Green Building Point Rating System New Homes and Substantial Rebuilding Town of Portola Valley March 15, 2009 Tom Vlasic, Deputy Town Planner Town of Portola.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for LEED ® Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design LEED and related logo is a trademark owned by the U.S. Green Building Council and is.
Advertisements

Sustainability and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Lessons Learned from The Fernald Preserve Visitors Center.
Greening America’s Congregations Through Energy Efficiency ENERGY STAR ® Tools, Technical Support and Public Recognition.
Welcome! Earth Day Webinar April 22, Agenda ENERGY STAR qualified homes Amber Stewart – ENERGY STAR Account Manager Meritage Green C.R. Herro –
Energy Rating Index Performance Path Speaker Name Speaker Affiliation.
Energy Rating Index Performance Path Speaker Name Speaker Affiliation.
1 AB 32 Scoping Plan Energy Action Plan Meeting Mike Scheible Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board California Public Utilities Commission.
LEED CERTIFICATION IN THE RETAIL ENVIRONMENT Maggie Benson and Isabelle Bouthillier Project By:
Test USGBC Architects Building Owners Planners Federal, Local, and State Governments Utility Managers Nonprofit Leaders Engineers Building Tenants Property.
SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS A New Approach to Building CAUBO 2006 John Metras, P.Eng. University of British Columbia.
Sustainable Buildings Going Green. Green Building Building the Future with Intention Building to ensure that waste is minimized at every stage during.
BECOMING GREEN Santa Margarita High School Academic Building.
Planning Department – Building and Safety Adoption of the 2010 California Code of Regulations Presented By: Building and Safety & Fire Prevention.
The Green Building Act of 2006: Transforming the Market DC Department of Housing and Community Development Prepared by the DC Department of Housing and.
Green School Design Gary A. Jerue ED 846 Spring 2010.
CATEE CONFERENCE SAN ANTONIO, TX December 18, 2013.
Kendal at Longwood Cottages Expansion Project Sustainable Development & LEED Certification.
Catherine Elvert City of Palo Alto Utilities Communications Manager.
Working Toward a Sustainable Manhattan Beach July 20, 2011 Livable Communities Working Group.
Understanding Fundamental Concepts and Trends of Drafting
1 Ohio School Facilities Commission Green Schools Initiative Presentation #2.
Green Initiatives & Climate Protection 2011 Annual Report Brian Moura Assistant City Manager July 11, 2011.
Building Metering & Benchmarking: It’s Worth the Energy American University Emily Curley, Sustainability Coordinator Chris O’Brien, Director of Sustainability.
GREEN B UILDING, E NERGY R ETROFIT & S OLAR T RANSFORMATION.
LEED: LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN Gibbs INTD 153 Design Studio I.
Lauren Rank Los Angeles County Office of Sustainability.
1 Southern California Water Dialogue April 23, 2008 Jon Costantino Climate Change Planning Manager California Air Resources Board AB 32 California Global.
City of Brisbane Open Space & Ecology Committee April 27, 2006 Baylands EIR Scoping.
Home Energy Retrofit Forum, May 3, 2010 Jess Traver P.E. The Builders Association of Northern Nevada Green Home Building.
*Green City “Briefing” presentation to the City Council Summer 2008 GCGC GCGC * Project Location is confidential.
Denise Thompson Virginia Municipal League.
Developed by the U.S. Green Building Council in 2007U.S. Green Building Council Inspired the creation of the national Green Schools initiative Is the.
2009 Greenhouse Gas Inventory The American College and University President’s Climate Commitment.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report OVERVIEW Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments October.
30 Muir Road Awarded LEED Gold Certification. LEED Founded in 1993, the U.S. Green Building Council (USBC) is a nonprofit organization committed to a.
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
Sustainable Building and Housing
Joel Kreisberg, DC, MA Executive Director of the Teleosis Institute Creating Healthy Buildings: How Does Building.
The Greening of the Rooftop Module 4 Green Building Rating Systems What Are They? How Do They Work?
Green Real Estate NSCC - RES 130 Week 1 Introduction to Green Real Estate Cate O’dahl, Instructor.
Livable Delaware Energy Task Force - the Key to Energy and Environmental Co-Benefits.
Overview of San Diego Climate Action Plan Nicole Capretz Director of Environmental Policy iMayor’s Office.
Going Green Is it Worth it? Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre AIPC July 2010.
Sustainability Elements of the ARRA, and Getting the Most out of Stimulus Funding Jeannie Renne-Malone, LEED AP National Director – Climate Change & GHG.
Green Real Estate: An Introduction Source: The Green Revolution by Jerry Yudelson.
Solar Power Project at the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant August 26, 2015.
An Introduction to the U. S
2008 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE Dave Walls Executive Director California Building Standards Commission David Thorman State Architect.
Test USGBC Architects Building Owners Planners Federal, Local, and State Governments Utility Managers Nonprofit Leaders Engineers Building Tenants Property.
Libby Barnes Ron Brown MONTEREY BAY BRANCH Creating a Greener Future for Carmel-by-the-Sea.
Hillsborough Building & Planning. Green Building 101  Efficiency of buildings and responsible use of water, and construction materials  Reducing building.
Session E2: Mandating GREEN - A Regulatory Scheme for Realizing Institutional Sustainability.
Planning for LEED ® © 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Civil Engineering and Architecture Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design LEED ® and its related.
ITEM 6.a AT GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE City Council – August 25, 2009.
Planning Commission Meeting July 30, Presentation Outline  Project Purpose, Background and Schedule  Overview of Community Input  Overview of.
Virginia Energy Conservation and Environmental Standards May 19, 2009 Capital Outlay & Facilities Manager Forum.
Fundamentals of LEED v4 for
City of San Mateo 2016 Reach Code
National Green Building Standard™
for Residential Design Projects
Objectives of a Green Building
Technological Design Sustainable Construction
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
City-wide LED Street Light Conversion Program
Green Building and Sustainable Architecture
City of Ventura Green Building Standards
Lori A. Brown, LEED AP BD+C, LEED AP ND, LEED AP O+M -- LEED Green Associate Exam -- Power Jam Study! -- lorisweb.com 1.
Need to Know these terms:
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

