IP Community Outreach (Suite of Patent Products) Andrew Faile Director, TC 2600 United States Patent and Trademark Office

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Under New Management : Developing a Library Assessment Program at a Small Public University Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable,
Advertisements

School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
October  A Web Portal recognized as the authoritative source for national interagency wildland fire information is needed to.
The Building Blocks of Public Involvement Presented By Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor ODOT Office Of Environmental Services The Ohio Planning.
Bicoastal Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting RCE Progress Update Daniel Sullivan Director, TC1600 September 17, 2014.
Developing a Statistics Teaching and Beliefs Survey Jiyoon Park Audbjorg Bjornsdottir Department of Educational Psychology The National Statistics Teaching.
PPAC Outreach Effort Andrew Faile Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Patents.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.
February 2012 Presentation to the Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Introduction to the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
The Vision, Process, and Requirements for Creating EarthCube Presentation at Second EarthCube WebEx Aug 22, 2011.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
NYS Workers’ Compensation System BPR Implementation NY PRIMA September 18, 2014.
National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped Library of Congress Strategic Plan for the New Public Education Initiative May 7, 2014.
OFFICE OF DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION Climate Study Working Group Process February 3, 2012.
Step 6: Implementing Change. Implementing Change Our Roadmap.
Board of Regents State of Iowa Rising to the Next TIER – a Transparent, Inclusive Efficiency Review Program Overview March, 2014.
ELearning Update March 12, National Trends Approximately 1.9 million students were studying online in the fall of 2003 In 2009, 11.9 million students.
Community Assessment Process WHY?? To identify and document the opportunities, challenges, strengths, and needs of a specific geographic community and.
Concept to Implementation Leadership Team Prototype Implementation Plan First Call for Engagement, Formation of Communities of Practice Formation.
Regional Transportation and Complete Mobility Okotoks Presentation June 23, 2014.
Achieving Workable Unity A Roadmap for Collaborative Planning WA Equal Justice Community Leadership Academy.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
Excellence for All Children Knox County Schools Balanced Calendar Discussion Excellence for Every Child.
SCAPR UPDATE Presented by: John Kmiec Utilities Director Town of Marana SCAPR Co-Chair APEC Meeting September 27, 2013.
American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
Pilot Concerning Public Submission of Peer Reviewed Prior Art Jack Harvey Director, TC 2100 United States Patent and Trademark Office
TUALATIN TOMORROW VISION AND STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN UPDATE City Council Work Session – June 24, 2013.
INFO425: System Design INFORMATION X Chapter 8 Evaluating Alternatives for Requirements, Environment, and Implementation Evaluating Alternatives.
Development of the Strategic Vision and Where We Go From Here? Dan Dooley Vice President.
CEO, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Christian Chace Patent Process Reengineering Team December 8, 2010 Patent Process Reengineering Team and Patent End-To-End Processing Team The Biotechnology.
1 Conservation and Development Network A Smithsonian Institution and the World Bank collaborative effort within the Global Tiger Initiative Smithsonian.
S&I Standards Organization Engagement & Communication Plan DRAFT Standards Support Team 1 September 2011.
How do you eat an elephant? Janet May April 21, 2010.
Pilot Concerning Public Submission of Peer Reviewed Prior Art Jack Harvey Director, TC 2100.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Project Charter
Strategic Planning January Update. Steering Committee Eight meetings so far, with reviews of data on: O Student achievement O Finance and facilities O.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
A new Opportunity For multi-stakeholder Engagement with UNEP and UNEA.
TDRp Implementation Challenges David Vance, Executive Director Peggy Parskey, Assistant Director October 23, 2014.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
Copyright © 2015 Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP Inside the USPTO Peggy Focarino Senior Patent Advisor.
Evaluation Assistant Research Projects EAs are required to lead an evaluation research project for the academic year.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
Building Collaborative Partnerships Bill Heatherman, County Engineer Wyandotte County/KCK Slides courtesy of Karen McNamara, City of San Ramon.
1 Biotech/Chem/Pharm Customer Partnership Meeting June 15, 2005 USPTO Study on Restriction Reform and Update on TC1600 Restriction Practice Action Plan.
Five Year Health and Human Service Public Transportation Plan Update SEPT 2015 TO FEB 2017.
Bob BERSANI, GS1 Vice President Global Standards GS1 Standards Development Update.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
Niclas Morey23 October 2015Director, International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 Technical Harmonization in the IP5 EPO’s Global Dossier, CCD and CPC.
Future Directions Update Project Timeline Report to the Steering Committee - 6/04 Briefing to Coordination Group - 6/1/04 Comments due - 5/14/04 Briefing.
A Software Engineering Model Based Curriculum Development Approach Leon Pan University of the Fraser Valley.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Strategic Planning Chester County Library System Strategic Planning Steering Committee November 14, 2008 Gail Griffith.
+ Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and Health Toolkit for the UN Global Conference RIO + 20 Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and.
Strategic Prevention Framework - Assessment Program Title Here date.
Shared Services Initiative Summary of Findings and Next Steps.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
Building on our tradition of excellence – planning for the future.
What is a Learning Collaborative?
IP Community Outreach (Suite of Patent Products)
Simpler Systems Reporting Pilot
The Decision Making Model
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
Kuali Research Organizational Change Management
Presentation transcript:

IP Community Outreach (Suite of Patent Products) Andrew Faile Director, TC 2600 United States Patent and Trademark Office

Overview Fulfilling the USPTO Strategic Plan –Optimize Patent Quality and Timeliness –Objective #3: “Improve the Quality and Timeliness of Patent Examination by exploring a range of approaches to examining applications” –“Explore the development of alternative approaches to examination in collaboration with stakeholders”

Overview PPAC-led effort to engage the IP community in: –Identifying alternate ways to examine patent applications –Identifying improvements to the Patent system PPAC will reach out directly to the IP community with no preconceived ideas Identify all manner of change including: –Long term solutions(statutory changes) –Medium term solutions (Rule changes) –Short term solutions (programs that can be implemented under USPTO existing authorities)

Overview Identify and engage a wide variety of stakeholders including: –Academics –CEOs –Industry groups –Practitioners/attorneys –Patent holders –Independent inventors

The Process Use an objective process to gather user input and analyze the results –Process includes conducting: Focus sessions Virtual focus sessions On-line surveys One-on-one interviews –Problem/solution matrix developed to capture and correlate input

The Process Use an objective process to gather user input and analyze the results (cont.) –Analyze the results scientifically and identify/build solutions –PPAC will consider the results and make recommendations to the USPTO on viable solutions –USPTO to pilot alternative examination programs based on PPAC recommendations

Phases of the Process – Planning Phase Task 1: Conceptual Solutions –Defining participant pool for inclusion in the focus sessions Problem/Message Draft to invite participants to the focus sessions –Defining subject matter of the focus sessions –Conduct the gathering of information Two to three focus sessions planned to gather a wide variety of user input User input will be added to the problem/solution matrix Results from these focus sessions will be evaluated to refine future, more specific information gathering activities

Phases of the Process – Planning Phase Task 2: Exploration of the Concepts –Update problem/solution matrix –Examine correlations in the matrix and begin to identify solutions Task 3: Refinement of the Concepts –Two to three additional focus sessions planned to gather input and to have participants react/validate the general ideas uncovered in the first focus sessions –Begin on-line surveys and one-on-one interviews

Phases of the Process – Implementation Phase TASK 4: Implementation of the Concepts –PPAC to consider data/responses and formulate recommendations to USPTO –USPTO to develop first set of pilot programs for alternative examination

Timeline First Focus sessions tentatively planned for the end of July 2007 Task 3 “refinement phase” scheduled for fall of 2007 (additional focus sessions and on-line surveys) PPAC recommendations scheduled for fall 2007/winter 2008

IP Community Outreach Thank you! Questions?