2015-16 Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
Kentucky Association for Assessment Coordinators (KAAC) Office of Assessment and Accountability 10/23/12 1 Assessment and Accountability Update.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.
ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Create by KAAC Modified by Kenna Williams.
School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
January 19, :00 – 10:00 a.m. ET 1. Changes to Kentucky’s ESEA Waiver Request Required by USDOE Affecting 703 KAR 5:222, Categories for Recognition,
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
DAC Back-to-School Training Overview Presented By: Jennifer Stafford 1 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
School Year. Unbridled Learning Next Generation Learners (100%) Next Generation Support (23%) Next Generation Professionals (10%) Next Generation.
BUILDING ASSESMENT COORDINATOR BACK-TO-SCHOOL TRAINING Overview Presented By: Erica Thompson 1.
Assessment and Accountability Update Kentucky Association of School Administrators July 18, 2013 Kentucky Department of Education Office of Assessment.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets 2015 Workbook.
ESEA Flexibility: Student Growth Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 6 of 8.
ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Kentucky Association for Assessment Coordinators Ken Draut, Associate Commissioner Rhonda L.. Sims, Director Office.
ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
703 KAR 5:240 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Student Growth Percentile & Categorical Growth Presented by Pamela Powers Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp:
Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Monthly DAC Webcast February 11, 2016 KDE:OAA:DSR:
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
2015 Assessment and Accountability Update Scott Trimble Workshop October 20, Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Kentucky.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
Accountability Update
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Next Generation Learners
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
Texas State Accountability
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
HOGSETT Elementary School
Unbridled Learning: College/Career for All Accountability System
Spencer County Public Schools
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Support for Effective Schools and Districts Persistently Low-Achieving
Presentation transcript:

Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015 1

Topics ESEA Reauthorization Inclusion of Special Population Regulation Change Overview of Changes Accountability Administrative Procedures/Guidelines Next-Generation Learners Accountability, Recognition, Support and Consequences Next-Generation Instructional Programs and Supports Next-Generation Professionals 2

ESSA Reauthorization 3

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) U.S. House of Representatives Approved by a vote of U.S. Senate Approved by a vote of 85 – 12 President signed on December 10,

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Continued KDE will continue to observe the progress of the bill before providing new baselines, Annual Measurable Objectives, College and Career Readiness goals and novice reduction targets for Graduation Rate goals were shared December 14, 2015 in a DAC Monday . 5

Inclusion of Special Population Regulation Change 6

703 KAR 5:070 Cease Student-Initiated Immediately All other guidance for the administration of accommodations remain unchanged. 7

Accountability Overview Next Generation Learners – 77% Achievement Gap Growth College Readiness Graduation Rate Next Generation Instructional Programs and Support – 23% K-3 continues to be included at the elementary in addition to Arts and Humanities, Practical Living/Career Studies and Writing Global Competency will be included in accountability at high school (scheduled to be reported at elementary and middle) in addition to Arts and Humanities, Practical Living/Career Studies and Writing 8 At its August meeting, the Kentucky Board of Education postponed the inclusion of Next Generation Professionals in accountability.

Changes 9

Changes to Accountability Regulations Increased attention to reducing the percent of students scoring at the novice level Revised regulations define changes to the accountability system for KAR 5:200 Learners 703 KAR 5:225 Recognition, Supports and Consequences 703 KAR 5:240 Procedures and Guidelines Changes first reflected in fall 2016 reporting 10

Next-Generation Learners (703 KAR 5:200) Achievement – Calculation remains unchanged Science scores will not be included in accountability at elementary, middle school and alternate assessment at all levels. Science high school scores from EOC Biology will be included in accountability. Social studies will be tested and accountable at all levels. Language mechanics (4%) from ACT Plan will be replaced by the ACT subtest (Usage/Mechanics) used for reporting. 11 If data cannot be calculated for any category of next-generation learners, the weights shall be redistributed using an equal proportion to categories that shall be reported for the school or district.

