Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
1 st September 2005LHC-LUMI 05 - G.Arduini – CERN/AB Optical requirements for the magnetic lattice of the high energy injectors (SSPS in the SPS tunnel)
TRANSITION-FREE LATTICES C Johnstone and B. Eredelyi Fermilab NuFact02 Imperial College, London July1-6, 2002 *special thanks to A. Thiessan WG1 July 4.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou. PS2 meant as potential replacement of existing PS PS2 main characteristics given by LHC requirements – Circumference defined.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
BEAM’07 summary PS2 October 5 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 M. Benedikt.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Hybrid Synchrotron Arc: 2 Dipoles per Half Cell J. Scott Berg Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting 28 July 2011.
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Some words of Wisdom / Caution B. Holzer is allowed to spend 5 % of his (precious) time to act as consultant for the lattice design and beam optics of.
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Optics considerations for PS2
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
PS2 design status Y. Papaphilippou LIS section meeting
Progress of SPPC lattice design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Towards an NMC lattice for PS2
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Optics considerations for PS2
Update on Alternative Design of jleic ion injector Complex B
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring2 07/02/08 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, J. Jowett (CERN) G. Arduini, R. Garobi, B. Goddard, S. Hancock (CERN), Y. Senichev (FZ Jülich), D. Trbojevic (BNL) Contributors Acknowledgements

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring3 07/02/08 Motivation and design constraints for PS2 FODO lattice Doublet/Triplet Flexible (Negative) Momentum Compaction modules  High-filling factor design  Tunability and optics’ parameter space scan  “Resonant” NMC ring  Hybrid solution Comparison and perspectives Outline

PSB SPS SPS+ Linac4 (LP)SPL PS LHC / SLHC DLHC Output energy 160 MeV 1.4 GeV 4 GeV 26 GeV 50 GeV 450 GeV 1 TeV 7 TeV ~ 14 TeV Linac2 50 MeV (LP)SPL: (Low Power) Superconducting Proton Linac (4-5 GeV) PS2: High Energy PS (~ 5 to 50 GeV – 0.3 Hz) SPS+: Superconducting SPS (50 to1000 GeV) SLHC: “Super-luminosity” LHC (up to cm -2 s -1 ) DLHC: “Double energy” LHC (1 to ~14 TeV) PS2 Present acceleratorsFuture accelerators Motivation – LHC injectors’ upgrade Upgrade injector complex.  Higher injection energy in the SPS => better SPS performance  Higher reliability R. Garoby, BEAM’ 07 4

5 Design and optics constraints for PS2 ring Replace the ageing PS and improve options for physics  Provide 4x10 11 protons/bunch for LHC (vs. 1.7x10 11 )  Higher intensity for fixed target experiments Integration in existing CERN accelerator complex Versatile machine:  Many different beams and bunch patterns  Protons and ions Basic beam parametersPSPS2 Injection kinetic energy [GeV]1.44 Extraction kinetic energy [GeV]13/2550 Circumference [m]200 π 1346 Transition energy [GeV]6~10/10i Maximum bending field [T] Maximum quadrupole gradient [T/m]517 Maximum beta functions [m]2360 Maximum dispersion function [m]36 Minimum drift space for dipoles [m] Minimum drift space for quads [m]0.8 Maximum arc length [m]510 Analysis of possible bunch patterns: C PS2 = (15/77) C SPS = (15/7) C PS Improve SPS performance Normal conducting magnets Aperture considerations for high intensity SPS physics beam Space considerations Longitudinal aspectsConstrained by incoherent space charge tune-shift

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring6 07/02/08 Layout  Racetrack: Integration into existing/planned complex:  Beam injected from SPL  Short transfer to SPS  Ions from existing complex All transfer channels in one straight Minimum number of D suppressors  High bending filling factor  Required to reach 50GeV PS2 SPL Linac4 PSB PS

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring7 07/02/08 FODO Ring Conventional Approach:  FODO with missing dipole for dispersion suppression in straights  7 LSS cells, 22 asymmetric FODO arc cells, 2 dipoles per half cell, 2 quadrupole families  Phase advance of 88 o, γ tr of 11.4  7 cells/straight and 22 cells/arc -> in total 58 cells  Q H,V =  Alternative design with matching section and increased number of quadrupole families  Transition jump scheme under study

