Sternentstehung - Star Formation Sommersemester 2006 Henrik Beuther & Thomas Henning 24.4 Today: Introduction & Overview 1.5 Public Holiday: Tag der Arbeit Physical processes, heating & cooling, cloud thermal structure 22.5 Physical processes, heating & cooling, cloud thermal structure (H. Linz) 29.5 Basic gravitational collapse models I 5.6 Public Holiday: Pfingstmontag 12.6 Basic gravitational collapse models II 19.6 Accretion disks 26.6 Molecular outflow and jets 3.7 Protostellar evolution, the stellar birthline 10.7 Cluster formation and the Initial Mass Function 17.7 Massive star formation, summary and outlook 24.7 Extragalactic star formation More Information and the current lecture files:
Summary last week - Ambipolar diffusion - Magnetic reconnection - Turbulence - Cloud collapse of singular isothermal sphere and Bonnor-Ebert sphere - Inside out collapse, rarefaction wave, density profiles, accretion rates - Accretion shock and accretion luminosity - Observational features: SEDs, Infall signatures - Rotational effects: - magnetic locking of “outer” dense core to cloud. - further inside it causes the formation of accretion disks
Star Formation Paradigm
Rotational effects II In dense core centers magnetic bracking fails because neutral matter and magnetic field decouple with decreasing ionization fraction. matter within central region can conserve angular momentum. Since F cen grows faster than F grav each fluid element veers away from geometrical center. --> Formation of disk The larger the initial angular momentum j of a fluid element, the further away from the center it ends up --> centrifugal radius cen cen = 0 2 R 4 /GM = m 0 3 a t 0 2 t 3 /16 = 0.3AU (T/10K) 1/2 ( 0 / s -1 ) 2 (t/10 5 yr) 3 cen can be identified with disk radius. Increasing with time because in inside-out collapse rarefaction wave moves out --> increase of initial j.
Early disk indications and evidence Early single-dish observations toward T-Tauri stars revealed cold dust emission. In spherical symmetry this would not be possible since the corresponding gas and dust would extinct any emission from the central protostar. --> Disk symmetry necessary! Beckwith et al mm IRAS NIR Full line: no inner whole Dashed line: Inner whole
HH30, one of the first imaged disks
Optical disk examples
Schmetterlingsstern The Butterfly star Wolf et al. 2003
10 16 m 7 10 4 AU Molecular cloud core 5 m 300 AU Circumstellar dust disk Approximate disk size-scales
Disk masses Beckwith et al. 1990, Andre et al Theories of early solar system require disk masses between 0.01 and 0.1M sun. --> Typical disk systems apparently have enough disk mass to produce planetary systems.
Disk ages Haisch et al. 2001
Simple case: flat, black disk T ~ r -3/4, L disk ~ 1/4 L * Model SEDs Beckwith et al. 1996, 1999
Effects of gaps on disk SED Full line: no gap Long-dashed: gap 0.75 to 1.25 AU Short-dashed: gap 0.5 to 2.5 AU Dotted: gap 0.3 to 3 AU To become detectable gap has to cut out at least a decade of disk size.
Additional FIR excess - Larger inner or smaller outer disk radii even increase the discrepancy. - Data indicate that outer disk region is hotter than expected from flat, black disk model --> Disk flaring
Disk flaring The scale height h of a disk increases with radius r because the thermal Energy decreases more slowly with increasing radius r than the vertical Component of the gravitational energy: E vert, grav ~ h/r * GM * /r ~ E therm ~ kT(r) with T(r) ~ r -3/4 --> h ~ k/GM * r 5/4
Hydrostatic equilibrium, radiative transfer models for flared disks I Chiang & Goldreich 1997
Hydrostatic equilibrium, radiative transfer models for flared disks II Chiang & Goldreich 1997 h n vert ~ exp(z 2 /2h 2 )
Hydrostatic equlibrium, radiative transfer models for flared disks III Chiang & Goldreich 1997
Flat spectrum disks Class I protostar Class II T Tauri star Outflow cavity Infalling envelope disk - Flat-spectrum sources have too much flux to be explained by heating of protostar only. - In very young sources, they are still embedded infalling envelope --> this can scatter light and cause additional heating of outer disk. Flat spectrum sources younger than typical class II T Tauri stars. Calvet et al. 1994, Natta et al. 1993
Disk accretion rates The centrifugal radius cen is: cen = 0 2 R 4 /GM core = GM core /2a t 2 with break = 2√2 a t 3 /GM core larger mass cores form larger disks accretion rate spread is dominated by initial rotation of cores, imprint of initial core properties Dullemond et al M acc M * Dimensionless rotation rate of initial core: break.
