10 Nov. 2009 Seong Yil BAE Vice President

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Advertisements

Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
1 Access Line Operation Analysis & Case Study in Beijing Metro System Zhili Liu, Ph.D. School of Traffic and Transportation Beijing Jiaotong University.
9/7/2012 MBS UU.
Briefing on Cape Town’s Integrated Rapid Transit System 2009.
Urban Mobility by BRT.  Population: 6,5 million  Travels by public transport: 10 million/day (metropolitan region) Bus: 9 million Train: 568,000 Metro:
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Smart Transportation Pricing - Value Case Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group - December 2008.
Management and Operations In MPO Planning Christopher O’Neill.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
INNER CITY INVESTMENT SUMMIT TRANSPORT, INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Presenter: L N Mangcu SED: Transport and Roads Department.
Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan
DEC Seoul Development Institute Take Transit, Enjoy More Time for Life SEOUL Challenges for Environmentally Sustainable Transport Dr. GyengChul Kim.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Public Transport in Saudi Arabia
Increasing the Quality of Public Transport in Prague Prague Integrated Transport.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
Transportation Policies Why is public transit in Zurich the way it is today? 1970s- Vehicular traffic and congestion ruled Proposal for Underground.
Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 11 Mass Transit.
The Potential BRT in Asia
Planning and Polishing Service for High Schools Kristin Thompson Supervisor, Service Analysis Metro Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Managing Director/CEO
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
Presentation by: Permanent Secretary - PMORALG Mr. Jumanne Sagini 3 rd June 2014.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Developments in China Dongquan HE China Sustainable Transportation Center Supported by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Making Way for Public Rapid Transit in South Asia and its Impact on Energy and Environment Bangalore, Dhaka and Colombo Ranjan Kumar Bose & Sharad Gokhale.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESS & RIDERSHIP: A CLEAN AIR ISSUE Geetam Tiwari Transportation Research and Injury prevention Programme Indian Institute of Technology.
Bus Management System in SEOUL Metropolitan Area.
Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership Len Usvyat 1, Linda Meckel 1, Mary DiCarlantonio 2, Clayton Lane 1 – PB Americas, Inc. 2 – Jeffrey Parker.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
1 Presented by Tom Harrington WMATA Office of Long-Range Planning TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Future Metrorail Capacity Needs.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Brief comments on the urban transport situation in Iran Jean-Charles Crochet Senior Transport Economist The World Bank April 2004.
Indicator pilot project – 2011 Central Hungary Operational Program.
BRT in India Delhi Case study. What is Delhi HCBS Delhi HCBS is not a BRT system. It is primarily a road infrastructure project. It was not conceived.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
Write down one word that comes into your thought when you read the following word: 15 Feb 2008 R. Shanthini Transport.
Envision Central Texas Presentation Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) by Richard Shultz Concerned Citizen March 24, 2008.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
February 2014 Bus Rapid Transit for Chennai. Chennai city bus service GOOD PATRONAGE  50 lakh daily passenger trips  3650 buses  Maximum flow of.
Oscar Figueroa P. Universidad Católica de Chile Reducing the Impact of Vehicles on Air and Environment Quality in Cities ISSUES AND ACHIEVEMENTS ON TRANSPORTATION.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
TRANSMILENIO ENRIQUE LILLO EMME/2 UGM May Bogotá n 7 million people n Mean annual population growth of 4,5 % over the last 10 years n 25 % of Colombian.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Premium Transit District 4, Office of Modal Development Making the Connection.
Urban Land Use. Residential – Includes all places where people live – Generally the largest land use in most cities often taking up to 40% or more of.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
Metrô Rio & SuperVia March Location BRASIL Rio de Janeiro Rio Rio de Janeiro Metropolitan Region - Population: 11,6 million - Counties: %
The Potential of Using the Smart Card Data to Define the Use of Public Transit in Seoul Dr. Jin Young Park The Korea Transport Institute Dept. of Metropolitan.
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING VI SEM.  Transportation contributes industrial, social, economic & cultural development. It is vital for the economic development.
Menauitpuitptransport#MENAUITP Land Transportation Projects in the Kingdom of Bahrain Nada Deen Director, Land Transportation Projects Ministry of Transportation.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
2016 APTA Sustainable and Public Workshop COTA’s Role in Smart City Columbus Implementation July 25, 2016 Michael L. Bradley Vice President of Planning.
I. Site Operation II. Transportation III. Accommodations.
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
2016 APTA Sustainable and Public Workshop COTA’s Role in Smart City Columbus Implementation July 25, 2016 Michael L. Bradley Vice President of Planning.
Presentation transcript:

Modal Integration and the Passenger Transport Strategy in Seoul Metropolitan Area 10 Nov. 2009 Seong Yil BAE Vice President Yooshin Engineering Corporation E-mail: sybae@yooshin.co.kr

Contents Seoul in Korea Public Transport in Seoul Modal Integration Passenger Transport Strategy

1. Seoul in Korea

1. Seoul in Korea Capital City of Korea Business Hub in the North-east Asia Competitiveness for the Advanced Digital Industry 0.6% of the Total Area → 21% of the GDP Global Power City Index: 12th (Mori Memorial Foundation, 2009) Source : Googleus

1. Seoul in Korea Socio-economic indices (2008) Population : 10,456,000 Area : 605.27 Km2 Registered Car: 2,949,000 Road Length: increase steadily Road Ratio : around 22% Road Length

1. Seoul in Korea Trip Characteristics Modal Split (Peak Hour) Bus : 27.6% (29.0%) Subway : 34.9% (41.0%) Car : 26.3% (22.6%) Taxi : 6.2% ( 3.2%) Public Transport : 62.5% ( 70% in Peak Hour )

Going to Seoul (%) (B/A) 1. Seoul in Korea Commuter Trips in the Metropolitan Area Trip Generation : Increase of 16% Trip to Seoul : Increase of 14% Concentration to Seoul: Decrease of 0.8% due to New Development of Residential Areas outside Seoul Origin Generation (A) Trip to Seoul (B) Going to Seoul (%) (B/A) 2002 2006 5 New Towns 560,439 652,717 210,764 226,515 37.6% 34.7% New Dev’t 451,112 663,017 116,826 193,367 25.9% 29.2% Other Area 3,399,023 3,884,257 704,072 754,314 20.7% 19.4% Total 4,410,574 5,119,991 1,031,662 1,174,196 23.4% 22.6%

1. Seoul in Korea Dependence on Seoul Dependence on Seoul = Commuter Trip (Seoul~Gyeonggi) Total Commuter Trip in Gyeonggi (below) (above)

2. Public Transport in Seoul 2.1 Public Transport (Bus) 2.2 Public Transport (Subway)

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Reformation of the Bus System (July 2004) Problems before the Reform Expansion of Commute Areas to Seoul Traffic Volume across the Seoul City Boundry ▷ 2.68 Million Vehicle/day (1996) → 3.15 Million Vehicle/day (2003) Increase of Traffic Congestion Average Travel Speed in CBD ▷ 20.04 km/h (1994) → 16.3 km/h (2002) Decrease of Bus Passengers Number of Bus Passengers per Bus per Day ▷ 1,069 passengers (1983) → 504 passengers (2003)

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Reform 1: Bus Operation – 4 Types Regional Connection (Trunk Lines) between suburbs and downtown Trunk Lines Feeder Circular Wide Area Blue Bus Green Yellow Red Feeder to Trunk Lines and Subways to meet local travel demand Local Lines in CBD for Business/ Shopping/ Tour Trips Express Connection between satellite cities and CBD under Operation: 417 Lines / 7,164 Buses