Green Building Point Rating System New Homes and Substantial Rebuilding Town of Portola Valley March 15, 2009 Tom Vlasic, Deputy Town Planner Town of Portola Valley March 15, 2009 Tom Vlasic, Deputy Town Planner

What is Green Building? Improving our site and building design and construction practices so that the the homes we build today will: last longer cost less to operate won’t harm people’s health Protecting natural resources and improving the built environment for people, communities and ecosystems Improving our site and building design and construction practices so that the the homes we build today will: last longer cost less to operate won’t harm people’s health Protecting natural resources and improving the built environment for people, communities and ecosystems

Why Does the Town Desire/Need a Green Building Rating System? Achieve Town Greenhouse Gas reduction goals. Part of town action plan to achieve climate protection goals. Encourage a new approach to thinking about building and use of space in homes in the town. It’s not about “green” points or score, but it is about homes and rebuilding that result in site improvements and structures better for the environment and healthier for the occupants based on careful consideration of specific factors: -- Energy Efficiency -- Resource Conservation -- Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality -- Water Conservation -- Community Quality Ensure the Town continues its Leadership role in protecting the environment, one of the cornerstones of Town incorporation. The health and quality of the Portola Valley environment make the community the special place it is and the climate action program will ensure the town retains its healthy environment for future generations.

Steps to Selection of PV Green Building Rating System A deliberate and careful process January 2006 San Mateo County “Sustainability Checklist” required as a project design tool. July 2007 Building, Energy Efficiency & Transportation (BEET) Committee of town Climate Protection Task Force recommends adoption of rating & tracking system for new construction & substantial remodels. Part of a multi-front climate protection plan. October 2007 Council tasks Planning Commission, ASCC and BEET committee to develop options for local Green building rating systems. December 2007 PC, ASCC & BEET subgroup begins one year process to develop recommendations for a Green building rating system. April 2008 “Building green” public participation workshop at Corte Madera School. Oct.-Dec Subgroup tentative recommendations shared with full PC, ASCC and town council. PC, ASCC and TC concur and town proceeds with additional Public Outreach Workshops, Feb. 28th & March 15th April 2009 With workshop input, Subgroup to prepare final recommendations to the town council for a Green building point rating system. These would be considered at public meetings later this year prior to adoption.

