Partners for Segment 1 Jennifer & Beverly Susan & Yelena Faye & Kellie Jamie-Marie & Sandy Rita & Bob Sabrina & Chris Katrina & Julie Richard & Jackie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Strategies. Agenda  Use your agenda book (consistently)  Keep agenda book with you at all times  System for recording items in agenda.
Advertisements

The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Current Comfort Level with Learning Targets
Best Practices for Adolescent Literacy Secondary Alabama Reading Initiative ARI Content Literacy 2010.
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership March 25, 2010 We will begin at 9:01.
Featured Presenters: Harvey SilverJennifer Bay Williams Jan ChappuisMyron Dueck Carol Commodore Embassy Suites, Lexington Preconference: July 25, 2011.
Productive Math Talk Math Alliance April 3, 2012.
SEPT 20 8:00-11:00 WHAT ARE WE MEASURING? HOW DO WE MEASURE? DHS English Department Professional Development.
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
A CONNECTION BETWEEN SELF REPORTED GRADES AND FEEDBACK Jaimee Sutherland Farmington Middle School.
Session 2 Teaching Comprehension Strategies with Explicit Instruction.
Network for New Science/Math Teachers November 17, 2009 Lexington, KY Brought to you by : University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
New Teacher Training The Effective Teacher: Classroom Management Rosalie Gardner Induction and Mentoring Project Coordinator August 4, 2009.
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership September 23, 2009 We will begin at 9:01.
Making Algebraic Connections Math Science Partnership Grant Funded by the United States Department of Education through the Kentucky Department of Education.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
ATP Summer Workshop July 19-20, 2010 Ramada Inn Lexington, KY Welcome! Please enjoy some refreshments.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Math-It’s Elementary February 2013 Investigating strategies that promote highly effective teaching and learning for meeting the Kentucky Core Academic.
Featured Presenters: Harvey SilverJennifer Bay Williams Jan ChappuisMyron Dueck Carol Commodore Embassy Suites, Lexington Preconference: July 25, 2011.
Network for New Science/Math Teachers June 1, 2010 Meeting 6 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science Education Reform.
PVNC MATH 3 PROJECT DIGGING DEEPER WITH DIFFERENTIATION Session 2.
August 19, 2015 Do Now  On a ticket, write your name.  On scratch paper, write down definition of formative assessment  Find a partner to work with.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance May 7, 2008 Blue Licks State Park Welcome! Please help yourself to some refreshments and make sure you have.
Grant County Schools Science Collaboration September 27, 2011.
LNHS CASL Training Tuesday, December 16th, Classroom Assessment For Learning A Quick Review Key 1: Clear Assessment Purpose Key 2: Clear Learning.
Pre-Meeting Task Use Post It Notes to address the following on the appropriate charts Unit Parking Lot –Questions? –Concerns? –Barriers? Unit Success –Are.
Next Generation Science Cadre Facilitators: Jennifer Spencer Katrina Slone.
Featured Presenters: Harvey SilverJennifer Bay Williams Jan ChappuisMyron Dueck Carol Commodore Embassy Suites, Lexington Preconference: July 25, 2011.
Getting Started National Board Candidate Support Please sit together by NB Certificate Area WS
Establishing a Culture of Achievement Planning for Success: lesson planning, learning styles and teaching strategies.
HOW TO TEACH WRITING IN A NON-ELA SETTING District Learning Day 10:20-11:30 August 5, 2015.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science November 13, 2009 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
Math Leadership Support Network ’09-’10 Mathematics Leadership Support Network Presentation Provided Jointly by the P-12 Math and Science Outreach Division.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science December 15, 2009 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance October 28, 2008 Blue Licks State Park Good Morning! Please help yourself to some refreshments and make sure.
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
Determining Student Mastery: Achieving learning potential using assessment Drew Maerz Asheboro City Schools July 8, 2014.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science March 12, 2010 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Science Leadership Support Network September 25, 2009 Supported by PIMSER and Kentucky Department of Education Welcome!
Network for New Science/Math Teachers December 10, 2009 Lexington, KY Brought to you by University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science.
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership January 28, 2010 We will begin at 9:01.
C&I 222: Understanding Goals and Purposes: Assessment OF Learning and Assessment FOR Learning.
Network for New Science/Math Teachers October 23, 2008 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science Education Reform Welcome!
Alabama Reading Initiative Session 1. Parameters: 1. All participants - no observers. 2. Use time wisely. 3. Stay focused. Please keep sidebar.
Please Sit in These Groupings: A—Sabrina, Kellie, Katrina, Micki B—Susan, Chris, Rita, Beverly C—Jennifer, Bob, Jeremy, Yelena D—Jamie-Marie, Sandy, Julie,
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
“Do Now”. Introduce yourself to new colleagues at your table. Then Turn and Talk about this; What’s wrong with this picture? What can teachers do to ensure.
Network for New Science/Math Teachers November 20, 2008 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science Education Reform.
Master Teacher Project Appalachian Math Science Partnership August 28, 2009 We will begin at 9:01.
To STLN November 30th, Today’s Facilitators Dr. Robert Boram Morehead State University Teresa Rogers KDE Literacy Consultant Dr. Katrina Slone Stem.
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance April 14, 2009 Blue Licks State Park Come on In! Please help yourself to some refreshments and make sure you.
Math Leadership Support Network ’09-’10 Mathematics Leadership Support Network Presentation Provided Jointly by the P-12 Math and Science Outreach Division.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Summer Assessment Institute: Linking Data Teams & Quality Assessment August 2015.
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science
Write your metaphors on the butcher paper
Collaborative Instructional Strategies Inquiry
Correlated Curriculum
Kentucky Standards: Overview of Deconstruction Process
Assessment for Learning
An Information Evening for Parents
Presentation transcript:

Partners for Segment 1 Jennifer & Beverly Susan & Yelena Faye & Kellie Jamie-Marie & Sandy Rita & Bob Sabrina & Chris Katrina & Julie Richard & Jackie Jeremy & Micki Please Sit Together

Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership February 11, 2011 We will begin at 9:01

Group Norms Place cell phones on silent or vibrate Come prepared for each meeting Listen actively as others are speaking Avoid sidebar conversations Respect and solicit opinions Rule of 2 feet

November Review Selected Response Assessment Web Tools Developing Higher Level Questions Revisit Deconstruction DECEMBER AMSP Conference

Roadmap for Today Selected Response Analysis High Level Question Analysis Subject Break Outs The formative-assessment process

Assessment: Selected Response Learning Targets –I can analyze student assessments to determine item quality. –I can analyze student assessments to determine next steps in instruction. –I can modify questions in order to improve accuracy. –I can use student self- assessment to inform next steps in instruction.

Why Accuracy Is Important Assessment information can be inaccurate in one of two ways: 1. We think students have mastered material when they actually have not. 2. We think students haven’t mastered material when they actually have.

Using Assessment Results Using the student results and self- assessment for the MC quiz, analyze each item using the analysis form. Once completed: –Revise items if needed –Determine next steps in instruction Whole Class Individuals

Determining if Revision is Needed Questions to consider: –How many students missed the question? –What “wrong answer” was selected? Is it consistent among students or spread out? –Were there questions that ALL students got correct or incorrect? May this be attributed to distractor problems? Formatting problems? –Student self-assessment—How many students missed the question and attributed simple mistake as the reason?

Making Instructional Decisions Questions to consider: –How many students missed the question? –What wrong answer was chosen most often? –Were wrong answers spread among the distractors? –How did the students self-assess? Are there several “didn’t know it” selections? Decisions to make: –Re-teaching needed? –Individual Instruction? Homework or extra practice 1-on-1 time –Differentiation for student groups? Were there patterns in the overall results of the quiz? –Continuing with unit plan?

Let’s Debrief! What is the value in MC analysis using student results? What do well constructed MC items reveal about student understanding? How important is adequate sampling in MC assessments? How important is student self-assessment in this process? D

T-chart Time

The Head Band Game

Questioning Learning Targets: –I can identify the purpose of using good questions during instruction. –I can describe the criteria necessary for thoughtful questions. –I can analyze a set of questions to determine if they meet the criteria. –I can modify questions based on analysis results.

Goals of Questioning 1.Build Motivation 2.Enhance Recall and Memory 3.Teach Good Thinking 4.Increase Students’ Depth of Knowledge 5.Design Better Lessons and Units

Purpose of Questions Most questions we ask in school are managerial or simplistic in nature— “Will you please get out your book?” or “What is the formula for density?” Is this bad? Why or why not? What should the purpose of questioning be?

Good questioning doesn’t just happen; it’s planned for.

Question Analysis Using the analysis form, analyze each question you developed from the last meeting. Additional resources may include the Think Trix & Thinking Questions cards and the Silver Questioning Styles folder. Once completed: –Revise questions if necessary –Fill in gaps—by target and/or style

What? So What? Now What? What? –You have planned a question-rich unit. How do you think this will impact student learning? So What? –What did you learn from this experience? –What are the implications of this framework for developing questions? Now What? –What is your plan for continuing this type of planning for future units?

T-chart Time

Formative-Assessment Process Article developed for use by KY Leadership Networks and CCSSO Formative Assessment for Students and Teachers.

For Immediate Release! Write a press release for the local paper about the use of formative assessment in your classroom. Describe what one would expect to see when observing your class and give your rationale for using this type of assessment.

Sticky Notes As you read the article, use post-its to: –Summarize key points –List any questions you have –Make connections to your own practice You will use this process for every 1-2 paragraphs of text.

Partner Talk Using support from the article and your notes, discuss with an elbow partner the following: –What does formative- assessment really mean? –What new insights did you gain from the reading?

Let’s All Discuss What DOES formative- assessment really mean? How does this match or differ from what is currently practiced in your classroom? What steps can you take to ensure a closer match? Revise your press release if needed.

Next Meeting Prep Read the Chapter 2 excerpt from Advancing Formative Assessment Every Classroom. Please complete the reading guide.

T-chart Time

Roadmap for Today Selected Response Analysis High Level Question Analysis Subject Break Outs The formative-assessment process

For March Our next meeting will be March 25, 2011 Next meeting prep –Read book excerpt and complete reading guide. –Read CASL Ch. 9— Communicating About Student Learning and complete the reading guide.