General Public Release The added value of a stochastic mortality framework Fasecolda 22.04.2015 - Philippe Maeder General Public Release.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrew D Smith April 2005 Stochastic Mortality Andrew D Smith April 2005 Deloitte.
Advertisements

IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance Contract Model IAA Fund Meeting Kuala Lumpur, October 10, 2011 Darryl Wagner, FSA, MAAA.
PMI vs. Protection Protection Review, July 2013 Complimentary Alternative.
Medical insurance Risks and Mitigants
Mega Container Ship Casualties – General Average
©Towers Perrin Emmanuel Bardis, FCAS, MAAA Cane Fall 2005 meeting Stochastic Reserving and Reserves Ranges Fall 2005 This document was designed for discussion.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
Claims Reserving for Non Life Insurance Craig Thorburn, B.Ec., F.I.A.A. Phone
Reinsurance Presentation Example 2003 CAS Research Working Party: Executive Level Decision Making using DFA Raju Bohra, FCAS, ARe.
Economic Capital (EC) ERM Symposium, CS 1-B Chicago, IL April 26-27, 2004 Hubert Mueller, Tillinghast Phone (860) Profit Growth Value/$ Capital.
Reserve Variability Modeling: Correlation 2007 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar San Diego, California September 10-11, 2007 Mark R. Shapland, FCAS, ASA, MAAA.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
Company Enterprise Risk Management & Stress Testing Case Study.
1 Math 479 Casualty Actuarial Mathematics Fall 2014 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Professor Rick Gorvett Session 7: Ratemaking I September.
Lecture 11 Implementation Issues – Part 2. Monte Carlo Simulation An alternative approach to valuing embedded options is simulation Underlying model “simulates”
Orphans in Actuarial Data DM-1: Data Cleansing for Predictive Modeling Jeremy Benson March 2012 – RPM Seminar.
Alternative Measures of Risk. The Optimal Risk Measure Desirable Properties for Risk Measure A risk measure maps the whole distribution of one dollar.
Enhanced Annuities, Individual Underwriting, and Adverse Selection August 6, Enhanced Annuities, Individual Underwriting, and Adverse Selection.
FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORTING Ioana Abrahams 13 November 2009.
Introduction to Experience Rating Kyle Vrieze, FCAS Senior Vice President, Willis Re CAS Ratemaking Seminar Cambridge, Massachusetts March 17, 2008.
PwC CAS Fair Value Project Casualty Actuaries in Europe Spring Meeting 23 April 2004 E. Daniel Thomas (1)
Use of Statistical Models on the Supervisory Process of
The Reserving Actuary’s Role in Risk Assessment: Value Added by the Reserving Actuary in Identifying and Helping Mitigate Financial Risk Both on the Balance.
Two Approaches to Calculating Correlated Reserve Indications Across Multiple Lines of Business Gerald Kirschner Classic Solutions Casualty Loss Reserve.
The Common Shock Model for Correlations Between Lines of Insurance
© AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS 101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC Solvency Modernization and Corporate Governance ACLI’s Compliance.
Making Claims management effective and profitable Danijela Ziser, Swiss Re, Claims Forum 2014.
Hidden Risks in Casualty (Re)insurance Casualty Actuaries in Reinsurance (CARe) 2007 David R. Clark, Vice President Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.
Actuarial Science Meets Financial Economics Buhlmann’s classifications of actuaries Actuaries of the first kind - Life Deterministic calculations Actuaries.
The Application Of Fundamental Valuation Principles To Property/Casualty Insurance Companies Derek A. Jones, FCAS Joy A. Schwartzman, FCAS.
Discussion of Unpaid Claim Estimate Standard  Raji Bhagavatula  Mary Frances Miller  Jason Russ November 13, 2006 CAS Annual Meeting San Francisco,
Embedded Value and Analysis of Change KBC Insurance business as at 31/12/2002.
4 Life business, embedded value and analysis of change Johan Daemen General Manager, Life insurance Foto gebouw.
©2015 : OneBeacon Insurance Group LLC | 1 SUSAN WITCRAFT Building an Economic Capital Model
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
2009 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2009 Halifax, Nova Scotia ● Halifax (Nouvelle-Écosse) 2009 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2009 Halifax, Nova.
CS-12 IAA Progress on RBC Life Case Study Les Rehbeli July 29, 2003.
Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.7-2 Agenda Property and Casualty Insurers Life.
Enterprise Risk Management An Introduction Frank Reynolds, Reynolds, Thorvardson, Ltd.
Stochastic Loss Reserving with the Collective Risk Model Glenn Meyers ISO Innovative Analytics Casualty Loss Reserving Seminar September 18, 2008.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute.
Individual Claim Development An Application Bas Lodder 9 March 2015.
Aggregate margins in the context of level premium term life insurance Results of a study sponsored by the Kansas Insurance Department Slides prepared by.
ProAdapt The Role of Insurance in Adaptation to Climate Change Nikhil da Victoria Lobo Head of Americas Swiss Re Global Partnerships General Public Release.
Prepared for the Annuity Reserve Work Group By Steve Strommen FSA, CERA, MAAA May 1, 2013 POTENTIAL RESERVE METHODOLOGY.
Protection market overview Protect Association Maxine Udall and Ron Wheatcroft, 20 May 2016.
E&O Considerations for Coastal Agencies Exposures & Risk Management Corporate Solutions.
Dr. Maya Bundt, Head Cyber & Digital Strategy, Swiss Re
Actuarial role/ contributions/ challenges in Reinsurance
Digitalisation and insurance
Closing the gap Partnerships for reaching people
Income Protection ... and beyond
24th India Fellowship Seminar
LIABILITY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Diversification of Longevity and Mortality Risk Stuart Silverman, FSA, MAAA, CERA Longevity 12 September 29-30, 2016.
IIABA / Swiss Re Corporate Solutions E&O Programs Conference
Claims by Carriers v. Agents
1 The roles of actuaries & general operating environment
Group Watch and Term & Health Watch 2017
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver
Cost of Capital Issues April 16, 2002 John J. Kollar.
Bermuda Economic Balance Sheet (EBS) Technical Provisions
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Presentation Workshop
Oklahoma Municipal Retirement Fund Asset Allocation Discussion
Agricultural Drought Insurance
Old challenges, new solutions
Presentation transcript:

General Public Release The added value of a stochastic mortality framework Fasecolda Philippe Maeder General Public Release

Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 3 Table of Contents / Agenda ABC of Stochastic Mortality Illustrations Modelling Mortality Shocks Conclusion

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health ABC of Stochastic Mortality From Deterministic to Stochastic Models Random Fluctuation of Mortality 4

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health First models developed by actuaries were deterministic, with more or less sophistication; for a policyholder since age x and having attained age x+t : – Periodic mortality tables: they reflect mortality observed or projected in a given year – Select and ultimate tables: a selection factor intervenes to acknowledge the underwriting effect. – Generation tables (or longitudinal tables): they take into account difference of mortality between generations (defined by birth year Y) and mortality variations (in general: improvements) over time. Most recent developments consisted of adding a stochastic error term reflecting "unexplained" and random variations of mortality over time. – There are several models that consider random fluctuations of mortality either in additive or multiplicative way, so for instance: – This random fluctuation can be autocorrelated in time, or reflect mortality shocks From Deterministic to Stochastic Models 5

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Additive model with normal distribution: – similar to a Brownian "noise": normal distribution with expected value 0 – inconvenience: it can generate negative total mortality rates if not bounded – a variant introduces negatively autocorrelated (ARIMA(0,1,0)) random variations Model with lognormal distribution: – in aggregate format, mortality is a random lognormal variable with expected value qx and a standard deviation determined by calibration – no negative values, but a bigger "tail": resulting probabilities should be less than 1 Multiplicative models – the deterministic mortality rate is multiplied by a random variable with expected value 1; – here as well Gamma or logarithmic random variables are popular because they have positive values only. Random Fluctuation of Mortality 6

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Illustrations Survivorship Group P.V. temporary annuity P.V. Claims for a Term Life P.V. Level Premium Term Life Math. Provision Term Life 7

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Deterministic survivorship group with basis periodic table Stochastic mortality component with lognormal distribution, uncorrelated Calculation of a Survivorship Group 8

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, mean 92'553 (deterministic: 92'557) and standard deviation 188. Quant (5%) = 92'234; Quant (95%) = 92'853; ±0.33% Distribution of the Number of Survivors 9

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, mean (deterministic: ) and standard deviation Minimum = ; Maximum = ; ±0.14% Distribution of the P.V. of a Temporary Annuity 10

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, mean 4.875% (deterministic: 4.872%) and standard deviation 0.115%. Minimum = 4.422%; Maximum = 5.350%; ±9.5% Distribution of the Single Premium of a Term Insurance 11

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, mean % (deterministic: %) and standard deviation %. Minimum = %; Maximum = %; ±9.6% Distribution of the Level Premium of a Term Insurance 12

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Mathematical Provision - Term Life Policy ( x = 35; n = 30 ) 13

