…or a compact cyclotron to accelerate

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE SMALL ISOCHRONOUS RING PROJECT AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY J. Alberto Rodriguez.
Advertisements

Cairo University Electrical Engineering – Faculty of Engineering Cyclotrons Yasser Nour El-Din Mohammed Group 2 - Accelerators and Applications Supervisors.
ECPM 2006, Nice, France, 2-4 November DESIGN STUDIES OF THE 300AMEV SUPERCONDUCTING CYCLOTRON FOR HADRONTHERAPY Mario Maggiore Laboratori Nazionali.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 1 DESIGN STUDY OF MEDICAL CYCLOTRON SCENT300 Mario Maggiore on behalf of R&D Accelerator team Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
XXXVIII th Rencontres de Moriond MORIOND WORKSHOP ON Radioactive beams for nuclear physics and neutrino physics Acceleration of RIB using cyclotrons Guido.
Proposed injection of polarized He3+ ions into EBIS trap with slanted electrostatic mirror* A.Pikin, A. Zelenski, A. Kponou, J. Alessi, E. Beebe, K. Prelec,
Carbon Injector for FFAG
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Simultaneous Delivery of Parallel Proton Beams with the EURISOL Driver
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
SPECIALISED CYCLOTRON FOR BEAM THERAPY APPLICATION Yu. G. Alenitsky, A
Design of FFAG-ERIT 05/12/07 Kota Okabe (KEK) for FFAG-DDS group.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
FFAG Accelerators for Proton Driver Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France April 12-17, 2007.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
ICIS2015 in NY Y.HIGURASHI Y. Higurashi (RIKEN Nishina center) 1.Introduction RIKEN RIBF and RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS 2.Emittance measurements 1.4D.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Rob Edgecock, Roger Barlow, David Bruton, Basil Gonsalves, Carol Johnstone & Jordan Taylor Industrial partners: GE & Tesla Compact High Current FFAG for.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Radioactive Ion Beams CW 0.5 MW (for protons) 1 GeV (for protons) p to U Chiara, Manuel, Adam, HuiMay 2011, CAS, Bilbao.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Direct measurement of the 4 He( 12 C, 16 O)  cross section near stellar energy Kunihiro FUJITA K. Sagara, T. Teranishi, T. Goto, R. Iwabuchi, S. Matsuda,
Cyclotrons Chapter 2 Basic Longitunal dynamics Acceleration Injection Extraction 1.
Cyclotrons Chapter 3 RF modelisation and computation B modelisation and computation Beam transport computation 1.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Accelerators and Sources Report from Discussion Session Jose Alonso 1.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Beam Measurements After the Sources at the Ion Source Test Stand Including H 2, N 2 and Kr Gas Injection R Scrivens, Linac 4 10/04/2014 Lots of input from.
F D F November 8, 2006Alessandro G. Ruggiero1 of GeV 10-MWatt Proton Driver Target 200-MeV DTL 1.0-GeV FFAG H – Stripping Foil Injection Energy,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Cyclone 70 IBA Radiopharma’s high energy, high current cyclotron.
PS-ESS and LEBT State of the art Lorenzo Neri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
Recycler Injection with Carbon Foils Dave Johnson, Alexandr Drozhdin, Leonid Vorobiev September 8, 2010 Project X Collaboration Meeting.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Bunching system for SPES project
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
High Current Cyclotrons for Future Neutrino Experiments
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Summary & Concluding remarks
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Calibration simulation for 14N5+ ion acceleration regime
Physics Design on Injector I
11 MeV/u 16O7+ ion acceleration
E.Perepelkin and S.Vorozhtsov
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Presentation transcript:

…or a compact cyclotron to accelerate The IsoDAR Cyclotron …or a compact cyclotron to accelerate H2+, Deuteron+,- and fully stripped light ions Luciano Calabretta, INFN-LNS, Catania, Italy Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Accelerator Requirements IsoDAR Energy: Efficient production of neutrons in beryllium target (desired reaction is 7Li(n,g)8Li) 40÷80 MeV Beam species: beam on target: protons or deuterons Beam intensity: calculated to provide statistics in 5 year experiment – 10 mA Time structure: No timing requirements, so want greatest possible on-time (for statistics) Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Problems to deliver10 mA proton with Cyclotrons: - Injection Central region: space-charge blowup Energy is low (~ 30 ÷ 80 keV) Current is high (~ x5 higher than today values) Electrostatic forces hard to contain High “Perveance” value: (measure of space-charge forces) K ∝ I (q/m) (bg)-3 Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Acceleration of H2+ ions high intensity proton beam Proposed solution: Acceleration of H2+ ions to produce high intensity proton beam Two protons for every ion (1 emA = 2 pmA). The Generalized Perveance measures the space charge effect and it is defined by the Reiser’s formula: Perveance of 5 emA H2+ at 35 keV/amu same as 2 emA of 30 keV protons axial injection of 2 emA protons at 30 keV is an upper limit Extraction with stripping foil may be is feasible. It requires a high-acceptance extraction channel but not a clean turn separation. May be there is a problem with the life time of stripper foil Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

