Out – of – commerce works in Polish legislation Ministry of Culture and National Heritage Mr Karol Kościński Departament of Intellectual Property and Media.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation on the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures By Shashank Priya, Director, Department of Commerce.
Advertisements

Orphan works and the cultural sector. A governmental organisation perspective Rossella Caffo Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali – Italy Coordinator.
Ministerial Conclusions November 2006 David Dawson Senior Policy Adviser Digital Futures.
Copyright & digital cultural heritage: an update from the Dutch practice and abroad Annemarie Beunen, copyright lawyer National Library of the Netherlands.
Accessing Cultural Heritage Out-of-Commerce Works MoU Olav Stokkmo, CEO of IFRRO Licence for Europe WG 3 4 March 2013,Brussels.
Accessing Cultural Heritage The Role of Collective Management Olav Stokkmo, CEO of IFRRO ARIPO-IFRRO-NCC-Repronig-WIPO conference, 17 September 2013,Lagos.
IDEC campaign and Brazilian reform of copyright law Guilherme Varela.
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
Polish Copyright Forum and orphan works Katarzyna Ślaska National Library of Poland.
WIPO African Sub-Regional Workshop on Developing National Strategies and Polices: New Perspectives on Copyright Compulsory licencing – An idea whose time.
Piero Attanasio Associazione Italiana Editori Access to books – European publishers’ view Krakow, 5 April 2011 Conference: Use of Books and.
HSC: All My Own Work Copyright.
Preserving and Accessing Our Cultural Heritage – The Role of Copyright Law, Digitisation and the Internet The Community Dimension Dr. Jens Gaster King’s.
Text and data mining for non-commercial research: the UK’s planned exception to copyright UK Government 22 April 2013, Brussels.
Copyright / Legal liability Paul Van den Bulck Brussels 28 November 2002 Law of : New Technologies Intellectual.
Audit of Public Procurement
"Open Europe: Open Data for Open Society" Selected legal barriers for Open data results from Lapsi 2.0 best practices in IP.
Public Procurement in the Republic of Cyprus By: Theodosis Tsiolas Public Procurement Directorate Treasury of the Republic.
1 Spanish Model of RRO: CEDRO Magdalena Vinent Chief Executive of CEDRO President of IFRRO 5 April 2011.
Accessing Cultural Heritage The Role of Collective Management Rainer Just, President of IFRRO August 2013Bangkok, Thailand.
Copyright / Legal liability Paul Van den Bulck Brussels 6 th of february 2004 Law of : New Technologies Intellectual.
DIRECTIVE 2003/98/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (PSI directive) Theory.
The Changing Face of Exclusive Rights on Digital Cultural Content after the 2013 PSI Directive 3 rd LAPSI 2.0 Meeting – 10 th October 2014.
Copyright, Licensing, & the Provision of Electronic Resources Vicki L. Gregory Associate Professor University of South Florida
IFRRO and the Work of the Reproduction Rights Organisation - RRO Olav Stokkmo, IFRRO Chief Executive 6 April 2011Polska Kziaksa, Krakow.
Copyright / Legal liability Paul Van den Bulck Brussels 6 th of june 2003 Law of : New Technologies Intellectual.
Usage of Cadastre and Address Register Data for production of Geospatial Reference Data Conference Dedicated to the 20th Anniversary of the State Land.
MoU On Out of Commerce Books and Learned Journals Jerker Rydén Senior Legal Adviser National Library of Sweden.
Korea Institute of Science & Technology Dec. 2, 2013 Kiseok Choi A Study on the Improvement of Legal System for Collecting and Registering National R&D.
MAKING AVAILABLE RIGHT AS PROVIDED BY RUSSIAN CIVIL LAW State educational institution of higher professional education “Russian academy of justice” Ilya.
Making cultural heritage available to the public Managing Orphan and Out-of-Print Works Olav Stokkmo, Chief Executive, IFRRO 5 April 2011Polska Kziaska.
Ministry of Culture Republic of Croatia NAPLE Conference Athens, 13 May 2014.
RROs’ activities & operations (1) Models of operation.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF DIGITAL LIBRARIES By TALWANT SINGH ADDL DISTT. & SESSIONS JUDGE; DELHI.
Czechia Legislation. Digitization – weak points Satisfactory results of digitization x Access Economical use.
Ministry of the Interior – its role in preventing trafficking in human beings 19th of March 2014 Urszula Kozłowska Unit against Trafficking in Human Beings.
IP LibCMASS, 5th September 2011 Librarians and cultural professionals as protectors of copyright and users’ rights Aleksandra Horvat University of Zagreb,
National policy of the preservation of digital cultural heritage Estonian Legal Deposit Act and web resources Ülle Talihärm Head of Collection Development.
System of Export Support in the Russian Federation.
RESOURCE SHARING AMONG TURKISH ACADEMIC LIBRARIES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF COPYRIGHT LAW AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS SAMI ÇUKADAR KEREM.
China IP’s Challenge Since joining the World Trade Organization (2001), China has strengthened its legal framework and amended its IPR laws and regulations.
HSC: All My Own Work What is copyright and what does it protect? How does it relate to me?
LIBER and the Google Book Settlement Wouter Schallier Executive Director.
Copyright and the Freedom of Accessing Information in the Cyberspace András Szinger András Szinger copyright expert ARTISJUS, Hungary.
COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE PROCEDURE. LEGAL SERVICES COPYRIGHT ACT The Copyright Act no. 98 of 1978 governs the use of copyright protected works – those works.
Howard Davies 3 March 2016 M25 Directors and Associate Directors The Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations in universities.
Extended Collective Licensing WIPO Cooperation with the Polish Ministry of Culture, Warsaw 16 and 17 March 2016 TOPIC 5.v. Cultural institutions, incl.
ECL – FOR ONLINE ACCESS TO BROADCASTERS’ ARCHIVES IN SWEDEN Extended Collective Licensing Conference in Warsaw Birgitta Adamson Legal Counsel,
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Extended Collective Licensing Models and Practices World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Ministry of Culture and National Heritage Warsaw, March.
Copyright and the public domain: contradictory or complementary notions? Irini Stamatoudi, LL.M., Ph.D., General Director, Hellenic Copyright Organisation.
Legal Framework of Intellectual Property Protection during Exhibition The Intellectual Property Center of Shanghai University of Political Science and.
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
Extended Collective Licensing: Application in libraries KATARZYNA ŚLASKA NATIONAL LIBRARY OF POLAND Conference on Extended Collective Licensing, National.
Jakub Slovák Permanent Mission of the Slovak Republic in Geneva/ Copyright Unit Media, Audiovisual and Copyright Department Ministry of Culture of the.
Agencija za zaštitu ličnih/osobnih podataka u Bosni i Hercegovini Агенција за заштиту личних података у Босни и Херцеговини Personal Data Protection Agency.
Extended Collective Licensing Conference March 2016 Application in different areas: Out-of-Commerce Works (OOC)
POLISH COPYRIGHT LAW 2015 ANALYSIS OF LIBRARY-RELATED PROVISIONS Barbara Szczepańska EIFL webinar, 29 June 2016.
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
Lecture 14 agency.
« Out of commerce works » The French system
Professor Niklas Bruun
The NRN evaluation process in Poland
KOPIOSTO Tuning the blanket license Jukka-Pekka Timonen
The Mutual Recognition Regulation
Commission proposal for a Directive on
Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh Treaty and the Production and Exchange of Accessible Books by the World Intellectual Property.
The Promotion and the Implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty into National Legislation Thailand.
Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market
Presentation transcript:

Out – of – commerce works in Polish legislation Ministry of Culture and National Heritage Mr Karol Kościński Departament of Intellectual Property and Media Director, Civil Legal Adviser

I. 1. Why the need for legislative intervention appeared?

I. 2. Why the need for legislative intervention appeared? – general remarks  mass digitalisation in progress – last four years approx. 30 mln euro for this purpose (more than 55 mln scans);  no real interest of organisations in negotiating voluntary agreements on the general basis of Memorandum of Understanding – MoU (2011);  no applied rights clearance standards or procedures in such instances in Poland;  side effect of the political and economical transformation - some rightholders do not exist and have no legal successors/ sometimes scope of such succession unknown or unclear;  serious doubts, whether existing rightholders obtained all neccesary rights under the Copyright Act 1952 – especially rights to make content publicly available (scope of the agreements between author and publisher under CA 1952).

II. Definition of out – of – commerce work in Polish Copyright Act.  works published in books, journals, magazines or in other forms of printed publication;  works published for the first time on the territory of the Republic of Poland before 24 May 1994 – when Copyright Act entered into force;  works are not available for buyers - with authorisation of the rightholders – in the number of copies in a quantity fulfilling their reasonable needs neither: - in customery channels of commerce (second hand bookshops not taken into account) nor - via internet.

III. Who and how will be entitled to use out-of-commerce works?  publicly accessible cultural institutions – archives, libraries, museums, educational and scientific institutions;  scope of rights – right of reproduction/ making available via internet –possibility to create thematic collections of works;  limitations : -institution may use content only in order to perform their statutory tasks - preserve, restore and make available of works included in the collections for cultural and educational purposes; -revenues for such use can only cover direct costs of digitalisation and making works available to the public.

IV. 1. Mechanism which allows to use out-of –commerce works  framework statutory regulation gives a designated collective management organization (hereinafter CMO) right to grant the institution a licence also in the name and on behalf of rightholders not represented by such organization;  protection of rightholders guaranteed by two possible opt – outs: - general opt-out – rightholder submits the organisation written objection against management of his rights by this organisation (within 90 days after his work is disclosed in list of out – of – commerce works maintained by Ministry of Culture); - specific opt-out – rightholder renounces from entrusting intermediation with regard to specific works (no time limit).

IV. 2. Mechanism which allows to use out-of –commerce works 1.Motion from the designated organisation to add certain works to list of out-of-commerce works maintained by Minister of Culture. 2. List open to the general public – published via internet (no significant transactional costs/ source of information about rightholders – possibility to get a licence directly). 3. Work is added to the list days for general opt – out (no opt – out – licence). 5.Afterwards specific opt – out (institution has a chance to get a licence directly from the rightholder or stop the exploitation without legal risk).

V. Potential practical problems  Statutory regulation is very fresh - amendments entered into force in November 2015 FIRST STEP – creating statutory framwork × NEXT STEP - work on the effective licencing mechanism  Potential problems: who and when should cover costs of checking the „out-of-commerce” status (?); regulation does not alllow to use this mechanism by the commercial entities e.g publishers or for the commercial purposes (?); scale of opt - outs (?).

VI. General conclusions 1.Polish regulation is narrow – contains narrow definitions of out-of- commerce works, beneficieries, purposes for which institutions can use works. 2.Regulation is based on core of ECL idea and is compatible with MoU. 3. Ministry of Culture in near future will - together with interested CMOs and selected insitutions - start to work on the effective licencing mechanism (based on the general statutory framework).

Thank you for your attention Mr Karol Kościński Departament of Intellectual Property and Media Director, Civil Legal Adviser Ministry of Culture and National Heritage of the Republic of Poland ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 15/ Warszawa Phone : +48(22) | Fax: +48(22) |