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, at duration 18 (max. prov.), mean % (deterministic: %) and standard deviation %. Minimum = %; Maximum = %; ±9.6% Distribution of the Math. Provision of a Term Insurance 14

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Stochastic mortality introduces a certain complexity in modelling. It barely has any impact on longevity (present value of annuities) and on products where savings and risk both intervene. It brings an additional information for pure Term covers: Single premiums, Annual Premiums and Reserves can vary in the same order of magnitude as the variation coefficient of mortality. What about mortality "shocks"? – they can be introduced in the stochastic mortality model or studied as scenarios; – they should not be modelled for policyholders separately, but strike the whole portfolio at the same time, taking correlation between risks into account. What about the comparative impact of other factors, such as mortality improvements or lapses? What Can We Learn? 15

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Modelling Mortality Shocks Survivorship Group P.V. temporary annuity P.V. Claims for a Term Life P.V. Level Premium Term Life Math. Provision Term Life 16

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health A mortality shock of 3.7 ‰ randomly introduced as a 1 in 30 years event. Calculation of Survivorship Group with Mortality Shocks 17

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, mean 92'454 and standard deviation 387 (vs. 188) Distribution of the Nb. of Survivors – Mortality Shocks 18

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, mean and standard dev (vs ). Minimum = ; Maximum = ; [-1.28%; 0.28%] P.V. of a Temporary Annuity with Mortality Shocks 19

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, mean 4.974% and standard dev % (vs %). Minimum = 4.308%; Maximum = 6.662%; [-13.4%; 33.9%] Single Premium of a Term Insurance – Mortality Shocks 20

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 10'000 simulations, mean % and std. dev % (vs %). Minimum = %; Maximum = %; [-13.6%; 35.3%] Level Premium of a Term Insurance – Mortality Shocks 21

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Math. Provision - Term Life Policy – Mortality Shocks 22

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Conclusion When should Stochastic Models be Used? When should use of Stochastic Models be Questioned? Alternatives to Stochastic Models Disadvantages of Stochastic Models Concluding Remarks 23

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health When required by regulation and / or standards of professionalism – calculation of risk-based capital or statutory liabilities (USA) When analysing extreme outcomes or "tail risks" that are not well understood – scenarios of very unlikely events are difficult to calibrate When using certain risk measures, such as Value at Risk (VaR) or Conditional Tail Expectation (CTE) – Such values are at times used to determine risk-based capital (cf. above) When certain percentiles are required – what would be the extent of a 1 in N years event? When one wants to understand where stress tests fall in the broader spectrum of possible outcomes When should Stochastic Mortality Models be Used? 24

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health When it is difficult / impossible to determine the appropriate probability distribution – normal / lognormal distributions not reasonable? When it is difficult or impossible to calibrate the model – credible historical experience missing When it is difficult or impossible to validate the model When should Use of Stochastic Models be Questioned? 25

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Stress testing / scenario testing – What if…? Collective Risk Models giving analytical and / or numerical answers Static factors – "load factors" developed on other cases Ranges – higher and lower bounds Alternatives to Stochastic Models 26

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health "Black Box" phenomenon – the model must be properly set up and understood before being used – it might give the impression of (false) precision while other basic assumptions are not fixed Improper calibration or validation – What is the purpose of the model? – are historical data relevant and consistent? Uses of inappropriate distributions or parameters – use of standard assumptions (normal, etc.) without thinking enough about the application framework Disadvantages of Stochastic Models 27

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Relative Impact of Stochastic Assumptions 28

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Stochastic Mortality Models should not be the "tree that hides the forest"! Modelling mortality improvements is very important as well Lapse rates have a much higher impact on the present value of claims Selective lapsation – mortality deterioration due to the cancellation of policies of good risks – is also a phenomenon deserving analysis and models. Sensitivity analysis and scenario testing are essential to the actuary to develop an educated judgement about assumptions Questions? Concluding Remarks 29

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Philippe Maeder – Swiss Re: – University of Lausanne: From the IAA: References 30

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health 31

General Public Release Fasecolda | Philippe Maeder | Senior Product Expert Life & Health Legal notice 32 ©2015 Swiss Re. All rights reserved. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivative works of this presentation or to use it for commercial or other public purposes without the prior written permission of Swiss Re. The information and opinions contained in the presentation are provided as at the date of the presentation and are subject to change without notice. Although the information used was taken from reliable sources, Swiss Re does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or comprehensiveness of the details given. All liability for the accuracy and completeness thereof or for any damage or loss resulting from the use of the information contained in this presentation is expressly excluded. Under no circumstances shall Swiss Re or its Group companies be liable for any financial or consequential loss relating to this presentation.