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Reform 2: Fare System Bus (only) Trip → Distance Based Fare Base Fare: 1,000 Korean Won -- up to 10 km Additional Fare: 100 Korean Won -- every 5 km Transfer Trip Free of Charge for Transfer (Bus to Bus, Bus to Subway) ‘Distance Based Fare’ system is still deployed. Before After Independent Fare System Transfer: 50 Won Discount → Deployed to All Passenger Integrated Fare System Discount to Children/Students → 50% and 20%, respectively

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Reform 3: New Smart Card System Introduced to facilitate Intermodal Ridership Used on Bus and Subway Distance-based Integrated Fare Automatic Discount to Children/Students Fare Revenue: accounted more accurately & timely

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Reform 4: Bus Management System (BMS) Bus Information to Operators, Passenger, and City Government for Efficient Management of Bus Operators for Convenient Use of Passenger For Public Transport Policies, Level of Subsidy of the City Government

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Reform 5: Exclusive (Median) Bus Lanes Introduce Exclusive Median Bus Lanes Phase 1: 3 Major Corridors (27 km) Phase 2: plus 3 Corridors (total 58 km) by 2006 Continue to Extend the Corridors → making a Network Introduce Traffic Signal Priority for Bus Increase of Bus Speed: up to 20%

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Reform 6: BRT on the Gyung-Bu Expressway Introduced by Korea Expressway Corporation (KEC) - Opening in Oct. 2008 Total Length =44.8km Operation Hours: from 7am to 9 pm - Trips per day: 190,000 → 250,000 (31.6% ↑)

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Evaluation of the Bus System Reformation: Before 1 year and After Ridership Speed Punctuality Safety Number of Traffic Accident : 7,966 ⇒ 5,971 (25% decreased) Number of Death : 60 ⇒ 41 (31.7% decreased) Corridor Dist (km) T-time (min) Deviation (Bus/min) (Car/min) Dobong-Mia 15.2 44.3 2.7 15.3 Susack-Sungsan 6.8 18.1 1.2 15.6 Kangnam 4.8 16.7 1.3 4.6

2.1 Public Transport (Bus) Going Forward Selection of Additional Corridors 23 Corridors with 202.8 km (2009) CBD to Satellite Cities, pass through High Density Development Areas

2.2 Public Transport (Subway) Subway Operation (Sep. 2009) Total Length: 313.9 km (290 Stations) 8 Lines: 286.9 km ( + Line 9 : open in July 2009) Operator Line Name Length (㎞) Travel Speed (㎞/hr) Headway (Min.) No. of Station Peak Hour Non-Peak Seoul Metro Line 1 Line 2 Line 3 Line 4 7.8 60.2 35.2 31.7 31.2 33.6 34.0 35.8 3.0 2.5 4.0 5.5 6.0 5.0 10 50 31 26 Sum 134.9 31.2~35.8 2.5~3.0 4.0~6.0 117 SMRT Line 5 Line 6 Line 7 Line 8 52.3 35.1 46.9 17.7 32.7 30.1 32.3 34.2 4.5 8.0 51 38 42 17 152.0 30.1~34.2 2.5~4.5 6.0~8.0 148 Seoul Metro 9 Line 9 Normal Express 27.0 23.4 34.5 49.5  20.0 10.0 25 9 Total 313.9 30.1~49.5 290

2.2 Public Transport (Subway) Map of Subway Lines (Sep. 2009)

2.2 Public Transport (Subway) Airport Railway Opened the Section [Incheon Int’l Airport (IIA) ~ Gimpo Airport] in March 2007 Planned to Extend the Line from Gimpo to Seoul Railway Station by 2010 Normal Train (33 min.) and Express Train (28 min.) Name Origine~Destination Length (㎞) Travel Speed (㎞/hr) Headway (Min.) No. of Station Peak Hr. Non-P Airport Railway IIA~Gimpo Airport 37.6 70.0 12.0 6

