ROAD PROFILING-ROUGHNESS Presentation by Niranjan Santhirasegaram

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ride Specification – IRI Update Prepared by Joe Thomas, P.E. 11/1/06 MAAPT 53 rd Annual Asphalt Conference December 6, 2006.
Advertisements

Research | consulting | technology safety and efficiency in transport through knowledge TT1825 Mix design and field evaluation.
1 Road maintenance and construction Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time spent: 6 hrs.
Reducing Traffic Speed within Open Road Roadwork Sites using Obtrusive Perceptual COUNTERMEASURES Jesse A. Allpress & Louis S Leland, Jr Abstract Excessive.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 2 Surface Characteristics.
Detection and Measurement of Pavement Cracking Bagas Prama Ananta.
The Company ViaTech is a Norwegian Company with a comprehensive range of tailor-made products and services aimed at road, rail and airport authorities.
History Dynatest was founded in 1976 in Denmark by a group of engineers and technicians who combined  science  technology and  business into the development.
Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.
The Company ViaTech is a Norwegian Company with a comprehensive range of tailor-made products and services aimed at road, rail and airport authorities.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Basic types of condition surveys n Different.
Module 2-4 Roughness and Surface Friction Testing.
Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
Fuzzy Logic in Traffic Control State Trafic Departement Baden Württemberg realized by INFORM Software Corporation Martin Pozybill Martin Pozybill Bernhard.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES. n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of.
Bituminous Roads Deterioration
Applications of GPS to Shortest Path Algorithms and Automatic Vehicle Location Systems A Project for FRS 142 – Where’s Waldo? The Science and Application.
Odysa ® Experiences with an individual “green wave” Marcel Willekens / Arjan Bezemer / Kristiaan Langelaar.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
Complete High Speed Data Collection System
Portorož, Slovenia ADVANCED ANALYSIS FOR SINGULAR LONGITUDINAL PROFILES Alejandro Amírola SanzAlejandro Amírola Sanz Equipment research and development.
Moving to International Roughness Index Measured By Inertial Profilers for Acceptance of New Asphalt Construction in Ontario By John A. Blair, Bituminous.
SPEED DETECTION OF MOVING VEHICAL BY USING SPEED CAMERAS SUBMITTED BY: PRABHU DAYAL SINGH.
15th International Road Weather Conference February 5th - 7th, 2010 in Québec City, Canada By Naoto Takahashi*, Roberto Tokunaga* & Naoki Nishiyama **
Footer Text 3D TEXTURE MEASUREMENT Development and Field Evaluation of a Texture Measurement System Based on Continuous Profiles from a 3D Scanning Instrument.
Trucks on Motorways in the Netherlands A survey of the role of trucks in traffic flow AVV Transport Research Centre Ministry of Transport Onno Tool
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
On Low Speed Problem in Road Smoothness Profiling Vadim Peretroukhine Michael Nieminen September 28, 2011.
The use of texture in the Swedish road management Thomas Lundberg Leif Sjögren Mika Gustafsson.
Portorož, Slovenia Alex WrightAlex Wright TRL Infrastructure DivisionTRL Infrastructure Division Group manager, Technology DevelopmentGroup manager, Technology.
Portfolio Committee on Transport 9 th March 2005 SANRAL 2005/2006 BUDGET DOCS_NRA-#
JC VAN DER WALT.  Who is SANRAL?  Functions  Network  Budget Allocation  Western Region Projects for 2011/12.
User perceptions of highway roughness Kevan Shafizadeh and Fred Mannering.
Analyzing Changes to Truck Size and Weight Regulations Methods for States presented to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport presented by Donald Ludlow,
Using LTPP Data in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pavement Smoothness.
4/25/2017 9:25 AM Inertial Profiler Forum Intro to the Inertial Profiler Implementation September 28, 2015 © 2015 California Department of Transportation.
Estimation of Stone-loss on network condition surveys by use of multiple texture lasers Thomas Wahlman, Peter Ekdahl,
Portorož, Slovenia Slovenia, its roads and its expertise Bojan LebenBojan Leben NK PIARC SlovenijaNK PIARC Slovenija Chairman NK PIARC SlovenijaChairman.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
1 COMPARISON OF MPD VALUES FROM HIGH- SPEED LASER MEASUREMENTS WITH MPD FROM TWO STATIONARY DEVICES Rohan Perera, PhD, PE Soil and Materials Engineers,
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
User perceptions of highway roughness
Road Profiler User Group Conference September 19, 2013 Robert Babcock Director, Certification and Compliance Affairs Hyundai-Kia America Technical Center,
The Basics of Motorcycle Safety in Delaware. Delaware Office of Highway Safety Corporate Outreach Summer 2015.
Safer Roads Unit Wet Weather VAS at Friction Deficient Sites.
GUIDED BY PRESENTED BY LIJA.M.PAUL SHYAM.S.THAMPY LECTURER C7-51 DEPT.CIVIL.
1 By, Er. Lalrinawma Executive Engineer, W-II, ENC Office, PWD, Mizoram.
Data Collection for HDM Christopher R. Bennett EASTE.
CERTAIN workshop Kapitanivka CDV - Transport Research Centre (Czech Republic) Division of Infrastructure and Environment Dr. Josef Stryk Ass.
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
HDM-4: Pavement Deterioration Modeling and Road User Effects
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
“Analysis of Pavement Condition along Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard by Pavement Distress Approach” Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Major in Transportation.
Prepared by: 1.Jihad Ghanem 2.Fares Al kherashi 3.Hadeel Sadaqa Supervised by: Eng. Hussein Abu- Zant Dec 2015 Evaluation and Redesign of Haifa Street.
Abstract A highway traffic noise prediction model has been developed for environmental assessment in South Korea. The model is based on an outdoor sound.
Assessment of dynamic loading of bridges
8.2 Average Velocity.
UIC 518.
Transitioning to IRI for Pavement Smoothness
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
Thermal analysis Friction brakes are required to transform large amounts of kinetic energy into heat over very short time periods and in the process they.
Introduction and Applications
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Technologies and type examination
TUGS Jason Higuchi && Julia Yefimenko && Raudel mayorga
Roads and Bridges Central Laboratory University of Versailles
Average Velocity Unit 8.2.
The Use Of Hard Shoulders As A Turning Lane: A Safety Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

