 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Environmental Protection CLEAN FILL POLICY
Advertisements

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Analysis of Dike 14 CDF to Public Greenspace. Who owns Dike 14? State of Ohio holds Dike 14 as a public trust land Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority.
Northwest Region Cleanup Program Zidell Waterfront Property Cleanup 2012 Portland Scott Manzano | Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
Confined Disposal Facilities and In Situ Capping Site characterization / selection Engineering design Operational considerations Contaminant pathways and.
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
 Cold Spring is a town in New York State, situated on the Hudson River  To the south of Cold Spring is:  Foundry Cove – a small river inlet  Constitution.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Neponset River Capen Street Investigation Milton, MA Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA) Department of Environmental Protection.
Neponset River Dredge Spoils Assessment RESULTS Boston and Milton Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA) Department of Environmental.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update June 07, 2006 Great Lakes Visitors Center DuPont CRG.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Connecticut Department of Public Works -- Rebecca Cutler – Environmental Analyst.
Common Issues for Exposure Scenarios without GNS VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Mike Allen Ohio EPA CO- Supervisor
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results 1 Data Evaluation Summary - Columbia River Component River Corridor Closure Project Safety People.
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Prepared for: Prepared by: A Tutorial for Identifying a Project-Specific Dredged Material Placement Site October 2012 Bill Goodfellow Kaitlin McCormick.
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
TURNING BROWNFIELDS. Definition US EPA 1997 abandoned, idled or under-used industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated.
Stormwater Rain and melting snow Collected by storm drains and flows into streams, rivers, lakes.
MUNISPORT LANDFILL Vijay Kumar Rayabharapu. Munisport Landfill (Biscayne Landings) Landfill N N.E. 151st St., Biscayne Blvd ) Florida International University.
A PROGRAM THAT OFFERS CUSTOMIZED ASSISTANCE TO PROPERTY OWNERS & INTERESTED PARTIES WITH THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Voluntary Assistance Program (VAP)
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
I.Summary of technical guideline II.Reviews III.Recommendations.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
CHEMICAL COMMODITIES INC. The History, Cleanup and Ecological Reuse of a Superfund Site 1.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2006 Great Lakes Visitors Center DuPont CRG.
Triangle Park Removal Action Area within the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (Portland, Oregon) Jennifer MacDonald Assistant Regional Counsel Office of.
1 Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site LTS&M Planning LTS&M Conference Grand Junction, CO November 16, 2010 Donald Metzler U.S.
The Superfund ERA Process. What is Superfund? Superfund was created on December 11, 1980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
UC Berkeley Richmond Field Station Remediation and Restoration Project January 16, 2008 Town Hall Meeting Agenda 1.Project Background 2.Recent Activities.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Prepared for: Prepared by: Masonville DMCF: Integrating Dredged Material Management with Environmental Restoration and Recreation Opportunities October.
Health Outcomes in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties Issue:  Higher health risks found in: Infants Infants Elderly (age >65) Elderly (age >65) Blacks Blacks.
Principles of Hazardous Waste Site Ranking September 27, 2001 Stephen M. Caldwell Deputy Director, State and Tribal Programs and Site Identification Center.
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
CHRYSLER NORTH ASSEMBLY PLANT| PREPARING A SITE FOR EXPANSION William Burkett, R.S., City of Toledo Michael Coonfare, CP, Hull & Associates, Inc. APRIL.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
EPA Targeted Brownfields Assessment Applications for Culturally Sensitive Sites The TseWhitZen Village Cemetery Restoration Project Joanne LaBaw, EPA Matthew.
Brownfields 2011 Philadelphia, PA – April 5, 2011 Vanessa Steigerwald-Dick, Ohio EPA Amy Yersavich, Ohio EPA Urban Gardens on Brownfields: Making Them.
Omaha Riverfront Redevelopment Project Brownfields 2004 C. Dale Jacobson, P.E., DEE.
Ecology and environment, inc. ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment Georganna B. Collins, International.
SILVER LAKE, REHOBOTH AQUATIC HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROJECT DNREC Division of Watershed Stewardship.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Sustainable Redevelopment
Green Energy and Green Spaces
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION IN RESPONSE TO CONTAMINATED SOILS ALONG THE EASTSIDE DITCH NEAR DEER LODGE, MONTANA G.S. Vandeberg1, D.J. Dollhopf1, D.R.
Sediment Cleanup Options
Brownfield Corrective Action with Revised RRS
Introduction EPA is overseeing the RI/FS for the Rolling Knolls Landfill being conducted by several companies under a 2005 administrative order on consent.
Dave Wethington, PE Joanne Milo, PMP
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials cannot cause impacts to waters of state  Ohio Revised Code Ohio Department of Natural Resources – Lease must be obtained to develop an in-water CDF for use of the waters and underlying submerged lands of Lake Erie  Hazardous Waste Rules – Dredged materials subject to 404 permit not a hazardous waste

 CDF 10B is an in-water, near shore facility located in Cleveland Harbor adjacent to Burke Lakefront Municipal Airport.  It was constructed in 1998, is approximately 68 acres, with a total capacity of 2.9 million cubic yards. It received about 300,000 cubic yards of dredge material annually from the Cuyahoga River and Cleveland Harbor.

Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) Dike 14 is 88- acres and is located on Cleveland’s eastside along Lake Erie. It received dredge material from the Cuyahoga River and Cleveland Harbor from 1979 to Its future use is as a nature preserve.

 CDF 10B assessment was conducted to determine if the dredge material could be safely used for fill at an upland commercial/industrial property.  Dike 14 was evaluated to determine if the area could be safely used as a nature preserve. Different end uses: How the land will be used and the receptors that will be at that location are important considerations when assessing protection of human health and the environment.

 Purpose was to determine if dredge material from CDF 10B could be harvested and placed at Cuyahoga Valley Industrial Center in Cleveland  Alternative placement of dredge material evaluated through a Materials Management Plan for Beneficial Use  12 borings installed in 2009, 20 samples collected; 10 samples from 0-4 feet and 10 samples from 4-8 feet horizon; this added to previous historical data collected  Analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, metals, PCBs and pesticides  Compared the data to U.S. EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for direct contact with soil

 Assessed: ◦ Residential human health direct contact with dredge material ◦ Commercial/industrial human health direct contact with dredge material ◦ Comparison to leach-based soil screening levels for protection of ground water ◦ Evaluate surface water impacts from placement of CDF 10B dredge material at Cuyahoga Valley Industrial Center in Cleveland

 Cumulative non-cancer hazard index of 1 and cancer risk goal of 1 in 100,000 (1x10-5) are met for commercial/industrial land use  Residential levels exceeded  Land Use restriction needed for commercial/industrial use at CVIC site  The dredge material will not cause adverse impacts from leaching to the Cuyahoga River

Left alone, vegetation began to grow and migratory birds and other wildlife began to inhabit and migrate through Dike 14. Today, Dike 14 is home to a wide variety of plants, trees, birds, butterflies, and other wildlife.

Brownfield Assessment included: Voluntary Action Program (VAP) Phase I Property Assessment Wetlands Delineation VAP Phase II Property Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment Ecological Risk Assessment Background Soil Determination Dike 14 Brownfield Assessment

 Dike 14 is 88 acres - Soil investigation focused on depths 0-4 feet (0-2 feet & 2-4 feet intervals)  Limited sediment & surface water sampling  Analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, pesticides, TPH (oil & grease), metals

 Assessed exposures to both adults & children as frequent recreational visitors (90 days/year)  Assessed exposures to construction & excavation workers  Evaluated direct contact exposures to soil in 2 exposure areas

 Level 1 Determine important ecological resources & habitat  Level 2 Soil screening found metals, PCBs and PAHs exceeded screening levels in localized areas  Level 3 Evaluated exposures to most susceptible wildlife species

 Dike 14 is Confined Disposal Facility ◦No native soil, not possible to find appropriate on- property sampling locations  Off-property soil background investigation: ◦Forest Hills Park ◦Bratenahl  Used for direct comparison purposes  Determining acceptable criteria for fill  Used as comparison standard for background metals concentrations for other properties in region

Compounds Background Upper Limits, mg/kg 0-2'2-4'0-4' Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead SeleniumDue to no. of censored data these compounds could not be reliably evaluated Silver Mercury

So…is Dike 14 safe?  Overall, the results show that Dike 14 can be used safely as a Nature Preserve.  Most of 88-acre property will require no cleanup.  With the exception of an approximately 5-acre area associated with the former landfill portion of the Dike, the Property is safe for recreational uses and wildlife. Low levels of chemicals of concern in the 5- acre area include PCBs, PAHs, and lead.

 Determine which yard stick to use to determine if dredge material can be reused safely ◦ Recommend U.S. EPA Regional Screening Levels for broader application and when there’s uncertainty regarding the property’s commitment to completing Ohio’s Voluntary Action Program  Land use is an important factor - Consider land use and how the material will be reused  Collect adequate data from dredge material to determine concentrations of chemicals of concern  Ensure property use restrictions are put in place if necessary

 Janine Rybka ◦ ◦ , ext. 13  Vanessa Steigerwald-Dick ◦ ◦