By Noah Berg-Mattson. Overview Ciénegas, or desert wetlands, provide crucial ecosystem services such as: Help maintain perennial stream flow Foraging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecology 14 Biogeography & Biodiversity Ralph Kirby.
Advertisements

Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Wetland Habitats: EMWMF Haul Road Remediation In 2005 a large haul road was constructed that resulted in loss of wetlands. To compensate for those losses,
Comparison of Basal and Aerial Cover for Total Vegetation Cover and Total Ground Cover on Oil & Gas Well Sites in Southwest Wyoming 2013 Joint Conference.
Global Mapping of Impervious Surface Area Benjamin Tuttle* - CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder Christopher D Elvidge, PhD - NOAA-National Geophysical.
Structure and Function
By Erick Arellano December Description The Westminster Ponds Mills complex is one of the largest Natural Areas in London, comprising some 300 hectares.
Reciprocal Influences of Long-Term Beaver Occupancy on Landscape Factors and Forest Structure (Adirondack Mountains, NY) Dr. John Stella Anna Harrison.
Chapter 3 Communities, Biomes and Ecosystems
An overview of Wetland Delineation In preparation for next week’s field trip.
Forest In Illinois. Southern Catalpa Forest Communities in Illinois Illinois's major woodland types have been described according to forest community.
Comparative Study of a Mitigation Project to Both an Impacted Wetland and a Natural, Untouched Wetland. Kalle Pladl Department of Biological Sciences,
Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions PoM implementation: wetland restoration Alexei Iarochevitch Afyon,
Big Walnut Creek Forest A study of soil and tree species Brett Bohlander Brittany Mohrman Tory Pavlovich.
Soil Carbon in Greenbelt Park Jay S. Gregg May 10, 2006.
UNDERC HABITATS (terrestrial & aquatic). CHANGE CONTINUES EVOLUTIONARY AND GEOLOGICAL CHANGE (inherent) ECOLOGY OF AQUATIC HABITATS (inherent) ECOLOGY.
Topics Included In Environmental Studies Syllabus.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
PFC Assessment Approach & Definitions Creeks and Communities.
Landfill Processes. Objectives  Describe the physical, chemical, and biological processes occurring in a landfill  Describe leachate quality (Table.
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity at Shale Hills CZO AUTHORS: ANNA SCHWYTER, MEAGAN REDMON, HENRY LIN, NEIL XU, NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, PENNSYLVANIA.
Water Sustainability Seminar Series Academy Village April 16, 2014 Part 1.1 – Watershed Overview and CWP.
Review: Watersheds. An area of land that is saturated with water for the majority of the year, and supports plant species adapted to living in wet environments,
Wetlands. What is a Wetland? Types of wetlands. – Marshes – Swamps – Bogs – Fens Types of wetlands. – Marshes – Swamps – Bogs – Fens Water saturated patches.
Conceptual Ecological Model of San Acacia Reach of Middle Rio Grande River – 2/13/07 1 st Draft Ibis Ecosystem Associates, Inc. Diversion & Regulation.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Blackwater River Area October 25, 2004.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
 Aldo Leopold’s Game Management - cornerstone text for U.S. federal wildlife agencies - three necessities for free-ranging wildlife: food, water, and.
INTRODUCTION Changes in land use in basin areas, including conversion of previously forested areas into agricultural pastureland, can often have negative.
St. Johns River Water Management District Special Publication SJ97-SP8 Water Management Alternatives: Effects on Lake Levels and Wetlands in the Orange.
Field Ecology 1. Aquatics 2. Forests & Grasslands 4. Soils3.Wildlife Populations.
 Comparing Vegetation in a Riparian Zone to an Upland Area in a Colorado Montane Forest By: Abby Branson Vegetation Ecology, Summer 2013 Mountain Research.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Ohio Wetland Real Estate Issues. Definition Definition Federal Regulations Federal Regulations Permits Permits Solutions Solutions Legal Statues Legal.
1. Measuring Soil Quality Soil quality integrates the physical, chemical, and biological components of soil and their interactions. Therefore, to capture.
Ecological Restoration
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service “Helping people help the land"

