ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 20, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nodal Credit Limit Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
Advertisements

ISDA ® The New CDS Landscape Auction Settlement International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA ® Copyright © 2009 International Swaps and Derivatives.
Seasonal Adjustment Factor Discussion Technical Advisory Committee
Load Shed Service for Import Information Session Market Services April 17, 2014.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public May 01, 2015.
© Copyright 2011, NASDAQ OMX Commodities Clearing Company. All rights reserved. 1 Presentation to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 3, 2011 A.
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
ERCOT 2003 UFE ANALYSIS By William Boswell & Carl Raish AEIC Load Research Conference July 13, 2005.
1 Adjusting the “Dispatch Instructions” to the Defined Metering Point (DMP). “Functional Deferral 6 (FD-06)” Market Operations Standing Committee (MOSC)
Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Exemption Proposals for Settlements and Billing Changes COPS June 14, 2011 Cheryl Yager, Mandy Bauld, Leslie.
Capacity Forecast Report Sean Chang Market Analysis and Design Suresh Pabbisetty CQF, ERP, CSQA Credit CWG/MCWG September 16, 2015 ERCOT Public.
Future Ancillary Services (NPRR 667) Update March 26, 2015 TAC meeting 1.
September 2012 Proposed CRR Auction Credit Changes: Summary of Draft NPRR.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2010.
1 Market Trials Congestion Revenue Rights Weekly Update June 25, 2010.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
CRR Auction Scope John Moseley. To outline aspects of the CRR market process to assure that these proposed CRR market protocols (as interpreted by ERCOT.
UFE 2003 Analysis June 1, UFE 2003 ANALYSIS Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation June 1, 2005.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Market Services Operating Reserve Redesign Project April 28, 2008 Working Group Session.
Treatment of Intertie Failures Intertie Trading Subcommittee November 24, 2003.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Market Credit Working Group update to the Wholesale Market Subcommittee 10/07/
Nodal Program Update and SEWG Update COPS 1/11/2011 Jim Galvin.
1 Capacity Forecast Report Mark Ruane Director, Market Credit CWG / MCWG March 10, 2015 ERCOT Public.
Mandy Bauld ERCOT October 9, 2012 RTM SETTLEMENT TIMELINE.
Market Operator User Group Meeting 1 Agenda Review of Action Items10:45 IT& Market System Development11:10 Customer Service11:25 Market Operations10:50.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
September 2012 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
International Finance FINA 5331 Lecture 5: Balance of Payments concluded. The market for foreign exchange Read: Chapters 5 Aaron Smallwood Ph.D.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public April 22, 2015.
1 Cutover Market Call November 29, :00 AM.
ERCOT, Market Analysis 2013 Annual Constraint Competitiveness Test (CCT) Study Results – Update for 8/27/12 CMWG 8/27/2012 ERCOT Public.
Transmission Congestion Rights – Credit Perspective April 17, 2014.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR 567 Multi-Part A/S Bidding PRS January Meeting January 19, 2006.
1 ERCOT Load Profile Transition Option 1 – 4 Analysis August 21, 2006.
Carrie Tucker Supervisor, Day-Ahead Market DAM data supporting MCWG/CWG credit parameters discussion February 29, 2012.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Invoices Business Requirements Settlements and.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
1 Tab X ERCOT Confidential Credit Impact of Increased Caps The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Oct 20, 2010.
ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Supplementary Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public May 13, 2015.
1 ICE Price Data Analysis CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, CQF, ERP, CSQA. ERCOT Public January 20, 2016.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
1 Load to Price Correlation CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public February 20, 2014.
1 NPRR 484/554 Phase 2 Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA Lead Technical Analyst, Credit CWG / MCWG May 20, 2015 ERCOT Public.
Total Potential Exposure (TPE) Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
July 28, 2010 Market Readiness Seminar Credit Transition to Nodal (Preliminary)
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
1 Exposure Stress Testing CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public June 12, 2014.
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager TAC 2 September 2010.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department September 28, 2006.
Capacity Forecast Report Fall Update Sean Chang Market Analysis and Design Suresh Pabbisetty CQF, ERP, CSQA Credit CWG/MCWG December 16, 2015 ERCOT Public.
1 NPRR638 (Seasonality) Back-Cast Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public October 3, 2014.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated and Supplementary Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public May 20, 2015.
Credit Exposure and Expected Loss update Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit February 17, 2016.
Revisions to Credit Exposure Calculations by using Electricity Futures Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit May.
Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 11, 2016.
Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 20, 2016.
ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 11, 2016.
2017 Seasonal Adjustment Factors
Calculating CRR Auction Portfolio Exposure:
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
CME Cash (Spot) Market Cheese, NDM, & Butter Session—
Activity-Based Costing Analysis At a Glance
Context Corporate presentation Elia Group | 2015.
MOD_09_18 Interim Credit Treatment for Participants with Trading Site Supplier Units 13th March 2018.
Presentation transcript:

ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 20, 2016

Agenda ICE Settlements Methodology Assumptions & Limitations Data Inputs & Transformations Results Liquidity in Settlement Window Liquidity in Trading Day

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis ICE Settlements Methodology 3

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis 1.Every business day, the ICE settlement committee will monitor all ICE system trading activity including trades, bids and offers for the ICE Cleared products during a settlement window (between 2:28 pm and 2:30pm Eastern time). 2.ICE volume-weighted trade prices that occur during the settlement window will be the primary consideration for determining settlement prices. 3.In the absence of a traded price, midpoints of the best bids and offers that are posted during the settlement window will be the primary determinants of the final settlement price. 4

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis 4.If a two-sided market is not found during the settlement window, one-sided bids or offers will be used as a primary determinant to set a respective floor or ceiling for the settlement price. 5.On some occasions, the ICE trading activity during the settlement window may not be sufficient for determining settlement(s) price(s) for the respective ICE Cleared products in one or more months. During these instances, the ICE settlement committee will determine a settlement price based on a combination of the best available ICE trading activity, spread relationships as well as the best available market information. 5

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Assumptions & Limitations 6

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Assumptions & Limitations: –Analysis is limited to the Settlement Window and Trading Day –Liquidity is the aggregated volume of cleared bids and cleared offers –ICE Peak futures and ICE Off-Peak futures prices are considered for Credit Exposure Methodology –Traded volume of ICE Peak futures and ICE Off-Peak futures for North Hub are used for liquidity analysis –Other cleared ICE products like spreads involving ERCOT North Hub are not used in this analysis –“Days with Trades” are the trading days consisting trade volumes greater than 0 7

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Data Inputs & Transformations 8

PUBLIC Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Data Inputs & Transformations: ICE cleared trades, bids and offers for the ERCOT North Hub –ICE Peak Futures –ICE Off-Peak Futures Operating Days OD+1 through OD+21 –Block trades are split into individual future Operating Days. –Volumes of multiple trades are aggregated to per hour of Operating Day –All the volumes mentioned are per hour of Peak or Off-Peak products per Operating Day Period used in this analysis –ICE Trading data used in this analysis is from the trading period 11/01/2012 through 03/24/2016 –A total period of 1240 days which contains approximately 826 trading days and approximately 414 non trading days. Non trading days are excluded from analysis 9

PUBLIC Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Data Inputs & Transformations: Cleared Volume in Settlement Window that was used to set price –Settlement Window is between 2:28PM and 2:30PM of the trading day –Aggregate bids and offers volume of ERCOT North-Hub Peak Futures for each of future Operating Days OD+1 through OD+21 –Aggregate bids and offers volume of ERCOT North-Hub Off-Peak Futures for each of future Operating Days OD+1 through OD+21 Cleared Volume in Trading Day: –Trading Day is after 2:30PM of previous Business Day to 2:30PM of current Business Day –Aggregate bids and offers volume of ERCOT North-Hub Peak Futures for each of future Operating Days OD+1 through OD+21 –Aggregate bids and offers volume of ERCOT North-Hub Off-Peak Futures for each of future Operating Days OD+1 through OD+21 10

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Results Liquidity in Settlement Window 11

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Peak Futures - Settlement Window Trading Participation: –1% to 6% days have some cleared trades within Settlements Window 12

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Peak Futures - Settlement Window Trading Volume: –Statistics are calculated only for the Days with trading volumes –All the volumes mentioned are per hour of Operating Day 13

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Peak Futures - Settlement Window Trading Volume: 14

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Off-Peak Futures - Settlement Window Trading Participation: –0% to 1% days have some cleared trades during Settlements Window 15

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Off-Peak Futures - Settlement Window Trading Volume: –Statistics are calculated only for the Days with trading volumes –All the volumes mentioned are per hour of Operating Day 16

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Off-Peak Futures - Settlement Window Trading Volume: 17

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Results Liquidity in Trading Day 18

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Peak Futures – Trading Day Trade Participation: –58% to 94% days have some cleared trades during Trading Day 19

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Peak Futures – Trading Day Trading Volume: –Statistics are calculated only for the Days with trading volumes –All the volumes mentioned are per hour of Operating Day 20

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Peak Futures – Trading Day Trading Volume: 21

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Off-Peak Futures – Trading Day Trade Participation: –18% to 86% days have some cleared trades during Trading Day 22

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Off-Peak Futures – Trading Day Trading Volume: –Statistics are calculated only for the Days with trading volumes –All the volumes mentioned are per hour of Operating Day 23

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Off-Peak Futures – Trading Day Trading Volume: 24

PUBLIC Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices ERCOT North Hub – ICE Futures Liquidity Summary: ERCOT will not be able to shadow all the rules of ICE Settlements, only confirmed deals/trades are used for this analysis Liquidity summary is based on forward 21 day period (from November 2012 to March 2016); Trading Participation and Trading Volume –Better for the whole Trading Day as compared to Settlement Window –Relatively very low during Settlement Window 25

PUBLIC ICE Futures ERCOT North Hub Liquidity Analysis Questions 26