07/02/08Optics solutions for the PS2 ring8 Dispersion suppressor and straight section InjKInjSH0SH0SH - InjS MTEBK ExtKESMS1MS2BDDuK Fast InjectionH - -Injection Extraction 7 cells Cell length [m]23.21 Dipole length [m]3.79 Quadrupole length [m]1.49 LSS [m] Free drift [m]10.12 # arc cells22 # LSS cells:7 # dipoles:168 # quadrupoles:116 # dipoles/half cell:2

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring9 07/02/08 Doublet and Triplet arc cells Advantages  Long straight sections and small maximum ß’s in bending magnets (especially for triplet) Disadvantage  High focusing gradients

Flexible Momentum Compaction Modules Aim at negative momentum compaction (NMC modules), i.e. Similar to and inspired from existing modules (SY. Lee et al, PRE, 1992, J-PARC high energy ring) First approach  Module made of three FODO cells  Match regular FODO to 90 o phase advance  Reduced central straight section without bends  Re-matched to obtain phase advance (close to three times that of the FODO, i.e. 270 o ) Disadvantage: Maximum vertical β above 80m regular FODO 90 o /cell -> zero dispersion at beginning/end reduced drift in center, average 90 o /cell -> negative dispersion at beginning/end γ tr ~ 10i

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring11 07/02/08 NMC modules with high filling factor Improve filling factor: four FODO per module Dispersion beating excited by “kicks” in bends Resonant behavior: total phase advance < 2 π Large radii of the dispersion vector produce negative momentum compaction High phase advance is necessary Phase advance with shorter drifts In red: real lattice 5D βxβx βyβy C. Carli et al. PAC07

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring12 07/02/08 Improving the high filling factor FMC The “high-filling” factor arc module  Phase advances of 280 o,320 o per module  γ t of 8.2i  Four families of quads, with max. strength of 0.095m -2  Max. horizontal beta of 67m and vertical of 43m  Min. dispersion of -6m and maximum of 4m  Chromaticities of -1.96,-1.14  Total length of 96.2m Slightly high horizontal β and particularly long module, leaving very little space for dispersion suppressors and/or long straight sections Reduce further the transition energy by moving bends towards areas of negative dispersion and shorten the module

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring13 07/02/08 Alternative NMC module 1 FODO cell with bends and an asymmetric low-beta triplet  Phase advances of 320 o,320 o per module  γ t of 6.2i  Five families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m -2  Max. beta of 58m in both planes  Min. dispersion of -8m and maximum of 6m  Chromaticities of -1.6,-1.3  Total length of 90.56m Fifth quad family not entirely necessary Straight section in the middle can control γ t Phase advance tunable between 240 o and 330 o Main disadvantage the length of the module, giving an arc of around 560m (5 modules + dispersion suppressors), versus 510m for the FODO cell arc

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring14 07/02/08 The “short” NMC module Remove middle straight section and reduce the number of dipoles 1 asymmetric FODO cell with bends and a low- beta doublet  Phase advances of 272 o,260 o per module  γ t of 10i  Five families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m -2  Max. beta of around 60m in both planes  Min. dispersion of -2.3m and maximum of 4.6m  Chromaticities of -1.1,-1.7  Total length of 71.72m Considering an arc of 6 modules + 2 dispersion suppressors of similar length, the total length of the arc is around 510m

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring15 07/02/08 Phase advance tunable between 240 o and 420 o in the horizontal and between 250 o and 320 o in the vertical plane “Tunability”

Transition energy versus horizontal phase advance imaginary

Dispersion versus transition energy Almost linear dependence of momentum compaction with dispersion min/max values Higher dispersion variation for γ t closer to 0 Smaller dispersion variation for higher γ t imaginary 07/02/08 17Optics solutions for the PS2 ring

18 07/02/08 Transition energy versus chromaticity Higher in absolute horizontal chromaticities for smaller transition energies Vertical chromaticities between -1.8 and -2 (depending on vertical phase advance) Main challenge: design of dispersion suppressor and matching to straights imaginary

