Building an Integrated Ocean Color Sensor Web at the Land-Sea Interface UCSC UARC/ARC Ames GSFC BSI SARP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Richard Young Optronic Laboratories Kathleen Muray INPHORA
Advertisements

Data Quality Issues Cabled observatories will produce long time series of real time physical ocean data -- revealing: –Trends –Long-period fluctuations.
Y. V. Tarakanchikova, L. E. Dolotov, A. P. Popov, A. V. Bykov, V. V
7. Beer’s Law and It’s Implications for Instrument Construction.
Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
Calibration and Status of MOBY Dennis Clark, NOAA/NESDIS Carol Johnson, NIST Steve Brown, NIST Mark Yarbrough, MLML Stephanie Flora, MLML Mike Feinholz,
Atmospheric scatterers
ASIC3 WorkshopLandsdowne, VA May 16-18, 2006 J. Harder Page 1 Calibration Status of the Solar Irradiance Monitor (SIM) : The Present and the Future Jerald.
NOAA Research and Operations Marine Optical Buoy Design Review July 18-19, 2006 Plan for calibration and maintenance of AHAB Uncertainty Budget: Laboratory.
Improving Uncertainties of Non-Contact Thermometry Measurements Mark Finch Fluke Calibration.
Effects of Fluorescence Self Absorption of Algae in Sea Water Candy Barbaran Annie Becerra Mentors: Prof. Fred Moshary Dr. Alex Gilerson NYCRI C N p.
HyperPro II Optical Profiler Deployment and data processing Geoff MacIntyre May 15, 2014.
Verifying the Use of Specific Conductance as a Surrogate for Chloride in Seawater Matrices Rob Mooney Technical Marketing Manager In-Situ ® Inc.
Tel: +44 (0) Turbidity Application and Product Data.
Work Package 2 / 3 TECHNOLOGICAL & PROCEDURAL HARMONISATION FixO3 General Assembly 14 th to the 16 th October 2014, Heraklion-CRETE ESTOC, PLOCAN,
Data Processing of IOP Packages Attenuation, Absorption and Backscattering c, a, b b Ian Walsh, Ph.D. Director of Science, Sea-Bird Scientific.
The IOCCG Atmospheric Correction Working Group Status Report The Eighth IOCCG Committee Meeting Department of Animal Biology and Genetics University.
Predicting Engine Exhaust Plume Spectral Radiance & Transmittance
Physical limnology WETA151 L6b Instruments. 9/14/2015 WETS150 Timo Huttula 2 ConductivityTemperatureDepth-probe.
Measuring pressure. Conductivity, Temperature and Depth (CTD) Despite the name, all CTDs actually measure pressure, which is not quite the same thing.
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Level-2 ocean color data processing basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight.
Solar Energy Part 1: Resource San Jose State University FX Rongère January 2009.
Norm Nelson, UCSB Chantal Swan, UCSB / ETH with assistance of: Julia Gauglitz, Teresa Serrano Catala, Erica Aguilera UltraPath in the Oligotrophic Ocean.
Salinometer Thermosalinograph (TSG) CTD
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Soe Hlaing *, Alex Gilerson, Samir Ahmed Optical Remote Sensing Laboratory, NOAA-CREST The City College of the City University of New York 1 A Bidirectional.
An Introduction to Radiometry: Taking Measurements, Getting Closure, and Data Applications Part I: Guide to Radiometric Measurements (See Video)
File Name: Turbidity.pptFeb 2001 Turbidity & Suspended Solids Overview.
SCM 330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Turbidity Measurement By Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E. Water/Wastewater Consultant To UTEP Laboratory Course On February 21, 2006.
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments – Initial Results from Fast Thermometer Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, John Pulsifer HAPL.
Atmospheric Correction for Ocean Color Remote Sensing Geo 6011 Eric Kouba Oct 29, 2012.
Optical Measurements & K d values Elizabeth Cox 29 November 2010.
Apparent Optical Properties (AOPs) Curtis D. Mobley University of Maine, 2007 (ref: Light and Water, Chapters 3 & 5)
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
DECam Daily Flatfield Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
Backscattering Lab Julia Uitz Pauline Stephen Wayne Slade Eric Rehm.
Preliminary results and uncertainties of scattering measurements for SORTIE Michael Twardowski 1, Scott Freeman, Jim Sullivan, Ron Zaneveld, Chuck Trees,
1 Reflected Solar Calibration Demonstration System - SOLARIS K. Thome, D. Jennings, B. McAndrew, J. McCorkel, P. Thompson NASA/GSFC.
Radiative Coupling in the Oceans using MODIS-Aqua Ocean Radiance Data Watson Gregg, Lars Nerger Cecile Rousseaux NASA/GMAO Assimilate MODIS-Aqua Water-Leaving.
CALCON September B. Carol Johnson, Steven W. Brown and Howard W. Yoon National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD Radiometric.
Radiometry and Uncertainties from SORTIE (Spectral Ocean Radiance Transfer Investigation and Experiment) Kenneth Voss and Howard Gordon, Univ. of Miami.
SeaWiFS Calibration & Validation Strategy & Results Charles R. McClain SeaWiFS Project Scientist NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center February 11, 2004.
Status of MOBY and Future Plans Dennis Clark Carol Johnson, NIST Steve Brown, NIST Mark Yarbrough, MLML Stephanie Flora, MLML Mike Feinholz, MLML.
Building an Integrated Ocean Color Sensor Web at the Land-Sea Interface UCSC UARC/ARC Ames GSFC BSI SARP.
Polarization analysis in MODIS Gerhard Meister, Ewa Kwiatkowska, Bryan Franz, Chuck McClain Ocean Biology Processing Group 18 June 2008 Polarization Technology.
Stray Light or Spectral Out-of-Band in MOS/MOBY Steve Brown & Carol Johnson (NIST) Michael Feinholz & Stephanie Flora (MLML) Jim Mueller (CHORS)
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.
Hydrolight Lab: Part 1 July 18th, 2013.
DATA PROCESSING & ANALYSIS. DATA ANALYSIS ADDITIONAL DATA PROCESSING Dark Corrections Interpolate to bins of wavelengths Quality Control (tilting corrections,
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Vision of the Brillouin lidar operated from a helicopter. The center ray represents.
Lab 4 Scattering. Samples: Platymonas * Chaetoceros * Arizona 'Dust' *Wikipedia Damariscotta River Estuary.
Satlantic HyperPro II Freefalling hyperspectral radiometer Can be deployed in “floater” mode 16 bit ADC at 12 Hz (maximum) 0 - ~100 m depth rating, descent.
E d ( ) L u ( ) c = a + b b tot = b f + b b IOP- Inherent optical property eg. absorption (a), scattering (b), attenuation (c) AOP- Apparent optical property.
RP-16, Verification of Laboratory Environments Presented by: Doug Cooper TAC.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.
Cruise Data: Initial Investigations. Above water radiometry measurements 7/25/2013.
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Group Presentation, July 17, 2013
Water-vapor contamination on Prelaunch SRF measurements
Energy Flow Concept Image Sensor Energy Source
DATA PROCESSING & ANALYSIS
Hydrolight and Ecolight
Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.
AC-9/AC-S data analysis from CDOM Lab
Radiation in the Atmosphere
Turbidity - “A Quantum Leap in Technology” Southwest Section AWWA
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics , Chinese Academy of Science
Presentation transcript:

Building an Integrated Ocean Color Sensor Web at the Land-Sea Interface UCSC UARC/ARC Ames GSFC BSI SARP

1. The primary geophysical data product(s) they are responsible for, e.g., the normalized water-leaving radiance, denoted here as [Lw]n. 2. The governing equation to produce the geophysical data product(s), e.g., [Lw]n = Fo*[0.54*Lu(0-)/Es]. 3. The measurements used to produce the primary data product(s), e.g., Lu, Ed, and Es (or Li, Lt, and Es). 4. The corrections applied to the measurements, e.g., self-shading, bidirectionality, Earth-Sun distance, etc. 5. Objective constraints applied during the data processing scheme, e.g., tilt filtering, Es normalization, Es convergence, etc. 6. Subjective constraints applied during the data processing scheme, e.g., determination of an extrapolation interval, etc. 7. The laboratory characterizations of the instruments, e.g., NIST-traceable calibration, immersion factor, stray light, etc. 8. The field characterizations of the instruments, e.g., dark currents, pressure tares, etc. 9. The uncertainty in the data product under the usual data sampling conditions, e.g., clear sky. 10. The publication(s) that document the protocols for laboratory characterizations, data acquisition, data processing, etc.

WET Labs ac-s 25 cm absorption (a) and attenuation (c) meter ~100 m depth rating, descent rate ~ 0.5 m/s Connected to dedicated SeaBird MicroCAT CTD nm, 4 nm resolution 4 Hz sampling rate Accuracy from.001 – 10 m -1 (depends on wavelength) 1)Primary geophysical parameters: spectral absorption and attenuation (m -1 ) 2)Primary Products: same (can be deployed with a filter to get CDOM but we don’t usually do that because of time constraints)

WET Labs ac-s Corrections: – Clean-water calibration – Water temperature and salinity corrections – Reflective tube scattering correction – Offset between gratings corrected – Data binned to depth (typically 0.5 m) – Generally use down-cast only

WET Labs ac-s Objective Constraints: – Various corrections applied – Absorption compared to discrete CDOM measurements – Does not require ambient light Subjective Constraints: – Grating offset – Comparison of data with “expected” values

WET Labs ac-s Lab Characterization – Vendor calibration/maintenance – Thermal correction, spectral corrections from CAL files – Air and pure water calibration Field Characterization – Deploy to 10 m, bring to surface (bubble purge) – Deploy at ~0.5 m/s (higher resolution) – Can let sit at a fixed depth to time-average data – Air Calibration (basically useless) – Water calibration daily

WET Labs ac-s Uncertainty – Data quality questionable below ~450 nm and strongly temperature dependent above ~600 nm – Calibration errors, drift, fouling of tubes, bubbles – 25 cm pathlength is ideal for Case 1, can lead to errors in highly turbid or high-biomass waters – No Attenuation Acceptance Angle correction – Sensitive to abrupt changes in T, S Publications – Manuals from WET Labs – Many (many) peer-reviewed publications – We generally follow the protocols developed by NRL