QMWG Measures Framework Quality Measure Workgroup Report David Lansky Aug. 3, 2011.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday July 25, 2013.

Advertisements

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday July 22, 2013.

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 19, 2013.

Functional Requirements and Health IT Standards Considerations for STAGE 3 Meaningful Use for Long-Term and Post-Acute Care (LTPAC) Update to the HITPC.

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.

HITSC Clinical Quality Workgroup Jim Walker March 27, 2012.

Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)

ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting February 20, 2013 Jodi Daniel, Office of Policy and Planning, ONC.

Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session esMD Requirements, Priorities and Potential Workgroups – 2:00pm.

Building the Digital Infrastructure for Vermont’s Learning Health System ONC HIT Policy Committee Testimony September 14, 2011 Hunt Blair, Deputy Commissioner.

HITSC: Health Information Technology “Summer Camp” Doug Fridsma

Accountable Care Quality Measures Subgroup October 28, 2013.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Quality Measures Workgroup Report Jim Walker Karen Kmetik June 22, 2011.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair October 20,

Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.

Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup March 10, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.

Interoperability Framework Overview March 24, 2010 Presented by: Douglas Fridsma, MD, PhD Acting Director, Office of Interoperability & Standards ONC HIT.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair December 13,

August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.

Qualified Clinical Data Registries a Data Intermediary Model May 20, 2013 Data Intermediary Tiger Team.

ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Policy Committee Meeting July 9, 2013 Jodi Daniel Director, Office of Policy and Planning, ONC 0.

HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.

The Final Standards Rule John D. Halamka MD. Categories of Standards Content Vocabulary Privacy/Security.

Strategy and Innovation Workgroup: Recommendations on the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan March 4, 2015 David Lansky, Chair Jennifer Covich,

Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.

Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.

Public Health Informatics and Technology Program Office Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services Public Health and Meaningful Use.

LCC -Proposal for Next Steps August 28, Discussion Points Recap of Whitepaper Recommendations Critical milestones and activities driving LCC activities.

Data Intermediaries and Meaningful Use: Quality Measure Innovation, Calculation and Reporting Recommendations from Data Intermediary Tiger Team.

QMWG Measures Framework June 8, Core + Categorized Menu.

Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.

The United States Health Information Knowledgebase: Federal/State Initiatives An AHRQ Research Project J. Michael Fitzmaurice, PhD, AHRQ Robin Barnes,

Interoperability Framework Overview Health Information Technology (HIT) Standards Committee June 24, 2010 Presented by: Douglas Fridsma, MD, PhD Acting.

Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.

HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.

Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 20 August,

10/27/111 Longitudinal Care Work Group (LCWG) Proposal to Re-Scope and Re-Name the LTPAC WG.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Policy Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.

Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.

HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.

Workgroup Clinical Quality Measure Workgroup Jim Walker & Karen Kmetik, Co-Chairs May 7, :30 pm – 5:30 pm.

Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.

Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.

Clinical Quality Public Hearing June 7, 2012 HIT Standards & Policy Committees Summary: June 20, 2012 Marjorie Rallins, Clinical Quality WG, HIT Standards.

HIT Policy Committee METHODOLOGIC ISSUES Tiger Team Summary Helen Burstin National Quality Forum Jon White Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality October.

Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.

Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

Federal Advisory Committees Introducing Future Topics and Adding Workgroups Discussion Document October 2009 ** Pre-decisional Draft Do not Disclose **

Quality Measures Workgroup David Lansky, PhD 1. Quality Measures Workgroup 2012 Stage 2 Quality Measure Development Stage 2 NPRM Review Alignment with.

HIT Standards Committee Overview and Progress Report March 17, 2010.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard University February 24, 2010.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang Palo Alto Medical Foundation George Hripcsak Columbia University January 13, 2010.

What Lies Ahead for ONC Meaningful Use and Beyond Farzad Mostashari, MD ScM National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.

Discussion - HITSC / HITPC Joint Meeting Transport & Security Standards Workgroup October 22, 2014.

HIT Standards Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair October 27,

Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.

Lab Results Interface Validation Suite Workgroup and Pilots Workgroup Vision, Charter, NIST Collaboration, July 8,

Quality Measures Workgroup Recommendations QUALITY MEASURE WORKGROUP RECOMMENDATIONS Mar 2, 2011.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Quality Workgroup: Progress Report Janet Corrigan Floyd Eisenberg National Quality Forum August 20, 2009.

Improving access to CAMHS Applying LEAN within CAMHS Beverley Mack Bexley CAMHS.

Health Homes: SPA Application Process August 17, :00AM 1.

Pharmacy Health Information Technology Collaborative Date: April 28, 2016 Presenter:Shelly Spiro, RPh, FASCP Pharmacy HIT Collaborative Executive Director.

Query Health Operations Workgroup Standards & Interoperability (S&I) Framework October 13, :00am – 12:00pm ET.

HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,

Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting July 18, 2011.

HL7 Business Architecture Model (PLA TSC Project)

Presentation transcript:

QMWG Measures Framework Quality Measure Workgroup Report David Lansky Aug. 3, 2011

Summary of Activities Core plus Menu framework accepted by HIT Policy Committee Transmission Letter submitted for final approval by HIT Policy Committee for National Coordinator Measure Concept Recommendations from Tiger Teams accepted by ONC to guide novel e- measure development Joint hearing with Clinical Quality Workgroup/Standards Committee on e-measure standards and implementation

Core + Categorized Menu

Timeline of Activities Currently: Existing CMS e-measure development and testing contracts coordinated with ONC Late September: Award of ONC contract for measure development for Stage 2 and Stage 3 measures Late 2011: Measure concepts to be presented in MU Stage 2 NPRM Q2 2012: Measure numerator and denominators to be included in final rule

Future Activities of QM WG October 2011: –Receive feedback from providers/hospitals on implementation, report and use of measures for quality improvement (with MU WG) Fall 2011: –Explore clinical quality measure reporting and data infrastructure (e.g., role of data intermediaries, registries) –Joint discussion with Clinical Quality Workgroup/Standards Committee on implications of ICD-10 and potential use of SNOMED for clinical transactions –Explore linking future MU requirements for Clinical Decision Support to emerging measure concepts –Consider methodological recommendations: Infrastructure for capture and sharing of patient-reported data Define core set of data elements that are common to all e-measures and specify for MU?

Methodologic Issues Patient reported data--a vehicle is needed to capture data tagged to source (need CDA type standard and transport standard for self-reported race, ethnicity, language, and equity; perception of experience; and structured data for m-health/home devices) Delta measures—need guidance for methods that allow comparison of data points over time Problem lists--identify standards to consistently represent attributes and that can be used for reconciliation Capacity and scalability of EHRs—must be in step with increasing complexity of quality measures Attribution of provider—need standards to clarify assignment of “credit” to members of care teams