Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota Upgrades to the CMS detector.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent news about SiPM based applications R&D in DESY Nicola D’Ascenzo University of Hamburg - DESY.
Advertisements

Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #12.
CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals October 21, 2014 Jeremiah Mans On behalf of the CMS Collaboration.
Upgrading the CMS simulation and reconstruction David J Lange LLNL April CHEP 2015D. Lange.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
8.882 LHC Physics Experimental Methods and Measurements Jet Energy Scale [Lecture 23, May 04, 2009]
Wide Bandgap Semiconductor Detectors for Harsh Radiation Environments
B W Kennedy, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory VPTs for the CMS experiment B W Kennedy CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory St Petersburg, 26 April.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
November Electronic requirements for detectors Use LHC systems to illustrate physicstechnical Tracking.
1 Tianchi Zhao University of Washington Concept of an Active Absorber Calorimeter A Summary of LCRD 2006 Proposal A Calorimeter Based on Scintillator and.
Photon detection Visible or near-visible wavelengths
The CMS Upgrade Program ECFA High Luminosity LHC Experiments Workshop Aix-les-Bains, October 1, 2013 J. Spalding, on behalf of the CMS Collaboration 1.
1 Semiconductor Detectors  It may be that when this class is taught 10 years on, we may only study semiconductor detectors  In general, silicon provides.
Heavy Scitillating Crystals and Glasses for a Combined EM and HCal at ILC Tianchi Zhao University of Washigton Sept. 25, 2007.
INSTR-08, BINP, Novosibirsk 1 Belle calorimeter upgrade B.Shwartz, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk on behalf of BELLE calorimeter.
Hadron Calorimeter Readout Electronics Calibration, Hadron Calorimeter Scintillator Upgrade, and Missing Transverse Momentum Resolution due to Pileup Zishuo.
H.-G. Moser Max-Planck-Institut for Physics, Munich CALOR 06 Chicago June 5-9, 2006 Silicon Photomultiplier, a new device for low light level photon detection.
Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota 1.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
AlGaN/InGaN Photocathodes D.J. Leopold and J.H. Buckley Washington University St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A. Large Area Picosecond Photodetector Development.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
Photodetection EDIT Internal photoelectric effect in Si Band gap (T=300K) = 1.12 eV (~1100 nm) More than 1 photoelectron can be created by light in silicon.
Light Calibration System (LCS) Temperature & Voltage Dependence Option 2: Optical system Option 2: LED driver Calibration of the Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
CMS ECAL performance and upgrade Anton Karneyeu (INR, Moscow) CMS Collaboration INSTR14, Novosibirsk, Russia, 27 February 2014.
8 July 1999A. Peisert, N. Zamiatin1 Silicon Detectors Status Anna Peisert, Cern Nikolai Zamiatin, JINR Plan Design R&D results Specifications Status of.
EMCal in ALICE Norbert Novitzky 1. Outline How Electro-Magnetic Calorimeters works ? Physics motivation – What can we measure with Emcal ? – Advantages.
PHASE-1B ACTIVITIES L. Demaria – INFN Torino. Introduction  The inner layer of the Phase 1 Pixel detector is exposed to very high level of irradiation.
The Case for the Dual Readout Calorimetry for SiD Adam Para, December 4, 2007.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
RESMDD02 July , Florence, A.Singovski, University of Minnesota1 Radiation hardness of the Avalanche Photodiodes for ECAL CMS detector at CERN.
PIN current degradation Versus 3 MeV proton fluence 3 MeV proton (a)(b) (c)(d) Study of radiation damage in VCSELs and PINs for the optical links of the.
Prospects to Use Silicon Photomultipliers for the Astroparticle Physics Experiments EUSO and MAGIC A. Nepomuk Otte Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München.
Fabiola Gianotti, 14/10/20031  s = 28 TeV upgrade L = upgrade “SLHC = Super-LHC” vs Question : do we want to consider also the energy upgrade option.
Edouard Kistenev for the PHENIX Collaboration Calorimetry based upgrade to PHENIX at RHIC CALOR 2012 Santa Fe, NM, June 4-8, 2012.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Avalanche Photodiodes from the Start.
Instrumented Cone and other MC Detector Issues Mary Anne Cummings Muons, Inc. TIPP 2011, Chicago June 11, 2011.
PbWO 4 crystals Calorimeter Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Study and Development of the Multi-Pixel Photon Counter for the GLD Calorimeter Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu, Japan) on behalf of the GLD Calorimeter Group Oct-9.
Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
PROJECT X PHYSICS STUDY WORKSHOP (PXPS 2012) Working Group on Time of Flight Conveners: Mike Albrow (FNAL) & Bob Wagner (ANL) New directions in fast timing:
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Bandgap (eV) Lattice Constant (Å) Wavelength ( ㎛ ) GaN AlN InN 6H-SiC ZnO AlP GaP AlAs.
I nstrumentation of the F orward R egion Collaboration High precision design ECFA - Durham2004 University of Colorado AGH University, Cracow I nstitute.
Fermilab Budget Briefing FY Generic Detector Research and Development KA Breakout Erik Ramberg Fermilab February, 2013.
Technology and R&D Summary and next steps Burkhard Schmidt.
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
CMS plans for Endcap Calorimetry at HL-LHC
大強度
Experimental Particle Physics
CMS ECAL Endcaps: Fluence/Dose (500 fb-1)
Calorimeter Backgrounds
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Semiconductor Detectors
Dual readout calorimeter for CepC
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
PbWO4 Cherenkov light contribution to Hamamatsu S8148 and Zinc Sulfide–Silicon avalanche photodiodes signals F. KOCAK, I. TAPAN Department of Physics,
Experimental Particle Physics
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota Upgrades to the CMS detector

