EAD 856 At Risk Students. The term “at-risk” is often used to describe students who have factors in their lives that can have a negative effect on their.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Middle College A fresh start toward a successful future.
Graduation for All!. Overview Framing the Dropout Problem – ABCs State and Local Approaches – GED Option – Middle College Dropout Prevention IZ Grants.
[Your District's] Comprehensive Guidance Program: Linking School Success with Life Success 1 [Your District’s] Comprehensive Guidance Program Responsive.
PORTFOLIO.
Gwinnett County Public Schools Parent Portal Overview
January 10, 2013 Report on the Virginia Early Warning System (VEWS) Education Commission of the States June 27, 2013 Virginia Department of Education.
Supporting Students for High School Graduation and Beyond Introduction Judy Delgado Indian Education Program California Department of Education Webinar.
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
(Funded by Grad Pathways Grant).  Students at-risk for leaving high school before graduation.  Lack of attachment to school  Special educational needs.
Communities In Schools of Delaware Empowering students to stay in school and achieve in life.
KSIS Beginning-of-Year Training, July 23-24, 2014 Bonnie Tomberlin, Consultant Office of Next Generation Learners Division of Learning Services.
School Improvement Planning A Guide to the Florida Continuous Improvement Management System.
Closing the Achievement Gap A 3-hour training for experienced SBDM Council members.
What should be the basis of
© CCSR Stacy B. Ehrlich, Julia Gwynne, Amber Stitziel Pareja, and Elaine M. Allensworth with Paul Moore, Sanja Jagesic, and Elizabeth Sorice University.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Reducing Chronic Absence What Will It Take? 2014.
School Counselor's Role Marjorie Sutton, School Counselor RH Dana Elementary.
University of Kentucky
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant Calhoun ISD
STUDENT ASSISTANCE AND THE 7 SCHOOL TURNAROUND PRINCIPLES Dale Gasparovic, MSed., Administrator Student Assistance Center at Prevention First
Union University (Germantown Campus)
The CIS Model Research, Rationale, & a Business Plan.
Collaborative Closing the Gap Action Plans: School Counselors, School Social Workers and School Psychologists Working to Close the Gaps.
P t G T P ersistence t o G raduation T ool A tool designed to identify students who may be off-track for graduating.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
A Fairmont High School (NC) experience …. Can achieve a high school diploma and our belief starts before they walk into our doors.
Dr. Paul A. Rodríguez. Continuation Education Started in 1919 as an option for students who needed to work and finish school Refocused in 1965 with federal.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Secondary Experience and Achievement TASK FORCE Staff Leads: Matt Duffy, Brigitte Marshall, Alison McDonald.
SMART Goals: Writing Attendance Goals. Learning Outcomes Learners will: Create specific, measurable goals related to attendance Understand the process.
A major shift in Alabama’s curriculum to better prepare our students for post-secondary life (i.e. life after school). 1.Beginning this school year ( )
Access to Learning Section E STANDARDS & INDICATORS Council of International Schools New England Association of Schools & Colleges.
The Rise Cohort A Dropout Prevention Program Tina Krabitz and Laura Peter Homewood Center.
+ Early Decision Making Early Help & Early Warning Signs Leisa Gallagher Director, Reaching & Teaching Struggling Learners Coordinator, Superintendent’s.
2012 Summer Institute WHOLE SCHOOL, WHOLE CHILD 101.
LCFF and LCAPs Presented to the 4 th District PTA March 18, 2014.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 INSERT.
Rondout Valley CSD Strategic Planning Group Agenda 8/23/10  Welcome  The Global Achievement Gap- Tony Wagner  Videos The Global Achievement Gap 2 Million.
Student Conduct and Discipline Meeting 10/06/09. New PPS Discipline Policy.
RESEARCH Among developed countries the US ranks: – 17 th in high school graduation – 14 th in college graduation – Each year 1/3 of public school students.
KSIS Beginning-of-Year Training, July 23-24, 2014 Persistence to Graduation Tool Mike Hefling, Consultant Office of Next Generation Schools and Districts.
Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant Calhoun ISD Identifying and Acting on At Risk Data.
Introducing a new tool to keep kids in school. The Kentucky Department of Education’s mission is to prepare all Kentucky students for next-generation.
Intervention and Referral Services
Working Together for Student Success Kristie Wilson Contact us:
The School Counseling Program
Data Tracking WHY? In order for us to understand our students well, we must know what their level of growth is. By tracking data over time, we can get.
Randallstown High School Alternative Learning Center Looking at Suspension in a Different Way.
School –Based Efforts: A Plan to Support At- Risk Youth.
Safe Schools Infinite Campus Interchange Windy L. Newton Office of Next Generation Schools & Districts, Division of Student Success.
WHAT WORKS IN DROPOUT PREVENTION: BAKING PROTECTIVE FACTORS INTO MICHIGAN’S K-12 SYSTEM LEISA GALLAGHER, DIRECTOR REACHING & TEACHING STRUGGLING LEARNERS.
E ARLY W ARNING I NDICATOR S YSTEM Jessica Noble Education Program Consultant, KSDE
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
COUNSELING ADVISORY COUNCIL COUCH MIDDLE SCHOOL. WELCOME! Dr. David Anderson Counselor.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Mission Possible: Graduation & Beyond Class of 2024
The School Counseling Program
Evidence-Based Practices: Tier 1
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
A fresh start toward a successful future
Driving Through the California Dashboard
What does it stand for? Our program focuses on: Growth Engagement
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
Presentation transcript:

EAD 856 At Risk Students

The term “at-risk” is often used to describe students who have factors in their lives that can have a negative effect on their educational success. The actual definition of “at-risk student” has not been categorically defined across settings. The lack of common language when describing the “at-risk” learner is problematic, especially in the era of NCLB, high stakes testing, and teacher accountability. Definition

A student who is likely to fail at school. Students who drop out of high school prior to graduating. Students who fail to meet basic proficiency in key subjects, such as mathematics and reading. There are several factors that the NCTS reviews when defining the at risk student. These factors include the following: –Basic demographic characteristics to include: sex, race/ethnicity/socio-economic status –Family and personal background characteristics –The amount of parental involvement in the student’s education –The student’s academic history –Student behavior factors –Teacher perceptions of the student –Characteristics of the student’s school The National Center for Educational Statistics

At-risk students are students who are not experiencing success in school and are potential dropouts. Usually, they are low academic achievers who exhibit low self-esteem. Generally they are from low socioeconomic status families. At-risk students tend not to participate in school activities and have a minimal identification with the school. They have disciplinary and truancy problems that lead to credit problems. They exhibit impulsive behavior and their peer relationships are problematic. Family problems, drug addictions, pregnancies, and other problems prevent them from participating successfully in school. As they experience failure and fall behind their peers, school becomes a negative environment that reinforces their low self-esteem. US Legal

A student who qualifies for a free or reduced lunch programs or An at-risk student as defined by specific rules adopted by the school board if it has adopted rules to define an at-risk student. State of Oregon

School policy states that at-risk students are defined as having any of the following characteristics: –Excessive absenteeism and/or tardiness. –Low grades that do not reflect student’s potential. –Test scores indicating achievement below the current grade level. –Poor relations with peers as observed by school staff. –Multiple behavior referrals. –Parents or guardians unresponsive to phone calls, letters, or scheduled meetings. Spencer County Middle School- Spencer County Kentucky

Students are placed at-risk when they experience a significant mismatch between their circumstances and needs, and the capacity or willingness of the school to accept, accommodate, and respond to them in a manner that supports and enables their maximum social, emotional and intellectual growth and development. National At-Risk Education Network- NAREN

No set definition, but “at risk” is referred too often. KDE Provides a tool that is called The Persistence to Graduation Tool This tool is available as a part of Infinite Campus in our district. –Under KY State Reporting Access is granted to administrators, counselors, and social workers at this time. KDE also maintains a website that explains the PtG Tool…. What about Fayette County?

This report may take several minutes to render. Please do not click Generate Report more than once. This tool identifies students who may be off-track to be promoted to the next grade level or graduate on-time. It is the responsibility of each school to determine necessary and appropriate supports and interventions for students who may be off-track for graduation. It is expected that using this tool will aid the district in increasing its graduation rate, as well as to fulfill the commitment to increase its college and career readiness rate. Using the indicators and rules listed below, the tool calculates a risk value for each student. Information is presented in descending order according to risk value, where students with larger risk values are at the top of the list. The tool generates two reports. The EXCEL file includes risk values and all prior academic and current academic year characteristics used to calculate the risk value, as well as additional supportive information that does not contribute to the risk value. The PDF file only includes risk value and point values for current year attendance, behavior, and performance. Due to the information captured in the two reports, it is recommended that schools generate the EXCEL report once per semester as a reference point. The PDF then can be generated throughout the academic year for more timely information. Risk values are calculated using the following rules for current academic year AND prior academic year data (* indicates current academic year only): Demographics: Student is LEP = 1 point* Student is 2 years older than expected for grade level = 1 point* Attendance: 5-10% classroom time missed current academic year = 1 point >10% classroom time missed current academic year = 2 points 5-10% classroom time missed prior academic year = 1 point >10% classroom time missed prior academic year = 2 points Behavior: 1-4 in-school removals (INSR) current academic year = 1 point 5+ INSRs current academic year = 2 points 1-4 INSRs prior academic year = 1 point 5+ INSRs prior academic year = 2 points 1-4 suspensions (SSP3) current academic year = 1 point* 5+ SSP3s current academic year = 2 points* Performance (% Failing Term Grades) – Points assigned separately for current academic year AND prior academic year: >10 to 15% = 1 point >15 to 25% = 2 points >25 to 35% = 3 points >35 to 45% = 4 points >45 to 55% = 5 points >55% = 6 points

There are many other factors that should be considered when deciding if a child is at risk in a school…..The PtG tool does NOT look at the following: –Race –Socioeconomic status –Family Demographic and/or parental support –School Climate and Culture –Teacher Perceptions –Etc. The PtG tool is simply a starting point to help identify students at risk. Other Factors

Remember that this in ONE tool……Much more goes into identifying Students at risk…… Infinite Campus Portal

Development of interventions –Check in Check Out –Why Try –Social skills groups –FRC Referrals –Counselor referrals –Wrap around Services –Behavior modification strategies such as self monitoring –Whatever intervention that WORKS! Think outside the box! How to use the PtG Tool

The following sessions will touch on the following themes that we read about in our preparations for class. – Caring, Sustained Relationships –Reachable Goals –Realistic, Hopeful Pathways –Engaging School and Community Settings Sugar Break Breakout Sessions