HL-LHC WP14 2 nd meeting: Intercepting devices and failure cases to be studied Anton Lechner, Jan Uythoven.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collimation with retracted TCSGs R. Bruce, R. Kwee, S. Redaelli.
Advertisements

Simulation priorities for 2015 R. Bruce for task 5.2.
12/03/2013MPP Workshop Annecy Update on Beam Failure Scenarios Jan Uythoven Thanks to: T.Baer, R.Schmidt, J.Wenninger, D.Wollmann, M.Zerlauth, other MPP.
LHC 18 & 19 April 2015 At 450 GeV with bumps, no increased MUFO activity. Beam screen 15R8 warming up to 80 K, ongoing for the day 09:00: Orbit studies.
Beam Dumping System – Failure Scenarios Brennan Goddard, CERN AB/BT How the dump system can fail Catalogue of primary failures Failure classes and protection.
B.Goddard 08/11/04 HHH 2004 Workshop, CERN Beam Dump Brennan GODDARD CERN AB/BT The existing LHC beam dump is described, together with the relevant design.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Lot’s of time lost due to cryo problem in IR8. Major impact, therefore review of MD program… Start discussion here, please let us know your input. Will.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
New ALICE Beam Pipe: Injection Protection C. Bracco on Behalf of ABT/BTP Acknowledgment: M. Giovannozzi.
Changes to IR6 dump protection elements B.Goddard, W.Weterings, C.Maglioni, R.Versaci, T.Antonakakis, R.Schmidt, J.Borburgh, J.Blanco, plus many other.
V. Kain, G.H. Hemelsoet AB/OP1Nov 08, 2007 LHC Injection System V.Kain, G.H. Hemelsoet, AB/OP Input from: E. Carlier, B. Goddard, J. Wenninger What do.
The LHC injection systems located in points 2 and 8 are comprised of several elements common to the LHC ring and the downstream ends of the TI 2 and TI.
Ralph Assmann What Do We Want To Measure (in 2009) R. Assmann S. Redaelli, V. Previtali CERN/BE discussed with W. Scandale CERN/EN26/3/2009CC09  See also.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
RA CPM 21/2/03 1 Present Approach and Status R. Assmann for the LHC Collimation Team Problem: Al/Cu system would not resist irregular dumps (pre-trigger.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
1 Beam Dumping System MPP review 12/06/2015 Jan Uythoven for the ABT team.
Tuesday 17 th April 04:00 Prepare second fill for v/d Meer scans. 06:22 Stable beams, v/d Meer scans for Alice and LHCb. 13:20 End v/d Meer scans.Dump.
1 CC & MP - CC10 - CERN Crab LHC J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department for the LHC Machine Protection Panel.
Status of ABT beam tests preparation 9-Oct-14. Preparation of sector test without beam I MKI: – Open valves, conditioning to 55 kV, softstart – Check.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Simulations of TCT beam impacts for different scenarios R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. RedaelliAcknowledgement: L. Lari, C. Bracco, B. Goddard.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
P. 1Mario Deile – Meeting on Experiment Protection from Beam Failures Protecting TOTEM Mario Deile PH-TOT
Overview WP14 Developments Hardware  Interferometry on the spare TDIs, planned to be installed Christmas stop 2015/2016. Final acceptance tests ongoing.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
18 July Reminder Dilution kicker system MKB is staged (2H, 2V) –Limits extracted intensity at 7 TeV to 50% of nominal –For 25ns spacing, this is.
Aperture in case of an asynchronous beam dump with ATS optics R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. Redaelli With valueable input from: A. Bertarelli, C. Bracco, F.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
Work in progress: Improved models of collimation margins with TCT damage limit R. Bruce, L. Lari 1 Input and discussions: R. Assmann, A. Bertarelli, C.
Technology Department 1 TCDS material selection and qualification W. Weterings
Issues Raised by the Design of the LHC Beam Dump Entrance Window Ray Veness / CERN With thanks to B.Goddard and A.Presland.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
LHC Commissioning Phases Phase A GeV, Increasing the Beam Intensity presented by Jan Uythoven on behalf of the LHCCWG Particular thanks to Laurette.
LHC beam dump, injection system and other kickers B.Goddard, with input from L.Ducimetière, W.Bartmann, V.Mertens, J.Borburgh, M.Barnes, C.Bracco, V.Senaj,
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
Outline of 2014/2015 plans V. Kain, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger 6/18/2013Optics Measurement and Correction Review
NM4SixTrack Implementation of new composite materials for HL-LHC collimator upgrades in SixTrack “Tracking for SixTrack” workshop – CERN, R.
TPSG4 validation at HighRadMat #6 Cedric Baud, B. Balhan, Jan Borburgh, Brennan Goddard, Wim Weterings.
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Injection status W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, B. Goddard, V. Kain, A. Macpherson, M. Meddahi, S. Redaelli, J. Uythoven, J. Wenninger LIBD Meeting, 20 th Sept.
Beam absorbers for Machine Protection at LHC and SPS
ALICE sensitivity to background and injection failures with the smaller aperture A. Di Mauro TREX meeting, 31/07/2014.
Collimation design considerations at CERN (with some applications to LHC) R. Bruce on behalf of the CERN LHC collimation project R. Bruce,
LIU-SPS T. Kramer, L. Ducimetiere, L. Sermeus, J. Uythoven LIU-IONS 20 th November /11/2015 LIU-ABT Review - SPS2.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Session 8: What we will do for beam preparation in 2009 G. Arduini, R. Giachino 1Session 8 – Summary - GA24/02/2009.
V. Kain AB/OP1Chamonix XV What is required to safely fill the LHC? V.Kain AB/OP Input from: B.Goddard, M.Jonker, Y.Kadi, R.Losito, V.Mertens, B.Puccio,
Aperture measurements during LHC commissioning 2017
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Introduction: FCC beam dumping system
LHC beam dump 7.56 TeV operation
Jan Uythoven For discussion
Thermo-mechanical simulations jaws + tank
LHC Risk Review: Kicker Magnet Reliability
FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Overview on LHC Machine Failure Scenarios
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
Safe Injection into the LHC V.Kain AB/CO
Safe Injection into the LHC V.Kain AB/CO
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
Beam halo and beam losses in IR1 and IR5
Collimation margins and *
Machine Protection Issues for LHCb
Another Immortal Fill….
Presentation transcript:

HL-LHC WP14 2 nd meeting: Intercepting devices and failure cases to be studied Anton Lechner, Jan Uythoven

Intercepting devices and studies Following action of first WP 14 meeting:  Summarise all elements covered by WP14  For each of them define The failure cases and impact scenarios Timeline for studies and production – not now, except TDI  First need to identify if modifications are required Presented here for the protection devices. WP 14 devices not treated here:  Injection kicker magnets MKI  Dump kicker magnets MKD and MKB  Beam dump window and BTVs  Diagnostics in general 2 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013,

Injection protection devices 3 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013, TDI MKI +90˚ TCDD TCLIB TCLIA Kicker MKI LEFT OF IP2 (H plane) RIGHT OF IP2 (H plane) TCLIM Septum MSI

Injection protection devices TDI  Primary injection absorber  Mobile, upgrade needed. Only item for which studies have started TCDD  “Mobile”/fixed, upgrade to be confirmed. Include in TDI study TCLIA  Mobile, upgrade to be confirmed  Maximum opening affects crossing angle, ALICE ZDC for ion operation (see presentation later) TCLIB  Mobile/fixed, upgrade to be confirmed TCLIM  Fixed, upgrade to be confirmed 4 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013,

Failure cases Failure scenarios following injection kicker failure  Injection settings, quench is allowed but not damage Cases  Impact close to jaw edge – possibly limited by tensile stress worries about survival of the jaw Synergy with TCDI studies (Fausto, Alessio) Maximum temperature (step) on surface Also important for coating Sensitivity study to be made by varying position and angle  Full impact – possibly limited by compressive stress Injected beam, no kick Stored beam, full kick  Grazing beam – limited by smaller effective absorber length and resulting reduced protection – study combined protection of TDI and TCDD Injected beam, core of the beam hitting upper edge at entrance of TDI Stored beam, core of the beam hitting lower edge at entrance of TDI 5 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013, - No sweep to be studied - Reduce number of studies, depending on optics details: -Differences IP2 and IP8: worst case -Symmetry cases for different detector polarities and differences between injected and circulating beam

