Animal Welfare Review – Dairy Reference Example Observation Calculation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
Advertisements

The Cost of Raising Replacement Dairy Heifers
Ian J.H. Duncan Professor of Applied Ethology Chair in Animal Welfare University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada The Costs and Benefits of Tail Docking.
AfiWeigh ™ Automatic Cow Body Weighing System Oded Nir (Markusfeld) Consultant to SAE Afikim Dealers Meeting, Dead Sea, Israel, 2008.
Dairy Center Research Projects. Skin tests as a predictor of Johne’s disease in cows and heifers An attempt to find an inexpensive and simple way to detect.
Offering Milk Quality Programs for Producers Brenda Moslock Carter, DVM Keseca Veterinary Clinic, PLLC P.O. Box 267, 1441 State Routes 5 & 20 Geneva, NY.
Residual Feed Intake and the Cow Herd A. M. Meyer 1 *, R. L. Kallenbach 2, M. S. Kerley 1 University of Missouri, Columbia 1 Division of Animal Sciences.
Lay out plan for livestock housing Aim Learning the preparation of lay out for different species of livestock with different capacities or what are all.
Animal Housing, Movement and Working Facilities Module 10.
Amin Ahmadzadeh AVS Department Univ. of Idaho
IFAD Partner Logo Nutritional management of dairy animals Y. Ramana Reddy Milk IT Project Nainital, Uttarakhand, India November, 2014.
BVD on the modern Dairy: The present state of confusion? Tom Shelton MS, DVM Bruce W. Hoffman, DVM.
Variability Measures of spread of scores range: highest - lowest standard deviation: average difference from mean variance: average squared difference.
Evaluation of beef cow-calf nutrition in Yucatan, Mexico: MS thesis progress report Animal Science Kotaro Baba January 2006.
Dairy Science An Introduction. Types of Dairy Cattle Operations Intensive Dairy Production- animals are raised in a more confined setting such as an open.
Selecting and Judging Dairy Cattle
Agricultural Science and Technology Dairy Terminology Lesson #2 By Mr. Weaver.
Economic Tools to Evaluate Culling Decisions for Breeding Cattle and Replacements.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Dairy Center Research Projects
Dairy Cow Nutrition Feeding ruminant animals at different life stages Julie Toth.
Summer Management of Beef Calves Mark F. Spire, DVM, MS, DACT Schering-Plough Animal Health Technical Services Manager Manhattan, KS.
Cow Fertility How can we affect it?. Objectives Identify three management areas Make a vaccination calendar Have a basic understanding of the body condition.
Reproductive Tract Scoring
Nutrition Programs for Growing Heifers José Eduardo P. Santos VMTRC.
 2011 Calf-ETERIA Study Benchmarking Ontario dairy calf and heifer raising practices Dairy Farmers of Ontario Dairy Research Communication Extension Event.
Jeremy Schefers, DVM Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory
Chapter 2: Breeds and Life Cycles of Livestock and Poultry Unit 2b: Dairy Life Cycle - history and general production of dairy cattle.
Animal Welfare Initiatives in the Dairy Industry Alan Davenport.
Dairy Management Chris Ellason. 4 groups of dairy cows  Far- off dry cows: Cows from time quit producing milk until 21 days before calving  Close up.
Animal Welfare, Recording & Breeding Scheme For Suckler Herds.
Genetic correlations between first and later parity calving ease in a sire-maternal grandsire model G. R. Wiggans*, C. P. Van Tassell, J. B. Cole, and.
Sequence of Major Events : Dairy Cattle Reproductive Cycle Calving Not Pregnant 283 d82.
Case 6: Neosporosis Linda Behling Sarah Galdi Jamie Jergenson.
Computer Controlled Parlours & Feeders. & A Totally Integrated Solution!
Estimation of a Population Mean
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
REARING DAIRY HEIFERS PROFITABLY Dr. Rachel J. E. Stewart.
The Reproductive Cycle
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Feeding and Managing Dairy Cattle Part1. Objectives Analyze the production practices involved in the care of dairy calves from birth to weaning. Analyze.
Bush Dairy Milking the system. Bush Dairy Getting started Select hardy, docile beef cattle (Tuli tested) These cows are put to dairy bulls (Red Dane Tested)
5.5.3 Means and Variances for Linear Combinations
Beef Cattle Calves Creep Replacement Heifers Bulls.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
2002 George R. Wiggans and Curt P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Lactation Curve Topic 3091 Basic Concepts Melinda Klockziem.
C.P. Van Tassell 1, * G.R. Wiggans 1, J.C. Philpot 1, and I. Misztal Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Waste Characteristics and Volumes CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 – Manure and Wastewater Storage and Handling.
Chapter 14: Labor Requirements and Scheduling © 2005 Thomson Delmar Learning. All rights reserved.
Research update Dr. Ron Lemenager Beef Extension Specialist
Livestock Terminology. Cattle Bull – a male bovine of any age that has not been castrated. Steer – a male bovine animal that was castrated before reaching.
CHAPTER 8 Estimating with Confidence
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
You Determine: Higher or Lower?
Locomotion and Body Condition Scores
Dairy vs. Beef Management
Drought and fodder crisis What cows should I cull?
Comparing two Rates Farrokh Alemi Ph.D.
Genetic Selection- More ways than 1!
Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows. Body condition score is an indicator of stored energy reserves Fat tissue Protein tissue (muscle and organs)
Expected Progeny Differences
Genetic Evaluation of Milking Speed for Brown Swiss Dairy Cattle
I can determine the different sampling techniques used in real life.
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Distribution of the body condition score (BCS) for cows per herd as the percentage of cows with suitable, high or low BCS in relation to lactation stage.
Presentation transcript:

