Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences CDER, FDA October 21, 2003 Dose Content Uniformity: Parametric Tolerance Interval Approach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a Cradle-to-Grave Approach with Your Design Documentation and Data Denise D. Dion, EduQuest, Inc. and Gina To, Breathe Technologies, Inc.
Advertisements

ICH Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria (RAAPAC) Overview and Update Robert H. King, Sr. Office of Pharmaceutical.
Statistical Approaches to Addressing the Requirements of the New FDA Process Validation Guidance for Small Molecules 1 Jason Marlin, MS/T Statistics, Eli.
Parametric Tolerance Interval (PTI) Test for Delivered Dose Uniformity (DDU) for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products (OINDP) Michael Golden On behalf.
1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
Rapid Microbiology Methods A Regulatory Viewpoint Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office.
Development and Review Process of NDA, ANDA/AADA and OTC Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Associate Professor Department of Pharmaceutics KLE.
Office of New Drug Chemistry, OPS, CDER, Food and Drug Administration Establishing Dissolution Specification Current CMC Practice Vibhakar Shah, Ph.D.
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
FDA Nasal BA/BE Guidance Overview
Ensuring Physical Stability of Pharmaceuticals: Can/should we improve our ability to identify and prevent physical changes? Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy.
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
1 Process to Address Specifications for Delivered Dose Uniformity of Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products Presented by Robert O’Neill, Ph.D. Chair ACPS Working.
Science at the FDA: Update for the Science Board Jesse L. Goodman, MD, MPH Chief Scientist and Deputy Commissioner for Science and Public Health November.
Organizational Gaps in Reaching the “Desired State” Helen Winkle.
ITFG/IPAC Collaboration CMC Specifications Technical Team ITFG/IPAC TECHNICAL TEAM: CMC SPECIFICATIONS Presented by: Bo Olsson, PhD 26 April 2000 Rockville,
Establishing Drug release/Dissolution Specifications – QBD Approach Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER Advisory.
FDA Approach to Review of Outcome Measures for Drug Approval and Labeling: Content Validity Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences CDER, FDA October 21, 2003 Welcome and Introduction to the Meeting.
Report on Conformity to Type (CTT): CIML Item 10.4 Presented to: 46 th CIML Meeting Prague 13 Oct 2011 Presented by: Stephen O’Brien – CIML Member Manager,
2015 MBSW1 Quality Assurance Test of Delivered Dose Uniformity of Multi-dose Spray and Inhalation Drug Products Drs. Yi Tsong 1, Xiaoyu (Cassie) Dong*
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
FDA Regulation of Drug Quality: New Challenges Janet Woodcock, M.D. Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration April.
Delivery Verification Jennifer Anziano Regional Technical Forum March 17, 2015.
Blend Uniformity - PQRI Research
The Practical Art of Endpoint Selection: Industry Perspectives A View from the Pharma Industry of the FDA Guidance on PROs Glenn A. Phillips, Ph.D. Director.
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
ACPS Meeting, October 19-20, 2004 BioINequivalence: Concept and Definition Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER,
Introduction to Topic #1: QbD approach for quality control and assurance of Dissolution Rate Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office of Pharmaceutical.
A Focus on CME and Grants Nancy Coddington, PhD Senior Director, Compliance Operations AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP And Terry Hisey Deputy Managing Principal.
Parametric Tolerance Interval Test for Delivered Dose Uniformity (DDU) Working Group Update Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Quality Assessment (ONDQA,
1 Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceutical Excipients PQRI Workshop Nick Buhay Acting Director Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality Office of Compliance.
Bioequivalence Studies and Other Recommendations for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products: Work of the ITFG/IPAC-RS Collaboration Presented by Cynthia.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
WHO Workshop on Prequalification of Medicines Programme, Abu Dhabi, October, 2010 Regulatory principles reflected in practice of WHO PQP Milan Smid,
1 Basis of the Proposed Tactical Plan for a QbD approach for Quality Control and Assurance of Dissolution Rate Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director,
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
Prof. Moustafa M. Mohamed Vice dean Faculty of Allied Medical Science Pharos University in Alexandria Development and Regulation of Medical Products (MEDR-101)
Meiyu Shen, PhD Collaborators: Xiaoyu Dong, Ph.D., Yi Tsong, PhD
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Blend Uniformity: Update Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D.. Background Issue: Assuring and documenting “adequacy of mixing” operations –PQRI’s Proposal Stratified.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
1 Dose Content Uniformity for Aerosol Products Wallace P. Adams, Ph.D. OPS/IO Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science 13 March 2003 Rockville, MD.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
1 Drug Safety Oversight Board: Recent Activities FDA Science Board Advisory Committee Meeting March 31 st, 2006 Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director.
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Subcommittee of the ACPS Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. ACPS Meeting October 22, 2002.
1 PTIT for DCU of OINDP: Approaches to Resolution of Identified Issues Wallace P. Adams, Ph.D. OPS/IO Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science 21.
Introduction to the Meeting Introduction to the Meeting Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18,
1 PAT Subcommittee Closing Report 12 March 2003 Tom Layloff Acting Chair.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
ITFG/IPAC Collaboration Introduction OVERVIEW OF ITFG/IPAC COLLABORATION Presented by: Harris Cummings, PhD 26 April 2000 Rockville, MD.
CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.
FDA’s Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science The Subcommittee on Process Analytical Technologies (PAT): Closing Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy.
Lawrence X. Yu, Ph.D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER, FDA ACPS Meeting, ACPS Meeting, Oct. 22, 2003 Office of Generic Drugs Research.
Ethical issues with the regulatory use of gene expression data Benjamin S Wilfond MD Medical Genetics Branch National Human Genome Research Institute Department.
Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products Subcommittee Introduction and Objectives Eric B. Sheinin Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center.
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products (OINDP) Subcommittee Report to the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Rockville, Maryland November 15,
Office of Pharmaceutical Science OPS Center for Drug Evaluation and Research CDER FDA Food and Drug Administration HHS Health and Human Services 1 Advisory.
Parametric Tolerance Interval (PTI) Test for Delivered Dose Uniformity (DDU) for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products (OINDP) Michael Golden On behalf.
An Assessment of IPAC-RS’ Proposal Walter W. Hauck, Ph.D. Biostatistics Section Division of Clinical Pharmacology Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia,
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Quality System.
Responsibilities and Duties of Members and Staff
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
GL 51 – Statistical evaluation of stability data
PROCESS VALIDATION - ACTUAL REGULATION, PERFORMING AND INSPECTION
Presentation transcript:

Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences CDER, FDA October 21, 2003 Dose Content Uniformity: Parametric Tolerance Interval Approach

Issues and Next Steps International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (PAC- RS) Proposal –Proposal discussed and refined for about three years –Resolution challenges OPS Executive decision –Need to resolve the remaining issues in next six months –If not resolved, step back to reevaluate options and approach Merge this with the Quality by Design approach

The Test One of several end product test “..designed to demonstrate the uniformity of medication per actuation or dose, consistent with the label claim, discharged from the mouthpiece of a sample of an appropriate number of containers from a batch (n=10 is recommended) “Providing an overall performance evaluation of a batch, assessing the formulation, the manufacturing process, the valve, and the actuator” (MDA/DPI draft Guidance)

Acceptance Criteria (draft Guidance) N=10; not outside % of label claim for more than 1 of 10 containers; none outside ; and the mean is not outside % If 2 or 3 of 10 is outside %, none outside %, and the mean is not outside %, an additional 20 containers can be sampled. No more that 3 of all 30 determinations is outside %; none of the 30 is outside %, and the mean is within %

Today: Framing Issues Dr. Adams (FDA) IPAC-PS presentations ACPS discussion –We seek your input on a process to resolve remaining issues in the next six months –In your deliberations please consider Clinical relevance and specifications tailored for intended use Hypothesis testing for every batch – is this consistent with “Quality by Design” –Hypothesis testing at the “process validation stage”; quality assurance and verification for routine production operations Complexity of PTIT with respect to explaining its meaning to the customers