GREECE: Meeting of the National Councils for S&T policy of the EU Member Countries Prague,25-26 May 2006 National Research Council General Secretariat.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Economic and Social Committee Consultative Committee on Industrial Change "CCMI" P r e s e n t a t i o n of J á n o s T Ó T H Member of the EESC.
Advertisements

Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
Active employment policies IN EUROPEAN UNION AND GREECE
1 Regional Policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020 Standard presentation Brussels, November 2010 Pierre GODIN Policy Analyst, DG Regional policy.
N.Vakalis, MEP, ITRE “Greek experiences in using Structural funds for regional development” Conference "Research and Innovation - an Opportunity for Convergence.
2nd Workshop Prague 29/11/2007 WP4: Pilot action plan Region of Central Macedonia Isidoros Passas, URENIO Research Unit.
Linking BRICS innovation potential through Innovation Networking Platform Sergey Korotkov Director, UNIDO CIIC Russia.
Promoting University-Industry Collaboration Diponegoro University.
Community Initiative Programme Interreg III A Greece – Italy February 2006.
The National Innovation System in Kosovo
2015. MITA. All rights reserved.````` Lithuanian Country Report Gintarė Narakienė The Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 1 THE ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI ISO 9001:2000 and AUTH Research Committee Christina Besta,
Ari Kokko Industrial policy Why? How? Examples: EU Industrial Policy and Swedish Industrial Policy Sources
Dutch Enterprise Policy: Topsector approach OECD CIIE-meeting, March 2015 Henry van der Wiel Ministry of Economic Affairs 26 March 2015.
Workshop ”InDeCS-H: Development of Healthcare Biotechnology SMEs“ 10th September 2009 Budapest Strategy for Hungarian pharmaceutical and biotechnology.
First Science Park in the Baltics – operating since Founders: University of Tartu, Institute of Physics, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu.
National innovation strategies and policies - Republic of Slovenia Dr. Klemen Grošelj SIPO Novi Sad,
Experience and Lessons of Utilizing National and EU Funds for Innovation in Bulgaria Enhancing Bulgaria’s Competitiveness through Innovation.
GATEWAY TO FINNISH EXPERTISE 1 Commercialization guidelines – NanoCom and ProNano results Dr. Eeva Viinikka, Business Director Programme Director of National.
CHANGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF THE SS. CYRIL AND METHODIUS UNIVERSITY IN SKOPJE Prof. Dr. Velimir Stojkovski Rector Ss. Cyril and Methodius University.
Instruments for support to innovative and competitive SMEs in Serbia
Some aspects of National STI system in Albania & The Research at Polytechnic University of Tirana T.Korini, UPT, Tirana Tbilisi, 11 April 2012.
European Commission Enterprise Directorate General Innovation Policy R&D and Innovation in the Regional Operational Programs Meeting with Regions 11 July.
Panagiotis KARNIOURAS NCP for SPACE / Technology Transfer Consultant PRAXI/ HELP-FORWARD Network … the Greek experience 9 October 2009.
III ASTANA ECONOMIC FORUM INTERNATIONAL INNOVATIVE CONGRESS Innovative potential development in SME`s in region Dr. Karl-Heinz Klinger Technostart GmbH,
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
1 The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan: Main Conclusions and Recommendations.
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
INNOVATION 2004 Prague, Nov. 30/Dec.1-3, 2004 The EUREKA Initiative: Assessment and Evaluation Procedures Svatopluk Halada EUREKA Secretariat, Brussels.
Martin Bruncko Zrenjanin, Serbia 23 February, 2009 THE ROLE OF ICT POLICIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY The Experience of Slovaki a.
1 Innovation and innovation policies in developing countries in the framework of PaceNet+ Ludovico Alcorta Director. Research, Statistics and Industrial.
General Secretariat for Research & Technology (GSRT) Ministry of Development Dr. Dimitris DENIOZOS Secretary General for Research and Technology Thessaloniki,
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
S&T and Innovation Policy in the Republic of Armenia Innovation Programs Division, SCS RA “Development of Coherent Innovation Policy in South Caucasian.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
Marie Curie Schemes - ToK Marie Curie Host Fellowships for the Transfer of Knowledge ToK.
EU STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION - EUSDR Conference on TEMPUS project – Lifelong learning for sustainable agriculture in Alps-Danube-Adriatic Region Zagreb,
Identification of national S&T priority areas with respect to the promotion of innovation and economic growth: the case of Russia Alexander Sokolov State.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
B R U S S E L S Partnership of local authorities in sciences and business Best practices of Brussels-Capital Region Sofia, 31st October 2008.
1 Regional Innovation Strategies RIS. 2 About Regional Innovation Strategies The RIS projects aimed to support regions to develop regional innovation.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Cogita Final Conference, 23 October 2014, Bologna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Elisa.
Launching conference of the ClusterCoop Project The future role of clusters in Central Europe Budapest, 13th of July 2011 Polish clusters and cluster policy.
FP7 /1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION - Research DG – September 2006 Building a Europe of Knowledge Towards the Seventh Framework Programme
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
Establishing National Technology Development and Transfer Systems
1 EUROPEAN INNOVATION POLICY: Innovation policy: updating the Union’s approach in the context of the Lisbon strategy Thursday, 9 October 2003 Sofia, Bulgaria.
EU Research and Innovation Strategies: Lessons for Thailand and Emerging Economies EU Innovation Strategy Sascha Ruhland Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe.
1 Trends in Science, Technology and Industry: An OECD Perspective Jerry Sheehan OECD Science & Technology Policy Division Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest,
Internationalisation in Education Adam Tyson European Commission DG Education and Culture.
Utilization of knowledge for economic growth in the Czech Republic Karel Klusacek Technology Centre AS CR Knowledge Economy Forum V.
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
Szilárd Árvay Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Hungary.
Pentti Pulkkinen Programme Manager Academy of Finland Research funding and administration in Finland
Ivan Mikloš Deputy prime minister of the Government of the Slovak Republic responsible for economic affairs Bratislava 22 November 2004 COMPETITIVENESS.
Benchmarking RTDI Organisations in Central and Southeast European Countries Regional Innovation Strategies International workshop 19 November 2004 Zoya.
Innovation Development Strategy
Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
The National Innovation System in Kosovo
Projekt jednako razvoj d.o.o.
DEVELOPMENT & IMPLEMENTATION OF A NATIONAL STRATEGY ON CSR
MEANING OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES: DEFINITIONAL TESTS
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
European Innovation Platform for Knowledge Intensive Services Elke Van Tendeloo DG Enterprise and Industry Brussels, 04 June 2007.
Competitiveness of the regional market, importance of statistics and innovations THE ROLE OF RESEARCH CENTERS IN PROMOTING OF RESEARCH Sarajevo, 8th.
Research and Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialisation of the Slovak Republic Mgr. Martin Svoboda
Presentation transcript:

GREECE: Meeting of the National Councils for S&T policy of the EU Member Countries Prague,25-26 May 2006 National Research Council General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Development Prof. Iacovos Vasalos

Discussion items Characteristics of the Greek National Innovation System Areas for discussion Role of governments in making a link between expectations and needs of the business sector on the one hand with the need to encourage research freedom and independence of the research sector on the other hand, and in fostering a link between R&D and innovation Content of the presentation:

Research expenditures in Greece IndexGreeceEU mean Gross Domestic Expenditure on Research and Development in relation to GDP 0,58%1,9% Business contribution to the Gross Domestic Expenditure on Research and Development 30%55%

Greece’s economy competitiveness innovation/technological upgrading business initiatives employment Greece’s economy competitiveness is based on three pillars:

Innovation / Technological upgrading Higher education institutions supervised by the Ministry of Education Public research and technology centers, most of which are supervised by the General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Development The private sector The bulk of research activities in Greece is carried out by entities categorized into three major groups

Research and other personnel occupied in research and technological activities Number of persons ResearchersOther R&D personnel Total Personnel in private sector Personnel in public research centers Personnel in high education institutions Personnel in non profit organizations Total

Public research institutions administered by: Ministry of Development - General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) 12 Research Centers Ministry of Education 19 university establishments, including the Open University 14 technological educational establishments Ministry of Agriculture National Agricultural Research Institute Ministry of Health Hospitals

Although the Ministry of Education exerts great influence on the national research system due to the large number of universities in the total R&D effort, the only body that has explicit role in developing research and technology policy in Greece at present is the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) of the Ministry of Development.