Next-Generation Learners (703 KAR 5:200) Gap (equally uses two calculations) Non-duplicated gap group percentage scoring Proficient and Distinguished in all content area tests Annual novice reduction targets in reading and mathematics for individual student groups [African American, Hispanic, American Indian, Limited English proficiency, students in poverty (free/reduced –price lunch), students with disabilities] and non-duplicated gap group. Points awarded based on percent of target met. Targets will be calculated annually to reduce the percent of novice by 10%. Calculations are based on all groups of sufficient size in the school. Some schools may not have novice reduction targets for individual student groups, but may have the non-duplicated gap group. 12

Next-Generation Learners (703 KAR 5:200) Growth (equally uses two calculations) Student growth percentile in reading and mathematics Elementary, middle and high remain the same Without ACT Plan, growth can be calculated for , since current juniors took the ACT Plan in Categorical growth model sums the number of students moving from a student performance level (NAPD) to a higher level, the number remaining at proficient and distinguished divided by total number of students Only elementary and middle in

Next-Generation Learners (703 KAR 5:200) Readiness – Calculation remains unchanged Middle school Without ACT Explore, 16% will be redistributed to other categories (Growth 33.3%, Achievement 33.3% and Gap 33.3%) Future discussion regarding ACT Explore and ACT Plan is to likely use state procurement process to purchase a new test for

Next-Generation Learners (703 KAR 5:200) Graduation Rate – Adjusted Cohort 4-year rate used for graduation rate goal Annual graduation rate goal is created for each high school and district that measures progression toward the statewide goal of ninety-eight (98) percent by End goal has changed from Goal is computed by dividing by ten (10), the difference between the 2014 baseline percent and ninety-eight (98) percent. 5-year rate used at high school for 20% of overall score 15

Next-Generation Learners (703 KAR 5:200) Weights for Next-Generation Learners Grade RangeAchievementGapGrowth College/Career Readiness Graduation Rate Total Elementary 33.3 NA 99.9 Middle Redistribute to Achievement, Gap and Growth NA99.9 High

Accountability, Recognition, Support and Consequences ( 703 KAR 5:225) Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) is calculated from the total score of the Next-Generation Learner’s component only. Program Review scores are included in the overall score that determines classifications (i.e., Needs Improvement, Proficient, Distinguished) To achieve recognition labels (i.e., School/District of Distinction, High Performing School/District, High Progress School/District), minimum graduation rate is increased from 60 to

Accountability, Recognition, Support and Consequences (703 KAR 5:225) continued Focus calculations will combine two (2) years of data New or reconfigured schools shall use one (1) year of data The 3rd Standard Deviation model for a Focus School is replaced with a lowest 5% model in each individual gap group by subject. Schools labeled as Priority Schools have an overall score in the bottom 5% of overall scores by level for all schools that have failed to meet the AMO for the last three consecutive years. 18

Accountability Administrative Procedures and Guidelines (703 KAR 5:240) Early Graduates Exempt from 100-Day Rule Early Graduates, defined by 704 KAR 3:305, must have a signed intent form and be flagged in Infinite Campus as an Early Graduate. Early Graduates will count in the school’s accountability calculations the year of the student’s graduation, even if less than 100 days of enrollment. If a student is in a school for 100 days or more, the 100-day rule applies. 19

Accountability Administrative Procedures and Guidelines (703 KAR 5:240) Early Graduates Exempt from 100-Day Rule Early Graduates, defined by 704 KAR 3:305, must have a signed intent form and be flagged in Infinite Campus as an Early Graduate. Early Graduates will count in the school’s accountability calculations the year of the student’s graduation, even if less than 100 days of enrollment. If a student is in a school for 100 days or more, the 100-day rule applies. 20

Accountability Administrative Procedures and Guidelines (703 KAR 5:240) Alternative Program/School Track Back All rules for accountability tracking remain in place except for students who are directly placed in an alternative program without entering an A1 school. Direct placements in district programs code to district accountability rather than school. Students attending an alternative school for the entire school year will track back to the district the student would have attended (excludes Gatton Academy, Craft Academy and KSD/KSB). Alternative programs/schools will have enhanced accountability reporting including overall scores included in the School Report Card. No classifications will be reported. KDE will monitor placement practices. 21

Accountability Regulation Trainings KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko 12/15/ Achievement & CCR Gap Growth 703 KAR 5:200 AMO Learners Graduation Rate Rewards & Assistance 703 KAR 5:225 Early Graduation Alternative School Track Back 703 KAR 5:240

Questions? Growth CCR Grad Rate Achieve -ment Gap Division of Support & Research Office of Assessment & Accountability (502) KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/