Innovative Policies for Virtual Education NECC/NYCC Regional P12 Virtual Education Summit Paul Leather Deputy Commissioner, NH Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Stan W. Heffner Associate Superintendent Center for Curriculum and Assessment Ohio Department of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Partnership Next Generation Learning for. Will Discuss ~ Why Do We Need to Move to Next Generation Learning? What is Next Generation Learning? What is.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Career and Technical Education in Arizona adds so much value to the lives of its citizens and the state’s economy that every parent and student considers.
Implementing the ASCA National Model
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
Chapter Twelve - 12 Preparing for Tomorrow’s Challenges Instructional Technology and Media for Learning Presented By: Ms. Yohana Lopez.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Indiana Commission for Higher Education Public Square February 13, 2014 Cathrael Kazin, JD, PhD Chief Academic Officer 0.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Colleen Worrell Virtual High School Blended Learning: Strategies for Success.
WELCOME. AGENDA  LCFF/LCAP Review  LCAP Process  Community Input/Findings  2014/15 LCAP  Plan Alignment- LEAP/LCAP/SPSA  Planning and Input.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
New York’s State of Online Learning S/CDN Thursday, March 3, 2011 Office of Educational Design and Technology
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
October 2009 Oregon Department of Education 1 Diploma Options 2009.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Gene Wilhoit, Executive Director Center for Innovation in Education Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Retreat July 21, 2014.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
HEALTH & PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN OHIO: THE NUTS & BOLTS FOR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS: LEGISLATION, GUIDANCE & BEST PRACTICES Kevin Lorson OAHPERD President-Elect.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
FIRST CHOICE ALABAMA HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES OF THE FUTURE Curriculum and Instruction Alabama Department of Education FIRST CHOICE ALABAMA HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES.
Colorado Achievement Plan for Kids Update November 2011.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Creating Alternative Pathways for Students to Achieve Academic Credit in School The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US.
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Implementing the ASCA National Model The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 7 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom use.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
SOL Innovation Committee
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
The CCPS Strategic Plan
Presentation transcript:

Innovative Policies for Virtual Education NECC/NYCC Regional P12 Virtual Education Summit Paul Leather Deputy Commissioner, NH Department of Education

Will Discuss ~ On Line Policies NH On Line Policies Related Policies that Matter in NxGL ~ – Personalization – Authentic Student Voice and Agency – Competency Based Learning and Credit – Any Time, Everywhere Learning – Performance Assessment – Student Centered Systems of Support – Effective Educators, who can award credit?

INACOL Funding and Policy Frameworks for Online Learning

Four Pertinent Policy Issues: Of the dimensions shown in the previous slide, four are particularly pertinent to policy issues: Comprehensiveness: Although programs may provide both full-time and supplemental options, most offer primarily one or the other. The way in which a program is funded and regulated rests largely on this variable because in most cases, supplemental programs do not directly generate funding based on the state education funding formula, while students enrolled in full-time online schools usually do. Reach: Several states draw a distinction between online programs that primarily serve students in their own districts, and programs that serve students across multiple districts, the entire state—or even beyond. Blended learning: Schools may deliver instruction online, face-to-face, or in some kind of combination. An increasing number of schools are blending online and face-to-face learning, with implications for policymaking related to the location and financing of physical facilities, attendance, requirements for teachers, etc. Location: Since the beauty of online learning is directly related to its “any time, any place” flexibility, it is important to rethink policy as relates to attendance at a physical school. The establishment of physical facilities that might serve multiple districts also presents policy challenges related to funding, supervision of instruction, understanding who is ultimately responsible for student grades and progression, graduation requirements, and more.

