MET Slice Monitoring Xiaowen Lei, Venkat Kaushik Ken Johns.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jet Slice Status Report Ricardo Gonçalo (LIP) and David Miller (Chicago) For the Jet Trigger Group Trigger General Meeting – 9 July 2014.
Advertisements

Releases & validation Simon George & Ricardo Goncalo Royal Holloway University of London HLT UK – RAL – 13 July 2009.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
Jet and MET HLT Monitoring for HI Running Ken Johns, Sam Silva, Venkat Kaushik, (U. Arizona)
CSC DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Caleb Lampen, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
SCT Offline Monitor Measuring Module Hit Efficiencies Helen Hayward University of Liverpool.
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Mar 25, 2010.
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Dec 17, 2009.
11 CSC DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Caleb Lampen, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
CSC DQA and Commissioning Summary  We are responsible for the online and offline DQA for the CSC system, a US ATLAS responsibility  We are ready for.
Status and Plans for the Measurement of the Top Quark Production Cross Section in the Leptons plus Jets Channel Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei.
1 Online Jet Slice DQA Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei University of Arizona.
Update on Pileup Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)
1 Jet and MET Slice DQA Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik University of Arizona Lucian Ancu University of Bern.
CSC DQA for Last Week Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei University of Arizona.
CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
GLAST LAT ProjectOnline Peer Review – July 21, Integration and Test L. Miller 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Integration Readiness Review.
O FFLINE T RIGGER M ONITORING TDAQ Training 30 July 2010 On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
Trigger-aware analysis Current status Under development What’s missing Conclusions & Outlook Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
10 TeV Updates on Efficiencies and Event Shapes Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona) Single lepton + jets channel.
Plans for Trigger Software Validation During Running Trigger Data Quality Assurance Workshop May 6, 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo, David Strom.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
Databases E. Leonardi, P. Valente. Conditions DB Conditions=Dynamic parameters non-event time-varying Conditions database (CondDB) General definition:
Darren Price – HLT B-trigger offline status report :: B-Physics meeting July 23 rd ‘08Page 1 HLT B-trigger offline monitoring status Darren Price, LANCASTER.
Detector Diagnostics Calibration Analysis Ped/LED/Laser RadDam Analysis Detector Optimization Lumi Detector Performance Monitoring DQM On/Offline Prompt.
OFFLINE TRIGGER MONITORING TDAQ Training 5 th November 2010 Ricardo Gonçalo On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.
RPC DQA but also Monitoring for the DCS group: status and prospective for Marcello Bindi RPC L1MU Barrel DQM - 08/05/2013.
EMU Reference Histogram Comparison Unit R. Cavanaugh, V. Barashko, A. Korytov.
November 2013 Review Talks Morning Plenary Talk – CLAS12 Software Overview and Progress ( ) Current Status with Emphasis on Past Year’s Progress:
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
News from Jet/Etmiss Monica. Jet/Etmiss meeting yesterday (25/5) at P&P week – Mostly review of conf notes for ICHEP10 – Good review to check where we.
Organisation of the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs WG Meeting - 22 Jan.09.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Trigger Software Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) TAPM Open Meeting – April 12, 2007 Outline: Reminder of plans Status of infrastructure.
Conditions Metadata for TAGs Elizabeth Gallas, (Ryan Buckingham, Jeff Tseng) - Oxford ATLAS Software & Computing Workshop CERN – April 19-23, 2010.
Argonne Jamboree January 2010 Esteban Fullana AOD example analysis.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora-Herrera Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève ATLAS Reconstruction Meeting 8 June 2010.
N. Hod, Y. Benhammou, O. Ben-Ami, Y. Silver, L. Levinson D. Lellouch O. Silbert TGC ONLINE Monitoring.
Trigger validation for Many thanks to Long Zhao, Chihiro Omachi, Julie Kirk, Giovanni Siragusa, Patricia Conde Muiño, Andreas Reinsch, Olya Igonkina,
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
1 Outline: Update on muon/dimuon AOD production (R. Arnaldi/E. Scomparin) Other ongoing activities: MUON correction framework (X. Lopez) MUON productions.
Online monitor for L2 CAL upgrade Giorgio Cortiana Outline: Hardware Monitoring New Clusters Monitoring
Nov 1, 2002D0 DB Taking Stock1 Trigger Database Status and Plans Elizabeth Gallas – FNAL CD (with recent help from Jeremy Simmons, John Weigand, and Adam.
General requirements for BES III offline & EF selection software Weidong Li.
A. Gheata, ALICE offline week March 09 Status of the analysis framework.
Jet/MET Trigger On-Call Report Ricardo Gonçalo – LIP Jet Trigger Meeting – 31/3/2015.
1 Offline Week, October 28 th 2009 PWG3-Muon: Analysis Status From ESD to AOD:  inclusion of MC branch in the AOD  standard AOD creation for PDC09 files.
Hadronic Jet Energy Scale Hadronic t-t bar selection and Jet Energy Scale calibration Part I : Accessing the trigger information 09/02 - Menelaos Tsiakiris.
Trigger Input to First-Year Analysis Model Working Group And some soul searching… Trigger Open Meeting – 29 July 2009.
Level 1-2 Trigger Data Base development Current status and overview Myron Campbell, Alexei Varganov, Stephen Miller University of Michigan August 17, 2000.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M DMT Monitor Verification with Simulated Data John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G E Data Simulation for the DMT John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
D.Spiga, L.Servoli, L.Faina INFN & University of Perugia CRAB WorkFlow : CRAB: CMS Remote Analysis Builder A CMS specific tool written in python and developed.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
Thomas Ruf, CERN EP Experience with C++ and ROOT used in the VX Beam Test Thomas Ruf, CERN, EP  Why? Event structure for VX-data rather complex: raw hits.
Analysis framework plans A.Gheata Offline week 13 July 2011.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
1/5/09 Jiri Masik1 Event Filter Tracking in the Inner Detector Jiri Masik EFID Trigger related work –Trigger bytestream –Event display.
Starting Analysis with Athena (Esteban Fullana Torregrosa) Rik Yoshida High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
HLT Jet and MET DQA Summary
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Presentation transcript:

MET Slice Monitoring Xiaowen Lei, Venkat Kaushik Ken Johns

2 Online Monitoring  Current List of Histograms: See Diego’s talk. Updated list of histograms is in and above.  DQMF configuration file was prepared and used in M7 run. Based on old list of histograms. Configuration is listed on:  Monitoring Need to update according to current list of histograms for use in the future.

3 Offline Monitoring  A first version HLTMETMonTool has been submitted by Venkat and is in cvs. In Trigger/TrigMonitoring/TrigHLTMonitoring/ Will be used at Tier 0 in FDR2A run. Plots ex, ey, et, sumet for L2 and EF.  Offline monitoring tool with vertical slice monitoring has been written. Right now called TrigMETMonTool and not in cvs yet. Tested in , with AOD files reconstructed on on RDO’s, example histograms made. Plan to update the tool above with this one. Can also be used for CAF (CERN Analysis Facility) monitoring.

4 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  Organisation of Histograms: Histograms organized in folders for different triggers:  noTrigger, L1_XE15,…,L2_XE15,…,EF_XE15,…  we can specify the triggers that we are interested in to make histograms for only those triggers Under each folder the following histograms are plotted:  noTrigger folder: MET quantities for all levels and RecMET quantities.  L1_** folder: L1MET and RecMET quantities for events that passed the L1_** trigger; correlation plots between L1MET quantities and RecMET quantities.  Same for L2 and EF trigger folders.

5 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  Organisation of Histograms

6 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  Example Histograms: Made by running TrigMETMonTool in AOD’s made from Release RDO’s in Diego’s Wtaunu.list Reconstruction is run in Release Use the histograms in EF_XE20 as an example.

7 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  Example Histograms in EF_xe20 EFMET quantities

8 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  Example Histograms in EF_xe20 RecMET quantities

9 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  Example Histograms in EF_xe20 Correlation plots

10 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  To-Do: Need to implement efficiency plots correctly. Need to make L1, L2 and EF efficiency plots/turn-on curve with respect to RecMET. Need to have plots of 10%, 50%, 90% point (on turn-on curve) MET versus time. Efficiency plots booked and filled with pseudo-efficiency. Tools for calculating 10%, 50% and 90% are in place and ready for use.

11 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  To-Do: Need to implement efficiency and purity plots with the appropriate triggers. We have decided to use the following to calculate efficiency: MET trigger efficiency:  Function of met, eta, phi  Using min bias triggers or dijet triggers  offline met passing l1/l2/ef met trigger / all  For real physics triggers: use wenu triggers and ttbar triggers, and do the calculation above  Once these plots are in place we can also implement the 10%, 50%, 90% plots.

12 Status of Offline Monitoring Tool  To-Do’s: Better Organisation of the Histograms.  E.g.: have summary folders. Need to test and update the code with AOD’s produced by and above. Once the code is in place, we need to prepare offline DQMF (han) configuration files to be able to see the plots on the web displayer.