CEL5D+ Teacher Panel Tips and tricks for a successful first year. ASD 2015-16 CEL5D+ Training1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Differentiated Supervision
Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials  Wiki
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Focus Reviewing Sessions 1 and 2 Learning Target: I understand key concepts presented in Sessions 1 and 2. Success Criteria: I can explain the attributes.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
 Nuts & Bolts 2015/16 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve.
EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Collaborative Action Research Option (2013) Staff Development.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Student Outcomes (SO) Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
C OMPREHENSIVE & F OCUSED E VALUATIONS U SING P IVOT CEL5D+ Training Summer 2015 This session will: Give an overview of Comprehensive and Focused Evaluations.
SCRIPTING, CODING, & FINAL EVALUATION. SCRIPTING What is Scripting? Captures what is happening as it unfolds in real time What Does it Look Like When.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Updates.
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Self-Advocacy in the Observation Cycle
Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Evaluation Information
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

CEL5D+ Teacher Panel Tips and tricks for a successful first year. ASD CEL5D+ Training1

Fall Self Assessment Why Self Assess? State law requires that every teacher complete a self assessment each fall on the criterion they will be evaluated on The self assessment starts a conversation about strengths and the potential areas for professional growth for that year ASD CEL5D+ Training2

Fall Self Assessment Tools You Can Use: Use CEL5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric Use CEL5D+ Rubric Organized by WA State 8 Criteria Use Pivot Self Assessment Module ASD CEL5D+ Training3

CEL5D+ Rubric by CEL Criteria ASD CEL5D+ Training4

CEL5D+ Rubric by WA State 8 ASD CEL5D+ Training5

CEL5D+ Pivot Self Assessment ASD CEL5D+ Training6

Teacher Panelists’ Insights on Self Assessment ASD CEL5D+ Training7

Communicating With Your Evaluator Conversations during the year: Self Assessment Student Growth Goal Setting & Progress Pre & Post Observation Meetings Mid-Year Formative Feedback Final Evaluation ASD CEL5D+ Training8

Teacher Panelists’ Insights on Communicating with Your Evaluator ASD CEL5D+ Training9

“Evaluation Procedures” document Defines the new evaluation system –Comprehensive & Focused Evals, Student Growth, Self Assessment, etc. Outlines responsibilities for the teacher and evaluator Timeline of events articulated Provides sample documents ASD CEL5D+ Training10

“Eval Procedures” Front Page ASD CEL5D+ Training11

Teacher Panelists’ Insights on Evaluation Procedures ASD CEL5D+ Training12

Student Growth Goals Points to Consider: What does the “pre” data show your students need support in this year/term? What “post” assessment will demonstrate achievement of the goals? What formative assessment(s) will inform instruction and support between the pre and post assessments to maximize growth? Discuss whether or not the aim line is reasonable, why or why not? ASD CEL5D+ Training13

ASD CEL5D+ Training14

ASD CEL5D+ Training15

Student Growth Goal Setting Form ASD CEL5D+ Training16

Teacher Panelists’ Insights on Student Growth Goals ASD CEL5D+ Training17

Artifacts & Evidence Completed primarily through: –Self assessment discussions –Student growth goal setting discussions & data –Formal observations feedback –Conversations during “pre” and “post” observation conferences ASD CEL5D+ Training18

Artifacts & Evidence… continued Additional artifacts and evidence may be requested and/or provided Booster Sessions provide support for possible artifacts and evidence for each criteria SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Artifacts and Evidence are NOT intended to cause you to produce a binder/tote/box/ truckload of paper and pictures to be submitted to your evaluator ASD CEL5D+ Training19

Teacher Panelists’ Insights on Artifacts and Evidence ASD CEL5D+ Training20

CEL5D+ Booster Sessions Seven 1hr trainings spread over the year Per diem pay in Yr1 to attend 7 Clock hours for attendance Support for first year on the CEL5D+ Framework ASD CEL5D+ Training21

CEL5D+ Booster Sessions Topics Covered: Each of the CEL5D+ Criteria Self Assessment & Student Growth Preparing for observations Mid-Year Formative Feedback and Final Evaluation Q&A ASD CEL5D+ Training22

Teacher Panelists’ Insights on Booster Sessions ASD CEL5D+ Training23

Open Q & A from Audience ASD CEL5D+ Training24

Thanks Rotate now to: –Messiah Lutheran Church Music Room (June Trainings) OR –AHS Room 201 (August Trainings) ASD CEL5D+ Training25