1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Lake Raleigh Wetland Creation Feasibility Study NC State Centennial Campus Melanie Carter, Jennifer Burdette, Amanda Jones.
A Mass-Balance, Watershed-Scale Analysis of the Chemistry of Adirondack Lakes Discussion - Day 5.
Assessing Crayfish Habitat Dan O’Brien John Meredith Leroy Mims.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Definitions.
Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.
Ben Graeff  Individual state losses range from 9% to 91%. The continental United States was once home to over 215 million acres of wetland habitat,
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Georgia Agricultural Curriculum Office June 2011.
Response of Understory Vegetation following Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) Cutting on Two Sites Breanna S Sabin FS 533.
STREAM DRYING IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN: HOW WILL LOW FLOWS SHAPE FUTURE RIPARIAN VEGETATION? Lindsay V. Reynolds 1,2,3, Patrick B. Shafroth 3,
Biomes and aquatic Ecosystems
What is a ‘watershed’? An area of land where all of the water in it drains to the same place. Think of a watershed like a big sink. The water from the.
Warm Up 52 1) Describe some of the features you see on this map.
Rangelands & Forestry.
PRESCRIBED FIRE BASICS
Biomes and aquatic Ecosystems
Rangeland Principles (Rem 151)
150 Years of Wetland Loss at Jeffers Petroglyph Site
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
Environmental Law Fall 2018
The potential for microbial nutrient cycling processes in urban soils
Butternut Creek Biomonitoring
Comparing Ecosystem AQUATIC TERRESTRIAL.
Southeastern Section, GSA
Texas Aquatic Ecosystems
Dr Helen Pontier Senior Scientific Advisor for Habitats Defra
Riparian and Wetland Ecosystems
Presentation transcript:

By Noah Berg-Mattson

Overview Ciénegas, or desert wetlands, provide crucial ecosystem services such as: Help maintain perennial stream flow Foraging opportunities Crucial aquatic habitats Contain only 2% of the land area but harbor 19% of species of concern for conservation

Definition Ciénegas Desert wetlands in the American Southwest between 1000 m and 2000 m in elevation. Characterized by hydrosols (permanently saturated, highly organic, reducing soils) Dominated by Swamp Willow, Mimulus and sedges understory, and Gooding Willow and Cottonwood in less saturated soils along the margins.

Purpose How do percent organic carbon and inorganic carbon change in regard to stream proximity? Can changes in organic and inorganic carbon explain the developmental history of ciénegas and possible historical stream position within the ciénegas?

Hypothesis H o : The stream channel migrates H1: Once the ciénega develops the stream becomes fixed Tested through organic composition of series of cores Ho: Inorganic carbon is covariant with organic carbon H1: Inorganic carbon reflects hydrologic flow Tested through comparison of organic and inorganic carbon

Background Ciénegas were degraded over the past 100 years through over-grazing, groundwater withdrawal. Areas of high conservation concern. Experience transitions between steady states of gravel-bed/grassland and wetland.

Site Description I Canelo Hills Ciénega Purchased by Nature Conservancy in 1969 Small ciénega which is relatively undisturbed Located in Southeastern Arizona at 31° 33’ N and 110° 31’ W

Site Description II Ciénega surface is approximately 100m wide and 1500 m long. At the head waters of Turkey Creek Vegetation characterized by: Swamp Willow, Mimulus and sedges and grasses Gooding Willow and Cottonwood on margins Oak Juniper woodlands/ grassland in the uplands

Methods Cores were collected at 10 m intervals in a transect Each core was sampled contiguously for Loss on Ignition Loss on ignition was used to estimate: Percent organic carbon Percent inorganic carbon Pairwise comparison between each core T-test used to determine significant difference

Transect

Organic C along transect

Organic C Results

Results Percent Organics (students t-test)

Carbonate along transect

Results

Percent Inorganics (Student T-test)

Organic Carbon compared to Inorganic Carbon

Discussion Question 1: How do percent organic carbon and inorganic carbon change in regard to stream proximity? Organic carbon is consistent across transect. Percent inorganic carbon varied significantly across transect with an increasing trend across the middle of the ciénegas. Hypothesis accepted that stream channel fixes with cienega development

Discussion Question 2: Can these changes in organic and inorganic carbon help explain the developmental history of ciénegas and possible historical stream position within the ciénegas? Percent organic carbon suggests ciénegas undergo a uniform change in vegetation structure. However, differences in inorganic carbon are due to evaporation and indicate that this is a hydrologic flow/flux proxy and is not related to growth.

Conclusion The hydrology through system (inorganic carbon) is separate from growth (organic carbon) of system The different evaporative potentials across the surface cause variation in the inorganic carbon

Acknowledgements Dr. Tom Minckley and Dr. Mark Clementz The Nature Conservancy of Arizona The EPSCoR Program The Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy

Results