Injection Protection Studies: Normal Operation No quench is allowed, acceptable heating Repeated injection of pilot on the TDI With collimators at injection settings:  Halo scraping not to quench downstream magnets  Beam impedance stored beam at injection Effect of beam on TDI Effect of TDI on the beam With injection collimators open  Beam impedance stored beam, any beam energy Effect of beam on TDI Effect of TDI on the beam 6 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013,

Additional Studies TCLIA / TCLIB / TCLIM (‘other side’ of IP)  Phase coverage of injection protection  In case of change of optics / phase advance relative to Run I studies  For beam impact and new HL-LHC beam parameters No damage to downstream magnets No damage to the absorber  Beam impedance issues? TCDD impedance? 7 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013,

Additional info required LIU parameters to be taken into account: HL-LHC parameters:  We need detailed parameters for impedance calculations  Coherent with LIU parameters given above Optics  Crossing, separation, Twiss Quench and damage levels of D1 and triplet  Iteration -> 8 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013, OptionSpacingI beam [p+]  x,y [  m] Standard50 ns3.68e ns2.32e BCMS50 ns2.70e ns2.00e111.37

Quench and damage levels D1 and triplet Values used in ‘old’ Functional specification  Damage level: 20 J/g  Fast quenches (injection failure): 5 mJ/g  Quench level ‘slow’ (DC load): 40 mW/g At injection Initial discussion with Arjan roughly confirm the quench levels but the damage level might be significantly lower Re-asses with proper load cases from FLUKA, using latest quench and damage models  Proposal. In the coming weeks For the present TDI and TCDD take existing FLUKA data for grazing incidence Define quench and damage level for the present TDI and TCDD (Bernhard / Arjan): to be written down in a note as reference  Followed by Define new TDI / TCDD configuration - will take several months Repeat FLUKA simulations for new configuration Define quench and damage limit for this configuration: publish this again in a note. 9 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013,

Priorities / timeline Continue with the injection protection studies as this is more urgent than the LBDS studies: needs to be installed in LS2. Injection studies:  Quench and damage limits of D1 and triplet with present TDI and TCDD configuration Grazing incidence case only. FLUKA data available. To be done very soon.  Survival of the TDI using LIU BCMS parameters Limit by tensile stresses Sensitivity analysis on position and angle of the beam Look for new absorber material ! Synergy with TCDI work Will take several months  Protection. Define new TDI and if required new TCDD New materials Most likely multi-module TDI Check of all defined failure cases with FLUKA using SixTrack input Estimate of D1 and triplet quench and damage limits.  TCLI checks in parallel 10 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013,

Dump Protection Devices 11 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013, TCSG

Dump protection devices TCDS  Fixed, upgrade to be confirmed TCDQ  Mobile, upgrade done, installation LS1 ongoing TCSG  Mobile, upgrade most likely not necessary, to be confirmed  Stay compatible with other TCS collimators, buttons TCDQM  Fixed, upgrade most likely not necessary, to be confirmed TDE  Fixed, upgrade most likely not, but study gas handling and dilution. Effect on MKB. 12 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013,

Dump failure scenario’s to be studied Asychronous dump with full HL-LHC beams: quenches allowed but no damage  FLUKA studies for TCDQ done Extend results to TCSG and TCDQM  Will need to be done for TCDS Dump with full HL-LHC beams on TDE: no damage  Estimate allowed repetition rate of dumps – N 2 pressure Experimental and FLUKA data  Do we need to re-assess the number of MKBs which are allowed to simultaneously fail?  Double spiral Do we need it? How much would we gain? 13 Intercepting devices and studies HL-LHC WP14, 5/11/2013,