5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F PRELIMINARY NEW VERSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) LEVEL-2 PRODUCTS Terence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Space Weather dependence of the air drag as observed by CHAMP Hermann Lühr 1) and Huixin Liu 2) 1) GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany 2) Dept. Earth.
Advertisements

4 th Swarm DQW – Magnetic Session 23 Dec 2014Potsdam (D) ELM – “EXTENDED” LESUR MODEL OF DISTURBANCE CHARACTERISATION AND VFM CALIBRATION Lars Tøffner-Clausen,
The day-to-day longitudinal variability of the global ionospheric density distribution: Preliminary results E.E. Pacheco and E. Yizengaw Institute for.
European Repeat Station Workshop Bucharest May 2007 UK repeat station programme Tom Shanahan and Susan Macmillan.
Repeat station crustal biases and accuracy determined from regional field models M. Korte, E. Thébault* and M. Mandea, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (*now.
Coestimating models of the large-scale internal, external, and corresponding induced Hermean magnetic fields Michael Purucker and Terence Sabaka Raytheon.
Separating internal geomagnetic secular variation and long-term magnetospheric field variations Monika Korte Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ.
Spatio-temporal structures of equatorial F-region plasma irregularities & Geomagnetic Regular Daily Variations (Sq, Solar quiet) as seen in space and at.
Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.
Paper Discussion: “Simultaneous Localization and Environmental Mapping with a Sensor Network”, Marinakis et. al. ICRA 2011.
Upper atmospheric density profiles from the Mars Odyssey Accelerometer: Report on data processing, archiving plans, and scientific analysis Paul Withers.
Tidal Structures in the Equatorial Ionosphere C. Y. Huang 1, S. H. Delay 2, E. K. Sutton 1, and P. A. Roddy 1, 1 Air Force Research Laboratory 2 Boston.
J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &
Swarm Data Processing and First Scientific Results
MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #1 7-Sep-15 swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Mid Term Review The swarm E2E Consortium.
Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm PM1, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.
4 th Swarm QWG Meeting 2 – 5 December 2014GFZ Potsdam/D Data Selection Model Parameterization Results: Statistics, Lithospheric Field, Core Field Perspective.
Kick off meeting, swarm E2E study, nio #1 8-Sep-15 Development Approach Task 1: Industrial Module –to be used by industry for their system simulation –Output:
Icebase: A proposed suborbital survey to map geothermal heat flux under an ice sheet Michael Purucker SGT at Planetary Geodynamics Lab, Goddard Space Flight.
Magnetospheric ULF wave activity monitoring based on the ULF-index OLGA KOZYREVA and N. Kleimenova Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS.
Secular variation in Germany from repeat station data and a recent global field model Monika Korte and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.
Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #1 1-Nov-15 Swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Final Presentation The Swarm E2E.
Introducing POMME Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth Star camera calibration Ring current field Static and annually varying external fields Internal field.
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
An assessment of the NRLMSISE-00 density thermosphere description in presence of space weather events C. Lathuillère and M. Menvielle The data and the.
Swarm ASM-VFM meeting 9-10 Apr 2015ESTEC (NL) Ideas for improving the disturbance model or Welcome to the Null-Space! Nils Olsen, Lars Tøffner-Clausen,
Oceanic Magnetic Fields Robert Tyler -Planetary Geodynamics Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -Astronomy Department, University of Maryland College.
New Science Opportunities with a Mid-Latitude SuperDARN Radar Raymond A. Greenwald Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
X = Y. Direct variation X 1 X = Y 1 Y 2.
Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm MTR, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.
Future China Geomagnetism Satellite Mission (CGS) Aimin Du Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS 2012/11/18 Taibei.
Characterizing the magnetic fields of Mars: What do the tell us about the history of Mars? Michael Purucker, Raytheon Planetary Geodyn. Laboratory,
Earth’s Dynamic Magnetic Field: The State of the Art Comprehensive Model Terence J. Sabaka Geodynamics Branch NASA/GSFC with special thanks to Nils Olsen.
STSE Swarm + Innovation Science Study: MTR Meeting Magnetic Tidal Signals and Their Use in Mapping the Electrical Conductivity of the Lithosphere and Upper.
Sensitivity Analysis and Building Laterally-Variable Ocean Conductivity Grid 1 N. R. Schnepf (UoC/CIRES) C. Manoj (UoC/CIRES) A. V. Kuvshinov (ETHZ)
Space-based studies of low-latitude ionospheric forcing originating in the lower atmosphere Thomas J. Immel, Scott L. England Space Sciences Laboratory,
STSE Tides to Sense Earth, MTR 25 January 2016DTU, Lyngby/DK REPORT ON WP2X00: TIDAL SIGNAL RECOVERY USING THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) RESULTS FROM.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern Astronomical Institute, University of Bern Swarm Gravity Field Results with the CMA Adrian Jäggi, Daniel Arnold,
5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F About ESL Level 2 Processing and Data Products Some Selected Science Results Plasma depletion.
IUGG 2015 Prague 25 June 2015IUGG-4186 SCARF: Level 2 Data Products and Processing Some Selected Science Results Plasma depletion seen in different parameters.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
Quality indicators for Swarm FAC products and their statistical behavior Maosheng He 1, Joachim Vogt 1, Adrian Blagau 1,2 (1) Jacobs University Bremen.
Magnetic Measurement Expert Group10-11 March 2016Warsaw / PL MAGNETOMETER – STAR-IMAGER ALIGNMENT: APPARENT EULER ANGLE VARIATION DUE TO MAGNETOSPHERIC.
ACC/GPSR Splinter Summary
European Geosciences Union, General Assembly Vienna | Austria | 23–28 April 2017 Seismic zoning (first approximation) using data of the main geomagnetic.
The 3rd Swarm Science Meeting, June 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark
Rapid core field variations just before Swarm
Danish National Space Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
Summary of part of L2 session
Alfvén Dynamics in High-Latitude IT Heating
The Swarm D NanoMagSat project Latest News
Estimating susceptibility and magnetization within the Earth’s terrestrial crust Michael Purucker (SGT at GSFC/NASA, USA) and Suzanne McEnroe (NTNU, Norway)
Proposals of new Swarm data products
Nils Holzrichter, Jörg Ebbing
swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Working meeting on Task 2
OceanMag II EM-Raying the Ocean
SPP Colloquium, 16-Jun-2017, Bremen
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Astrid Maute, Art Richmond, Ben Foster
European Geosciences Union, General Assembly Vienna | Austria | 23–28 April 2017 Seismic zoning (first approximation) using data of the main geomagnetic.
New "quite time" concept: application to Champ lithospheric field modelling Nils Olsen, Jesper Gjerløv & Co.
First Validation of Level 2 Cat-2 products: EEF
Summary & recommendations multi-mission synergies session 9
Future Opportunities in Geomagnetism and Electromagnetism:
Variation of Protonated Ions and H2 as observed by MAVEN NGIMS
Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna
Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)
Presentation transcript:

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F PRELIMINARY NEW VERSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) LEVEL-2 PRODUCTS Terence J Sabaka, Lars Tøffner-Clausen, Nils Olsen

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Crustal field of CI inversion (MLI) as of May 2015

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Crustal field of CI inversion (MLI) New version (preliminary) How has this new CI model been obtained ?

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Data selection and data use Data selection 1 Hz data downsampled to 15 sec data |dDst/dt| < 3 nT/hr Kp ≤3 0 East-West/North-South (EW/NS) scalar sums/differences (s/d) for all local times and all latitudes EW/NS vector s/d for all local times and |QD lat| < 55° Scalar data nightside for all latitudes Vector data nightside for |QD lat| < 55° No observatory data

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Model Parameterization (1) Degree/order (d/o) 90 static (core+crustal) field d/o 13 linear SV d/o 1 magnetospheric/induced fields in 1 hr bins "usual" CI ionospheric parameterization accounting for 3D induction via Q-matrices d/o 36 M 2 tidal field (period hrs)

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Model Parameterization (2) (Nominal) core determined by all data except low-latitude dayside (Nominal) crust determined by all field data and all difference data except low-latitude dayside Ionosphere determined by all data Magnetosphere/induced determined by all data (Nominal) M 2 determined (mostly) by all difference data

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Major differences from "old" CI model Direct Huber weighting of s/d rather than formal covariance propagation from scalar or vector constituents Component-only s/d used (like SIFM+) rather than full covariant forms The addition of scalar/vector data to s/d data rather than only s/d data No vector data for |QD lat| > 55° rather than using vector at all latitudes (no toroidal field estimated yet) Day as well as night data for crust and M2 rather than nightside only M 2 determined mostly by gradient data Core field now varies linearly rather than quadratically

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Secular Variation of CI inversion (MCO) Note: ”new CI” uses linear SV, whereas ”old CI” estimates a quadratic SV

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Crustal field of CI inversion (MLI)

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Ionospheric Current Function March Equinox

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F M2 Tidal Field 18 months of Swarm data allows for an astonishing determination of the M 2 tidal signal, comparable to what has been obtained using 10 years of CHAMP data (at lower altitude) |B r | of M 2 tide Model prediction CM5 (CHAMP) CI (Swarm) Sabaka et al., GJI (2015)Sabaka et al., in preparation for GRL

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F Conclusions New version of CI model parts derived MCO: core field MLI: crustal field MIO: ionosphereic “Sq” contribution MMA: magnetospheric and induced fields Major improvement compared to version 01, in particular of the crustal field model Further tests will be performed within the next weeks, then (probably) release of new CI chain models