WELCOME Education Directors’ Briefing 25 th September 2015

Employability in Schools Strategy Head teachers Briefing September 2015 Cllr Sam Webster Portfolio Holder for Schools

Barriers to Young People in Nottingham Developing Employability Skills i.Raising Aspirations of Young People ii.Working with Schools – Impartial Careers Advice and Guidance and Work Experience iii.Employer Engagement iv.Post 16 Transition

The Nottingham Vision Priority One – Ensure that all young people have had 10 contacts with employers by the time they leave full-time education, through participation in a co-ordinated Employability and Careers Advice programme. Priority Two - To increase the numbers of employers engaging with schools and supporting young people in developing the skills they need for the workplace.

What are we asking schools to do? Nottingham City Council would like every primary, secondary and special school in the City to get involved in delivering activities which support the development of their pupils’ employability skills. We would encourage a Senior Manager to make contact with Aspire to discuss the range of support and opportunities available to them.

ASHREEN Seethal Business Engagement Adviser ASPIRE

What is ASPIRE? Education Business PARTNERSHIP in Nottingham FUNDED by Nottingham City Council and DELIVERED by Futures Advice, Skills and Employment

AIMS RAISE aspirations and attainment IMPROVE employability skills DEVELOP enterprise capabilities ENHANCE work-related learning STRENGTHEN employer engagement WIDEN access to post-16 career options

WHO is it aimed at? PRIMARY and SECONDARY schools in Nottingham City Local and national EMPLOYERS of all sizes and sectors DELIVERY partners Education and employer GROUPS

CONTEXT ALIGNED with:  OFSTED Inspection Handbook  Careers Inspiration Agenda  D2N2 Employability Framework

HOW can ASPIRE help? Employability DIAGNOSTIC Local LMI Delivery of Activity Employer Engagement CEIAG

What do we need from you? Engagement Commitment Meaningful outcomes Sustainability Open to change Partnership

ASHREEN Seethal QUESTIONS

Ofsted update David Anstead

Updates Transition – CTF/Common Transfer Day/Week Pat and Sarah Fielding Safeguarding network Pat and Sarah Fielding EIB update and action plans Pat and Sarah Fielding Maths Bally Atwal School Improvement Advisers -developments and progress so far Pat and Sarah Fielding Alternative provision Pat and Sarah Fielding Attendance Pathway Karen McAndrew/David Hughes

Safeguarding DSL network-update 12 th November ADSL initiative

Strategic Alliance (EIB) 3 strands of work: transition / recruitment / mathematics. Establish strategic planning group Publish action plan ACTIVITY MILESTONES WHEN LEAD IMPACT EVALUATION RESOURCE Mathematics ; Curriculum development – curriculum continuum Transition – Y5,6, 7, and 8 Data developments Rationalise city wide CPD Subject knowledge Interventions and vulnerable groups Assessment Mastery, fluency and depth The non specialist Training for MAST / SLE – subject leadership Child focused activities – maths challenge days / booster sessions / G and T

School Improvement Advisors The team Purpose and intentions Deployments to schools and academies Special schools coming on line Scorecards and personalised letters Feedback so far

Notes: Headline Indicators Rate of Improvement – is based upon the average year- on-year change in expected progress levels 2014 to 2015 Floor Standard – is based upon expected Floor Standard for 2015

Coasting - is based upon the schools performance against the released ‘Coasting Schools’ definition: A ‘coasting’ primary school will be one that: Had less than 85 per cent of children achieving level 4, in each year between 2014, 2015 and 2016*, had below average proportions of pupils making expected progress in reading and writing and maths between Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 *2016 data has been based on 2015 scores, so if a school has been flagged as coasting it will be based on if a school does not improve upon its 2015 scores

Attendance – is based upon current attendance being above 94% and school showing year-on-year improvements Closing the Gap – is based upon the latest two year gaps between school disadvantaged pupils and national non- disadvantaged pupils Attainment – is based upon the schools 2015 score for pupils achieving RWM L4+ compared to a score of 70% Gauges PROGRESS – is based upon the school average expected progress score for 2015 compared to national OUTCOMES – is based upon the schools score for pupils achieving RWM L4+ compared to national RWM Gap to 85% – is based upon the gap between schools 2015 RWM L4+ score to 85%, compared to the LA and national gap

Charts Expected vs. Actual Progress – is comparing a schools expected proportion of pupils making expected progress in 2015 (based upon prior attainment) to the schools actual proportions of pupils making expected progress. The ‘LA Best’ school is the one which has the largest positive gap between its expected and actual scores, the ‘LA Worst’ school is one which had the largest negative gap between its expected and actual scores. Attainment – is based upon the schools proportion of pupils achieving at least level 4 in the combined tests (or teacher assessments) of Reading, Writing and Maths compared to national. Progress – is based upon the schools proportion of pupils making at least 2 levels of progress between KS1 and KS2 compared to national

Closing the Gap – is based upon the gap between schools disadvantaged pupils compared to national non- disadvantaged pupils, for attainment or progress

Alternative Provision Review AP review component parts; Consultants’ brief Methodology Overview of current system-inc Ed Psychs, BST, in house capacity Cost implications-additional and specialist funding Strengths of the current approach-EYFS-KS4, alternative and specialist provision Analysing current leadership and partnership Volume of permex / numbers accessing AP and specialist provision Inequitable access to provision and funding Financial sustainability Coherence of external support Ways forward-devolving funds, collaborative working KEEP IT FREE - 14 th October a.m. – developing the structure and the strategy

AOB Reminder - DBS checks on all staff POET- changes to the EHCP Ofsted training - David Anstead-5 th Oct Structures – what next?

Education Directors Briefing for School and Academy Leaders Education Welfare update Attendance Pathway Karen McAndrew – Service Manager David Hughes – Legal Intervention Officer

Education Welfare Service Update The Education Welfare Service is part of the Education Directorate Team update Referrals are allocated centrally Persistent Absence criteria Half Term10% Half term 1 7 sessions Half term 214 sessions Half term 320 sessions Half term 425 sessions Half term 531 sessions Half term 638 sessions

Penalty Notices & Prosecution The Common Attendance Protocol The Local Code of Conduct 2011/122012/132013/142014/15 Number of Penalty Notices issued to parents Prosecutions for Non-school attendance to date

The Referral Pathway The online EWS referral

Contact Details Education Welfare Specialists: Elaine Parker – Tina Stuart –

The next Education Directors’ Briefing is Friday 27 th November am start until 10.00am at Nottingham Racecourse