:45 PM +/- 15 min. equator crossing time. Launch date.
EOS CHEM. EOS-CHEM Platform Orbit: Polar: 705 km, sun-synchronous, 98 o inclination, ascending 1:45 PM +/- 15 min. equator crossing time. Launch date.
Infrared Interferometers and Microwave Radiometers Dr. David D. Turner Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin - Madison
1 NOAA/GCOS Workshop to Define Climate Requirements for Upper-Air Observations February 8-11, 2005 Boulder, Colorado NOAA/GCOS Workshop to Define Climate.
Boundary layer temperature profile observations using ground-based microwave radiometers Bernhard Pospichal, ISARS 2006 Garmisch-Partenkirchen AMMA - Benin.
Aura Validation Working Group Report / Oct. 3, 2007 Aura Validation Working Group Report (Lucien Froidevaux)
JCSDA Summer Colloquium Erica Dolinar 4 August 2015.
HIRDLS Ozone V003 (v ) Characteristics B. Nardi, C. Randall, V.L. Harvey & HIRDLS Team HIRDLS Science Meeting Boulder, Jan 30, 2008.
MMS - Ozonesonde Wind and Temperature Comparison during CR-AVE T.P. Bui, J. Dean-Day, C. Chang, R. Castaneda NASA-Ames Research Center H. Voemel University.
11th OMI Science Team Meeting De Bilt, June The Aura Validation Data Center Bojan R. Bojkov.
Intercomparisons of Water Vapor Measurements during IHOP_2002 – Radiosonde and Dropsonde Junhong (June) Wang NCAR Atmospheric Technology Division Acknowledgement:
Measuring the Antarctic Ozone Hole with the new Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) Natalya Kramarova, Paul Newman, Eric Nash, PK Bhartia, Richard.
Intercomparison of Ground-based Column Ozone Measurements with Aura Satellite Retrievals over Richland, WA during INTEX-B/IONS-06 Wan Ching Jacquie Hui.
Comparison of MLS with SOWER observations Masato Shiotani 1, Fumio Hasebe 2, Masatomo Fujiwara 2, Noriyuki Nishi 3, Holger Voemel 4, and Samuel Oltmans.
SRL/Reference sonde P. Di Girolamo, D. Whiteman, B. Demoz, J. Wang, K. Beierle, T. Weckwerth The Reference sonde (C34) consists of a Snow White (SW) chilled-mirror.
AIRS science team meeting Camp Springs, February 2003 Holger Vömel University of Colorado and NOAA/CMDL Upper tropospheric humidity validation measurements.
Analysis of PBL Turbulent and Non-turbulent Fluxes M. Hicks 1, S. Kang 2, B. Demoz 1, E. Joseph 1, 1 Howard University, Washington, DC, USA 2 UCAR, Boulder,
Airborne/ground-based sensor intercomparison: SRL/LASE Paolo Di Girolamo, Domenico Sabatino, David Whiteman, Belay Demoz, Edward Browell, Richard Ferrare.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Lindenberg Meteorological Observatory Richard Assmann Observatory Michael Sommer GRUAN Lead Centre, DWD 2 nd GRUAN Implementation.
October 02, st IHOP_2002 Water Vapor Intercomparison Workshop Status of intercomparisons and the next steps  Characterize moisture measuring techniques.
A new method for first-principles calibration
1 / 22 Deutscher Wetterdienst Lindenberg Meteorological Observatory Richard Assmann Observatory What final GRUAN observations may consist of and look like.
HDF-EOS Aura File Format Guidelines Cheryl Craig HDF-EOS Workshop IV Sept 20, HDF-EOS Aura File Format Guidelines Cheryl Craig September 20, 2000.
H. Worden Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology J. LoganHarvard University TES ozone profiles compared to ozonesondes ABSTRACT:
Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS p&T&H20 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) Mission: Retrieval Characterisation and Error Analysis H. Bösch 1, B. Connor 2, B. Sen 1, G. C. Toon 1 1 Jet Propulsion.
Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.
Correlative Analysis of PMC Existence and Mesospheric Temperature and Water Vapour A.G. Feofilov 1,2, S.V. Petelina 3, A.A. Kutepov 1,2, W.D. Pesnell 1,
AIRS science team meeting, Greenbelt, 31 March 2003 Holger Vömel University of Colorado and NOAA/CMDL Cryogenic Frost point Hygrometer (CFH) Measurements.
METR Introduction to Synoptic Meteorology Other upper air sounding systems, apart from radiosondes University of Oklahoma 2004.
Aura Data System Working Group Meeting Fall 2007 Aura Microwave Limb Sounder David T. Cuddy Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
Investigating Precipitation Processes along the Atlantic Coast of Senegal and Their Relationship to Tropical Cyclogenesis Research Team: Everette Joseph.
A Study of Variability in Tropical Tropospheric Water Vapor Robert L. Herman 1, Robert F. Troy 2, Holger Voemel 3, Henry B. Selkirk 4, Susan S. Kulawik.
A U.S.-Japan Workshop on the Tropical Tropopause Layer
How Has It Been Conducted? How Has It Been Conducted? Campaign Basis Campaign Basis International collaboration (NOAA, INAMHI, LAPAN etc) International.
NDACC Microwave Workshop, January 11, 2013 Diurnal variability of middle atmospheric H 2 O and comparison with WACCM Dominik Scheiben, Ansgar Schanz, Brigitte.
Latmos UPMC/CNRS - ILRC 2015
Jianchun Bian (IAP/CAS)
CAST – sonde activities
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Huailin Chen, Bruce Gentry, Tulu Bacha, Belay Demoz, Demetrius Venable
R2971 Seq0100 Scn003 Hohenpeissenberg (48N, 11W)
Preliminary comparisons of GOMOS and MIPAS ozone products with Odin
Jianchun BIAN, and Hongbin CHEN
Mobile GPS tracking system using STRATO
University of Colorado and NCAR START08/Pre HIPPO Workshop
Upper Air Observations The atmosphere is 3D and can not be understood or forecast by using surface data alone ATM 101W2019.
Presentation transcript:

EOS-Aura MLS Validation Using Radiosonde Profiles During the WAVES Campaign Cassie Stearns August 10,2006 Dr. Bojan Bojkov and Dr. David Whiteman, Advisors

WAVES campaign, Howard University Research Campus, Beltsville MD Inter-instrumental Aqua/Aura Validation Campaign with 2 major ground components: –Meteorological balloon with:  Vaisala RS-92 and RS-80, ATM, Intermet, and MODEM for PTU  Electrochemical cell (ECC) ozonesondes  Cryogenic frost point hygrometer (CFH) for water vapor. –4 LIDAR systems for aerosols and 3 for water vapor

Weather Balloon with RS-92 CFH/ECC RS-92 ATM Intermet

Sonde Launches Coordinated with Aura

The Aura MLS (Microwave Limb Sounder) Instrument 20 second vertical scan (every ~1.5˚), 7 min ahead 5 spectral regions: 118,190,240,640,GHz; 2.5 THz Scan Values averaged and reported at 37 pressure levels 705 km orbit height

Typical temperature sounding (MLS vs RS92)

MLS-Sonde ozone comparison

MLS-sonde T differences (preliminary) Few points High variability 215 hPa 146 hPa 10 hPa

MLS-sonde ozone differences (preliminary) High variability Few Points/Mechanical Uncertainty 146 hPa 10 hPa

Conclusions  The MLS profiles are in good agreement with the WAVES soundings, within uncertainty  Measurements are within error estimates specified in MLS documentation, including the temperature warm biases  210 and 146 hPa levels are heavily variable due to tropopause variation, and may fall outside expected error.  10 hPa level data contains fewer points of the RS-92 profile, and should be weighted less heavily; with the O3 sonde, there is also mechanical error introduced at low pressure.  Ongoing work: –Complete analysis to completed shortly (campaign is ongoing) –Aura HIRDLS and TES products to be investigated also

A Special Thanks to:  Dr. Bojan Bojkov, and Dr. David Whiteman, my advisors  Dr. Everett Joseph, Dr. Demetrius Venable, and the Howard University Beltsville crew  My fellow RS-92 radiosonde launchers: Eduardo, Ani, Scott, and Pat; and everyone else helping with WAVES!  UNH/GSFC Research and Discover Program

Questions?