Drafts of the North Carolina Essential Standards STEM Design Team Webinar Middle Grades Summer PD June 15-17, 2010 Asheboro City Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revised Blooms Taxonomy (RBT) and North Carolina Essential Standards March 5, 2010.
Advertisements

Common Core Standards English Language Arts and Mathematics GCS 3 June 2,
Learning and Accountability College- and Career- Ready Standards A Balanced Assessment System A New School Accountability Model.
Response to The Framework For Change: The Next Generation of School Standards, Assessments and Accountability October 2008 Presented Oct 2008 – plans subject.
Drafts of the North Carolina Essential Standards Globally Competitive Students Committee August, 2009.
H IGHER O RDER T HINKING Q UESTIONS Lesson Plan Review.
Response to The Framework For Change: The Next Generation of School Standards, Assessments and Accountability October 2008.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy A Tool for Rigor and Alignment
Lorin Anderson University of South Carolina
SCIS Oration We are pleased to sponsor Joy McGregor for the SCIS Oration.
CTE Essential Standards 1. NC State Board of Education Goals CTE Essential Standards for 158 Courses 5/19/20152 Business & Industry Education & Government.
Learning Taxonomies Bloom’s Taxonomy
NC School Counselors Guidance Essential Standards 2012 Regional Summer Institutes Front-loaded Information.
March 21, 2011 Bassett High School Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised and Revisited.
What Do the Data Say? Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Tool for Rigor and Curriculum Alignment.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Vaulting into the Future Reaching Higher with the Common Core.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
WSFCS Elementary Social Studies Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Alignment & Assessment Module 3 - PT. 1.
The Race to Future-Ready Dr. Rebecca Garland Accountability Conference February 19, 2009.
It’s a REVOLUTION… …not just another swing of the pendulum! Tyrrell County Schools Preparing for Changes to Come Thursday, February 24, :30-5:30.
Objectives are statements of what we want students to learn as a result of the instruction we provide. Standards are simply mandated objectives.
Depth of Knowledge A HEAP of Complexity. BLOOM’S TAXONOMYBLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY KNOWLEDGE “The recall of specifics and universals, involving little.
Bloom's Taxonomy: The Sequel (What the Revised Version Means for You!)
The Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (RBT): Improving Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in an Accountability-Driven, Standards-Based World Developed and.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Thank You for Attending! The powerpoint for this webinar is now
Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.
Curriculum Update Curriculum and Instructional Leaders Meeting July 19,
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
Dillon School District Two Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Common Core and Essential Standards Implementation Plan.
Welcome Back!. ACS Curriculum Guides Wednesday, June 17, 2009 Day 3.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
RBT and the Field Test Year Mary Jo Nason Special Assistant for Curriculum Career and Technical Education Department of Public Instruction.
August 2, 2010 TE 818. Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943)  Studied exemplary people  Physiological Needs (warmth, shelter, food)  Security.
Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) and Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised (2001) Thomas F. Hawk Management Department Frostburg State University.
NCDPI Update NC Arts Education Coordinators’ Meeting September 11, 2009 Meredith College Raleigh, NC Myron Carter Christie Lynch Ebert NCDPI Consultants.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) & North Carolina Essential Standards (NCES) June 12, 2012.
North Carolina Essential Standards PCk12 Fine Arts Learn to Love the Change!
Bloom’s Taxonomy vs. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Bloom’s Taxonomy 1956 Benjamin Bloom, pyschologist Classified the functions of thought or coming to know.
A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge.
Superintendents Quarterly July 30, NCDPI’s Response to Framework For Change SBE’s Framework For Change Blue Ribbon Commission Report.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Understanding the Standards to Support Student Growth Think Tank Facilitators: Cheryl Maney, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Common Core Standards English Language Arts 1. Overview of the Initiative o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12 in English Language.
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
Selecting Appropriate Assessment Measures for Student Learning Outcomes October 27, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of Assessment and.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Building Knowledge for Success Trey MichaelMary Jo Nason Marketing ConsultantSpecial Assistant for Curriculum
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Designing Aligned Instruction.
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy Creating Higher Level Discussions.
Title I Directors’ Meeting Regions 5 and 7 Update on the Race to the Top September 8, 2011.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Year 2. 1.Name 2.What you teach 3.Hope or Fear Who makes up this Curriculum Team?
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
Bengkel pembinaan item soalan unit biologi 2014
Session 4: NC ACRE and ACS ACRE Vision
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
Starting with the End in Sight…
Chapter 10: Bloom’s Taxonomy
Overview of the Initiative
Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy
Davidson County Schools
Overview of the Initiative
Presentation transcript:

Drafts of the North Carolina Essential Standards STEM Design Team Webinar Middle Grades Summer PD June 15-17, 2010 Asheboro City Schools

i. Back-story NCDPI’s Response to Framework For Change SBE’s Framework For Change Blue Ribbon Commission Report Vision into Mandate

Essential Standards Assessments Accountability i. Back-story A Simple Vision from October 2008

ii. Conceptual development Mission Our Goal: NC public schools will produce globally competitive students. The Purpose of Standards: To define and communicate the knowledge and skills a student must master to be globally competitive.

ES National & International Standards 21 st Century Skills Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy ii. Conceptual development Principles and Filters Enduring Measurable Clear and Concise Prioritized and Focused Rigorous Relevant to the Real World CriteriaFiltersCourse Generalized goals Examples and processes to achieve criteria Student Outcomes Assessment Prototypes

Summative (Statewide) Essential Standards Benchmark (Classroom, School, District) Formative Assessment (Classroom) Will inform and reflect the common core work Three Tiered assessment system designed to improve instruction. New types of assessments! (pilot and demonstration schools) GrowthAchievement (EOCs and EOGs) K-12 ACRE and New Generation of Assessments v. Next generation

Essential Standards Benchmark (Classroom, School, District) Formative Assessment (Classroom) Summative (Statewide) + Graduation Rate + Future- Ready Core + Readiness GrowthAchievement (EOCs and EOGs) K-12 Accountability ACRE

North Carolina’s Mandates “Essential” “Narrow“ “Deep“ “Rigorous + Relevant“ “Readiness for College and Career“ Race to the Top “Essential” ”Fewer, Higher, Clearer” ”Focused” “Enduring“ “Measurable“ “Clear and Concise “Prioritized and Focused” ”Rigorous” ”Readiness for College and Career” The common core and the Draft Essential Standards use the same adjectives v. Next generation Next generation and the Race to the Top

The work of the Blue Ribbon Commission, Framework for Change and ACRE is aligned to the RTTT assurances. Improved Data Systems Support for Low-performing Schools Teacher Effectiveness Standards and Assessments RTTT Assurances Summative Essential Standards Benchmark Formative Assessment Race to the Top Assurances v. Next generation

Summative (Statewide) Essential Standards Benchmark (Classroom, School, District) Formative Assessment (Classroom) Will inform and reflect the common core work Apply for $350 million assessment grant. From Smart Options: “Develop local data systems with formative, interim, and benchmark assessment data....” GrowthAchievement (EOCs and EOGs) K-12 ACRE and The Race to the Top v. Next generation

Common Core Time Line August 2009 Common Core Standards (ELA and Math) for College and Career Readiness DRAFTED Sept 2009 Common Core Standards (ELA and Math) for College and Career Readiness VALIDATED Dec 2009 Common Core Standards (ELA and Math) for K-12 DRAFTED Jan 2010 Common Core Standards (ELA and Math) for K-12 VALIDATED Early 2010 States submit timeline and process for adoption v. Next generation

What’s New/Different on ACRE link?

Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy : “A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing” RBT: Moving Toward Cognitive Alignment

A Fundamental Truth by Dr. Lorin Anderson: We don’t see the world as it is; we see the world through the lens through which we look at it.

