Renewable energies | Eco-friendly production | Innovative transport | Eco-efficient processes | Sustainable resources Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 -Classification: Internal Uncertainty in petroleum reservoirs.
Advertisements

Jose-Luis Blanco, Javier González, Juan-Antonio Fernández-Madrigal University of Málaga (Spain) Dpt. of System Engineering and Automation May Pasadena,
Ensemble Emulation Feb. 28 – Mar. 4, 2011 Keith Dalbey, PhD Sandia National Labs, Dept 1441 Optimization & Uncertainty Quantification Abani K. Patra, PhD.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
SPE PP A Method for Probabilistic Forecasting of Oil Rates in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Julio César Muñoz Blanco y Rafael Paz Palenzuela, CBM.
High performance flow simulation in discrete fracture networks and heterogeneous porous media Jocelyne Erhel INRIA Rennes Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy Geosciences.
1 (from Optimization of Advanced Well Type and Performance Louis J. Durlofsky Department of Petroleum Engineering, Stanford University.
Dual Mesh Method in Upscaling Pascal Audigane and Martin Blunt Imperial College London SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 3-5 February 2003.
A Workflow Approach to Designed Reservoir Study Presented by Zhou Lei Center for Computation and Technology Louisiana State University June 25, 2007.
A New Biclustering Algorithm for Analyzing Biological Data Prashant Paymal Advisor: Dr. Hesham Ali.
Numerical Porous Media KAUST SRI Center Modeling and simulation of multiscale problems N Ahmed, VM Calo, Y Efendiev, H Fayed, O Iliev, Z.Lakdawala, K.Leonard,
HMM-BASED PATTERN DETECTION. Outline  Markov Process  Hidden Markov Models Elements Basic Problems Evaluation Optimization Training Implementation 2-D.
Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Models Jeremy Oakley & Anthony O’Hagan University of Sheffield, UK.
Petroleum Reservoir Management Based on Approximate Dynamic Programming Zheng Wen, Benjamin Van Roy, Louis Durlofsky and Khalid Aziz Smart Field Consortium,
USE OF LAPLACE APPROXIMATIONS TO SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY
A COMPUTER BASED TOOL FOR THE SIMULATION, INTEGRATED DESIGN, AND CONTROL OF WASTEWATER TREAMENT PROCESSES By P. Vega, F. Alawneh, L. González, M. Francisco,
Analysis of Layered Gas Reservoir Performance Using a Quasi-Analytical Solution for Rate and Pressure Behavior I Nengah Suabdi Department of Petroleum.
Value of Information for Complex Economic Models Jeremy Oakley Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield. Paper available from.
Upscaling, Homogenization and HMM
Upscaling and History Matching of Fractured Reservoirs Pål Næverlid Sævik Department of Mathematics University of Bergen Modeling and Inversion of Geophysical.
1 Prediction of Oil Production With Confidence Intervals* James Glimm 1,2, Shuling Hou 3, Yoon-ha Lee 1, David H. Sharp 3, Kenny Ye 1 1. SUNY at Stony.
Marginal Field Development Advances in 3D Geological Modeling: How it can help?
Wavelets Series Used to Solve Dynamic Optimization Problems Lizandro S. Santos, Argimiro R. Secchi, Evaristo. C. Biscaia Jr. Programa de Engenharia Química/COPPE,
Optimizing In Fill Well Drilling - Wamsutter Field
Sedimentology & Stratigraphy:
OIL RECOVERY MECHANISMS AND THE MATERIAL BALANCE EQUATION
CRESCENDO Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise Naples, 28 Nov
Applications of Bayesian sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to the statistical analysis of computer simulators for carbon dynamics Marc Kennedy Clive.
Workflow for Finding Bypassed Reserves in Mature Assets  Real Time Integration of Simulation, Seismic Interpretation, and Geophysics  Best Answers Possible.
1/26 LOÏC LE GRATIET Bayesian analysis of hierarchical codes with different levels of accuracy Masters thesis conducted from 07/04/2010 to 15/09/2010 in.
Euro-Par, A Resource Allocation Approach for Supporting Time-Critical Applications in Grid Environments Qian Zhu and Gagan Agrawal Department of.
Adaptive Multi-path Prediction for Error Resilient H.264 Coding Xiaosong Zhou, C.-C. Jay Kuo University of Southern California Multimedia Signal Processing.
Business Process Change and Discrete-Event Simulation: Bridging the Gap Vlatka Hlupic Brunel University Centre for Re-engineering Business Processes (REBUS)
17 May 2007RSS Kent Local Group1 Quantifying uncertainty in the UK carbon flux Tony O’Hagan CTCD, Sheffield.
Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review Assessment of predictive capability Derek Bingham 1.
Adaptive Hybrid EnKF-OI for State- Parameters Estimation in Contaminant Transport Models Mohamad E. Gharamti, Johan Valstar, Ibrahim Hoteit European Geoscience.
Wytch Farm Field Development Project
Induced Seismicity Consortium (ISC) Quarterly Review Meeting, Q Quantifying Seismic Hazard from Subsurface Fluid Injection and Production (SFIP)
Optimal Self-placement of Heterogeneous Mobile Sensors in Sensor Networks Lidan Miao AICIP Research Oct. 19, 2004.
A New Flood Inundation Model Yang Liu and Garry Pender School of Built Environment Heriot Watt University.
Errors, Uncertainties in Data Assimilation François-Xavier LE DIMET Université Joseph Fourier+INRIA Projet IDOPT, Grenoble, France.
Quality of model and Error Analysis in Variational Data Assimilation François-Xavier LE DIMET Victor SHUTYAEV Université Joseph Fourier+INRIA Projet IDOPT,
Reservoir Uncertainty Assessment Using Machine Learning Techniques Authors: Jincong He Department of Energy Resources Engineering AbstractIntroduction.
Reducing MCMC Computational Cost With a Two Layered Bayesian Approach
Retrospective Production Optimization Under Uncertainty Using Kernel Clustering Mehrdad Gharib Shirangi and Tapan Mukerji Department of Energy Resources.
Efficient Design & Analysis of Variable-Fidelity Experiments for High Dimensional Aerodynamic Data Space Design & Analysis of Variable-Fidelity Multi-Objective.
Hybrid Bayesian Linearized Acoustic Inversion Methodology PhD in Petroleum Engineering Fernando Bordignon Introduction Seismic inversion.
A Kriging or Gaussian Process emulator has: an unadjusted mean (frequently a least squares fit: ), a correction / adjustment to the mean based on data,
SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
Geostatistical History Matching Methodology using Block-DSS for Multi-Scale Consistent Models PHD PROGRAM IN PETROLUM ENGINEERING CATARINA MARQUES
Measurement and Control of Reservoir Flow
COmbining Probable TRAjectories — COPTRA
Problem statement: parametrized weak form
Michigan Technological University
Dual Mesh Method in Dynamic Upscaling
Boosted Augmented Naive Bayes. Efficient discriminative learning of
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
C. F. Panagiotou and Y. Hasegawa
Jincong He, Louis Durlofsky, Pallav Sarma (Chevron ETC)
A RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT REVOLUTION
A Unifying View on Instance Selection
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
An Adaptive Middleware for Supporting Time-Critical Event Response
Brent Lowry & Jef Caers Stanford University, USA
Yao Tong, Tapan Mukerji Stanford University
Gas Condensate Blockage
Gas Condensate Blockage
Meeting of the Steering Group on Simulation (SGS) Defining the simulation plan in the Kriging meta-model development Thessaloniki, 07 February 2014.
Presentation transcript:

