Intensity Frontier Physics with a Mega-Watt Proton Source R. Tschirhart Fermilab Science & Technology Review November 5-7 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Hewett Intensity Frontier Vision. J. Hewett Our Charge 1.Document ( in one coherent document) the physics /science opportunities at the Intensity Frontier.
Advertisements

The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
U.S. Department of Energy Brookhaven Science Associates BNL’s Role in High Energy Physics Thomas B.W. Kirk Associate Director for High Energy and Nuclear.
Position of the Czech Republic on the European Strategy in Particle Physics Current main activities in particle physics * Plans for the future Recommendations.
CERN First Considerations to implement nuSTORM on the CERN site “North Area Neutrino Hub” E.Wildner, CERN Wednesday, March 27, 2013Elena Wildner,
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Is B s 0 production by neutrino interactions interesting? Presented at the Super-B factory workshop as an alternative approach Nickolas Solomey 21 April.
International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Edward McKigney Imperial College RAL March 25, 2002 Physics Motivation and Cooling Introduction.
F Future of Neutrino Program at FNAL NuMI Off-Axis Meeting Hugh Montgomery January 12, 2004.
A Possible Strategy Towards a Future Lepton Collider Tor Raubenheimer SLUO Annual Meeting September 17, 2009.
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
Electric Dipole Moment Goals and “New Physics” William J. Marciano 12/7/09 d p with e-cm sensitivity! Why is it important?
Output from this Series of Workshops: A science vision for the RHIC future 1.Provide a science case for the future RHIC program that makes clear its importance.
International collaboration in high energy physics experiments  All large high energy physics experiments today are strongly international.  A necessary.
FFAG Fixed Field Alternating Gradient synchrotrons, FFAGs, combine some of the main advantages of both cyclotrons and synchrotrons:  Fixed magnetic field.
R. Tschirhart Fermilab Oct 15 th 2012 PX Stage 1 Physics Case: Preparations for Snowmass / Minnesota.
Jefferson Lab Strategic Planning Divisional Town Meeting Mission Statement of your Division – What is or should be the mission statement of your division?
Long Range Plan (LRP) & EDM Nuclear Physics LRP is prepared every 5- 6 years Provides guidance to funding agencies w.r.t. scientific and funding priorities.
My Chapter 30 Lecture.
Conveneers: M. Grassi (INFN, Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN), Y. Semertzidis (BNL) Summary of WG4, Part Two. Yannis Semertzidis, BNL 1 August, 2004 Most muon.
1 Muon Physics Project X Workshop Fermilab 17 November 2007.
Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
Future Neutrino Physics Mitch Soderberg Fermilab Institutional Review June 6-9, 2011.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS OPEN QUESTIONS and FUTURE PROJECTS Cristina VOLPE Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, France.
Staging of a Neutrino Factory (and beyond…) Mark Palmer Director, US Muon Accelerator Program NuFACT 2014, Glasgow, August 25-30, 2014 NUFACT2014 XVIth.
Pathways to Explore Neutrino Physics Fred Gilman NuFact03 New York June 5, 2003.
An Integrated Intensity Frontier Strategy Steve Holmes & Bob Tschirhart LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop April 25, 2012.
Project-X Physics Opportunities R. Tschirhart Fermilab March 18 th, 2010.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
EIC — Bring the Glue to Light. Gluons dominate QCD QCD is the fundamental theory that describes structure and interactions in nuclear matter. Without.
Fermilab Perspective: Where are We Going with Project-X, and How Can it Benefit Nuclear Energy? Stuart Henderson PASI Meeting April 5, 2013.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
Fermilab: Present and Future Young-Kee Kim Data Preservation Workshop May 16, 2011.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
August 2011 R. Tschirhart - DPF - Providence RI Project-X DPF, August 10 th 2011 R.Tschirhart R.TschirhartFermilab Project-X DPF, August 10 th 2011 R.Tschirhart.
Intensity Frontier Workshop, Nov 30- Dec 2, 2011 SpeakerSlide 1 Introduction & Welcome November 30, 2011 J.Hewett & H.Weerts.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
March 2012 R. Tschirhart PX Kaon Targetry Design Study March 2012 R. Tschirhart Fermilab PX Kaon Targetry Design Study March.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Project-X Research Program R. Tschirhart Project X Research Program Scientist Fermilab Junne 20 th 2012.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Fermilab SRF Linac Development Steve Holmes Workshop on High Intensity Proton Accelerators October 19, 2009.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Project X Research Program R. Tschirhart Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
BSM Group Activities DUNE Collaboration Meeting –ND Physics Jan. 14, 2016 Jae Yu Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
Ionization Cooling for Muon Accelerators Prepared by Robert Ryne Presented by Jean-Pierre Delahaye MICE Optics Review Jan, 2016 RAL.
Science Requirements and Instrumentation for Future Neutrino Experiments Gina Rameika, Fermilab Instrumentation Frontier Community Planning January 9 –
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
K. Long, R. Roser, 23 July 2014 Report from the Neutrino Summit.
Opportunities from the Intensity Frontier to the Energy Frontier J.P.Delahaye/SLAC.
The High Intensity Horizon at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IPAC 2012, New Orleans, USA. May 23 rd, 2012.
1 Intensity Frontier Instrumentation R.Tschirhart, S. Kettell Fermilab.
Fermilab-India Agreements and Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Project-X, International Collaboration Coodinator Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia,
The High Intensity Horizon at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IPAC 2012, New Orleans, USA. May 23 rd, 2012.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
Steve Holmes DNP Meeting/Santa Fe November 6, 2010 Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab.
– + + – Search for the μEDM using a compact storage ring A. Adelmann 1, K. Kirch 1, C.J.G. Onderwater 2, T. Schietinger 1, A. Streun 1 1 Paul Scherrer.
ICNPF 2013, Crete, Aug. 28 – Sept. 5, 2013 JEDI - The Jülich Electric Dipole Moment Investigations in Storage Rings | H. Ströher.
Future Flavor Physics At Fermilab?
nuSTORM and the Physics Beyond Colliders workshop
Future physics at nuSTORM
Particle Physics Theory
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
u c s b d n Hadron & Nuclear Physics Particle Physics Quarks Leptons
Presentation transcript:

Intensity Frontier Physics with a Mega-Watt Proton Source R. Tschirhart Fermilab Science & Technology Review November

 Proposal to evolve the existing Fermilab accelerator complex with the revolution in Super-Conducting RF Technology. 2 Project-X: A Mega-Watt Proton Source R. Tschirhart - PSI Sept 12th R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Evolution from the Energy Frontier to the Intensity Frontier at Fermilab… 3 Project X RDR 3 R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

The Project-X Research Program Neutrino experiments A high-power proton source with proton energies between 1 and 120 GeV would produce intense neutrino sources and beams illuminating near detectors on the Fermilab site and massive detectors at distant underground laboratories. Kaon, muon, nuclei & nucleon precision experiments These could include world leading experiments searching for lepton flavor violation in muons, atomic, muon, nuclear and nucleon electron dipole moments (edms), precision measurement of neutron properties (e.g. n,nbar oscillations) and world-leading precision measurements of ultra-rare kaon decays. Platform for evolution to a Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Neutrino Factory and Muon-Collider concepts depend critically on developing high intensity proton source technologies. Material Science and Nuclear Energy Applications Accelerator, spallation, target and transmutation technology demonstrations which could investigate and develop accelerator technologies important to the design of future nuclear waste transmutation systems and future thorium fuel-cycle power systems. Possible applications of muon Spin Resonance techniques (muSR). as a sensitive probes of the magnetic structure of materials. 4 Detailed discussion in ‘The Book’ Project X websiteProject X website 4 R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

The Project-X Research Program…Redux New Forces Lepton Flavor Violation (e.g.   e) Baryon Number Violation (n  n oscillations) Non-standard flavor changing neutral currents New properties of matter CP violation in neutrinos, charged leptons, quarks New dimensions e.g. super-symmetric amplitudes via EDMs Warped dimensions via kaon decays R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Project X Strategy: Simultaneous Operation of Program Elements. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Project X Research Program in the March 2013 Facilities Analysis  “Project X experiments that compose the research program range from important to absolutely central, but scientifically the Project X research program as a whole is classified as absolutely central. Being in the planning phase, the construction readiness of the Project X research program is classified as mission and technical requirements not yet fully defined, although some experiments are beyond this phase.” R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Project X Book prepared for Snowmass:  The "Project X Book", is a 3 part book describing the Accelerator Reference Design, Physics Opportunities, and Broader Research Impacts. Part 1: Accelerator Reference Design: Part 2: Physics Opportunities: Part 3: Broader Impacts: More than 300 contributors from the community, major contributions from Fermilab staff. 8