Quality Online Learning Policy Public education should include a variety of high quality learning options, including online learning Include both full-time and supplemental online opportunities Provide equal access to all students Facilitate a range of online learning opportunities Provide fair and sensible funding that allows online learning to expand with demand while maintaining state-of-the-art quality Provide reasonable oversight and reporting requirements to ensure quality Allow for thoughtful teacher licensure requirements so that students benefit from the best online instructors Advocate for valid research to ensure effective, research-based instructional and curricular practices Seek a balance between simultaneously providing oversight and ensuring a responsive ongoing policy refinement process to allow policy development to keep pace with emerging virtual learning developments Maintain teachers as the expert leaders and facilitators of learning, giving them responsibility for overseeing and managing student learning, and for ensuring academic progress and accountability Encourage and facilitate the involvement of parents, guardians, and mentors to increase accountability and support in the learning process Require high quality curricula, aligned with state and applicable district standards Address existing policies that do not fit or that hinder online learning progress and accessibility, including removing enrollment caps and artificial limits restricting student access to online courses Allow learning to transcend time- and place- related requirements and focus, instead, on successful student achievement Look for opportunities to address policy issues that may provide improvement or address gaps across all modes of education delivery Trujillo Commission Online Education Final Report, 2007

National On Line Policies States should continue to revise, create, and implement standards and learning objectives using technology for all content areas that reflect 21st-century expertise and the power of technology to improve learning. Rethink basic assumptions in our education system that inhibit leveraging technology to improve learning, starting with our current practice of organizing student and educator learning around seat time instead of the demonstration of competencies. States, districts, and others should develop and implement learning resources that exploit the flexibility and power of technology to reach all learners anytime and anywhere. National Education Technology Plan 2010

What is Next Generation Learning? A personalized system of education that prepares each child for life, work and citizenship in the 21 st century. Critical attributes: 1. Personalized learning 2. Authentic student voice 3. World-class knowledge and skills 4. Performance-based learning 5. Any time, anywhere opportunities 6. Comprehensive systems of learning supports

NxGL Policy Development in NH NxGL AttributesNH Policies and/or Innovations Personalized LearningICT E-Portfolio Requirement: Extended Learning opportunities, Multiple Pathways to Graduation tied to Compulsory Education (SB 18); ELO Network and Charter Modeling Authentic Student Voice and AgencyE-Portfolio Requirement; Charter Schools, ELO Modeling World Class Knowledge and SkillsCommon Core (?); Certain Charters; Competency-based system requirements Performance Based AssessmentState Accountability Model; I3 Network; Charters Anytime, Everywhere OpportunitiesELOs; Online Learning Policies—Snow days/Sick days; VLACS Student Centered Comprehensive Systems of Support Effective Educator policy (developing); Response to Intervention—APEX/PBIS; My Voice Survey and Follow the Child Data Supports; Multiple Pathway Designs

Current NH Definition of “Extended Learning” (c) “Extended learning” means the primary acquisition of knowledge and skills through instruction or study outside of the traditional classroom methodology, including, but not limited, to: (1) Independent study; (2) Private instruction; (3) Performing groups; (4) Internships; (5) Community service; (6) Apprenticeships; and (7) Online courses.

Current Extended Learning Policy (4) If a district chooses to offer extended learning opportunities, the extended learning opportunities shall: a. Consist of activities designed to: 1. Provide credit or supplement regular academic courses; and 2. Promote the schools and individual students’ educational goals and objectives; b. Be governed by a policy adopted by the local school board that: 1. Provides for the administration and supervision of the program; 2. Encourages that certified school personnel oversee an individual student’s program; 3. Requires that each extended learning proposal meet rigorous standards, and be approved by the school prior to its beginning; 4. Specifies that credits can be granted for extended learning activities, including, but not limited to, independent study, private instruction, team sports, performing groups, internships, community service, and work study; and 5. Requires that granting of credits shall be based on a student’s demonstration of competencies, as approved by certified educators; c. Incorporate student participation in selecting, organizing, and carrying out extended learning activities; d. Provide opportunities for students to acquire knowledge and skill development comparable to knowledge and skill development in courses offered at the high school; and e. Be available to all students

Anytime, Everywhere Learning Nothing in this section shall prevent a HS from offering classroom courses, distance education courses, independent study programs, or extended learning opportunities in addition to the [required] credits. Schools shall not be required to pay for student registration or similar fees if the course is offered in the classroom. Nothing in this section shall prevent a student from completing any number of credits through classroom courses, career and technical center courses, distance learning, independent study, or extended learning opportunities to meet the graduation requirements consistent with local district policies.