19 Similar half module as for the NMC with 2+5 dipoles (instead of 2+4) Using 4 families of quads to suppress dispersion, while keeping beta functions “small” Maximum beta of 70m Total length of 77.31m Dispersion suppressor cell

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring20 07/02/08 The ring I Adding a straight section with 7 FODO cells, using 2 matching quadrupoles  Straight drift of 9.5m  Tunes of (12.1,11.4)  γ t of 12.9i  13 families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m -2  Max. beta of around 71m in horizontal and 68m in the vertical plane  Dispersion of -2.3m and maximum of 4.6m  Chromaticities of -16.7,  Total length of 1346m

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring21 07/02/08 The resonant NMC module 1 symmetric FODO cell with bends and a low-beta doublet  Phase advances of 315 o,270 o per module 8 x 315 o ->7 x 2 π 8 x 270 o ->6 x 2 π  γ t of 5.7i!!!  Four families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m -2  Max. beta of around 59m in both planes  Min. and max. dispersion of -8.5m and 8.9m  Chromaticities of -1.5,-1.7  Length of 1.2m between QF and D  Total length of 64.8m e.g. Y. Senichev BEAM’07

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring22 Dispersion is suppressed by fixing horizontal phase advance to multiple of 2 π Solution with odd number of 2 π multiples is preferable for getting lower imaginary γ t Suppressing dispersion

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring23 07/02/08 8 NMC modules Total horizontal phase advance multiple of 2 π Maximum β of 59m Total length of 518m The “resonant” NMC arc

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring24 07/02/08 The “resonant” NMC ring II Adding a straight section with 7 FODO cells, using 2 matching quadrupoles  Straight drift of 9.4m  Tunes of (16.8,9.8)  γ t of 10.7i  8 families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m -2 Extra families for phase advance flexibility in the straight  Max beta of around 60.5m in horizontal and vertical plane  Min. and max. dispersion of -8.5m and 8.9m  Chromaticities of -21.7,  Total length of 1346m

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring25 07/02/08 An optimized NMC module 1 asymmetric FODO cell with bends and a low-beta doublet  Phase advances of 316 o,300 o per module  γ t of 5.6i!!!  Four families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m -2  Max. beta of around 54m and 58m  Min. and max. dispersion of -7.8m and 10.2m  Chromaticities of -1.3,-2  Total length of 73m

26 Hybrid approach:  Phase advance close to multiple of 2 π and 2 extra quad families Suppressing dispersion

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring27 16/11/07 7 NMC modules Phase advances of 5.8 x 2 π and 5.5 x 2 π Maximum β of 60m Total length of 511m The arc III

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring28 16/11/07 The NMC ring III Adding a straight section with 7 FODO cells, using 2 matching quadrupoles  Straight drift of 9.5m  Tunes of (13.8,13.4)  γ t of 10.9i  10 families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m -2 Extra families for phase advance flexibility in the straight  Max beta of around 58m in horizontal and 56m in the vertical plane  Min. and max. dispersion of -8.2m and 10.2m  Chromaticities of -18.7,  Total length of 1346m

29 Comparison ParametersRING IRING II Transition energy12.9i10.7i10.9i Number of dipoles Dipole length [m] Arc module length [m] Number of arc modules5+287 Arc length [m] Straight section drift length [m] Quadrupole families13810 Arc phase advance [2 π ]5.2/5.27/65.8/5.5 Maximum beta functions [m]71/6861/6158/56 Maximum dispersion function [m] Tunes12.1/ / /13.4 Chromaticity-16.7/ / /-29.5 Optics solutions for the PS2 ring 07/02/08

Optics solutions for the PS2 ring30 07/02/08 Different lattice types for PS2 optics investigated  FODO type lattice a straightforward solution Challenge: Transition crossing scheme  NMC lattice possible alternative No transition crossing Challenge: low imaginary transition energy Perspectives:  Complete the lattice design including chromaticity correction and dynamic aperture evaluation  Detailed comparison based on performance with respect to beam losses Collimation system Non-linear dynamics Collective effects Summary