Applied Meteorology Unit 1 Observation Denial and Performance of a Local Mesoscale Model Leela R. Watson William H. Bauman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Estimated Mixing Depth Daily Maximums R. L. Buckley, A. Dupont, R. J. Kurzeja, and M. J. Parker Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River.
Advertisements

The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Mission: Apply NASA measurement systems and unique Earth science research to improve the accuracy of short-term (0-24 hr) weather prediction at the regional.
Intense Spring Sea Breezes Along the New York - New Jersey Coast Stanley David Gedzelman and Kwan-Yin Kong EAS Department and NOAA CREST Center City College.
The Persistence and Dissipation of Lake Michigan-Crossing Mesoscale Convective Systems Nicholas D. Metz* and Lance F. Bosart # * Department of Geoscience,
An Intercomparison of Surface Observations and High-Resolution Forecasting Model Output for the Lake Okeechobee Region By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006.
Coupled NMM-CALMET Meteorology Development for the CALPUFF Air Dispersion Modelling in Complex Terrain and Shoreline Settings Presented at: European Geoscience.
NOAA/NWS Change to WRF 13 June What’s Happening? WRF replaces the eta as the NAM –NAM is the North American Mesoscale “timeslot” or “Model Run”
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
The Effect of the Terrain on Monsoon Convection in the Himalayan Region Socorro Medina 1, Robert Houze 1, Anil Kumar 2,3 and Dev Niyogi 3 Conference on.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Atmospheric Modeling at RENCI Brian J. Etherton. Atmospheric Modeling at RENCI Focus of RENCI for C- STAR project is to provide modeling support/development.
Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorological Division / ESSL / NCAR WRF (near) Real-Time High-Resolution Forecast Using Bluesky Wei Wang May 19, 2005 CISL User.
Climatology and Predictability of Cool-Season High Wind Events in the New York City Metropolitan and Surrounding Area Michael Layer School of Marine and.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 An Operational Configuration of the ARPS Data Analysis System to Initialize WRF in the NWS Environmental Modeling System 31.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Oceanic and Atmospheric Modeling of the Big Bend Region Steven L. Morey, Dmitry S. Dukhovksoy, Donald Van Dyke, and Eric P. Chassignet Center for Ocean.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 Using Flow Regime Lightning and Sounding Climatologies to Initialize Gridded Lightning Threat Forecasts for East Central Florida.
Mesoscale model support for the 2005 MDSS demonstration Paul Schultz NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory Global Systems Division (formerly Forecast Systems.
Applications of the Land Information System (LIS) Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Jonathan Case transitioning unique.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
WSN05 6 Sep 2005 Toulouse, France Efficient Assimilation of Radar Data at High Resolution for Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Keith Brewster,
Cloud Evolution and the Sea Breeze Front
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
The “Ambrose” (New York Bight) Jet: Climatology and Simulations of Coastally Enhanced Winds Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony.
Development Mechanism of Heavy Rainfall over Gangneung Associated with Typhoon RUSA Tae-Young Lee, Nam-San Cho, Ji-Sun Kang Kun-Young Byun, Sang Hun Park.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Comparing GEM 15 km, GEM-LAM 2.5 km and RUC 13 km Model Simulations of Mesoscale Features over Southern Ontario 2010 Great Lakes Op Met Workshop Toronto,
Use of Mesoscale Ensemble Weather Predictions to Improve Short-Term Precipitation and Hydrological Forecasts Michael Erickson 1, Brian A. Colle 1, Jeffrey.
A Contrast of Two Las Vegas Flash Flood Scenarios Introduction/BackgroundIntroduction/Background A Classic Monsoon CaseA Classic Monsoon Case »July 8,
Bay Effect Snow from the Chesapeake Bay David F. Hamrick WPC Meteorologist College Park, Maryland.
Boundary layer depth verification system at NCEP M. Tsidulko, C. M. Tassone, J. McQueen, G. DiMego, and M. Ek 15th International Symposium for the Advancement.
Do the NAM and GFS have displacement biases in their MCS forecasts? Charles Yost Russ Schumacher Department of Atmospheric Sciences Texas A&M University.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 High Resolution Analysis Products to Support Severe Weather and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Threat Assessments over Florida 31.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Local Analysis and Prediction System (LAPS) Technology Transfer NOAA – Earth System Research Laboratory Steve Albers, Brent Shaw, and Ed Szoke LAPS Analyses.
August 6, 2001Presented to MIT/LL The LAPS “hot start” Initializing mesoscale forecast models with active cloud and precipitation processes Paul Schultz.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
CWB Midterm Review 2011 Forecast Applications Branch NOAA ESRL/GSD.
Local Analysis and Prediction System (LAPS) Technology Transfer NOAA – Earth System Research Laboratory Steve Albers, Brent Shaw, and Ed Szoke LAPS Analyses.
1 WRF Configuration for Ukraine  Input & boundary conditions from NCEP GFS model  3 day forecasts every 6 hours  10 km horizontal grid, 200x200 gridpoints.
15 June 2005RSA TIM – Boulder, CO Hot-Start with RSA Applications by Steve Albers.
WINDSOR TORNADO STUDY - STMAS (updated 10/21/2009 by Huiling Yuan and Yuanfu Xie)
National Weather Service Houston/Galveston Lance Wood Science and Operations Officer Assessing the Impact of MODIS SST Utilizing a local WRF.
WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.
Weather Research Requirements to Improve Space Launch from Cape Canaveral AFS and NASA KSC William P. Roeder, 45th Weather Squadron, Patrick AFB Lisa L.
Flow Regime Based Climatologies of Lightning Probabilities for Spaceports and Airports SUMMARY: Provided warm season climatological probability of one.
Grupo de Meteorologia e Climatologia na Universidade de Aveiro Alfredo Rocha, Tiago Luna, Juan Ferreira, Ana Carvalho and João.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
Daniel M. Alrick 14th Cyclone Workshop Monday, September 22, 2008
Alan F. Srock and Lance F. Bosart
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
NOAA - LAPS Albers, S., 1995: The LAPS wind analysis. Wea. and Forecasting, 10, Albers, S., J. McGinley, D. Birkenheuer, and J. Smart, 1996:
Climatology of Inverted Troughs over the Gulf of Maine
Winter storm forecast at 1-12 h range
Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Naval Research Laboratory
Local Analysis and Prediction System (LAPS)
Radiation fogs: WRF and LES numerical experiments
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Daniel M. Alrick 14th Cyclone Workshop Monday, September 22, 2008
WARM SEASON CONVECTIVE WIND CLIMATOLOGY FOR THE CCAFS/KSC AREA
Warm season convective wind CLIMATOLOGY for the ccafs/ksc area
An Update to the Convective Wind Climatology of
William Flamholtz, Brian Tang, and Lance Bosart
A Comparison of In-Situ Data with Meso-Scale Forecasts
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Status of the Regional OSSE for Space-Based LIDAR Winds – Feb01
Presentation transcript:

Applied Meteorology Unit 1 Observation Denial and Performance of a Local Mesoscale Model Leela R. Watson William H. Bauman III NASA Applied Meteorology Unit ENSCO, Inc. Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida

Applied Meteorology Unit Outline Background Project Goal Methodology Candidate Days Model Configuration Subjective Analysis Objective Analysis Summary and Conclusions 2

Applied Meteorology Unit Background Budget cuts may eliminate –East-central Florida mainland KSC/CCAFS wind towers –Some CCAFS rawinsondes (RAOB) Data loss may impact the ability to forecast wind events by: –45th Weather Squadron CCAFS, Florida –Spaceflight Meteorology Group JSC, Houston, Texas –National Weather Service WFO, Melbourne, FL 3 CCAFS KSC RAOB KSC/CCAFS Island KSC/CCAFS Mainland

Applied Meteorology Unit Project Goal Assess model capability to predict wind events by removing –Mainland wind towers –All but one CCAFS RAOB per day 4

Applied Meteorology Unit Methodology Selective data denial to model initialization Four scenarios –Towers, RAOB –Towers, no RAOB –No towers, RAOB –No towers, no RAOB Compare outputs 5

Applied Meteorology Unit Candidate Days Period of Record –Warm Season: Jun – Sep 07 –Cool Season: Nov 07 – Jan 08 Three criteria –45 WS wind advisory or warning issued –Non-synoptic forcing (warm season only) –Mean winds > 18 kt observed at any wind tower at any height (12’ to 300’) Candidate days and observed maximum peak wind speed recorded for the day. Warm SeasonCool Season Candidate Day Peak Wind (kt) Candidate Day Peak Wind (kt) 12 Jun Nov Jun Dec Jun Dec Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Sep Sep Sep

Applied Meteorology Unit Model Configuration WRF EMS – start at 0900 UTC –ARW core –1.3 km horizontal grid –40 vertical sigma levels –12 km NAM BC LAPS “hot-start” initialization –Level II KMLB WSR-88D –GOES visible and IR imagery –MADIS data –KSC/CCAFS wind towers –CCAFS RAOB –0600 UTC cold start 3-km WRF background model 7 Surface Observation Sites METAR Buoy MADIS KSC/CCAFS Island KSC/CCAFS Mainland Model Domain Boundary

Applied Meteorology Unit Subjective Analysis Model output of peak and average winds compared to corresponding wind tower observations Warm season –Model radar reflectivity also assessed because its location and strength was highly correlated with WRF peak wind forecasts –Little difference among four scenarios –Model forecast average speeds provided no useful information Cool season –Synoptic scale gradient flow primary cause of high wind events –No cool season events associated with convection –Little difference among four scenarios –WRF peak wind forecasts better in cool season 8

Applied Meteorology Unit 9

Applied Meteorology Unit Subjective Analysis – Warm Season 10

Applied Meteorology Unit Subjective Analysis – Cool Season 11

Applied Meteorology Unit Objective Analysis Peak winds only Identified maximum model-domain peak wind speed for each output time Compared WRF four scenarios to each other Compared WRF to observed maximum peak wind speed 12 Model Domain Boundary Objective Analysis Domain Boundary For Peak Winds

Applied Meteorology Unit Objective Analysis – Warm Season All four model runs were consistent with each other Model forecasts matched the trend of the observed maximum peak wind speed in the domain 13

Applied Meteorology Unit Objective Analysis – Cool Season All four model runs were consistent with each other Model forecasts matched the trend of the observed maximum peak wind speed in the domain 14

Applied Meteorology Unit Objective Analysis – Four Scenarios Did any one scenario perform better than the others? Average difference between the maximum and minimum WRF forecast for each forecast hour in each case 15

Applied Meteorology Unit Objective Analysis – WRF vs Obs Was WRF able to predict maximum peak wind speeds? WRF did better in the cool season WRF bias about -3.5 kt 16

Applied Meteorology Unit Summary and Conclusions Budget cuts may eliminate mainland wind towers and some RAOBs Forecasters use wind tower and RAOB observations to: –Issue and verify wind advisories and warnings –Initialize local models –Support Space Shuttle landings Assessed model capability to predict wind events by removing m ainland wind towers and all but one RAOB per day Conducted subjective and objective analyses –Little difference among the four WRF model scenarios –WRF performed better in the cool season –WRF could predict the threat of wind advisory or warning criteria –Provides added value to the forecaster’s daily planning forecast 17