2.2 Public Transport (Subway) Ticketing Stopped the Paper Ticket System in July 2009 Automatic Ticketing System Slim Gate (Preventing from ‘steal a Ride’) Automatic Recharge Machine Single Trip Ticketing Machine Deposit Refund Machine

3. Modal Integration 3.1 Modal Integration Strategy 3.2 Modal Integration Examples

Modal Integration: Basic Needs 3.1 Modal Integration Strategy Movement Condition Private Car Door to Door Route Choice Public Transport Region to Region Route Networking Modal Integration: Basic Needs Transfer Facility Improvement To Reduce Transit Distance To Supply Convenient Facilities to Transfer To Provide Timely & Adquite Information Modal Integration Strategy Transfer Center Large/ Middle/ Small Centers

Example : Kimpo Airport Station 3.2 Modal Integration Examples To Reduce Transit Distance Example : Kimpo Airport Station Transfer: - Airport to Airport (International): Airport Railway - Airport to City: Subway Line 5 & Subway Line 9 - City to Airport (International): Subway Line 5 & 9 ↔ Airport Railway - with 23 Bus Routes Important thing

Example : Kimpo Airport Station 3.2 Modal Integration Examples Example : Kimpo Airport Station Transfer (Subway ↔ Airport Railway) on the Same Floor

3.2 Modal Integration Examples To Supply Convenient Facilities Example : Subway Line 9 Escalator / Elevator Moving Walk

3.2 Modal Integration Examples Entrance of Sta. To Provide Information Example : Subway Line 9 Timely & Adequate Information in Train Platform

3.2 Modal Integration Examples Transfer Facility Improvement in Seoul (March 2009) Item Elevator Escalator Wheelchair Lift Moving Walk No. of Station No. of Facilities Total 249 642 179 1,052 145 462 6 18 Seoul Metro 109 279 61 274 33 68 1 2 SMRT 140 363 118 779 63 158 5 16 Note: Total Number of Stations = 265 ← not including Line 9

3.2 Modal Integration Examples Transfer Center Item Multi-Transfer Center (A) Public Transport Oriented Transfer Center (B) Transfer Terminal (C) Transfer Parking (D) Concept ▪ B + C + D ▪ near City Boundary & Important Railway Station ▪ C + D ▪ Important Places in Transport Networks ▪ Trunk & Local Bus Transfer + D ▪ in Regional or Local Center ▪ Car + Public Transport ▪ in Local Center Transfer Type ▪ Car↔Subway ▪ Subway↔Bus ▪ Bus↔Bus(BRT) ▪ Car↔Bus ▪ Blue Bus↔ Blue Bus ▪ Blue Bus↔ Feeder Bus ▪ Bus↔Bus (BRT) ▪Car↔Subway ▪Car↔Bus (BRT) A B C D

Example : Seoul Station 3.2 Modal Integration Examples Railway Subway Trunk Bus Local Bus Private Car Transfer Center Example : Seoul Station

Example : Cheongryangri Station 3.2 Modal Integration Examples Transfer Center Example : Cheongryangri Station Railway Subway Trunk Bus Local Bus Private Car

Example : Yeoeudo Transfer Terminal 3.2 Modal Integration Examples Transfer Terminal Example : Yeoeudo Transfer Terminal Subway Trunk Bus Local Bus Private Car

4. Passenger Transport Strategy

Copenhagen Protocol (Dec. 2009): Obligation of All Countries 4.1 Transport Strategy Global Warming Natural Disaster Copenhagen Protocol (Dec. 2009): Obligation of All Countries Efficient Use of Transport Energy Demand Reduction in Transport Energy Use Green Technology Development Transport Strategy (Trend)

4.2 Passenger Transport Strategy for Efficient Use of Transport Energy to Supply Public Transport - Public Transport: Railway, BRT, etc. to Encourage the Use of Public Transport - Modal Integration Facilities (Hardware) - Information System (Software) Transfer Center APTS