Renewable energies | Eco-friendly production | Innovative transport | Eco-efficient processes | Sustainable resources Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering March 23, 2016 – MASCOT-NUM Véronique Gervais (IFPEN) Mickaële Le Ravalec (IFPEN) Arthur Thenon IFP Energies nouvelles (IFPEN)

© IFP Energies nouvelles Reservoir characterization Introduction - Reservoir engineering context A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 2 Geological data Seismic data Core sample data Production data Log data Reservoir model

© IFP Energies nouvelles Introduction - Reservoir engineering context Goals of reservoir engineering  Assessment of field production potential  Management of the field development Tools 3D numerical models Flow simulator Main issues Size of reservoir models Building representative models A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse Simulated production data Reservoir model Flow simulation  time consuming flow simulations  lots of uncertainties 3

© IFP Energies nouvelles Introduction - Reservoir engineering context To handle / reduce uncertainties Identify the most influent uncertain parameters Probabilistic forecasting Incorporate all available data (dynamic data)  History-matching process A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse Simulated production data Optimization Reservoir model Measured production data Flow simulation Objective function 4

© IFP Energies nouvelles Introduction - Reservoir engineering context To handle / reduce uncertainties Identify the most influent uncertain parameters Probabilistic forecasting Incorporate all available data (dynamic data)  History-matching process Dealing with uncertainties and optimizing field production call for a huge number of flow simulations  Prohibitive computation time Solutions Using reservoir models with coarser grids  Approximate responses Using meta-models (polynomial, kriging, etc…)  Still requires a lot of simulations to be predictive A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse Good context to use multi-fidelity meta-models 5

© IFP Energies nouvelles Introduction - Multi-fidelity meta-models A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 6

© IFP Energies nouvelles Outline Introduction Numerical experiment Vectorial output modeling Sequential design strategy Conclusion and future work A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 7

© IFP Energies nouvelles Outline Introduction Numerical experiment PUNQ test case description Numerical experiment description Results Discussion Vectorial output modeling Sequential design strategy Conclusion and future work A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 8

© IFP Energies nouvelles Numerical experiment – PUNQ description The case is inspired from PUNQ S3 [Floris et al., 2001] 6 production wells (PRO-1, 4, 5, 11, 12 and 15) Produced by depletion Two reservoir models with different grid resolutions Coarse model: 19*28*5 grid blocks (average simulation time: 10s) Fine model: 57*84*5 grid blocks (average simulation time: 180s) A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse PUNQ S3 top and well positions Porosity in layer 3 for the coarse and fine PUNQ models