Neutrino Physics  Strong call from the community in the Snowmass process for accelerator driven neutrino experiments.  Project X drives more than (detector-Mass x Power). Power at lower Main Injector beam energy improves the performance of the (detector-Mass x Power) metric.  Big boost (x3 – x10) for short-baseline experiments.  Exploration of integrating the early stages of the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP) with Project X and LBNE. There is no substantive competition to Project X R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Rare Processes, Muons  Project X proton drive energies (1-3 GeV T p ) are optimal for muon-to-electron conversion experiments.  Project X beam timing is optimal for all rare muon decay experiments, muon-to-electron conversion in particular. There is no substantive competition to Project X R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Rare Processes, Kaons R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Rare Processes, EDMs  The High Energy Physics theory community has embraced EDM research as very important research for the field  Project X can super-charge existing EDM experiments (e.g. 225 Ra, 223 Rn)  Project X can drive new concepts such as the proton EDM storage ring There is no substantive competition to Project X R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Rare Processes, Neutrons  A neutron–antineutron oscillation experiment driven by a high power neutron spallation target can reach far beyond where massive underground detectors can ever reach for  B=2 BSM processes.  Neutron-edm: Project X can drive the “winning” technology of the current world-wide portfolio. The HEP experience of effective large collaborations could substantially benefit a next generation attack based in the Americas. R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

New properties of matter: CP & T violation research Neutrinos: > x3 increase in the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) neutrino statistics. Electric Dipole Moments:  Proton-EDM, x10 6 reach, advanced concepts exist  Muon-EDM, x10 4 reach, concepts exist  Neutron & Atomic EDMs x10 2 – x10 4 reach, explorations now 14 LBNE CP violation in quarks Project-X capability, described in The Book 14 R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

New Forces: Evolution of Mu2e V. Pronskikh et al, V. Pronskikh et al, Mu2e Mu2e R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

New dimensions: Warped Extra Dimensions as a Theory of Flavor?? Straub, CKM 2010 workshop (arXiv: v2) Buras et al. SM accuracy of <5%, motivates 1000-event experiments R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Kaon Physics Reach of Project X “Snowmass” (CSS2013) Quark Flavor Physics Summary R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov

Results from Snowmass, From the full executive summary:  “Execute a program with the U.S. as host that provides precision tests of the neutrino sector with an underground detector; search for new physics in quark and lepton decays in conjunction with precision measurements of electric dipole moment and anomalous magnetic moments”.  Neutrinos: “Future multi-megawatt beams aimed at LBNE, such as those from Project X at Fermilab, would enable studies of CP violation in neutrino oscillations with conclusive accuracy.”  Electric Dipole Moments: “Project X could provide the means to make incisive EDM measurements of unprecedented precision.”  Quark Flavor Physics: “Each [experiment] probes a di ff erent aspect of new physics in a unique way. Project X will complement and extend results of these experiments.” 18

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov Results from Snowmass, From the Intensity Frontier Summary:  Neutrinos: “The U.S., with the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) and a future multi-megawatt beam from Project X at Fermilab, is uniquely positioned to lead an international campaign to measure CP violation and push the limits of the three-flavor paradigm.”  Charged Leptons: “The physics potential of the charged lepton experimental program is significant with discovery opportunities in experiments being conducted this decade and in even more sensitive experiments possible with future facilities such as Project X at Fermilab.”  Quark Flavor Physics: “Kaon decays to unprecedented precision and would retain the U.S. capability to perform quark flavor experiments. Longer term, Project X at Fermilab could become the dominant facility in the world for rare Kaon decays.”  Neutron-antineutron oscillations: “A new experiment at Project X at Fermilab uses free neutrons from a 1 MW spallation target and could improve existing constraints by 4 orders of magnitude.” 19

R. Tschirhart, Fermilab S&T Review, Nov Conclusions  Next Steps: Documentation complete, closeout of the Physics Study in progress.  Intensity Frontier science requires a broad experimental program. Breadth is not a luxury.  The Project X Physics Study is an important resource for developing breadth of the future intensity frontier research program based on a Mega-Watt proton source. 20