New and Alternative Directions in Scholarly Publishing: The Berkeley Electronic Press Experience Tim Tamminga 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

ARL Authors’ Rights and the Library’s Role Karla Hahn Director, Office of Scholarly Communication Association of Research Libraries
University of Sydney – Academic Forum – 13 April 2005 John Shipp University Librarian THE FUTURE OF THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY CHANGES IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION.
Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives California Digital Library Scholarly Publishing at University of California ———— An.
When a Society journal changes publisher… Ian Russell Chief Executive Designate Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
Scholarly Publishing: Why service is poor, prices are high, and what can be done by Aaron.
If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.
1 Digital Commons - Overview. 2 “Digital My University” l Digital Commons is ProQuest’s Institutional Repository offering, powered by bepress.
California Digital Library eScholarship Update Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly Communication University.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
UCSF Library and The Center for Knowledge Management November 2005 THE COST OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION Karen Butter University Librarian Presentation to.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
California Digital Library eScholarship Repository Int’l Conference on Digital Institutional Repositories 9-10 December 2004, Hong Kong Catherine H.Candee.
Future Scientific Journals Anna Lundén Library and Information Science, M.Sc. EBSCO Information Services Helsinki, 8 October 2004.
TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.
New Crossroads Transitions & Transformations Science Librarians in the 21st Century Mary M. Case University of Illinois at Chicago.
Trends in Online Publishing New Pricing Models for 2003 as Online Dominates Print John Ben DeVette Asst. Vice President EBSCO Information Services November.
The impact of the development of institutional repositories on “Kiyo” or institutional research journals in Japan Hiroya Takeuchi and Syun Tutiya Chiba.
Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). Bepress history Started 10 years ago by University of California at Berkeley faculty to publish scholarly journals.
Open Access: An Introduction Edward Shreeves Director, Collections and Content Development University of Iowa Libraries
IEEE 4 October 2000 National Taiwan University A Society Publisher Looks at 21st Century Scientific Publishing 4 October 2000 National Taiwan University.
Herding dinosaurs? Scholarly publishing in a rapidly changing environment.
Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The "Toddler Years" for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories Greg Tananbaum President The.
University Libraries Library Systems Office. Life on MARS Mason Archival Repository Service Dorothea Salo Digital Repository Services Librarian Library.
UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco October 2004 Scholarly Communication – Impact on Libraries.
Open Access: The revolution in academic publishing Henry Hagedorn Editor, Journal of Insect Science Department of Entomology and Office of Scholarly Communication.
Current Scholarship Program Today’s scholarship is coming to JSTOR Mary Rose Muccie Director, Current Journals Program JSTOR
JSTOR Current Scholarship Program: Current Issues and e-Books Ken DiFiore, MLS Associate Director Outreach & Participation Services JSTOR | Portico.
California Digital Library eScholarship Publishing Services CDL Users Council Meeting, May 9, 2008 Catherine Mitchell Acting Director, Publishing Group.
Seminar on Scholarly Communication and the UC Community University of California Office of Systemwide Library Planning Fall 2003.
Duke University Press Vendor Relations Session ICOLC Spring 2008 Meeting April 15, 2008 Donna Blagdan, Journals Marketing Manager Kim Steinle, Library.
OSI and eIFL’s Work to Spread Open Access in Developing Countries International Seminar Open Access for Developing Countries Salvador-Bahia, Brazil September.
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Kay Vyhnanek Faculty Senate Library Committee Presentation April 5, 2007 The Ongoing Transformation.
Pricing and Paying for Scientific Information during a Period of Transition Madeleine McPherson
A Publisher’s Perspective on Academic Publishing in the Digital Era Dr Frances Pinter
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals Berlin March 2006.
Smathers Libraries in Support of UF Research and Scholarship: Open Access and The Presentation to the Latin American Studies Colloquium, March 17,
Scholarly Communication in a Knowledge-Based Economy John Houghton Centre for Strategic Economic Studies Victoria University, Melbourne
Dartmouth College Library COL 1 Scholarly Communication: Threats, Problems and Opportunities Presentation to the Council on Libraries Dartmouth.
Copyright transfer in a transitional time: Karla Hahn, Ph.D. Collection Management Team Leader University of Maryland Libraries A perspective.
Are academic journals becoming obsolete? Ted Bergstrom University of California, Santa Barbara.
A new breed of publisher: towards open global sharing Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information.
Towards Electronic Journals Carol Tenopir And Donald W. King
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries - What Libraries Are Doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
California Digital Library eScholarship: a UC Publishing Initiative Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly.
Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Publishing within the Institutional Repository (IR) Tim Tamminga, The Berkeley Electronic Press ALA Midwinter
Scholarly Publishing and IRs Tim Tamminga Alison Denby ALA July 12, 2009.
Institutional Repositories for Medical Schools Tim Tamminga Bepress.
Digital Commons digitalcommons.unl.edu. Digital Commons is: an “institutional repository” (IR) a resource for scholarly communication an opportunity for.
Update on Open Access & Activities at Penn State Presentation for Faculty Senate Committee on Libraries, Information Systems, and Technology (LIST) Linda.
Bepress Session – ALA Midwinter, Philadelphia Supporting Undergraduate Success; Institutional Repositories as curricular tools Teresa A. Fishel January.
TELL US WHAT YOU WANT TO DO Jonathan Bull DCGLUG Annual Meeting August 8 – 9, 2013 Utilizing the Institutional Repository to Create an Experiential Learning.
The Institutional Repository and the Institution’s Mission Tim Tamminga, VP Global Sales The Berkeley Electronic Press.
Hosting of Open Access Titles: Why and How for Libraries Wendy Robertson The University of Iowa Libraries ILA/ACRL Spring.
Catching the Wave: Academic Library as Scholarly Publisher Tim Tamminga bepress.
Talking about the Scholarship Repository June 21, 2016 Charlotte Roh, University of San Francisco.
The New Now: Institutional Repositories and Academia Institutional Repository USM April 17, 2015 Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian.
Visibility Matters Dave Stout, Sales Director Open Access Week Wayne State University October, 2011.
An Overview of Digital Lingnan University Tommy Yeung 19 April 2012.
Resolution Concerning Scholarly Publishing Alternatives and Authors’ Rights Passed by the UW Faculty Senate, April WHEREAS, the primary mission of.
Digital Commons: a suite of services Tim Tamminga.
Are academic journals becoming obsolete?
Information Resources Strategy: Continuing to Provide the Resources You Need Fall 2016.
Combining Scholarly Publishing and Institutional Repositories
Introduction: First, a bit of information about Berkeley Electronic Press, aka bepress. We were founded ten years ago by 4 faculty members from U.C. Berkeley. 
So what is Digital Commons?
Digital Commons: showcasing undergraduate research
Presentation transcript:

New and Alternative Directions in Scholarly Publishing: The Berkeley Electronic Press Experience Tim Tamminga 2010

Bepress history

Berkeley Electronic Press

Bepress has two primary activities: Scholarly journal publishing Bepress journals list Bepress journals list Software developed to promote scholarly communications (Digital Commons) DC journals DC sites DC journalsDC sites

Journals

Traditional scholarly publishing and tenure

25,000 active scholarly peer-reviewed journals, collectively publishing about 1.5 million articles a year Between 8000 to 8500 of these are owned by commercial publishers Almost 5000 journals are published by these publishers on behalf of societies and associations There are about 9,000 non-commercial journals There are almost 2500 journals published within universities & colleges, e.g., department titles, editor-driven, student run law reviews, managed titles and titles held smaller societies “The stm report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journals publishing,” Mark Ware. Sept 2009

Print vs electronic The vast majority of STM journals are now available online, with 96% of STM and 87% of arts, humanities and social sciences journals accessible electronically in The average cost of publishing an article in a subscription-based journal with print and electronic editions was estimated by a RIN/CEPA 2008 study to be $3800 (excluding non-cash peer review costs). The study estimated that eliminating print editions would save about $1.5 billion globally. There’s incentive to eliminate print journals. “The stm report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journals publishing,” Mark Ware. Sept 2009

Publishing cycle “The stm report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journals publishing,” Mark Ware. Sept 2009

Peer-review All the major publishers use an online article submission system and peer-review process even if the result is a print journal An international survey of journal editors conducted in late 2007 reported that 76% of journal editors were using online submission systems on their journals Journals without electronic submission and peer-review tend to be published by small publishers and societies, and they are struggling to survive

Benefit of e-journals Electronic journals support new types of impact measurements, i.e., usage or download counts. Authors can get reports of how many people are reading their articles and where these readers come from

Incentives for libraries to favor electronic journals The very low marginal costs of electronic distribution have allowed publishers to offer access to sets of journals (up to and including the complete output of the publisher) for relatively small additional license fees compared to the previous total print subscriptions at the institution. No requirement for physical facilities.