D- p+ n D+ Regarding space charge acceleration of D+ ions is similar to accelerate H2+ e- D- p+ n D+ 1 Deuteron for every ion. The Generalized Perveance measures the space charge effect and it is defined by the Reiser’s formula: Perveance of 1 emA D+ or D- at 35 keV/amu same as 0.4 emA of 30 keV protons axial injection of 2 emA protons at 30 keV is an upper limit Use of D+ is convenient to minimize the beam losses along the acceleration and due to interaction with the residual gas! Use of D- is convenient for the extraction! But vacuum problems! A Cyclotron for H2+ is usable for D+ and also for D- Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Electrostatic Deflectors This is one of the two coils of ISODAR extraction trajectory for H2+ or D+ Despite we extract just one beam, Anyway 4 extraction channel are drilled in the iron yoke to maintain the symmetry of the magnetic field! The RF Cavity in this layout have an angular width of 30°, in the final project could be larger, about 40÷44°, MC1 MC2 RF Cavity Equilibrium Orbit Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

DAEδALUS Injector Cyclotron: Peak current 5 mA H2+ , <I>= 1mA Einj 35 AkeV Emax 61.7 AMeV B0 1.075 T <B> at Rext 1.166 T <Rinj> 51.58 mm <Rext> 2000 mm N. Sectors 4 Hill width 25.5° ÷ 36.5° Valley gap 1800 mm Hill gap 100 mm Diameter 6240 mm Full height 2700 mm N. Cavities Cavities λ/2 Double gap RF Harmonic 4th RF frequency 32.8 MHz Acc. Voltage 70  250 kV Power/cavity <160 kW Coil size 200x250 mm2 Current density 3.17 A/mm2 up to 44°! Equilibrium Orbit IsoDAR cyclotron Ipeak= <I> =5 mA H2+ arXiv.org > physics > arXiv:1207.4895 Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Beam Extraction of H2+ from IsoDar Cyclotron by stripper is not convenient because the beam size is larger than > 10 mm! Electrons are the main source of stripper damage. In fact, 600 kW beam @ 60 AMeV on a stripper foil 0.2 mg/cm2 thick means < 4 W due to nuclear interaction, while the electrons removed by the strippers have a full power of 600 kW*Me/MH2=600/(2*1826)=164 W ! Electrons have to be stopped before they strike the stripper! For D- beam with maximum current of 1 mA, maximum power on the stripper foil is about 66 W! It is anyway quite high! For acceleration of D- the main drawback is the beam losses during acceleration and activation of the cyclotron! Stripper foil emerging protons H2+ beam electrons catcher If B=0.4 T Re=4.5 mm Break Comunque, a parita di energia di fascio incidente ed a parita di protoni estratti diciamo 100 protoni estratti, nel caso di H2+ abbiamo strippato 50 elettroni, mentre nel caso di H- ne abbiamo strippato 200! é l'energia degli elettroni che danneggia primariamente lo stripper. Un'altra considerazione per sapere quanto vale l'energia degli elettroni strippati. Per un fascio di 100 MeV di H- l'energia di ciascun elettrone strippato è di 1/2000 quindi di 50 keV, pertanto l'energia dei due elettroni strippati è di 100 keV. Nel caso di H2+ da 100 MeV/amu (protoni finali sempre da 100 MeV), l'energia dell'elettrone strippato è ancora di 50 keV, ma a fronte di estrarre due protoni da 100 MeV. In potenza se estraiamo un fascio di protoni da 100 kW accelerati con H-, la potenza degli elettroni strippati è di 100W, mentre se lo abbiamo accelerato con H2+ la potenza degli elettroni strippati è di solo 25 W! Center of Cyclotron Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