Animal Welfare Review – Dairy Reference Example Observation Calculation

Observation Planning ObservationGroups Observed Docked TailsClose-up, Fresh, High, Late pens Swollen Hocks/KneesClose-up, Fresh, High, Late pens Hygiene Close-up, Fresh, High, Late pens, Pre- weaned & Weaned calves Body Condition Scores Close-up, Fresh, High, Late pens, Pre- weaned & Weaned calves + Hospital (all) Stocking RatesFresh, High, Late, Hospital Footing (slips)(with locomotion scores) Locomotion Scores 2 milking pens (High & Late; ALL) + Calves (post-weaning) Parlor Behavior & Turn Time3 turns (heifers & cows)

Observation Planning GroupObservation* Close-up Dry Cows Tail docking, Hock/Knee Swelling, Hygiene, BCS Fresh Cows Tail docking, Hock/Knee Swelling, Hygiene, BCS Stocking Rate High Producing Cows Tail docking, Hock/Knee Swelling, Hygiene, BCS Stocking Rate Locomotion Scores & Footing Evaluation Mid-Late Lactation Cows Tail docking, Hock/Knee Swelling, Hygiene, BCS Locomotion Scores & Footing Evaluation Stocking Rate Hospital Pen Body Condition Score Stocking Rate Pre-weaned calves Tail docking, BCS, Hygiene, Hock/Knee Swelling, Navels Weaned calves Tail docking, BCS, Hygiene, Locomotion Scores & Footing Evaluation *Don’t forget Parlor Scores + Turn Times on 3 milking pens

Population Estimated Prevalence of Condition 10 %20 %50 % 10, (or every 104 th animal) 5, (or every 53 rd animal) 4, (or every 43 rd animal) 3, (or every 32 nd animal) 2, (or every 27 th animal) 2, (or every 22 th animal) 1, (or every 16 th animal) 1, (or every 11 th animal) (or every 9 th animal) (or every 6 th animal) (or every 4 th animal) (or every 2 th animal) Sample Sizes  Use 50% prevalence as worst case scenario

Number of pens Number of Animals per Pen Random Sampling of Pens  For individual calf hutches, evaluate 30% of hutches.

Determining observation numbers Far-Off Dry = 15% (150 cows)Fresh = 4% (40 cows) Close-up Dry = 5% (50 cows)High = 33% (330 cows) Hospital = 1% (10 cows)Mid & Late = 42 % (420 cows) Example: 1,000 cow dairy estimated herd profile  FODC = 1 pen  CUDC = 2 pens  Hospital = 1 pen  Fresh = 1 pen  High = 3 pens  Late = 5 pens Pen numbers

Example calculations: 1,000 cows CUDC 5 animals from 2 pens (88 *.06) Fresh 4 animals (88 *.05) High 35 animals from 2 pens (88 *.40) Late 44 animals across 3 pens (88 *.50)  Population = 1,000  Prevalence = assume worst case of 50%  Observation number (from table) = 88 animals  Spread 88 observations over groups designated by proportion  Account for numbers in observation groups only (subtract far off dry cows & hospital numbers ~16%) BCS, Hygiene, Tails, Hock/Knee Swelling Locomotion & Footing HighAll of 1 pen LateAll of 1 pen Stocking Rate FreshAll of 1 pen HighAll of 1 pen LateAll of 1 pen HospitalAll of 1 pen