July 2, 2012 8:30 – 11:30 Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Advertisements

Individual Professional Development Plan Santa Rosa District Schools School Year.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Through Instructional Rounds
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Contextualized Goals Setting: How to operationalize ISLLC standards for school improvement Dawn Shannon Assistant Superintendent, Broome-Tioga BOCES
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
RAPPS – Rural Alaska Principal Preparation and Support Program Selecting and Training Evaluators May 28 – 30, 2014 Learning Groups 1, 2, and 3 Hilton Hotel.
Data Driven Instruction for Common Core Learning
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Broome-Tioga BOCES Network Team… the ENTIRE team! (Pat Walsh, Barb Phillips, Jennifer Dove)
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
Introduction to Role Playing as an Instructional Method
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Identifying CCSS Aligned Instruction in Writing.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Presentation by Dr. Doug Bower. Always in motion is the future -Master Yoda.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
 Student Growth Goals & Plan KASA Conference July 17, 2014.
MS 219 Historical Data. M.S. 219 Quality Review Recommendations ( ) 1. Further develop all teachers’ skills, knowledge, and understanding of.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
An Informational Session on the Common Core Standards Laurie Gregory Holland Central School Director of Curriculum November 18, 2013.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Technical Support Webinar May 8, 2012 Presented by: Broome-Tioga BOCES RTTT Network Team.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
TPGES Overview Part II Jenny C. Ray PGES Consultant.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
Identifying and Using Multiple Measures Bill Bagshaw.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
NGSS Resources Facilitator Notes:
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Five Required Elements
CCRS Implementation
Evaluating Principals Making a Fuzzy Process More Clear
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Teacher Insight Survey 2019
Presentation transcript:

July 2, :30 – 11:30 Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips

 Explain criteria for quality evidence and how this is used in principal evaluation  Collect evidence, evaluate quality and classify evidence to components of your districts’ rubric Defend your position about this classification  Describe “goals” that provide evidence for significant sections of the rubric  Describe areas of the rubric that you will need further time to describe evidence collection processes.  Compare current practices with recommended practices. Describe the implications for your district.

Proposed Agenda 1. Reviewing significant learning from 6/25 2. Classifying evidence 3. Collecting evidence and classifying the evidence within the rubric 4. Identifying sections of the rubric that require additional consideration 5. Describing what will need to change in your current practice

1. Describe 2 significant differences between APPR requirements for TEACHERS and the requirements for PRINCIPALS 2. SED provides an option for goal setting. Describe 2 ways to utilize goal setting in your APPR process for principals. 3. Describe three things about the rubric for principals that all of your principals and supervisors MUST know!

Rigorous curriculum and assessment Data Driven Decision Making Great Teacher/ Great Leaders leadership What do these RTTT initiatives have to do with evaluation of principals?

What types of evidence could be collected during a site visit?

O bservable A ligned R epresentative S ufficient (remember: free of bias, opinion, not a summary)

 Does the evidence have examples of OARS?  Is the evidence a summary?  Is there bias, opinion present in the evidence?

The principal will...  Complete all observations of teachers, conduct post conferences, and provide teachers with feedback  Implement a complete DDI structure for a grade or school  Design and monitor a peer leader model for supporting teaches in implementing the common core.

 Lack clear performance expectations (results + actions and behaviors)  Need strategy definitions (To be successful, what does the principal need to know and do)  What is the reason for doing these goals? What are they designed to accomplish? Why do them?

Describe what kind of evidence the evaluator would collect for these “goals” Identify how this evidence would be used in the districts’ rubric. What components of the rubric are NOT covered by these goals?

a simulation... Goal one: The principal conducts high quality observations with provides effective feedback to all teachers. SCENARIO: The supervisor observes the principal giving feedback to a teacher after the observation...

1. Observe the lesson 2. Observe the simulation of the post conference. 3. Compare your evidence with a colleagues’ evidence. 4. Classify your evidence. 5. Join another colleague and defend your position.

 What did you learn?  What are your personal goals after this activity?  What are the implications for your district?

How is this system of evaluation different from current practice in your district? What structures will you need to have in place to ensure that this evaluation process is successful?

What’s Next??? THANK YOU! We have thoroughly enjoyed the opportunity to work with you today! Dawn and Barb THANK YOU! We have thoroughly enjoyed the opportunity to work with you today! Dawn and Barb