Evaluation of New World Heritage Nominations 2013-14 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Benefits and Challenges of Implementation of Basel II in Europe José María Roldán | 27 Sept 2005.

Advertisements

EURADWASTE 29 March 2004 LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT THE COWAM EUROPEAN PROJECT EURADWASTE, 29 March 2004.

Complex Site Governance Christopher Young. Levels of governance What UNESCO wants What the government should do Management at site level.

NMP-NCP meeting - Brussels, 27 Jan 2005 Towards FP 7: Preliminary principles and orientations… Nicholas Hartley European Commission DG Research DG Research.

General Analysis of the (European) Questionnaire Jorun Poettering Consultant WHC.

EFSA’s Mission and Priorities Bernhard Berger Head of the Advisory Forum and Scientific Cooperation Unit Conference “Importance of food additives today.

TU4Dublin and HEInnovate University Business Forum 5 March 2015 Pat O’Donnell.

The Department of Communications and Engagement Jimmy Lee Peterkin, Jr., MBA District Business and Community Partnership Coordinator

1 EFCA - 21th March 2002 Raul Mateus Paula. 2 This presentation underlines: The key objectives of the Relex Reform The division of the responsibilities.

Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants  Up to £12 million funding for Large grants to foster collaborative research.

Results of January 2007 Meeting of Working Group on the Questionnaire and Indicators 24 January 2007.

Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.

La Liste Verte des Aires Protégées France,

WORLD HERITAGE SITES. Heritage is: our legacy from the past what we live with today what we pass on to future generations.

The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites ICOMOS Discussion points.

‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.

JRC 2nd Progress Report Steve Peedell European Commission Joint Research Centre.

The IUCN Programme Nature+ Proposal, May 2011.

Mirna Bojić Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Croatia Budapest, November 2012.

Designation and Management of OSPAR MPAs Beyond National Jurisdiction in the North-East Atlantic Dr. Henning von Nordheim 1 & Tim Packeiser² 1 German Federal.

EFSA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2008 The Management Plan

“RACCE” Raising earthquake Awareness and Copping Children’s Emotions: Dissemination NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM – UNIV. OF CRETE (NHMC) Project co funded by.

Transboundary Conservation Governance: Key Principles & Concepts Governance of Transboundary Conservation Areas WPC, Sydney, 17 November 2014 Matthew McKinney.

European Charter Parks Sustainable Tourism Networking in Europe Paulo Castro EUROPARC

A Strategic Analysis for identifying MPA’s : - Towards a Marine Spatial Planning Method for the French MPA Agency CAML Workshop Villefranche s/mer 18th.

Workshop on Methods and Tools for Aquaculture Site Selection and Management, Alicante, February 2008 CAQ Working Group on Siting and Carrying Capacity.

The ten-year framework of the Global Centre for ICT in Parliament ECPRD Working Group on ICT Annual Meeting November 2010 Bucharest,

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE World Heritage renomination Presentation to the first leadership committee of the Ha Long Bay-Cat Ba Alliance.

Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy

Results The final report was presented to NICE and published by NICE and WHO. See

Land Governance and Security of Tenure in Developing Countries White paper of the French Development cooperation LAND POLICIES AND MDGS IN RESPONSE TO.

European Verification and Certification of Protected Areas under the IUCN Management Categories Presentation of the results of the WCPA Europe/IUCN Working.

4 July 2011 European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) Strategic Innovation Agenda (SIA)

The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.

ICCROM's role as an Advisory Body to the UNESCO World Heritage Committee with Special Attention to the World Heritage Capacity Building Strategy Joseph.

HEQC NATIONAL REVIEW OF ACADEMIC & PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMMES IN EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL PREPAREDNESS WORKSHOP 24 & 26 April 2006.

WCPA Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines on transboundary conservation: Key concepts Presenting IUCN WCPA BPG on transboundary conservation WPC, Sydney,

Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.

Agenda item 2.2 Progress on Target 1 Developments since CGBN of March 2012 CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 13 th meeting – 06/09/12.

Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.

Objectives for the day: To: bring Local Authorities up to date with progress in key areas of development of the successor arrangements to CCGs and CLs.

Presentation of Nominations to the World Heritage Committee by the Advisory Bodies Presentation by ICOMOS Paris, January 2013.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF STATES PARTIES TO THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION 17 th e ASSEMBLEE GENERALE DES ETATS PARTIES A LA CONVENTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF STATES PARTIES TO THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION 17 th e ASSEMBLEE GENERALE DES ETATS PARTIES A LA CONVENTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL.

OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE

Expert Workshop on Benchmarks and Chapter IV of the Operational Guidelines 2 – 3 April 2007.

Processes related to the Second Cycle of Periodic Reporting Sub-regional Workshop for World Heritage National Focal Points in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern.

