Soil Moisture Studies in the Mississippi Delta Kristofor R. Brye University of Arkansas Edgar Mersiovsky USDA-NRCS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASLA’s New Landscape Soil Specification System
Advertisements

Water Resources Section #1: Chapter 11.
Unit 5: Soil Surveys & Land Use Planning Chapter 17.
Genesee County Farmland & Soils George Squires Genesee County Soil & Water Conservation District Manager.
Soil Profiles Easy as ABC. Soil Profile Organic layer (absent in farmed soils Topsoil Subsoil Parent material Usually darker because of organic matter.
Land Classification and Use Chapter 8 Land is more than soil n Natural and artificial characteristics of an area to be used for agricultural or other.
How to create Nitrate Leaching Potential (WA) Maps and Reports from Web Soil Survey Contact: Brad Duncan Assistant.
Using Land Capability Classifications
1 Septic Tank Drainfield Site Suitability and Evaluation Workshop Montana State University Extension Service, Department of Land Resources an Environmental.
“That’s Not A Levee Boil !” or “How to do more with less” By Glen Pearson, Northern District 2005 Annual Geology and Groundwater Meeting Geology and Groundwater.
Unit C. Basic Principles of Agricultural/Horticultural Science.
CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN (CMRB) LTAR USDA-ARS Columbia Missouri Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology into Practice A training session.
SCOPE & EFFECT EQUATIONS Chapter 7
Hydrologic Connectivity of Isolated Wetlands Todd C. Rasmussen, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Hydrology Warnell School of Forest Resources University of.
The Caveat: Hydrology Complex Site specific Difficult to accurately quantify More questions than answers.
Climatic Impacts and Range Condition David J. Kraft Rangeland Management Specialist NRCS, Emporia, Kansas.
Improved Soil Moisture Variability in CLM 3.5 Sean Swenson NCAR Advanced Study Program in collaboration with Keith Oleson and David Lawrence.
Mark Campbell. Brief Intro of Wetlands Turkey Creek Wetland A restored floodplain wetland at a private farm in rural McLean County, Illinois.
Groundwater. In the U.S. we use: 400 million gallons of water a day to drink 450 billion gallons of water a day in our homes, agriculture and industry.
On Farm Drainage/Subsurface Irrigation Demo Gerald Bryan UM Extension Agronomist Jackson, MO.
IRIS TUBES I ndicator of R eduction I n S oils CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION ANALYSIS.
Acquisition and Interpretation of Water-Level Data Travis von Dessonneck.
Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Romania Catalin Simota Research Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Bucharest - Romania.
Equus Beds ASR Program – Wichita’s Future Water Supply September 6, 2012.
Biomes of the World.
OUTFLOW COMPONENTS. Evapotranspiration (EVAP) l Evapotranspiration is the result of surface water and soil evaporation and transpiration from the plants.
Soil Nutrient Availability Following Application of Biosolids to Forests in Virginia. Eduardo C. Arellano and Thomas R. Fox Department of Forestry, Blacksburg,
Ag I.  Outline the process involved in soil formation  Describe a mature soil profile  Discuss the 8 land capability classes.
Using LiDAR-Derived DEMs to Predict Wet Soils Gary Montgomery GEOG596A Advisor: Patrick Drohan Funding partners:
Properties of the Soil Wt. Tn. Workshop-Liberty July. 13, 2005.
Mississippi River Flood Plain prior to landscape modifications for agriculture Land Characterization:  Bottomland hardwood wetlands  Annual flooding.
The influence of extreme meteorological phenomena on soil water regime of lowlands Institute of Hydrology - Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava, Slovak.
Water underground MS. COULTER. How water moves underground  Water underground trickles down between particles of soil and through cracks and spaces in.
Answer on an index card. State which region these images would be part of and cite textual evidence to support your answer. State which region these.
