Including Parents In Alaska Child Outcomes. Alaska Child Outcomes Development Summer 2005 – General Supervision Enhancement Grant (GSEG) Infant & Toddler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

Trainings in Early Intervention with Infants and Toddlers with Hearing Loss Nancy Grosz Sager, M.A. Deaf and Hard of Hearing Programs Consultant California.
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Potpourri: Summary of Important Points to Remember Presenters: Jill Harris Laura Duos NOVEMBER 2011.
Activity. Lunch Time Activity Discuss at your table: –How is information about your district Special Education Services provided to parents? –Does your.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Early Childhood Information Sharing Toolkit for Community Providers.
Early Childhood Information Sharing Toolkit for Community Providers June 2009.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
Welcome to Presentation to House Education and Early Learning and Human Services Committees January 17,
DEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING FOR ALL HOW AGES AND STAGES ONLINE SCREENING CAN INCREASE ACCESS: ALASKA’S EXPERIENCE Prepared for the National Association for.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
The State of New Hampshire’s Family Involvement with the Child Outcomes Process.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data 1 I know it is in here somewhere Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Approaches to Measuring Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Prepared for the NECTAC National Meeting on Measuring Child and Family Outcomes,
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
About Early Intervention What is it? What is the goal? What are the benefits to my child and family? How do children get placed in the program?
Early Intervention Needs and Services What will it take for students who are deaf or hard of hearing to enter kindergarten with age appropriate skills?
Delaware Child Outcomes Part C and 619 Collaboration Measuring Child and Family Outcomes July 30, 2010 Arlington, Virginia.
USING THE ROUTINES BASED INTERVIEW AS A STAFF DEVELOPMENT TOOL.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Assessment -
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Good Start, Grow Smart Inter-American Symposium Understanding the State of the Art in Early Childhood Education and Care: The First Three Years of Life.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Infants, Toddlers, & Young Children with Disabilities ECSE 641 Spring 2015 (Lee, 2010)
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Assessing the Three Child Outcomes.
Early Learning Board Presentation March 2, 2016.
Pediatric Regional Integrated Services Model. Purpose The purpose of the Pediatric Regional Integrated Service Model (PRISM) is to provide streamlined.
Observing and Assessing Young Children
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Peartree Primary School SEND (Special Educational Needs & Disabilities) Information Report
CYNTHIA SPENCER THE BIG INTERVIEW. DESCRIBE YOUR PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION. Becoming a teacher is satisfying to many people for different reasons, but the.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Purpose The purpose of Module 1 is to orient new staff to child outcomes measurement and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF).
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data
Alaska Citizen Review Panel
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Pathways from Developmental Screening to Services: Spotlight of Effort led by Northwest Early Learning Hub - in collaboration with the Oregon Pediatric.
Chapter 14 Implementation.
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Using outcomes data for program improvement
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Involving Families Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
Presentation transcript:

Including Parents In Alaska Child Outcomes

Alaska Child Outcomes Development Summer 2005 – General Supervision Enhancement Grant (GSEG) Infant & Toddler group formed as a subset of a larger GSEG group

AK GSEG Infant & Toddler Workgroup Goals 1.Develop Infant & Toddler Outcomes Standards, based on ECO recommendations 2.Aligned with state outcome standards 3.Define child outcome measurements and targets 4.Provide recommendations for EI/ILP data enhancement or development

Alaska Early Childhood Providers Child Outcomes Pilot Initiated Spring participating Agencies

Pilot parent inclusion: Parent input is critical - Family members see the child in situations that professionals do not.

Pilot parent inclusion continued: Need to ask family members about what the child does at home and what family members know about the child. There is no expectation that parents will be able to determine whether what they are seeing is age appropriate.

Pilots parent inclusion continued: Alaska offers parents the choice to participate in outcome rating. Professionals explain why the rating is being done and what it means.

Outcomes in Action Survey of 10 pilot providers completed August % return rate (8 of 10)

How Do You Gather Information to inform the Rating - Comments Observation, parent report, assessment Evaluation, parent interview, observation Review assessment, medical records, therapist reports, parent report Assessment tools, parent observation, therapist reports Meeting with child and family, evaluations and observations Intake information, evaluation, discussion with family while completing the outcome rating

What Are the Challenges Difficult to complete, esp. with more involved children Completing in a timely manner Involving family with the outcomes rating form First rating is overwhelming for family and difficult to explain Difficult to teach staff to present in a family friendly way without depending on the form Does not seem appropriate at intake, too much to do at time of enrollment Difficult to complete when family is not ready at time of enrollment or for children who receive less frequent services

Challenges note: Many families in the Northern and Western regions of Alaska continue to speak native languages (Inupiaq and Yupik) Oral Traditions, yet less verbal than English speakers 92 primary languages spoken in the Anchorage School District

What is Working Well Nice teaching tool for parents Can show great growth at discharge Improves family outlook on child’s development and future Nice summary of child’s functional skills, compliments annual assessments Demonstrates accountability Substantiates need for increased funding Increases parent understanding of child development

Alaska Early Intervention/Infant Learning Program Full Outcomes Implementation 18 regional Early Intervention Programs initiated Outcomes ratings January 2007

Alaska Child Outcomes Data available FFY06 APR