“Customized, Personalized Education for all students, not defined by Time or Place!”

13 One Student’s Story ~ Young woman, 18 years old. Failed civics, however, needs to pass Civics to graduate. Impressed her teacher and others at the school with her interest and passion to make something of herself ELO Project ~ Working with Manchester City Hall Social Service Department Her plan is to create a report and presentation to the City Council and to the school, looking at the needed maternal health and wellness supports within her community that will lead to student success despite numerous at-risk indicators.

Graduation and Dropout Prevention State Plan 2009 A plan to Implement multiple pathways to graduation through greater personalization and student agency

Overall Goals ~ Reduce the Dropout Rate to 0% by Follow The Child: Identify the personal, physical, social barriers, and educational gaps to success for each student and build a system that will address those barriers and gaps early in the process by creating a variety of options towards success. Build a system that will challenge each student to become college and work ready by high school graduation.

Underlying Principles of New Hampshire’s Vision of Multiple Pathways and Redesign Follow The Child Personalization & Relationships Relevance ~ – Engagement & Active Learning Rigor and High Standards – Demonstration of Student Mastery Empowered Educators – Teachers as “Facilitators of Learning” Choices and Flexibility for Where and When Learning occurs

The Data to Date ~ Number of Dropouts Annual Dropout Percentage 4 Year Cumulative Rate State Total 1,0281.6%6.2% Number of Dropouts Annual Dropout Percentage 4 Year Cumulative Rate State Total 2,1853.2%12.2% Number of Dropouts Annual Dropout Percentage 4 Year Cumulative Rate State Total 2,5534.0%15.1%

Ed Information and Communication Technologies Program (a) The local school board shall require an integrated approach to the use of 21st century tools, including, but not limited to digital technology and communication tools, within all curriculum areas through the adoption of an information and communication technologies literacy (ICT) program in grades K - 12 that provides opportunities at developmentally appropriate levels for students to: (1) Develop knowledge of ethical, responsible use of technology tools in a society that relies heavily on knowledge of information in its decision-making; (2) Become proficient in the use of 21st century tools to access, manage, integrate, evaluate, and create information within the context of the core subjects (3) Use 21st century tools to develop cognitive proficiency (4) Use 21st century tools to develop technical proficiency at a foundational knowledge level (5) Create digital portfolios (b) The local school board shall provide opportunities for students to demonstrate ICT competency by the end of 8th grade using assessment rubrics applied to the contents of digital portfolios as required in (a)(5) above. Students who successfully demonstrate knowledge, skill, and understanding of these competencies shall have the opportunity, as high school students, to take a higher level computer course to meet the ½ credit requirement.

Current NH Online Policy Ed Distance Education. (a) In this section, “distance education” means correspondence, video-based, internet-based, and online courses. (b) If a district chooses to offer distance education, the provisions of (c) - (f) below shall apply. (c) The local school board shall be responsible for: (1) The approval, coordination, and supervision of distance education courses offered for instructional purposes or high school credit, or both, in the district; and (2) Granting student credit for completion of distance education courses. (d) School districts may cooperate to share delivery of distance education courses.

Required Local School Board Policies (e) The local school board shall adopt policies relative to all distance education courses offered by the school district to require that: (1) The courses comply with all federal and state statutes pertaining to student privacy and to public broadcasting of audio and video; (2) Credit courses require students to meet similar academic standards as required by the school for students enrolled in credit courses offered by the school; (3) Only students approved by the school principal or designee shall be eligible to receive credit for distance education courses; and (4) Students earning credit for distance education courses shall participate in all assessments required by the statewide education improvement and assessment program.

Required Local School Board Policies (2) (f) The local school board shall adopt policies relative to all distance education courses offered by the school district relative to: (1) The number of students a teacher may be required to supervise; (2) Monitoring of student progress, grading of assignments, and testing; (3) Security of individual student records, provided that no individual student records obtained through participation in distance education courses shall be used for any purposes other than those that support the instruction of the individual student; and (4) Gathering and disseminating of district-level aggregated data obtained through participation in distance education courses.

