Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0871r1 Jul. 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Submission doc.: IEEE /0623r1 May 2015 Guido R. Hiertz, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 TGax simulation scenario “Box 5” – calibration results Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.
Doc.: IEEE /0335r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Instantaneous SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1523r0 Submission Offline Discussion Minutes of SLS Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1 Nov 2014 Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies)
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2014 Frank LaSita, InterDigitalSlide 1 Residential Scenario CCA/TPC Simulation Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r0 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0889r0 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1441r0 Submission Simulation Setting of Box5 Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies) Nov 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1523r4 Submission Offline Discussion Minutes of SLS Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1 Jan 2015 Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies)
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0889r3 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Verifying 11ax’s PAR by UL MU-MIMO
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Simulation results for
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Marvell Semiconductor
Simulation results for
Simulation Results for Box5
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Box 5 Calibration Result
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Simulation results for
Simulation results for
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
DSC Calibration Result
Consideration on System Level Simulation
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date: Slide 1

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Abstract This presentation shows the updated results of each calibration box based on the latest parameters to promote the calibration progress. This presentation also shows the system throughput under different CCA levels evaluated by both PHY SS and Integrated SS. Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 2

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Background Box-by-box evaluation methodology and procedures have been agreed in [1] for various simulation scenarios [2]. Six companies finished the Box1 calibration for [2.4GHz, 20MHz] case [3] and the initial results towards integrated SS was provided in [4]. After the May meeting, simulation parameters in [2] were keeping updated offline and the modifications was proposed and accepted in [5] where [5GHz, 80MHz] is used for calibration. Based on [5], four companies have provided their Box-1 and Box-2 results of all the scenarios where the results of Scenario 1 & 3 are aligned in [6]. In the following, we provide our results of Scenario 1 - Residential for Box- 1 and Box-2 as well as subsequent Box-4 and Box-5 under varying CCA threshold to stress again the signification of integrated SS. Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 3

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Box 1: Long Term SINR/SNR Calibration Jul Three Test results are provided below Test 1: Interference free DL SNR Test 2: DL only SINR Test 5: DL and UL SINR (all nodes active) Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 4

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1Jul Three Test results are provided below Test 1: Interference free DL SNR Test 2: DL only SINR Test 3: CCA-only mechanism with assumption of all nodes having the same channel access probability, which can be reused in the PHY SS (i.e., Box 4) 1 Tx and 1 Rx is assumed Box 2: Instantaneous SINR Calibration Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 5

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1Jul CDF of per non-AP STA throughput of PHY SS Same CCA mechanism as in Box 2 Test 3 RBIR based PHY abstraction Ideal link adaption MMSE receiver Full buffer Box 4: PHY SS Calibration Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 6 Mean: 65.05Mbps 5%: 15.97Mbps

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1Jul CDF of per non-AP STA throughput of PHY SS Besides features defined in PHY SS, the following ones are also activated EDCA CCA RTS/CTS A-MPDU Box 5: Integrated SS Calibration Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 7 Mean: 55.08Mbps 5%: 7.91Mbps

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1Jul PHY SS and Integrated SS Comparison with Different CCA Thresholds Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 8 CCA threshold varies from -82dBm to -30dBm Mean and 5% non-AP STA throughput (Mbps) PHY SS and Integrated SS achieve different gains with varying CCA threshold PHY SS and Integrated SS achieve peaks at different CCA threshold In larger CCA regions, mean throughput in integrated SS decreases quickly

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1Jul Summary The calibration results of Scenario 1 – Residential were presented for all Boxes based on latest scenario parameters. We also provided results of Box-4 and Box-5 with suggested MAC and PHY features for varying CCA threshold. We recommended using Integrated SS to show more realistic mean and 5% percentile throughputs due to joint modelling of PHY and MAC details. Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 9

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1Jul References [1] 11-14/0571r2 11ax Evaluation Methodology [2] 11-14/0621r4 TGax Simulation Scenarios [3] 11-14/0336r0 Calibration of Long-Term SINR for System Simulator [4] 11-14/0612r0 Calibration procedures towards integrated system level simulation [5] 11-14/0799r2 Modifications to simulation scenarios and calibration process [6] 11-14/0800r2 Box1 and Box2 calibration results Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 10

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Appendix-1 Basic Parameters for Calibration Parameter Value ResidentialEnterpriseIndoorOutdoor Central Frequency5.0 GHz Bandwidth80 MHz Channel Assignment Random assignment of 3 non overlapping channels chan = mod(BSS_index,4). That is, in each office, (ch1, ch2, ch3, ch4) and identical for each office. Ignore adjacent channel interference. Frequency reuse 3Frequency reuse 1 Transmission Power per antenna AP / STA20dBm/15dBm Antenna Configuration Antenna gain # of AP/STA antenna AP: 0dBi; STA: -2dBi; 1*1 Penetration LossWall / Floor5dB / 18.3dB7 dB / N.A.N.A. / N.A.100% outdoor Noise FigureAP / STA7 dB / 7 dB Channel Model PL multipath TGn Model B TGn Model D ITU UMi Antenna Height AP STA 1.5m 3m 1m 3m 1.5m 10m 1.5m STA Number2 per apartment2 per cubicle30 per BSS50 per BSS AP-STA min distance (2D)N.A. 10m Association 100% STA associated to the AP in the same apartment 100% STA associate with the strongest AP in the same office 100% of STAs associate with the strongest AP Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 11