Subgroup Recommendations for Portola Valley Green Building Rating System New Homes Build it Green (BIG) GreenPoint Rated -- New Homes Adjust minimum base score for energy and conservation “up” with increase in size of project. Substantial Build it Green (BIG) GreenPoint Rated -- Existing Homes Rebuilding Set energy/conservation score at BIG minimums. (Use BIG checklist for small additions, but without any point mandates) April 1, 2009 Completed BIG checklists to required with New Projects BIG checklists replace the current San Mateo Co.“Sustainable Building” checklists. Initially, no mandatory point total or green building minimums. Checklist compliance self-certified. Aug. 1, 2009+/- Build it Green (BIG) GreenPoint Rated--New & Existing Homes Minimum Energy/Conservation Thresholds to take effect. To coincide with provisions of new State green building code Title 24 provision and BIG checklist updates.

Why BIG GreenPoint Rated System? BIG Build it Green (BIG) widely recognized, non-profit membership organization Developed for consumers & building professionals in California Proven system endorsed by the Home Builders Assoc. of Northern CA. Tested BIG in use for several years and has been tested in a System number of Cities throughout the State Locally used in Palo Alto, Los Altos, San Mateo County, Brisbane, & San Francisco Available BIG has an extensive web site with significant resources Resources directly linked to the GreenPoint rated system categories Links serve both the consumer and building professionals Include design, analysis and modeling tools as well as example projects Other Subgroup considered LEED and development of a town- Programs dedicated system and other options BIG found most cost effective and least cumbersome for applicants and town administration

BIG GreenPoint Rated System Checklist Categories for New & Existing Home Projects. Checklists assign points over a broad range of categories and set minimum levels for projects to be considered “green.” The applicant can choose the elements most appropriate for the project: A.Site I. Renewable Energy B.Foundation J. Building Performance C.Landscaping K. Finishes D.Structural, Frame & Building Envelope L. Flooring E.Exterior Finish M. Appliances & Lighting F.Insulation N. Other G.Plumbing O. Community Design & Planning H.Heating, Ventilation, & Air Conditioning P. Innovation Minimum Rating Points for BIG Green Certification. New Homes ______________________ 50 points (maximum possible 382 points) Existing homes: “Whole” home project _________ 50 points (maximum possible 224 points) “Element” of home project _____ 25 points (maximum possible 224 points) Checklist Categories for New & Existing Home Projects. Checklists assign points over a broad range of categories and set minimum levels for projects to be considered “green.” The applicant can choose the elements most appropriate for the project: A.Site I. Renewable Energy B.Foundation J. Building Performance C.Landscaping K. Finishes D.Structural, Frame & Building Envelope L. Flooring E.Exterior Finish M. Appliances & Lighting F.Insulation N. Other G.Plumbing O. Community Design & Planning H.Heating, Ventilation, & Air Conditioning P. Innovation Minimum Rating Points for BIG Green Certification. New Homes ______________________ 50 points (maximum possible 382 points) Existing homes: “Whole” home project _________ 50 points (maximum possible 224 points) “Element” of home project _____ 25 points (maximum possible 224 points)

BIG GreenPoint Rated Process & Resources Design project using GreenPoint checklist & guidelines. Submit application to planning department with completed checklist on one of the sheets of the project plans. Obtain approvals through design review (ASCC) and building permit process demonstrating project compliance with checklist items. Build project in compliance with approved plans. Certify compliance with BIG checklist using certified GreenPoint Raters. ********************************** BIG Resources: Available for downloading at or -- New and Existing Homes Guidelines and Checklists -- Listing and directory of Green Products -- Building certification program -- Design/Analysis/Modeling Tools -- Cost data and case studies Also visit for excellent San Mateo Countywww.recycleworks.org/greenbuilding Green building resources & for statewide studies of green projects Design project using GreenPoint checklist & guidelines. Submit application to planning department with completed checklist on one of the sheets of the project plans. Obtain approvals through design review (ASCC) and building permit process demonstrating project compliance with checklist items. Build project in compliance with approved plans. Certify compliance with BIG checklist using certified GreenPoint Raters. ********************************** BIG Resources: Available for downloading at or -- New and Existing Homes Guidelines and Checklists -- Listing and directory of Green Products -- Building certification program -- Design/Analysis/Modeling Tools -- Cost data and case studies Also visit for excellent San Mateo Countywww.recycleworks.org/greenbuilding Green building resources & for statewide studies of green projects