© IFP Energies nouvelles Numerical experiment - Description A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 10

© IFP Energies nouvelles Numerical experiment - Results A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 11

© IFP Energies nouvelles Numerical experiment - Results A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse The Q2 coefficient is computed for an independent test sample (LHS of 200 points). 12

© IFP Energies nouvelles Multi-fidelity meta-models show poor performance when approximating the OF.  Poor correlation between OF values for fine and coarse levels Similar behaviors do not imply a good correlation between the OF contributions. Numerical experiment - Discussion A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 13

© IFP Energies nouvelles Outline Introduction Numerical experiment Vectorial output modeling Methods Results Discussion Sequential design strategy Conclusion and future work A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 14

© IFP Energies nouvelles Existing method from [Douarche et al., 2014] [Marrel et al., 2015] Apply a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition on a set of responses Compute meta-models to approximate the coefficients of the reduced basis (scores) In multi-fidelity, we propose to compute coarse level scores by projecting the coarse level responses on the fine level reduced basis. Vectorial output modeling - Methods A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse Set of responses Apply PODGet the scores Design of experiment (LHS) Build kriging models Set of fine level responses Apply POD Get the fine level scores Design of experiment (nested LHS) Build co-kriging models Set of coarse level responses Projection on the fine reduced basis Get the coarse level scores 15

© IFP Energies nouvelles Vectorial output modeling - Results A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse Using this approach we approximate the OF by modeling each output involved in its definition (OF through output modeling). 16

© IFP Energies nouvelles Example: GOR at well 1 Example: BHP at well 4 Vectorial output modeling - Discussion A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 17

© IFP Energies nouvelles Example: BHP at well 4 Vectorial output modeling - Discussion A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 18

© IFP Energies nouvelles Outline Introduction Numerical experiment Vectorial output modeling Sequential design strategy Introduction Algorithms Results Conclusion and future work A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 19

© IFP Energies nouvelles How to choose the point location and the level of fidelity to be evaluated to build better multi-fidelity meta-models of the objective function? Sequential design strategy - Introduction A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 20

© IFP Energies nouvelles Sequential design strategy - Introduction A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 21

© IFP Energies nouvelles In simple fidelity context Sequential design strategy - Algorithms Initial design of experiment (small size LHS) Meta-model of the OF (output modeling) Compute the CVE on the OF Sampling of points in the Voronoï cell with the highest CVE Selection of the point maximizing the OF variance Stopping criterion Final meta-model of the OF Flow simulation 21 Stopping criterion Sufficient predictivity or end of time budget A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 22

© IFP Energies nouvelles In multi-fidelity context Sequential design strategy - Algorithms Initial design of experiment (small size nested LHS) Meta-model of the OF (output modeling) Compute the CVE on the OF Sampling of points in the Voronoï cell with the highest CVE Selection of the point maximizing the OF variance Stopping criterion Final meta-model of the OF Flow simulation Compute the CVE on the OF Sampling of points in the Voronoï cell with the highest CVE Selection of the point maximizing the OF variance Stopping criterion Fine level Coarse level Stopping criterion Sufficient predictivity Stopping criterion Sufficient predictivity or end of time budget A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 23

© IFP Energies nouvelles Sequential design strategy - Results A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 24 Coarse level evaluations Both levels evaluations

© IFP Energies nouvelles Sequential design strategy - Discussion A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 25

© IFP Energies nouvelles Outline Introduction Numerical experiment Vectorial output modeling Sequential design strategy Conclusion and future work A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 26

© IFP Energies nouvelles Conclusion The use of multi-fidelity co-kriging meta-models in reservoir engineering can save computation time, especially if the time budget is very limited. Suitable methodologies must be deployed. Efficiency depends on the correlation between the fidelity levels and the time ratio. Future work Application to a more complex test case (Brugge Field) Improvement of the proposed sequential strategy Sequential strategies for optimization Conclusion and future work A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 27

© IFP Energies nouvelles Kennedy, M., and O’Hagan, A. (2000). Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87, 1–13. Le Gratiet, L. (2012). MuFiKriging: Multi-fidelity co-kriging models. R package version 1.0. Floris, F.J.T., Bush, M.D., Cuypers, M., Roggero, F., and Syversveen, A.-R. (2001). Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: a comparative study. Petroleum Geoscience 7, S87–S96. Douarche, F., Da Veiga, S., Feraille, M., Enchéry, G., Touzani, S., and Barsalou, R. (2014). Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Surfactant-Polymer Flooding under Uncertainties. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles, 69(4), Marrel, A., Perot, N., Mottet, C. (2015). Development of a surrogate model and sensitivity analysis for spatio-temporal numerical simulators. Stoch Environ Res Risk Asses, 29, Le Gratiet, L., & Cannamela, C. (2015). Cokriging-Based Sequential Design Strategies Using Fast Cross-Validation Techniques for Multi-Fidelity Computer Codes. Technometrics, 57(3), 418–427. References A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 28

© IFP Energies nouvelles A. Thenon - Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir engineering - MASCOT-NUM - March 23, Toulouse 29