stripping process for H2+: H2+ =(p+p+e)  p, p, e Beam Extraction of D- from IsoDar Cyclotron by stripper seems feasible! But I don’t like D- for the beam losses during acceleration! Electrons are the main source of stripper damage. In fact, 120 kW beam @ 60 AMeV 1 mA on a stripper foil 0.2 mg/cm2 thick means < 0.2 W due to nuclear interaction, while the electrons removed by stripper have a full power of 120 kW*2Me/MH2=120/(1826)=66 W ! stripping process for H2+: H2+ =(p+p+e)  p, p, e is a one step process: stripping process for H-: H- =(p+e+e)  p, e, e is a two steps process: (p+e+e) H + e  p, e, e Break Comunque, a parita di energia di fascio incidente ed a parita di protoni estratti diciamo 100 protoni estratti, nel caso di H2+ abbiamo strippato 50 elettroni, mentre nel caso di H- ne abbiamo strippato 200! é l'energia degli elettroni che danneggia primariamente lo stripper. Un'altra considerazione per sapere quanto vale l'energia degli elettroni strippati. Per un fascio di 100 MeV di H- l'energia di ciascun elettrone strippato è di 1/2000 quindi di 50 keV, pertanto l'energia dei due elettroni strippati è di 100 keV. Nel caso di H2+ da 100 MeV/amu (protoni finali sempre da 100 MeV), l'energia dell'elettrone strippato è ancora di 50 keV, ma a fronte di estrarre due protoni da 100 MeV. In potenza se estraiamo un fascio di protoni da 100 kW accelerati con H-, la potenza degli elettroni strippati è di 100W, mentre se lo abbiamo accelerato con H2+ la potenza degli elettroni strippati è di solo 25 W! stripping process for D- : D- =(D+e+e)  D+ , e, e is a two steps process: (D+ +e+e) D, e  D+, e, e Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Beam dynamics in DAEδALUS Injector Cyclotron Simulation made by J. Yang and A. Adelman @ PSI, using OPAL code. rms 61.7 MeV/n 1 MeV/n Beam size rms Vertical beam size vs. turns number for different beam currents Beam size acceptable! Initial normalized emittance is 0.6 p mm.mrad! Realistic normalized beam emittance inside the cyclotron 1 p mm.mrad. Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Rms Beam size along the acceleration path (on the left) and rms beam size along the last two turns (on the rigth) The first turn start at 1 AMeV The first turn start at 1 AMeV and the rms normalized emittance in both radial and vertical plane was 0.6 p mm.mrad The phase acceptance and the energy spread are ±10° RF and ±0.2% Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 Inter-turn separation vs. <R> just due to RF cavity acceleration! E=60 AMeV E=40 A first harmonic precession is able to increase the inter-turn separation at extraction radius up to 20 mm! Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Be careful! The rms beam size could be misleading! Beam dynamics in DAEδALUS Injector Cyclotron Beam injection Deflector septum 0.5 mm width Be careful! The rms beam size could be misleading! Extraction efficiency 99.98%, if beam power is 600 kW on the septum 120 W! 14 mm 20 mm Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 E=40 AMeV  <R>=163 cm ; E=60 AMeV  <R>=199 cm <R> [cm] Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Extraction process for H2+ Safe! Stripper at Teta=0° If stripper position is between -65° and -10 ° spiral code is not able to evaluate the trajectory and beam envelope. Simulation made with OPERA The vertical beam halo is ±10 cm, at this point Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 May be also for D+ beam could be possible to protect the deflector septum. May be the beam envelope of the removed halo could be also smaller in vertical, but we need to perform additional simulation. Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 Outer radius of pole  220 cm Inner radius of yoke  252 cm Inner radis of coil  225 cm Outer radius of coil 250 cm Distance yoke surface below the coil from median plane 31 cm Coil distance from median plane  10.5 cm. yoke skirt valley hill upper part 31 cm Cyclotron Center 252 cm 220 cm hill Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