Disk dynamics: Keplerian motion Simon et al.2000 For a Keplerian supported disk, centrifugal force should equal grav. force. F cen = mv 2 /r = F grav = Gm * m/r 2 --> v = (Gm * /r) 1/2 Velocity Offset Ohashi et al Guilloteau et al DM Tau
Non-Keplerian motion: AB Aur PdBI, Pietu et al SMA, Lin et al GHz continuum SMA, Lin et al CO(3-2) - Central depression in cold dust and gas emission. - Non-Keplerian velo- city profile v r Possible explanations Formation of low- mass companion or planet in inner disk. Early evolutionary phase where Keplerian motion is not established yet (large envelope).
Disk chemistry Bergin et al. 2006
Accretion and mass transport Equilibrium between F cen and F grav : mr 2 = Gmm * /r 2 => = (Gm * /r 3 ) 1/2 --> no solid body rotation but a sheared flow --> viscous forces --> mass transport inward, angular momentum transport outward, heating The inner disk is warm enough for large ionization: matter and magnetic field are coupled well --> accretion columns transport gas from disk to protostar Strassmeier et al. 2005
Particle growth in disks - At (sub)mm wavelength the flux F B T) ( ) with the dust absorption coefficient ( ) proportional to --> In the Rayleigh-Jeans limit we get F - For typical interstellar grains = 2. Rocks are opaque at mm wavelengths --> = 0. --> Grain growth could be witnessed by decreasing . Tempting to interpret as grain growth. However, there are caveats, e.g., the temperature dependence not considered.
Disks in massive star formation IRAS , Cesaroni et al. 1997, 1997, 2005 Keplerians disk around central protostar of ~7M sun - Still deeply embedded, large distances, clustered environment --> confusion - Current obs. status largely “Velocity gradient perpendicular to outflow”. - (Sub)mm interferometry important to disentangle the spatial confusion. - The right spectral line tracer still missing which can distinguish the disk emission from the surrounding envelope emission. IRS5 in M17, Chini et al M sun mass star with 0.5M Jup dust
Summary - Disks are expected from angular momentum considerations. - The SEDs of disk sources show strong FIR excess. - SEDs allow to analyze various disk aspects: Radial and vertical disk morphology, flaring of disks Evolutionary stages Inner holes Gaps maybe due to planets - Observable in NIR in absorption and in (sub)mm line and continuum emission. - Disk lifetimes a few million years. - T Tauri disks usually in Keplerian motion. - Younger disks like AB Aur deviate from Keplerian motion - In young sources, the outer disks can also be irradiated by scatter light from the surrounding envelope - Strong vertical and radial chemical evolution. - Sites of grain growth and later planet formation. - Massive disks far less understood.
Zodiacal light Bob Shobbrook, Siding spring, 2 hours after sunset. Etienne Leopold Trouvelot ( )
Sternentstehung - Star Formation Sommersemester 2006 Henrik Beuther & Thomas Henning 24.4 Today: Introduction & Overview 1.5 Public Holiday: Tag der Arbeit Physical processes, heating & cooling, cloud thermal structure 22.5 Physical processes, heating & cooling, cloud thermal structure (H. Linz) 29.5 Basic gravitational collapse models I 5.6 Public Holiday: Pfingstmontag 12.6 Basic gravitational collapse models II 19.6 Accretion disks 26.6 Molecular outflow and jets 3.7 Protostellar evolution, the stellar birthline 10.7 Cluster formation and the Initial Mass Function 17.7 Massive star formation, summary and outlook 24.7 Extragalactic star formation More Information and the current lecture files: