Enhancing Librarians’ Research Skills: A Professional Development Program Kristine Brancolini, Marie Kennedy (Loyola Marymount University) Greg Guest (FHI 360) Lili Luo, Michael Stephens (School of Information, San Jose State University)

Agenda IRDL program development (Kris, Marie) IRDL curriculum (Lili, Greg) IRDL learning network (Michael)

IRDL program development Background Goals Assessment plan

Background Grew out of a December 2010 survey conducted by Brancolini and Kennedy Surveyed academic librarians regarding their research experience, research confidence, and perceived barriers to conducting research *Kennedy, Marie R. & Brancolini, Kristine R. (2012). “Academic librarian research: A survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities.” College & Research Libraries 73(5):

Results of the 2010 study How the survey informed the project and eventual grant application – Current research practice – Confidence – Methods training

Addressing Librarian Needs Foster an environment of collegiality and support in the research process Provide instruction in areas needed to complete the research design for a project developed by each participant Encourage the dissemination of research through publication or presentation Instill confidence in Institute Scholars about the research process by providing clear instruction on each step

IMLS grant to fund IRDL Submitted grant proposal to create a learning experience and support network for academic and research librarians Funded by IMLS Laura Bush 21st Century Librarian Program,

Our partners Institute of Museum and Library Services School of Information, San Jose State University Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium Advisory Board

SCELC Research Day Pilot the idea locally Now an annual event 2013 Research Day: morning of research instruction, lunch-time discussion about the Institute, and an afternoon of research posters/reports/works-in-progress networking time Topics decided by the SCELC membership via survey Evolution of Research Day to its current model

IRDL Summer Workshop Centerpiece of the program is a nine-day summer research “bootcamp” for academic and research librarians Convened on the LMU|LA campus June 15-26, 2014

Application process Application form Cover letter Research proposal CV Letter of support from library Dean or Director

Selection process Application packets each reviewed by two different Advisory Board members Rubric used to assist decision-making Project Directors made final decision 87 applications, 25 selected

The first cohort 1-7 years professional experience From 12 different states Varied professional library function

Our goal for the participants Goal: Increase the number of academic librarians with specific research skills in conducting and disseminating the results of research Objectives: – Host a nine-day research workshop in the summer, with two instructors to provide the research curriculum and one-on-one consultation – Supplement with pre-workshop activities and ongoing support for the year

Assessment plan Results of assessment of Year 1 will inform changes for Year 2 Four-part assessment plan: – Scoring of research proposals pre- and post-IRDL workshop – completed July – Social network analysis – completed on last day of workshop – Mastery of curriculum content – pre- and post-tests throughout the workshop – Confidence – administered survey right before workshop began and at the end

Other evaluation activities External reviewer from Colorado State Library who was on site for three days; interviewed instructors and participants – Identified from participants factors that contributed to learning – Identified from participants suggestions for improvement – Perceived outcomes from participants – Recommendations for improvement Survey of participants, incorporating feedback from external reviewer; sent out July 31

IRDL Curriculum

IRDL Curriculum - Objectives Write effective research questions and hypotheses Choose an appropriate research design for a library science study Conduct a literature review Explain the conceptual logic behind various data collection approaches and describe the rationale for selection of specific methods Access and participate in the Institute virtual community and related networks for support during the research process Identify appropriate sampling strategies for research projects Use and apply commonly used qualitative data collection methods Assess and apply different qualitative data analysis options Design and implement a surveyUnderstand survey data management Explain various analytic options for surveys Understand basic principles of mixed methods research design Choose an appropriate research dissemination forum Write and disseminate effective research report

IRDL Curriculum - Instructors Instructors – Greg Guest, Research Director, FHI 360 – Lili Luo, Associate Professor, School of Information, San Jose State University – Michael Stephens, Assistant Professor, School of Information, San Jose State University

IRDL Curriculum - Textbooks Fink, A How to Conduct Surveys: A Step- by-Step Guide, 5 th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Guest, G., K. MacQueen & E. Namey Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

IRDL Curriculum – 9-day Institute Lectures Exercises Quizzes Research Proposal Consultation on individual project and…

Mixed methods over cocktail

Participatory Culture Participatory Learning

Affinity Spaces - Gee content, something for the space to be “about.” a generator gives the space content both content and interaction occur a portal affords entry into the space Gee, James Paul Semiotic Social Spaces and Affinity Spaces: From The Age of Mythology to Today's Schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 214–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Learning from Libraries That Use Wordpress: Content-Management System Best Practices and Case Studies by Kyle L. M. Jones & Polly-Alida FarringtonKyle L. M. Jones