Outline  This talk is the context of preparation for Snowmass. I want to motivate some technical developments for detectors at the high intensities that we will see at the energy frontier. 2 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Phase 1 ≤ 1.7 × cm -2.s -1 with 25 ns 2.0 × after LS2. Phase 2 5 × cm -2.s fb -1 ANL lunchtime seminar. 3

Upgrades for CMS Phase 2  Planned changes to the detector:  Replace tracker.  Track trigger.  Complete upgrade of trigger level 1 and HLT.  Likely changes of detector:  Trigger level 1 readout at 1 MHz.  Replace endcap EM calorimeter.  Replace active components of endcap hadron calorimeter.  Replace forward calorimeter 3.0 < η < ANL lunchtime seminar.

Major Sensor Issues  High Pileup:  events/bunch crossing with 25 ns Bx  Overlapping events in the hadron calorimeter.  High radiation levels:  In excess of neutrons/cm 2 in forward regions of the calorimeters.  Aging.  If we run until 2030, much of the existing detector will be more than 25 years old. 5 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Detector Goals  Maintain or improve the current performance of the detector.  Benchmark standard Higgs decay channels including Higgs → γγ  Improve jet tagging in forward detector for VBF.  In CMS investigating precision timing as a means of vertex mitigation. ANL lunchtime seminar. 6

Radiation Levels  Unprecedentedly high radiation levels in the forward direction. ANL lunchtime seminar. 7

Flux of neutrons after Phase 2. 8 >10 15 n/cm 2 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Flux in Forward Calorimeter 9 The neutron flux at 2,500 fb -1. >10 16 n/cm 2 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Ambitions:  In intermediate η’s  Detect both Čerenkov radiation and ionizing radiation and measure signal time all at multiple depths inside calorimeter.  We need for a scintillator based detector:  Detector Materials that are stable under these conditions and maintain optical transmission after flux.  Photodetectors that are rad hard.  Means to extract signal from the detector. ANL lunchtime seminar. 10

