ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  36 AS9100  12 AS9110  28 AS9120 Applicant CBs  2 AS9100 (US & Israel)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Roles & Responsibilities San Diego, California January 20, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Advertisements

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) :2009 Revision Workshop Tony Marino The Boeing Company Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop.
Module 13 Oversight Assessment of Auditor Authentication Bodies
Proposed Aerospace Quality Management System (AQMS) Certification Process Survey (Portland, Oregon) Melvin L. Jeppson Systems Integration Manager ATK Launch.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor AS9104/2 - Oversight Training January 24, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona Roles and Responsibilities.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  37 AS9100  11 AS9110  27 AS9120 Applicant CBs  4 AS9110  1 AS9120 Increased.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse Program Manager, Aerospace RMC-Savannah, GA September
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions Stanley Faust Spirit AeroSystems Other Party.
Marca do evento Cgcre/Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program AAQG/ RMC Meeting Status : JAN 2010 RMC Meeting-USA 1.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective Boston, MA July 21, 2011.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training Oversight Assessment of Training Provider Approval Bodies February 2015 Module 14.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego, CA January 20, /9110/9120:2009 AQMS.
Registration Management Committee Body of Knowledge (BoK) for Other Party (OP) Assessors David Day GE Aviation.
OASIS User Training for Certification Bodies Part 2 – Applications Section July, 2013.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando FL Roles & Responsibilities Pre- and Post- Assessment.
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Activity 2009
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse RMC Denver Co., September
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Lori Gillespie RMC ~ 18 July 2012.
Company Confidential 1 Revisiting CB Use of AS9101 Rev D Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Michelle Barton – Lead Technical Reviewer/Auditor UL DQS Inc.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training SMS, CBMC and OASIS Oversight Assessment February 2015 Module 16.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop 11 ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 OP Assessor Workshop.
ISO 9001: 2000 Certified Audit Process What to do.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Completing Independent Assessments Robert Flaharty & John Horan January 17, 2013 OP Assessor Workshop.
Review and Revision of ISO/IEC 17021
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee OP Assessor Workshop, San Diego, CA - 17 January 2013 Body Of Knowledge for OP Assessors Will S.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Stanley Faust.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective July 19, 2012 Steve Holladay.
Hosted by AAQG RMC Certification Structures Impacts to Auditors Impacts to Stakeholders Transition.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  36 AS9100  12 AS9110  27 AS9120 Applicant CBs  4 AS9110 Increased Surveillance.
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Programs 2005
Company Confidential 1 AAQG RMC 9101:2009 Revision Workshop Prepared by IAQG 9101 Team 19 July, 2010 Atlanta Ga. “It’s All About Performing” Quality Management.
AAQG Meeting RMC Meeting Sergio Paulo Packer San Diego, CA Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 July 17, 2014 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator OASIS Tools for Continuous Improvement / Next-Gen.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Audit Outcomes & Appropriate Conclusions July 16, 2014 Bob Cruse ANAB, Aerospace Program Manager.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Independent Oversight Assessments 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens,
Company Confidential IAQG Workshop October 21, IAQG Workshop 9100 Certification Scheme Certification status – Changes implemented Tim Lee The Boeing.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse Program Manager, Aerospace RMC Seattle, WA September
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse Program Manager, Aerospace RMC Indianapolis, IN. July
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Programs Overall AQMS Accreditations  37 AS9100  6 AS9110  23 AS9120 AQMS Applicants  2 AS9100  8 AS9110  1 AS9120.
ISO 9001:2015/14001:2015 Certification Transition Process
Registration Management Committee (RMC) January 22-23, 2008 Phoenix, Arizona AAQG RMC Surveillance Team Report 2007 Prepared by: Susie Neal Goodrich Corporation.
ANAB Report to the AAQG RMC September CBs Per Program through 30 June 2006.
Lori Gillespie, ANAB Director of Accreditation
Bob Cruse RMC Ft. Lauderdale, FL. March
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Activity
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
AAQG Registrar Management Committee (RMC) SAE AS9104/AIR5359 OVERSIGHT RMC Procedure 102 REV 5 Changes 15-Sep-18.
Audit Documentation and Administration
Registration Decision Criteria
OASIS NextGen (G2) and AQMS:2016 for Auditors
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ January - March April 2011
Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop
Witness Assessment AS9104/2A
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ Year so far January 2011
AQMS 2016 Transition Training for AUDITORS and DECISION MAKERS
Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program
Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program
Americas Aerospace Quality Group
AS Risk Mitigation Plan
AS Risk Mitigation Plan
‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Americas Aerospace Quality Group Registration Management Committee
Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ to date July 2011
Presentation transcript:

ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board

Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  36 AS9100  12 AS9110  28 AS9120 Applicant CBs  2 AS9100 (US & Israel)  2 AS9110 (US) Suspensions  1 nonconforming (since lifted)  1 voluntary (since lifted) / 1 nonconforming (current)  1 nonconforming (current)  1 nonconforming (since lifted; for QMS including AS) Withdrawals  1 AS9120 (voluntary)  1 AS9100 applicant (voluntary)  1 AS9100, AS9120, AS9110 (Feb 2012)

 Heads Up 170, 175, 181, 187, 216  ALL CB’s completed the transition (in OASIS)  All CB’s applied prior to 1 Jan 2011 (no suspensions)  SR001 – Revised 4 Nov 2011  SR001 FAQ – Revised 14 Dec 2011   Matrices received early Dec 2011 and early Jan 2012  No CB’s were suspended for lack of matrix received

 Make sure decision making person/people are competent  SR001  9101D  Make sure required 9101 documentation is fully completed  Make sure audits are completed as required / scheduled, if not client suspended  ANAB sent an AATT trained assessor to most all office assessments in 2011  ANAB sending two assessors to most all office assessments in 2012  One being an assessor that successfully passed the AATT training

 372 (Feb 2011) – An organization is complaining about their AS9120 audit and the auditor assigned. CB is redoing the audit because of the first audit.  Details were requested, not provided.  Follow up during the next office assessment.  Closed, unable to substantiate Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 378 (Mar 2011) – An organization is complaining about their certification status in OASIS; their status was marked withdrawn (by the CB) and it was suppose to be suspended.  Found valid, Action was taken by the CB and OASIS was updated.  Closed, with action Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 379 (Apr 2011) – An AQMS certificate issued without an accreditation mark. The copy of the certificate was a draft and the final certificate was issued properly.  Closed, invalid Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 380 (Apr 2011) – Questions in regards to the auditor.  Closed, partially valid  Conducted a complaint validation audit  Conducting additional witnessed audits Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 381 (Apr 2011) – Certificate and scope of certification in OASIS not consistent in regards to inclusions/exclusions.  The items outlined in OASIS were actually sections of the standard that were not audited, not exclusions to the certificate. The CB entered them in the wrong fields.  Closed, with action. Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 388 (Jun 2011) – Organization continues to have AS9100 certificates referencing ISO 9001:2000  Complaint found valid, NCR issued to CB.  Closed, with action. Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 389 (Jul 2011) – CB transferred a client whose certificate had been withdrawn. The CB treated the client as an initial client and did not transfer the certificate.  Closed, invalid Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 397 (Oct 2011) – In regards to the outcome of a customer’s audit including the rating of the PEAR’s. The customer appealed to the CB and lost the appeal. The investigation found the CB followed their process (which conforms to requirements) and the main issue revolved around an interpretation of the form, which is part of AS9101. Recommended contacting the Sector Document Rep.  Closed, invalid Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 399 (Nov 2011) – A customer’s transition audit was not scheduled when required due to the CB not having an auditor. The customer was told to transfer to another CB. The CB had lost several auditors. The CB admits that they didn't respond to the client as quick as they should have but they did have evidence that they tried to reschedule the client. They have identified other auditor resources and provided evidence that all other AS clients are on schedule. Internal CA was verified.  