BIG GreenPoint Rated New Home Checklist

BIG New Home Building Performance Provisions

BIG New Home Landscape Provisions

For the Inspired Going Beyond Build it Green!! Energy Star for New Homes LEED for Homes American Lung Association Health House Living Building Challenge National Wildlife Federation, Certified Wildlife Habitat Energy Star for New Homes LEED for Homes American Lung Association Health House Living Building Challenge National Wildlife Federation, Certified Wildlife Habitat

Costs v. Benefits of GreenPoint Rating Program A comprehensive “green building” analysis by the State of California in 2003 concluded that, at that time, an initial “minimal upfront” investment of 2% of construction costs typically yields life cycle savings of over 10 times the initial investment. Since 2003, the “upfront” costs have been decreasing rapidly and BIG has found that in many cases costs for green are equivalent to or less than for “standard” building practices. The financial benefits of green building include lower energy, waste disposal and water costs, lower environmental and emissions costs, lower operation and maintenance costs and healthier and more productive living environments. In October of 2008, a cost.v benefit analysis for the City of Santa Rosa evaluated the BIG program. It set Tiers for single family homes, based on GreenPoint system & estimated incremental costs related to point tiers, pay-back time & annual Ghg savings. For a single family house, roughly 2,600 sf (largest evaluated), the study found implementing Tier 1 (50 pts. BIG), to Tier 3 (80 pts. BIG) could cost $1 to $8 per sf (low to high), with a payback period between 5-12 years. The C0 2 savings, on an annual basis, were found to range from.5 to 1 lb. per sf. For a 2,600 sf home the C0 2 savings would be from 1,300 lbs. - 2,600 lbs. annually For an average size house in town, it would likely be double the Santa Rosa example. According to subgroup findings, i.e., data from local architects, the cost to add the GreenPoint Rating system into a local house planning project should be minimal, but there would be some added construction cost. This would depend, however, on the specific proposals and complexity of the project. Typical cost for GreenPoint Rating Certification would be in the range of $800 to $2,000 depending on the size of the project. For BIG processing, a there is an additional fixed cost of $400. The town is exploring options to off-set the costs for the certification process. A comprehensive “green building” analysis by the State of California in 2003 concluded that, at that time, an initial “minimal upfront” investment of 2% of construction costs typically yields life cycle savings of over 10 times the initial investment. Since 2003, the “upfront” costs have been decreasing rapidly and BIG has found that in many cases costs for green are equivalent to or less than for “standard” building practices. The financial benefits of green building include lower energy, waste disposal and water costs, lower environmental and emissions costs, lower operation and maintenance costs and healthier and more productive living environments. In October of 2008, a cost.v benefit analysis for the City of Santa Rosa evaluated the BIG program. It set Tiers for single family homes, based on GreenPoint system & estimated incremental costs related to point tiers, pay-back time & annual Ghg savings. For a single family house, roughly 2,600 sf (largest evaluated), the study found implementing Tier 1 (50 pts. BIG), to Tier 3 (80 pts. BIG) could cost $1 to $8 per sf (low to high), with a payback period between 5-12 years. The C0 2 savings, on an annual basis, were found to range from.5 to 1 lb. per sf. For a 2,600 sf home the C0 2 savings would be from 1,300 lbs. - 2,600 lbs. annually For an average size house in town, it would likely be double the Santa Rosa example. According to subgroup findings, i.e., data from local architects, the cost to add the GreenPoint Rating system into a local house planning project should be minimal, but there would be some added construction cost. This would depend, however, on the specific proposals and complexity of the project. Typical cost for GreenPoint Rating Certification would be in the range of $800 to $2,000 depending on the size of the project. For BIG processing, a there is an additional fixed cost of $400. The town is exploring options to off-set the costs for the certification process.