RF Cavity shape and surface H field Courtesy by Michel Abs Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 E field Courtesy by Michel Abs Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 Coupling to the cavity It is proposed to couple the power in the median plane via a quarter wave resonant line The voltage on the RF tube is independent of the load (beam loading) No fine tuning is needed on the amp side (reactive currents flow to the cavity) Leaves the bottom of the cyclotron free to place ion source and vacuum pumps. Clearly the cheapest option Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Dee voltage law vs radius Scaling Voltage up to 240 kV Power increase up to 160 kW. Beam loading per cavity 150kW Courtesy by Michel Abs Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Main mechanical parameters Cavity height: 1800mm Radial extension: 2100mm Liner angular aperture: 38° Dee angle: 34° Inner Dee vertical gap: 50mm (100mm in the outer radius for deflector location) Dee plate thickness: 20mm Dee stems dia.(4/ Dee)= 200/120mm Dee stiffener: 50mm width 46° 42° Courtesy by Michel Abs Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Electrical parameters Unloaded Q= 9540 (theoretical) Main mode resonance frequency: 32.7MHz Hmax: 6900A/m Surface resistance: 1.53mOhms Max surface dissipation: 3.6W/cm² Courtesy by Michel Abs Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Cryogenic panel and/or NEG panel are mandatory! *RF Voltage constant=225 kV  109 turns Vacuum is challenging! Cryogenic panel and/or NEG panel are mandatory! Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Cryogenic panel and/or NEG panel are mandatory! 80 60 40 20 *RF Voltage constant=225 kV  109 turns Vacuum is challenging! Cryogenic panel and/or NEG panel are mandatory! Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 80 60 40 20 *RF Voltage constant=225 kV  109 turns Vacuum is not serious! Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Ion Source, Injection Tests How much H2+ can we get from a proton source? (VIS Catania) How much can we capture in central region? Tests performed at Best Cyclotron Systems development Lab, Vancouver BC, Summer 2014 Beam Stop Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

VIS Source Allison emittance scanner collimator, beamstop Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 Observations Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Summary of tests at BEST site in Vancouver Transport maximum 10 mA of H2+ to cyclotron, focus beam at entrance to spiral inflector. Size: 8 mm (2-rms) Emittance: 1.2 π-mm-mrad (4-rms, normalized, 86% of beam) Transport 95% of beam through spiral inflector Accelerate 100 µA for four turns in test cyclotron, but RF Voltage <60 kV Conclusion: Have good simulation tools in hand Conclusion: Need more current. How? Either better source or higher bunching efficiency Pursue both: Build new ion source (multicusp) Develop RFQ direct cyclotron injection design Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 Results to Date √ Characterize VIS source for H2+ - Max current : 12 mA… we need much more! - Emittance : ~ Twice larger than expected √ Test beam line for separation of protons/H2+~OK Inflection/capture in test cyclotron : RF Voltage <60 kV, instead of the 70 kV required! Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Inflector tested up to +/-13.5 kV reliable! The main difference between the Test site used in Vancouver and IsoDAR cyclotron is the number of RF cavities ( 4 for IsoDAR instead of 2 in the test site) and the Harmonic mode (4th for IsoDAR instead of 6th for the test stand). The injection energy was 60 keV! The test of the spiral inflector (15 mm gap) demonstrate that it works with +/-10 kV, when a 60 keV H2+ is injected! Inflector tested up to +/-13.5 kV reliable! It will be possible to inject H2+ with energy of 75-80 keV. In this way the emittance should reduce of a factor 12-15%! Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

The new injection beam line for H2+, including a RF buncher Will be build by MIT Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Alternative option to deliver H2+ >30 mA: RFQ in Test Beam Line Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 What have we learned? Existing Ion source for H2+ stay in the territory 15-30 mA; Is convenient to work with Bunching Gain Efficiency as high as possible; ISODAR has an acceptance phase double than PSI injector 2; With H2+ source delivering 30 mA, a bunching efficiency >3 is convenient; The use of Isodar cyclotron to delyver 1 mA D+ beam is feasible For a maximum energy of 40 AMeV the extraction radius should stay at 1.63 m, 15% smaller than IsoDAR cyclotron; Many problem of IsoDAR cyclotron are relaxed! Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

The use of Isodar cyclotron to delyver 1 mA D+ beam is feasible For a maximum energy of 40 AMeV the extraction radius should stay at 1.63 m, 15% smaller than IsoDAR cyclotron; Many problem of IsoDAR cyclotron are relaxed! The main advise to use IsoDAR cyclotron to accelerate Deuteron concerns the activation of the cyclotron itself and in particular of the RF Cavities copper made. May be the activation could be reduced covering all the surfaces of the median plane with 5-10 mm thick graphite layer or Aluminum! This layer prevent the production of bad radioisotope of cupper. Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Thanks for your attention! Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 Range of 40 MeV proton in Uranium target 1.85 mm Range of 40 MeV Deuteron in Uranium target  1.18 mm Range of 40 AMeV Deuteron in Uranium target  3.77 mm Gain a factor 1.6 due to cross section, + a factor 2 for double range, + a x factor due to the secondary neutron production and the fragments are more neutron rich! 40 AMeV 60 AMeV Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015

Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015 Range 3.77 mm D @ 40 MeV D @ 80 MeV 500 microA  40 kW Range 1.85 mm p @ 40 MeV 500 microA  20 kW p @ 80 MeV Workshop on Compact Cyclotron for H.P., RIKEN, 26-Juin-2015