ROAD PROFILING-ROUGHNESS Presentation by Niranjan Santhirasegaram

FHWA’s Office of Pavement Technology Introduction “ Smooth pavement makes sense from an agency and a user perspective. It’s what the public wants, and it’s what they should have.” Mark Swanlund FHWA’s Office of Pavement Technology

Roughness What’s ‘Roughness’? Roughness is defined as a measure of surface irregularities with wavelengths between 0.5 and 100 metre in the longitudinal profile of a traffic lane.

Short Wavelength Roughness Long Wavelength Roughness

Method of Determining Roughness Site inspection by Estimations Mechanical (NAASRA roughness meter ) bump car Non contact profilometers which use accelerometers and height sensors (Laser)

NAASRA is National Association of Australian State Road Authorities Roughness Roughness Measures International Roughness Index (IRI) NAASRA Roughness Counts (NRM) Heavy Articulated Truck Ride Index (HATI) NAASRA is National Association of Australian State Road Authorities

International Roughness Index (IRI) Unit of IRI is m/km or mm/m The accumulation of suspension travel over a km of the results of the application of a computer model of a standard “quarter car” to the measured longitudinal road profile of each wheelpath. The simulated travel speed of the quarter car model is 80km/hr Unit of IRI is m/km or mm/m

Roughness What is IRI roughness ? Lane IRIqc is the composite IRI value representing the roughness of a traffic lane within a section of road. It is determined by averaging two single track IRIqc values obtained separately in each wheelpath of a lane. The IRIhc is calculated by applying the IRI algorithm to the average of the wheelpath profiles

What is NAASRA Roughness ? NAASRA Roughness (counts/km) is a measure of the dynamic response of a NAASRA standard passenger vehicle in response to two longitudinal profiles measured simultaneously.

