1 Projectile Spectator Detector: Status and Plans A.Ivashkin (INR, Moscow) PSD performance in Be run. Problems and drawbacks. Future steps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.
The PSD upgrade performance Front-End-Electronics MAPD HV system Temperature stabilization MAPD gain monitoring system Slow control Readout –present and.
N. Anfimov (JINR) on behalf of the ECAL0 team.  Introduction  Installation and commissioning  Calibration  Data taking  Preliminary result  Plans.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
PSD upgrade: Ar-present and Xe-future 1.- Status of the PSD upgrade 2.- PSD performance after upgrade 3.- Problems during the Ar-run 4.- Future scenarios.
Status of Projectile Spectator Detector A.Kurepin (Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow) I. Introduction to PSD. II. Conception and design. III. Development.
Oct C. Smith - PCAL/EC Commissioning 1 PCAL/EC Commissioning Document
K.C.RAVINDRAN,GRAPES-3 EXPERIMENT,OOTY 1 Development of fast electronics for the GRAPES-3 experiment at Ooty K.C. RAVINDRAN On Behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
1 ALICE T0 detector W.H.Trzaska (on behalf of T0 Group) LHCC Comprehensive Review, March 2003.
BI day 2011 T Bogey CERN BE/BI. Overview to the TTpos system Proposed technical solution Performance of the system Lab test Beam test Planning for 2012.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Применение MAPD (Zecotek) в адронных калориметрах и многоканальных времяпролетных системах в экспериментах по релятивистской ядерной физике Ф.Ф.Губер,
Upgrade of the CMS hadron outer calorimeter with SiPM’s
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of production of new temperature, HV control systems MAPD gain monitoring system. -Status of the PSD temperature stabilization.
ANL, MAR-2014Ivo Polák, FZU, Prague1 Activity on Compass 2 detector with Calibration at Prague Ivo Polák, on behalf of Prague’s group Compass.
The ZEUS Hadron-Electron-Separator Performance and Experience Peter Göttlicher (DESY) for the ZEUS-HES-group Contributions to HES Germany, Israel, Japan,
On behalf of joint ITEP / IHEP team: A. Arefiev, N. Filimonov, T. Kvaratskheliya, I. Machikhiliyan, P. Shatalov, T. Zakoryuchkina, A. Zhokhov, S. Zvyagintsev.
Acquisition Crate Design BI Technical Board 26 August 2011 Beam Loss Monitoring Section William Vigano’ 26 August
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
BI day /12/00 1 PIPOS Project (TT2 & TT10) (Beam performances) G. Vismara  Present situation  Proposals  Beam parameters  Technical solution.
PSD upgrade - schedule/resources: electronics and cooling system F. Guber INR, Moscow NA61/SHINE upgrade workshop, CERN 3– 5 March, 2014.
PSD upgrade: concept and plans - Why the PSD upgrade is necessary? - Concept and status of the PSD temperature control - Concept of the PSD analog part.
FIT (Fast Interaction Trigger) detector development for ALICE experiment at LHC (CREN) Institute for Nuclear Research (INR RAS) National Research Nuclear.
E.Guschin (INR,Moscow) 3 May 2006Calorimeter commissioning meeting Status of PRS/SPD detector Cosmic test results Installation/tuning of monitoring system.
Gain stability and the LYSO beam radiation monitor measurements
LHCb Calorimeter Upgrade Meeting – 10th September 2012 – CERN LHCb Calorimeter Upgrade Electronics: ASIC solution status E. Picatoste, D. Gascon Universitat.
first results from EMCal test beam
Assumptions: Cockcroft-Walton photomultiplier bases are the same for all ECAL sections Digital to analog converters are installed on the distribution boards.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Problems with PSD in Be runs - Modification of cooling system - New temperature control - Upgrade of HV control system - MAPD.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Readout Architecture for MuCh Introduction of MuCh Layout of Much ( proposed several schemes) Read ASIC’s Key features Basic Readout chain ROC Block Diagram.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Status of MAPMT FEE Electronics Boards Connector board – have 5 boards, 1 assembled Readout board (“MUX” board) – layout completed 12/2, but unfortunately.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of the PSD cooling and temperature stabilization system - MAPD gain monitoring system - PSD readout upgrade F.Guber,
PSD upgrade: concept and plans - Why the PSD upgrade is necessary? - Concept of the PSD temperature stabilization and control - Upgrade of HV control system.
1 Chapter No. 17 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Measurement of Timing Properties.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
CBM 12 th Meeting, October 14-18, 2008, Dubna Present status of the first version of NIHAM TRD-FEE analogic CHIP Vasile Catanescu and Mihai Petrovici NIHAM.
Status of PSD simulation in Shine Oleg Petukhov Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow NA61 Analysis/Software/Calibration meeting , Warsaw.
Trigger system for setup 2016 V. Rogov, V. Yurevich,D.Bogoslovski, S.Sergeev, O.Batenkov* LHEP JINR *V. G. Khlopin Radium Institute, St. Petersburg.
MO/LO Performance Summary and Maintenance Plans Tomasz Plawski Jefferson Lab OPS Stay Retreat, July 15th, 2015.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Front End. Charge pre-amp and detector Voltage regulator. TOP side. Detector linear voltage regulator BOTTOM side. Charge pre-amp.
Forward Tagger Calorimeter Prototype tests at Jlab: report CLAS12 Workshop February 22, 2012 A. Celentano.
The PSD at Pb-Pb run PSD drawbacks at Ar beam
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
Calorimeter Mu2e Development electronics Front-end Review
Analog FE circuitry simulation
Alternative FEE electronics for FIT.
KRB proposal (Read Board of Kyiv group)
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
BCTW calibration status and future
NA61 PSD. Upgrade status. Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow.
F.Guber, A.Ivashkin INR, Moscow
EMC Electronics and Trigger Review and Trigger Plan
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Conceptual design of TOF and beam test results
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
BESIII EMC electronics
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
Presented by T. Suomijärvi
Presentation transcript:

1 Projectile Spectator Detector: Status and Plans A.Ivashkin (INR, Moscow) PSD performance in Be run. Problems and drawbacks. Future steps.

2 PSD – Projectile Spectator Detector Precise measurement of the energy of projectile spectators. Centrality selection (on trigger level) Measurement of event-by-event fluctuations (to reduce N part fluctuations) Reconstruction of the reaction plane Compensating calorimeter Pb/scintillator (4/1) 60 sandwiches in one module Modules 10 x 10 x 120 cm 3 – central part Modules 20 x 20 x 120 cm 3 - outer part 10 longitudinal sections with 10 MAPDs readout PSD in central modules in trigger PSD modules in 2011 Be-run

3 Photo of PSD after full construction (Feb.2012) Front Rear side before FEE installation 44 modules 440 MAPDs and readout channels 17 tons

4 7 Be spectra in PSD at low energies 13 GeV 30 GeV 20 GeV Good identification of beam ions. But the resolution is still ~20% worse of expected numbers. Needs the improvement of calibration. Contribution of electronic noise is maximum at low energies.

Energy in PSD – – Temperature Temperature dependent 7 Be peak position Time dependent calibration is needed! A few variants are considered. MAPD gain ~3%/ 0 C

6 What actions are needed for the improvement of PSD performance? 1.Improvement of temperature stabilization 2.Modification of trigger signal 3.Control on MAPD’s voltages 4.Full upgrade of readout 5.New approach in calibration with cosmic muons

7 Temperature stabilization At present: The flow of underground air trough the distributor box and pipes in each PSD module. Problems: the temperature of underground air is not constant. ~6 0 C difference between summer/winter. ~2 0 C spread during the run. Temperature gradient ~ C between top/down modules due to different length of pipes and air pressure in modules. What can be done: 1.Improvement of present cooling system: Chiller before the distributor box (accuracy ~1 0 C ), optimization of the pressure and pipe length for air. (The simplest and cheapest solution) 2.Full modification – installation of Peltier elements in each module (accuracy ~0.1 0 C ).

8 Modification of PSD trigger signal 60 ns 300 ns MAPD signal M~5x10 4 integrated signal M~10 7 ADC signal At present: the PSD trigger signal comes after integrators with rise time ~60 ns: rather slow and large time-amplitude walk. Needs careful adjustment for each beam energy and each beam ion. Plans: trigger signal after MAPD – fast signal, no problem with time walk and delay. This action requires the replacement of present FEE! New amplifiers, new adders!

MAPD voltages must be stable within 0.05V accuracy. At present two power sources in one chain (reference and variable) are used for all PSD modules. What can be done: 1.Slow control of output voltages after power sources. – Only 2 numbers, Rather simple solution. But the real voltage at MAPD would be not measured. Or 2. Control of voltages in each individual MAPD. Installation of ADC in each of 440 MAPDs. Full upgrade of slow control, replacement of FEE. 9 Control of MAPD voltages

Test of one PSD section reveals peak in energy spectrum from cosmic muons 10 Approach in calibration with cosmic muons Can we apply this approach for NA61?

Modification of trigger or control of individual MAPD voltages requires full replacement of PSD FEE. In this case one needs to develop new amplifiers, adders, slow control (hardware and software). The readout would be done in another way (DRS, TRB3…) The resources and manpower are needed. In present FEE one needs to repair two sections in one outer modules (short circuit during intervention), to repair one adder in central module (result of power cut at CERN). Description of present FEE in: 11 Full replacement of FEE?

Some inputs for new FEE Number of modules - 44 Number of channels – 440 ( 10 in each module) Geometrical size of one PCB 95x95 mm 2 with holes in the corners. Could be a few PCBs or mezzanine boards. V op of MAPD: V Accuracy of V set ~0.05V Signal – rise time 8-10 ns, full length 60 ns. Slow control must write and readout the MAPD voltages. Amplifier: gain~ , bandwidth~20 MHz, dynamical range 5mV- 1.5V. Two outputs – 9/10 parts for DRS and 1/10 for adder. Would be nice to have the gain switch from to amplifiers in one module. Analog adder – 10 channels with weight ~1. Output – LEMO connector. The electronic must ensure the gain/amplitude stability of about 1% in the temperature range C. 12

13 Thank you! The last item to be fixed – remote control of PSD moving table