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
An of the Hydric An Explanation of the Hydric Soil Standard and Soil Technical Standard and “Normal” Precipitation by: Wade Hurt, USDA, NRCS, NSSC, Gainesville,
Cache River Monitoring Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Soils Genesis and Characterization Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Correlating Soil Moisture with Forage Quality in Sierra Valley and Goodrich Creek 26 February 2007 Quincy, CA Laura A. Murphy University of California,
Five Ecoregions of Texas. What Is An Ecoregion?  Ecoregion – a major ecosystem with distinctive geography, characteristic plants and animals, ecosystems,
LandJudging in Oklahoma
Ecological Landscape Analysis Project Background and Status.
WEB SOIL SURVEYS AND SOIL SURVEYS Kennedy Cunliffe-Koehler Dainger Adams Ashlee Marz.
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
SMALL-SCALE SPATIAL VARIATION OF WATER QUALITY WITHIN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER VALLEY ALLUVIAL AQUIFER ARKANSAS, USA Ken Steele 1, Tim Kresse 2 and Ralph.
RECHARGE TO THE MEMPHIS AQUIFER IN SOUTHWESTERN TENNESSEE, AN EXAMPLE OF A SAND-DOMINATED COASTAL PLAIN AQUIFER IN A HUMID REGION. Bursi, J., Larsen, D.,
Trends in Shallow Ground-Water Quality of the Delmarva Peninsula Results from regional and local studies Linda M. Debrewer Judith M. Denver U.S. Department.
Virtual Academy for the Semi Arid Tropics Course on Insect Pests of Groundnut Module 3: Soils and Climatic requirements After completing this lesson, you.
Trends in Precipitation and Stream Discharge over the Past Century for the Continental United States Andrew Simon 1 and Lauren Klimetz 1,2 1 USDA-ARS National.
NORTH County MELBOURNE DISCUSSED LAKE Washington SOUTH County DISCUSSED JOe Ramos 01 University of Florida SWS 5716 – Pedology Prof. Willie Harris Site.
CTD - Salinity and Temperature at Depth Jonathan Walter University of North Carolina at Wilmington CHM Jonathan Walter University of North Carolina.
Describe the features and characteristics of the Three Gorges Dam.
You have learned how to interpret how landforms are the result of a combination of constructive and destructive forces such as deposition of sediment and.
Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.
Reconciling Podzolic and Redoximorphic Responses to Seasonal Saturation Willie Harris, Rex Ellis, Wade Hurt, Chumki Banik, Scarlett Balboa, Travis Richardson,
Some Observations from Using a Colloidal Borescope in Basalt Aquifers Gerry Winter.
Soil Interpretations Field Project of Soils Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India Environmental Pedology DE Spring 2010 K.S. Winans.
Deep Percolation and Groundwater Level Response Following Surface Irrigation Carlos Ochoa, Sam Fernald, Steve Guldan, Manoj Shukla Funding sources: USDA.
Introduction to Land Evaluation Basic Soil Science AFNR-BAS-6: Describe soil formation and management and assess its relevance to plant/animal production.
Water In what ways have you used water today? How much water is used to make a 1KG burger?
Comparison of Two Soils in Warren County, MS Michelle Bourne March 2010 SWS5716C-Pedology.
The Regional Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) Workshop for Southeast Asia Bangkok, Thailand 27 – 30 April 2009.
Use of a Vadose Zone Biobarrier for Removal of Nitrate from Percolating Groundwater Jim Hunter, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado
Steady flow in a confined aquifer
Hydrologic Conditions: Surface and Ground Water Resources July 2012
Water Cycle It keeps cycling back
You have learned how to interpret how landforms are the result of a combination of constructive and destructive forces such as deposition of sediment and.
THE ROLE OF SOILS AND CLIMATE
Soil Order: Inceptisols
You have learned how to interpret how landforms are the result of a combination of constructive and destructive forces such as deposition of sediment and.
Presentation transcript:

Soil Moisture Studies in the Mississippi Delta Kristofor R. Brye University of Arkansas Edgar Mersiovsky USDA-NRCS