NAASRA Roughness Counts per km (NRM) The cumulative total relative upward displacement between axle and body of a standard car, registered in units of counts per km of distance travelled at either of two principal standard speeds. 80 km/h or 50km/h. One NAASRA count corresponds to a measured axle to body displacement of 15.2 mm (measured either up or down, but not both) Each wheelpath is analysed through the “quarter-car” model to determine the Single Track IRIqc for each wheelpath for each 100m segment.

Roughness IRI values are averaged and then converted by applying the following equations Lane IRIqc = (Single Track IRIqc (inner) + Single Track IRIqc (outer) )/2 Lane IRIhc = A number calculated by applying the IRI algorithm to the average of two profiles NAASRA(counts/km) = 26.49* Lane IRIqc - 1.27. NAASRA(counts/km) half Car = 33.67 * Lane IRIhc - 1.95 PIL,PIR are left and right Profile Index HRI = 0.79IRI ( By Estimation)

Source: (Sayers and Karamihas, 1998, p. 61) Roughness Source: (Sayers and Karamihas, 1998, p. 61)

Profile based measurements available in Australasia Roughness Profile based measurements available in Australasia

Roughness Surveys Introduction Network surveys to be undertaken in the lane carrying the heaviest traffic loading, following the most common wheelpaths, and reporting roughness at intervals of 100m, either in IRI (m/km) or NRM (counts/km). (The wheelpaths are deemed to be offset 0.75m from the centreline of the lane)

Data reporting Roughness should be recorded for each 100m segment as: Lane roughness (IRIqc) in m/km to not more than two decimal places. Lane roughness in NAASRA Roughness Counts (counts/km) to the nearest whole number. The location of significant road features such as bridges, intersections, administrative borders, etc should be incorporated in roughness reports, to enable each 100m segment to be uniquely identified in terms of the road agency’s location system. Roughness reports should clearly identify the lane surveyed and the direction and speed of travel during the survey, as well as the date and weather conditions. Any impediment to the survey such as roadwork's, traffic congestion, localised wet surfaces , or obstacles that may cause lane change maneuvers should be noted.

Data reporting For each test run, the following data must be recorded: (a) Survey title / Contract Number (b) Date and Time (c) Survey Device Identification (d) Operator (e) Driver (f) Road number / Reference (g) Road Name (if applicable) (h) Test Direction (i) Test Lane (j) Start and End References (k) Intermediate Features and/or Reference Points (if applicable) (l) Any unusual occurrences (e.g. lane changes, bridge abutments, end of seal, etc.).

IRI Range Represented by Different Classes of Roads Roughness IRI Range Represented by Different Classes of Roads

Roughness Roughness values (NRM counts/km) for varying traffic ranges

Equipments to measure Roughness ROMDAS Z-250 ARAN ARRB Walking Profilometer NAASRA Bump Car Greenwood Laser profilomete Merlin

The preferred configuration of laser Profilometer Laser configuration The preferred configuration of laser Profilometer Photos source: Austroads. 2007

Roughness

Contributing Factors to Roughness 1 Water ingress Further cracking Patches Shear Uneven surface Spalling Faster deformation ROUGHNESS Potholes Time Surface Lower strength Area of Cracking Rut depth

Frequency and scope of Roughness surveys.

Roughness Roughness information can be used for one or more of three main purposes. Road network condition monitoring ( including performance measures) Project level analysis (e.g, life cycle costing, & quality assessment of new works.) Network level analysis (e.g., deterioration modeling & Forward works program) Research ( e.g, development of models, truck ride indicators.)

Roughness information is also used to assist in Assessing the suitability of a road for its users. Assessing the relative condition of distinct roads and networks. Monitoring changes of road condition over time. Predicting the cost of travelling on the road.

THANK YOU Roughness A Smoother Ride In addition to influencing driver satisfaction, pavement smoothness affects driver safety and mobility. Smoother roads increase fuel efficiency and decrease vehicle wear. THANK YOU