Business model for commercial journals The “Big Deal” and similar discounted packages have been extremely successful in widening researchers’ access to journals while simultaneously reducing the average cost per subscription and the average cost per article download. “The stm report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journals publishing,” Mark Ware. Sept 2009 Although the bundle model is under pressure from librarians (e.g. for reasons of inflexibility, lack of control or outdated pricing models) its benefits appear sufficient for it to remain the dominant business model for some time

Scholarly Publishing: In Crisis?

Historical perspective Scholarly publishing was largely based on the principle of gifts: authors give their treatises to others in exchange for access to theirs. In the 1960s, commercial publishers began to produce scholarly journals and charge prices that produced a profit for them. This profit motive now drives many scholarly societies as well David Shulenburger, Vice President for Academic Affairs, National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges (NASULGC), in the closing keynote, SPARC Digital Repositories meeting, November 2008

Publishing today “Vice Chancellors for Research and Deans are witnessing the gradual diminution of publishing options and opportunities for UC faculty, particularly in the arts and humanities.” “Junior faculty are beginning to struggle to get the book contracts they need for tenure and promotion; faculty working in innovative fields or non-traditional projects are constrained by a publishing model that cannot serve their needs; and campus resources are increasingly compromised by the commercial publishing culture” University of California taskforce on University Publishing by Catherine Candee & Lynne Withey

Small scholarly publishers are struggling Many small publishers struggle with declining subscription bases, particularly domestically and even research libraries report regular journal cancellations projects. Most of the journals that are lagging in the development of electronic formats are from publishers who print one or a handful of titles Research Library Publishing Services: New Options for University Publishing. Karla Hahn, March Published by ARL

Small societies are struggling Most small societies have a journal or newsletter. The societies cannot sustain these publications in print form. They also are losing members, especially younger members. They don’t know how to transition from print to electronic Publications tend to lack the credentials of more mainstream journals Additional services are needed to retain members and keep them involved Peer-review is difficult to provide and sustain in print. Medieval Feminist Forum

Libraries are struggling economically January 19, from the International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC) to the world: “The ICOLC library consortia consider the current [economic] crisis of such significance that we cannot simply assume that libraries and publishers share a common perspective about the magnitude of the crisis and the best approaches to cope with it.”

Bepress publishing alternatives

Characteristics of bepress journals Fast peer-review and publication (10 weeks) Flexible issue structure (traditional or incremental series) Journal of Homeland SecurityJournal of Homeland Security Extensive dissemination. Optimized for Google and Google Scholar searching Low cost compared to other publishers Guest access: free access for individuals Guest access slideGuest access slide Access for developing countries. Impact factor: wide readership increases citations

Let’s stretch the meaning of publishing Publishing that supports teaching faculty

Digital Commons: publishing hub

Publishing: Journals, peer-reviewed series… McMaster University: Russell Journal Okayama University: Acta Medica Policy Studies Organization (PSO) Bond University: Spreadsheets in Education

Books University of Nebraska's Online Dictionary of Invertebrate Zoology Cranes of the World

Applied research University of Massachusetts: Scholarly engagement University of Massachusetts: Community engagement University of Nebraska: Community engagement

Student Scholarship USU's Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies University of Pennsylvania: CUREJ Colby College: Atlas of Maine Texas State University - San Marcos: Thesis Bryant College: student scholarship and the historical material

Events Publishing: conferences University of Pennsylvania's Proceedings Macalester College: Library Technology conference Illinois Wesleyan University: John Wesley Powell Conference Pacific University: College of Optometry conference Utah State University: IR Day

Providing a destination for teaching and research