NH Policies for Online Learning ~ Minimum Standards for School Approval, (in revision) Credit requirements may be met through distance education programs, subject to the following: a.The 13.5 program specific credits required for HS graduation, not including open electives and information communications technology, shall be offered in a classroom setting. Duplicate, equivalent, or additional courses in those programs may be offered through distance learning; b.Distance education courses to be counted toward the 45 required credits must meet the school’s competencies and shall be identified in the school’s program of studies; c.The school shall provide all equipment, software, and internet connectivity necessary to participate in distance education programs; d.The costs of registration shall be borne by the school district; e.At least one staff member shall be identified and available to assist students having difficulty with distance education courses…

Current NH Competency language (d) By the school year, the local school board shall require that a high school credit can be earned by demonstrating mastery of required competencies for the course, as approved by certified school personnel. Until the school year, the local school board shall require that a high school credit can be earned as provided in (1) or (2) below, or both: (1) Attendance at a course scheduled to meet for no less than 135 clock hours of instructional time if the school operates on an 8- period schedule or for no less than 150 clock hours of instructional time if the school operates on a 7-period schedule; or (2) If a competency assessment is in place as provided in (i) below, by demonstrating mastery of required competencies for the course, as approved by certified school personnel.

Competency based Learning The local school board shall require that a HS credit can be earned by demonstrating mastery of required competencies for the course, as approved by certified school personnel. Each HS shall determine the number of credits to be awarded for successful demonstration of competencies of a classroom course, independent study, distance learning course, or extended learning opportunity. The local school board shall require that a HS have in place competency assessments for all courses offered through the HS.

Definition of Competency: One credit shall equate to the level of rigor and achievement necessary to meet competencies that have been designed to demonstrate the knowledge and skills necessary to progress toward college level or career work equivalent…

What is Mastery and Who Determines It? Mastery represents the degree to which a student is proficient in learning – it really represent s a degree of proficiency that allows a student to draw upon previous learning and apply it in new settings and in new ways over time. Determination of the weight of each course competency on which credit is based, as well as the degree of mastery on which credit will be granted, shall be a local decision, based on explicit learning progressions.

Course Competencies ~ Sociology Course Competencies: Upon successful completion of this course, students will be able to: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of the basic theories of Sociologic studies. 2. Describe and evaluate the major categories of sociologic research. 3. Demonstrate an understanding of the social response and impact of varieties cultural values, beliefs, and norms. 4. Define and evaluate the issues associated with violating and/or changing societal values, beliefs, or norms and the results to cultures and societies. 5. Analyze the effectiveness of proposed responses to "building a better society". 6. Discuss the societal connection of various cultures. 7. Describe the preventative factors involved in protecting the healthy functioning of various societal groups. 8. Discuss and evaluate the major historical themes of the field of Sociology 9. Demonstrate critical thinking skills (in reading, writing and on-line discussion) and communication skills in assimilating and synthesizing the information of the course.

Efficacy Competencies ~ MC2 Choice (and now Charter) School Self Direction Ownership Community Habits of Being Quality Work Character Curiosity and Wonder Collaboration Habits of Mind Problem Solving Decision Making Critical Thinking Creative Thinking Communication Organization Management Leadership Information Technology

Ex. Rubric ~ “Ownership” ~ MC2 NoviceAdv. BeginCompetentProficientExpert Asking for HelpDoesn’t ask for help, doesn’t accept help Accepts Help, but wants helper to decide how to help Asks for help when needed, but wants helper to decide how to help Recognizes need for help on own terms, but does not advocate for self Seeks out help from experts; seeks help on own terms; knows what he/she needs and advocates for self Responsibility for Learning Choice of Learning Projects Chooses projects that are perceived to be easy and don’t relate to goals Chooses projects that relate to learning goals Chooses projects that will contribute to self improvement Meets with teacher to plan projects that will challenge ability and expand to learning Takes responsibility for processes and outcomes of learning in ways that continually challenge and expand learning Intrinsic Rewards Investment in Learning