Closed, with action Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 401 (Nov 2011) – A CB certified two organizations to AQMS standards in India and according to the complaint they may not have used the accurate employee count to come to the accurate audit day numbers. Found valid; major NCR issued (late Dec 2011)  Open, needs correction Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 404 (Dec 2011) – A customer states their CB is going to withdraw their certificate early because they are transferring to another CB. The CB has a procedural requirement above & beyond requirements (if an audit is missed the certificate is canceled; not suspended). The CB agreed to not withdrawal the certificate since the customer scheduled the audit with the other CB (evidence was provided).  Closed, with action Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 None Received Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 A91 – Received Dec 2010 – Closed, partially upheld  Appealing several NCR’s from an AQMS witnessed audit  NCR in regards to missing items in the Quality Manual – NCR upheld  NCR in regards to document control – NCR withdrawn  NCR in regards to auditing to sufficient depth – 1 of 4 evidence items withdrawn, 4 part of the NCR evidence upheld  NCR in regards to the accuracy of the scope statement on the certificate – NCR upheld Appeal in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Appeal in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 A103– Received Feb 2011 – Closed, appeal denied  Appealed a major NCR during an AQMS office assessment in regards to accepting poor corrective action responses from the CB’s client  The CB discussed why the acceptance of updated documentation from their client and how the results of a check of a large quantity of other data supported that the fault was an isolated incident and therefore, the CB's acceptance of that client's CA response was not an indication of major deficiencies in the CB process.  ANAB discussed the repeat nature of the nonconformity issued to the CB, the lack of objective evidence for the CA taken by the CB client, and the lack of a complete and thorough Root Cause Analysis by the CB client, even though the fault was described as an isolated incident.  Even in isolated incidents the client must still provide acceptable CA to address the root cause to eliminate reoccurrence.  Therefore the panel upholds the NCR as valid. Appeal in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Appeal in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 A108– Received April 2011– Appeal upheld, NCR’s withdrawn  Appealed two minor NCRs during an AQMS witnessed audits.  Sufficient sample to draw conclusions  Not requiring client to provide root cause to NCR’s.  The panel has found that while statements made during the appeal hearing indicated that nonconformities may have existed at the time of the audit, the documented statements of finding for NCR 01 and NCR02 were not substantiated by objective evidence. Appeal in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Appeal in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

2011 Office Assessments  46 required (10 follow up) – All completed Witnessed Audits  53 required (8 follow-up and 9 AS9120) – All completed 2012 Office Assessments  39 required (4 follow up)  18 Scheduled Dates & 21 Scheduling Witnessed Audits  52 required (2 follow-up and 15 AS9120)  13 Scheduled Dates & 39 Scheduling/Unscheduled

 Office Assessments ~ 238 NCRs  52 NCR’s to aerospace requirements during 46 office assessments  13 majors, (6 originally minor, escalated due to timing)  186 NCR’s to ISO or general requirements during 46 office assessments  24 majors, (5 originally minor, escalated due to timing)  Witnessed Audits ~ 72 NCRs  26 NCR’s to aerospace requirements during 53 witnessed audits  11 majors (1 originally minor, escalated due to timing)  46 NCR’s to ISO or other requirements during 53 witnessed audits  12 majors, (3 originally minor, escalated due to timing)

 Aerospace Program Manager – New Position  Bob Cruse, ANAB Accreditation Assessor  Half time operations / Accreditation Assessments  Start Date TBD, Transition Plan in Process  Valerie Aronica, Client Coordinator,  Started 7 Nov 2011, in training  Ron Wilmes, John Stratton, Bob Abbott (Accreditation Assessors) no longer with ANAB  Revised many tools and procedures for Office Assessments and Witnessed Audits

 Transition Team – Lori Scheid-Gillespie & Donna Reinke (& Bob Cruse)  Will include Assessors and Council Members (as needed)  Committed to meeting SR002  Targeting RMC approval in 2 nd Quarter  Initial Review – Minimal changes to ANAB’s mgmt system  Many 9104/1 requirements are ANAB’s process already

 Questions / Comments