Background Initial Problem Some soils in MLRA 131A (Southern Mississippi River Alluvium) had interpretations of seasonal water tables, as inferred by depth to RMFs, between 0.4 and 1.1 m from the soil surface during wet seasons Assumed to be the result of Alluvial Aquifer fluctuations  Alluvial Aquifer level confirmed to be decreasing due to extensive agricultural irrigation withdrawals  Many soils have also been artificially drained by constructed ditches  Regional hydrology has likely changed

Previous Work Cooperative Agreement “Seasonal Saturation in the Dundee Soils in the Lower Mississippi Valley” by E. Mersiovsky, P. Owens, E. Rutledge, and L. West 2004 to 2008 Phase I Dundee soils Many have been drained as well Typic Endoaqualfs  Very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils that formed in loamy alluvium  Level to gently sloping soils on natural levees and low terraces

Previous Work Dundee Water Table Study 16 sites from NE AR to S LA 24 to 58 months Pedons described Piezometers installed Above Bt (~30 cm depth) Within Bt (~75 cm depth) Below Bt (~190 cm depth)  Outfitted with electronic water-level sensors IRIS tubes installed at select sites Evaluate degree of Fe reduction

Previous Work Dundee Water Table Study (Phase I) Results No water table within < 2 m at 6 of 16 sites Seasonal water table observed within < 2 m at 9 of 16 sites  Minimum depth was typically > 1 m Water table observed within < 1 m at 2 of 16 sites  Only temporary At only 1 of 16 sites, water table rose from > 2 m to the soil surface each wet season monitored Conclusion Seasonal water tables are likely deeper than present interpretations indicate Recommendation Establish a drained phase for Dundee soils in MLRA 131A to recognize deeper water tables  Conversion should made on a site-by-site basis Implication Will loosen current soil-use limitations due to high water tables

Current Work Phase II Cooperative Agreement “Evaluation of Contemporary Water Tables in Select Soils of MLRA 131A in the Lower Mississippi River Valley” by K.R. Brye October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2014 (extended to Sept. 30, 2015) Objective To monitor contemporary seasonal water table fluctuations in select loamy soils on a similar geomorphic surface throughout MLRA 131A in the LMRV Difference from Phase I study Target a slightly lower, younger surface Commerce soils targeted  Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts  Deep, somewhat poorly drained, moderately slowly permeable soils that formed in loamy sediments on level to undulating alluvial plains  No argillic

Current Work Phase II Water Table Study 10 sites from NW TN to S LA 24 + mo monitoring planned  Lauderdale County, TN (2)  Phillips County, AR (2)  Washington County, MS (1)  Sharkey County, MS (1)  Madison Parrish, LA (1)  Pointe Coupee Parrish, LA (2)  W. Baton Rouge Parrish, LA (1) Pedons described PSA analysis conducted on profile samples from 7 of 10 sites Piezometers installed ~40 cm depth ~230 cm depth  Outfitted with electronic water-level sensors * Phase II sites * * * * * * *

Current Work Sites Lauderdale County, TN Two (2) sites Mixed, deciduous hardwoods adjacent to cultivated cropland Shallow (1) and deep (1) Phillips County, AR Two (2) sites Bottomland hardwood forest Shallow (1) and deep (1) Washington County, MS One (1) site Pecan grove Shallow (1), intermediate (1), and deep (1)

Current Work Sites Sharkey County, MS One (1) site Pecan grove Shallow (1), intermediate (1), and deep (1) Madison Parrish, LA One (1) site Mixed, deciduous hardwoods Shallow (1) and deep (1) West Baton Rouge Parrish, LA One (1) site Periodically mowed grassland Shallow (1) and deep (1)

Current Work Sites Pointe Coupee Parrish, LA Two (2) sites Hayed grassland  Shallow (1), intermediate (1), and deep (1) Periodically grazed pasture  Shallow (1) and deep (1)

Cooperators Questions? NRCS scientists and staff from TN, AR, MS, and LA