Robert J. Noecker, MD, MBA Kimberly V. Miller, MD UPMC Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Ophthalmology.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group

Advertisements

A technique to salvage big-bubble deep lamellar keratoplasty after inadvertent full- thickness trephination Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati 1, MD and Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati.

Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Corticosteroids to Treat Bacterial Keratitis Ray KJ, Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas.

Early Outcomes of Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes with Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses Preeya K. Gupta.

Roy E Lehman MD*, Samuel F Fulcher MD**

Jeffrey J. Ing, MD, FACS, (Delta Eye Medical Group, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology) Thanh T. Nguyen, OD (Delta Eye.

Aqueous Humor and Plasma Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Nitric Oxide in Patients with Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Pseudoexfoliation.

We Support! The Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals Healthcare Technology Foundation The Joint Commission 2015 National Patient.

Yüksel Totan, Ramazan Yaĝcı, Zeynel Arslanyılmaz, Uĝurcan Keskin The authors have no financial interest.

Michael Peterson March 21, Maximize the gift of donation Develop novel surgical treatments Improve corneal transplantation Cure disease.

Dislocation of the DSEK Donor Graft into the Posterior Segment An Intraoperative Complication in DSEK Surgery Mark M Fernandez MD, Mark S Gorovoy MD, George.

Anterior Chamber Depth, Iridocorneal Angle Width, and Intraocular Pressure Changes After Phacoemulsification: Narrow vs Open Iridocorneal Angles Huang.

Moderator: Kevin T. Fuji, Pharm.D., M.A. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice Assistant Director Center for Health Services Research and Patient Safety.

Removal of Pediatric Cataract with Intraocular Lens Implantation Using 23 gauge Incisions and 25 gauge Instrumentation Irena Tsui, M.D. Steven Kane, M.D.,

Understanding Disparities Among Diagnostic Technologies in Glaucoma De Moraes C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC. Understanding disparities among diagnostic.

Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus Goldmann Applanation R. S. Davidson 1 ; N. Faberowski 2 ; R. J. Noecker 3 ; M. Y. Kahook 1 1.

So-Hyang Chung, MD, PhD, Choun-Ki Joo, MD, PhD Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,

Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.

Will my Glaucoma patient lose vision ?

Kimberly V. Miller, MD Jeremy B. Wingard, MD Michael J. Pokabla, MD Korinn M. Strunk Jennifer L. Gray, PhD Rocio Bentivegna, MD Robert J. Noecker, MD,

Pop and Pre-Chop A Safe Supracapsular Phacoemulsification Technique

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Nation’s Medical Center Serving active military, retired military and dependants in the Washington, D.C.

Implantable Optofluidic Sensor for Assessment of Intraocular Pressure Christina Antonopoulos MD, Mostafa Ghannad-Rezaie, Nikos Chronis PhD, Shahzad Mian.

QUANTITATING THE IMPACT OF CLINICAL AND BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH POSTER #2469 M. O. GORDON, C. SARLI, E. K. DUBINSKY, E. LONG, C. LA RUE, M. A. KASS, AND.

Comparison of morphologic changes after continuous and micro-pulse yellow laser trabeculoplasty by scanning electron microscopy Wingard JB; Miller KV;

South Hills Eye Associates

Recentering of ReZoom IOL by Suturing Technique to Optimize Visual Acuity Francis A. D’Ambrosio Jr., M.D. Lisa M. Wilson, O.D. Lancaster, MA.

Riley Hall BSc α, Robert Mitchell MD, FRCSC β University of Saskatchewan α, University of Calgary β Authors have no financial interest Comparison of postoperative.

Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR for Trichiasis Surgery Gower EW, West SK, Harding JC,

Phoebe D. Lenhart, M.D. 1, Amy K. Hutchinson, M.D. 1, Michael J. Lynn, M.S. 2, Scott R. Lambert M.D. 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University,

Subtenon’s Anesthesia in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Michael R. Gagnon, M.D. Clinical Instructor, Stanford University Valley EyeCare.

The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.

Combined cataract surgery and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in patients with glaucoma without prior incisional glaucoma surgery Matthew P. Traynor,

J. Brian Foster, MD No Financial Disclosures

Department of Ophthalmology Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Patches to Treat Ocular Surface Disorders Dorota Kopacz.

Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.

Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.

Zonular Weakness in Patients with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Yong Yeon Kim 1, Keny Kirti 2, Bokun Rho 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University.

Rate of Visual Field Progression in Eyes With Optic Disc Hemorrhages in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study De Moraes CG, Demirel S, Gardiner SK, et.