Possible Detector Materials.  What detector materials do we know that will work at these ultra-high radiation levels.  Amorphous silicon  Fused silica.  Some crystals.  What might work  Ceramics  Glasses.  Fluids.  Meta-materials.  …… 11 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Detector Materials  Amorphous Silicon.  Old idea for tracking dropped as charge collection efficiency was low and response to MIPs was small.  Calorimetry is a different problem.  See talk later in this session by Jim Kakalios on a/nc-Si:H.  Crystals  LYSO – good radiation tolerance reported.  Light output is high  Fused Silica  Very stable material under high radiation.  Excellent for Čerenkov.  Ceramics:  New ‘designer’ materials. Much progress in recent years: ANL lunchtime seminar. 12

LSO/LYSO ANL lunchtime seminar. 13 See talk by Renyuan Zhu at this meeting Stable band edge after p/cm 2 Less damage than PbWO 4

Ceramics ANL lunchtime seminar. 14

Photodetectors  Considerable progress in recent years in silicon APDs – now a mature technology.  Geiger Mode APD’s – SiPMs.  Low fab cost.  Several industrial manufacturers.  High gain and low amplification noise.  Rad hard ~10 13 n/cm 2.  Other materials.  GaAs APDs  High bandgap APDs - SiC, GaN, AlGaN. ANL lunchtime seminar. 15

GaAs Geiger-mode APD 16 First results from a GaAs SiPM photodetector Lightspin & UVA ANL lunchtime seminar.

High Bandgap APDs  Attractive since the material is intrinsically more rad hard.  Sensitive in the UV – solar blind.  Considerable interest in this UV detection in many other areas of research.  Astronomy  Čerenkov detectors.  Etc.  For UV sensors see talk by Dave Hitlin yesterday from intensity frontier. ANL lunchtime seminar. 17

Silicon Carbide  Bandgap of 4H-c SiC is 3.23 eV.  High bandgap material used in making LEDs, now showing up more in semiconductor and nan0-technology industry.  You can now buy JFETs and MOSFETs in SiC.  MOSFETs have been tested to 7.5 × neutrons/cm 2 and were operational.  Significant degradation at n/cm 2 seen by RD50.  Many interesting detector development possibilities. 18 ANL lunchtime seminar.

4H-SiC PIN480 Avalanche Photodiode: Recessed Window PECVD + Thermal SiO 2 SiO 2 n : + substrate n: 2000 nm, 4.5x10 18 cm -3 p: 200 nm, 2x10 18 cm - 3 p : 480 nm, - 1x10 16 cm - -3 p+:p+:p+:p+:200 nm, 1x10 nm, 1x10 19 cm -3 p-contact(Ni/Ti/Al/Au) n-contact(Ni/Ti/Al/Au) Thickness of p + : ~ 35 nm AR Coating (2300 Å) Joe Campbell – Electrical Engineering – University of Virginia

Quantum Efficiency 20 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Calorimeter Pileup Mitigation 21 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Precision Calorimeter Timing  For a luminous region distributed over ~ 10cm, collisions will be distributed over ~ 300ps  The TOF at the Calorimeter at  ~ 0 depends on the time of the specific collision  At Larger values of  the TOF depends both on the time and position of the specific collision 22 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Calorimeter Pileup Mitigation  Consider (for example) an EM pre-shower with 10~20ps TOF resolution for MIP’s and   Tracking identifies Z location of interesting collision  TOF of charged particles from that collision identifies time of interesting collision  Use Z location and time to select calorimeter clusters associated to interesting collision  Could result in similar effective pile-up as we have now. 23 ANL lunchtime seminar.

Timing in Calorimeter ANL lunchtime seminar. 24

4D Calorimeters ANL lunchtime seminar. 25 Can we make 4-D calorimeters in a high radaition environment?

How?  Various methods for this are being considered.  Fast crystal preshower.  Čerenkov detector.  Timing layer at shower maximum in EM calorimeter.  Direct measurement with SiPMs. ANL lunchtime seminar. 26

Summary  New sensor and photodetector technologies will be needed for the ambitious goals of the HL- LHC.  The time is soon to select out a few of the most promising ideas and invest in their develop them.  My bias is to invest where there are multiple gains inside and outside HEP. 27 ANL lunchtime seminar.