Areas for discussion  What tools seem to be appropriate for strengthening the chain „research, development and innovation“? Which type of measures have been identified as the most effective – fiscal schemes (direct support) or, e.g., tax deduction (indirect support) or others (platforms, clusters, etc.)? The following tools have been utilized to encourage innovation within the Greek economy: - Tax deduction of research expenditures - Direct support of innovative activities through subsidies - Formation of collaborative networks in areas of national priority

 How did the private sector participate in the preparation of measures and actions supporting the innovative behaviour of the business sphere? Or, was it first of all the activity of the government? There is a consultation process during which the business sector participates with its representatives

 What tools can be used to encourage the under-funded business sphere to innovate? What experiences have countries had with those tools? How are they (or will they be) evaluated? Networks of private and academic institutions in specific areas of sectoral technologies (PAVE) Evaluation: This tool appears to be the most effective way to engage SME’s and other enterprises together with academic institutions in collaborative work. However, the results are disappointing because in quite a few cases they lack the critical mass needed for innovation

Encouragement of the commercialisation of research results from Universities and research institutes (PRAXE A & B) Evaluation: Support of researchers to commercially exploit the results of R & TD for the creation of new, rapidly developing companies (spin-off) has been a priority for S&T in Greece. This program has met partially success, because for the first time an integrated approach for creating research intensive SME’s has been adopted.

Promotion of technology parks and research centres (ELEFTHO) Evaluation: Technology parks and research centres generate knowledge and technology which are essential in the modern economy. Incubators for high-tech, knowledge-intensive companies support the early and difficult phases of new companies and provide infrastructure and knowledge services essential for their development. Four private incubators have so far started up and the results are encouraging.

Creation of new technological and research collaborative networks (ESPRO) Evaluation: The promotion of long-term collaborations between public research institutions and private enterprises creates mechanisms for learning, for the transfer of technology and technical knowledge, and more generally reinforces the technological base and potential of productive agencies. However, this scheme seldom leads to the establishment of long term cooperation, a prerequisite for engaging Universities and research institutes in solving problems of the productive sector.

Development of Research Centers with the Participation of Users. Support of Laboratories Cooperating with Enterprises and Users of Research (AKMON) Evaluation: Strengthening the cooperation between companies, institutes of higher education and research centers is the objective of this action. The program matches company direct funding up to 2 mil Euro, providing there is a binding 2 to 4 year contract between the cooperating parties. There are indications that this action may be a catalyst for attracting multinational companies as part of their outsourcing strategy.

 Do these countries mean that a positive influence on innovative behavior of the private sector is possible and effective without threatening market conditions? The contribution of the private sector in research expenditure is today 30% of the total (0.58% of GNP) national expenditure. Encouraging the private sector to innovate is believed is possible without threatening market conditions. The above is secured by the strict application of state aid rules applied as required by EU regulations.

 How can national research councils promote innovation on the national level? Is there any way to influence innovation at the European level? The national research councils play a consultancy role for national research policy. Usually, their authority is derived from a mandate by a Ministry responsible for formulating national research policy for economic growth. The Ministries of Development in Greece has given the following mandate at present to the research council: - To draft a new national law for research with the goal of making the system more flexible and transparent - To open the system to international cooperation - To reorganize the public research Centers so that economies of scale are possible - To recommend policies for improving the knowledge potential from Universities and public research centers, and to exploit the value of this knowledge by fostering effective ways of cooperation between Universities, public research centers, and the private sector Coordination of policies at European level relating to innovation is an effective means of influencing European policies on innovation. The Open Method of Coordination is an effective way for mutual learning and EU policy makers have to take seriously the recommendations of the results produced by many expert groups over the last 24 months

 Should the system of R&D assessment also cover the innovative potential of scientific results? A flexible evaluation system should be adopted. This should take in account the primary mission of a researcher independently where he is located, that is a University or public research center. Four major parameters should be used for evaluation with different weighting factors dependent on the primary mission of a researcher’s activities. These are: - Public non competitive national funding - External funding from competitive national, international, and private sources - Scientific excellence as proven by publications in refereed journals taking in account impact factor in the specific field of research - Innovation potential as established by the funding obtained from industry, the number of cooperations and the participation in the creation of spin ofF companies