Conjunctivitis and Glaucoma. Conjunctivitis Conjunctiva- lines the eyelids and the sclera Conjunctivitis- inflammation of the conjunctiva caused by bacteria.

Diminished Endothelial Cell Counts in Corneas with Krukenberg Spindles Authors: Tod M. Haller1, Chad B. Haller2, Melvin L. Haller1, Judah Beck3, Keith.

|1 Hank Wuh, MD, MPH CEO. |2 |3 |4 CBI Polymers Eye Surgery Center Of Hawaii Skai Vision Institute Eyegenix Endoscopy Institute Of Hawaii TruTag Technologies.

4/3/2016 U F G Universidade Federal de Goiás C B C O Centro Brasileiro de Cirurgia de Olhos A Prospective, Comparative Study Between Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation.

Corneal vs. Scleral Incisions: Managing Lens luxation in homocystinuria Suqin Guo, MD,* Tatyana Milman, MD, N Bhagat, MD, D Chu, MD and R Fechtner, MD.

Hongseok Yang, MD Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of medicine, Suwon, Korea The author has no financial interest.

UC Davis Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis Jennifer Li, M.D., Mark Greiner, M.D. Ana Carolina Vieira, M.D. Mark Mannis, M.D. University.

Advanced Preloaded IOL System A Visco-free Preloaded Injector Kimiya Shimizu MD Professor & Chairman, Department of Ophthalmology Kitasato University,

We Support! The Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals Healthcare Technology Foundation The Joint Commission 2014 National Patient.

Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with prior Trabeculectomy or Tube shunt surgery. Thadani S.M. Fynn-Thompson N. Authors.

Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.

Simultaneous Cataract and ECP Glaucoma Surgery An opportunity to improve your vision while reducing or completely eliminating your dependence on Glaucoma.

V. Kumar 1,2, M. Frolov 1, I. Shepelova 1,2 Department of ophthalmology, People's friendship university of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 1 ; Ophthalmic.

iStent with phacoemulsification, n=50

Andrés Suárez-Campo, María López-Valladares

IOP control and corneal endothelial cell density changes

Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

Trauma z Surgical treatment of extremely complicated forms of glaucoma

Intraocular lens repositioning in a glaucoma patient with recurrent pupillary capture Kyoung Tak Ma¹, Hyung Won, Bae² , Gong Je Seong², Chan Yun Kim².

Outcomes and Complications of DSEK in Eyes with Tube shunts or ACIOLs

A presentation to: Meeting name Date

Lions International Eye Centre, Korle Bu

R. S. Davidson1; N. Faberowski2; R. J. Noecker3; M. Y. Kahook1 1

Lions International Eye Centre, Korle Bu, Ghana

Özcan R. Kayıkçıoğlu, Sinan Emre

This study/project is funded by/ supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [name of NIHR programme (Grant Reference Number XXX)/name.

This study/project is funded by/ supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [name of NIHR programme (Grant Reference Number XXX)/name.

Authors have no financial interests

This study/project is funded by/ supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [name of NIHR programme (Grant Reference Number XXX)/name.

John C. Hwang, MD MBA Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute

Presentation transcript:

Robert J. Noecker, MD, MBA Kimberly V. Miller, MD UPMC Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Ophthalmology & Visual Science Research Center The Eye & Ear Institute The authors of this poster received research funding from National Institutes of Health CORE Grant P30 EY008098, Eye and Ear Foundation of Pittsburgh, and Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY. The authors have no conflicts of interest.

 To compare the length of time used to place the tube of a glaucoma drainage device into the anterior chamber or ciliary sulcus using standard methods or using 25-gauge vitreoretinal microforceps (D.O.R.C.).

 24 videos of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery were reviewed.  16 (66%) used standard Hoskins forceps and 8 (33%) used D.O.R.C. forceps.  D.O.R.C. microforceps were used to insert the tube tip through the sclerotomy in superotemporal cases, and were inserted through a corneal paracentesis incision out through sclera and used to pull the tube tip into the eye in inferonasal cases.

 Average total case time for GDD surgery using 25G microsurgical forceps was 16.0 ± 4.8 minutes, and using standard forceps was 22.4 ± 8.0 minutes.  The use of 25G microsurgical forceps shortened total case time by 28.3%, p=0.032.

 Average time for insertion of GDD tube using 25G microsurgical forceps was 0.6 ± 0.3 minutes, and using standard forceps was 3.2 ± 2.3 minutes.  The use of 25G microsurgical forceps shortened time of tube insertion by 80.1%, p=0.002.

 25G microsurgical forceps shorten GDD surgical time. This may lead to improved surgical efficiency, greater patient safety and comfort, and lower overall healthcare spending.