NC’s New Lens: RBT

Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge The Original Bloom’s Taxonomy 1958

Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering The Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

The RBT Taxonomy Table COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION

The RBT Taxonomy Table COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION 1. REMEMBER Recognizing Recalling 2. UNDERSTAND Interpreting Exemplifying Classifying Summarizing Inferring Comparing Explaining 3. APPLY Executing Implementing 4. ANALYZE Differentiating Organizing Attributing 5. EVALUATE Checking Critiquing 6. CREATE Generating Planning Producing

FactualKnowledge Conceptual Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Metacognitive Knowledge Concrete Abstract The RBT Taxonomy Table KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION

RBT- The new way of categorizing thinking! With this revision, Dr. Anderson proposes four dimensions of knowledge: 1.Factual knowledge- terms, details, symbols, informational sources (vocabulary) 2.Conceptual knowledge- classification, generalizations, theories, models (Taxonomy of a bug/tree) 3.Procedural knowledge- employing a method or technique, using skills, procedures to solve a problem (Scientific method) 4.Metacognitive knowledge- strategic, self- knowledge, critiquing, cognitive demands of specific tasks, (experimentation)

KNOWLEDGEDIMENSION A FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE B CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE C PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE DMETACOGNITIVEKNOWLEDGE 1. REMEMBER 2. UNDERSTAND 3. APPLY 4. ANALYZE 5. EVALUATE 6. CREATE Recognize Recall Interpret Exemplify Classify Summarize Infer Compare Explain Execute Implement Differentiate Organize Attribute Check Critique Generate Plan Produce THE TAXONOMY TABLE

IMPROVED ALIGNMENT Objectives Assessment Instructional Activities/ Materials Students

ALIGNMENT USING THE TAXONOMY TABLE Objectives Assessments Instructional Activities/Materials RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreate Factual Conceptual X Procedural Meta- Cognitive

KNOWLEDGEDIMENSION A FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE B CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE C PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE DMETACOGNITIVEKNOWLEDGE 1. REMEMBER 2. UNDERSTAND 3. APPLY 4. ANALYZE 5. EVALUATE 6. CREATE Recognize Recall Interpret Exemplify Classify Summarize Infer Compare Explain Execute Implement Differentiate Organize Attribute Check Critique Generate Plan Produce THE TAXONOMY TABLE

RBT Alignment Activity Using Essential Standards and Clarifying Objectives from ELA, SS, and Sci curriculum guides to identify the level of RBT (Cognitive Dimension) and the Knowledge Dimension alignment. Reflect and share how this knowledge will be utilized during planning and implementation of instruction.

NCFALCON

ACS Vision ACS Goal/Product Why? ACS is committed to student learning. The work we do in the area of curriculum, instruction, and assessment is ongoing and based on our constant pursuit of 4 guiding questions: 1)What do we want students to know, understand, and be able to do? 2)How will we deliver high quality instruction to help students learn what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? 3)How will we assess to determine if students have learned what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? 4)What will we do if students have not learned what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? What? ACS is committed to the development of curriculum guides that will be used for planning instruction and assessments that result in student mastery of essential standards and objectives of the NCSCOS and are reflective of the 21 st century skills students need to be future-ready graduates.

Why? ACS is committed to student learning. The work we do in the area of curriculum, instruction, and assessment is ongoing and based on our constant pursuit of 4 guiding questions: 1)What do we want students to know, understand, and be able to do? 2)How will we deliver high quality instruction to help students learn what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? 3)How will we assess to determine if students have learned what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? 4)What will we do if students have not learned what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? What? ACS is committed to creating instructional units of study and assessments reflective of the NCSCOS Essential Standards and Clarifying Objectives as identified in the ACS Curriculum Guides. ACS Vision ACS Goal/Product

What? ACS is committed to creating instructional units of study and assessments reflective of the NCSCOS Essential Standards and Clarifying Objectives as identified in the ACS Curriculum Guides. Explore NCFALCON resource. Make revisions to ACS Curriculum/Pacing Guides as needed. Develop instructional units of study and assessments utilizing the instructional unit template on ACSACRE wiki space. Utilize the Lens for Learning Checklist on the ACSACRE wiki space (Quality Check). Present units of study on final day of work.