Orientation session for Committee Members: 25 July 2010 Current statutory monitoring processes Guy Debonnet Chief Special Projects Unit UNESCO World Heritage.

Sub- Regional Workshop for World Heritage National Focal Points in the Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe 14 – 16 November 2012, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Main conclusions of the previous Meetings on World Heritage Periodic Reporting Reflection Meeting of the Periodic Reporting Reflection Year UNESCO Headquarters,

1 IUCN GL GLPA Standard Framework Matthew Wenban-Smith (Technical Support to Green List PA Steering Group) 25 th February 2014.

Global Protected Areas Programme Protected areas.... Achieving quality.

Orientation session for Committee Members SOC reports: their nature and the importance of the Committee deliberations and decisions Guy Debonnet Chief.

ITB Berlin, March 2004 WORLD HERITAGE AND THE TOURISM INDUSTRY: PARTNERSHIPS FOR CONSERVATION UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

International Union for Conservation of Nature Conserving biodiversity Pioneering nature’s solutions to global challenges.

Dr. Vladimir Mamaev UNDP Regional Technical Advisor Integrated Natural Resource Management in the Baikal Basin Transboundary Ecosystem Russian Federation.

Monitoring the State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority Introduction

WORLD HERITAGE - EXPERT MEETING ON BENCHMARKS

Landscape Approach to Resource Management

IUCN Green List for Protected Areas

KNPS Korea National Parks Service South Korea

The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.

GUIDANCE ON (NEEI) AND NATURA 2000 ___________________________________________________________________ TERMS OF REFERENCE N2K GROUP.

Environment & Resource Management

The IUCN Red List.

Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)

The Joint Research Centre and the power of data to support decision making on protected and conserved areas Gran Paradiso National Park, Cogne, Aosta,

Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of New World Heritage Nominations

OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE CRITERIA MET INTEGRITY PROTECTION MANAGEMNT OG: Paras 77 & 78 The 3 pillars of the concept of Outstanding Universal Value ( natural sites)

Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) Emphasis: Representativeness: ecosystem, landscape, habitat and species conservation through effective PA systems and ecological networks Determinant: Outstanding Universal Value Sites nominated individually or serially can cross the threshold if they meet one or more WH criteria and stringent requirements of integrity Relationship of World Heritage Sites to other types of protected areas (PAs) in terms of Outstanding Universal Value versus Representativeness as key determinants Decreasing Global Numbers; Increasing International Recognition Potential OUV (T/Lists)

FOUR PRINCIPLES GUIDE IUCN’S EVALUATIONS Highest standards of assessment based on independent expert analysis and field assessment, and consistent with the Operational Guidelines; Partnership with the World Heritage Centre, ICOMOS and ICCROM, and UNEP-WCMC; Promotion of World Heritage properties as “flagships” of conservation; Use of IUCN and other specialist networks - including with IUCN World Commission for Protected Areas, Species Survival Commission as well as new agreements with the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) and International Association of Geomorphologists (IAG)

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel March-June 2013

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel June- November 2013 March-June 2013

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel Panel 1: December 2013 June- November 2013 March-June 2013

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel Panel 1: December 2013 June- November 2013 March-June 2013 Suppleme ntary Info: Feb 2014

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel Panel 1: December 2013 June- November 2013 March-June 2013 Panel 2: March 2014 Suppleme ntary Info: Feb 2014

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel Panel 1: December 2013 June- November 2013 March-June 2013 Panel 2: March 2014 Suppleme ntary Info: Feb 2014 Finalisation of reports, translation, printing and layout.

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel Evaluation report completed six weeks before COM (mid May 2014) Panel 1: December 2013 June- November 2013 March-June 2013 Panel 2: March 2014 Suppleme ntary Info: Feb 2014 Finalisation of reports, translation, printing etc.

IUCN Technical Evaluation Report to World Heritage Committee Field Mission (1-2 experts) External Reviews (10-20 experts) Consultation with National and Local Authorities, Local Communities, NGOs, Other Stakeholders IUCN World Heritage Programme Nomination Dossiers from World Heritage Centre IUCN World Heritage Panel Exchange of letters with State Party before and after Panel as required. Supplementary information. Meetings if possible. Calls, frequent. Exchange of letters with State Party before mission, including questions. Mission arranged in partnership with State Party.

EVALUATION PROCESS: SOME ISSUES Communication between the State Party and AB during the nomination process is helpful but challenging and limited by available time, and the nature of the evaluation which is a report for the Committee. Time very short especially at the end of the process. More interaction with nominating States Parties would be welcome but we seem to be at the limit of possibilities within the current process and timelines. The most helpful times to increase interactions are before nominations are submitted, and also before discussion at the Committee when the evaluation has been concluded. The clear need for the upstream process implies a new way of working, but we have to also work within the existing process until a new one is defined … so how to institutionalise upstream processes into the Operational Guidelines is now a key question requiring a forward plan.