WF on MCOT limit Signaling and Modifying LBT type Ericsson, … 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #85 R1-16xxxx Nanjing, China 23 rd – 27 th May 2016 Agenda item: 6.2.1.5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Way forward for LTE DL 4Rx AP SI on RF
Advertisements

WF on design of physical downlink control channel for MTC CATT, Alcatel Lucent, Alcatel Lucent Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, ETRI, InterDigital, MediaTek, NTT.
WF on PBCH Coverage Enhancement
Way forward on eIMTA signaling to support up to 32 component carriers
WF on DL LBT Scheme for DRS
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 # R1-15xxxx Fukuoka, Japan 25th – 29th May 2015
Way forward on TBS determination in initial partial subframes
Questions about LAA deployment scenarios DocumentIEEE Submitted Source Roger B. Marks BaiCells capable.
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission September 2015 Andrew Myles (Cisco)Slide 1 Discussion of issues related to EN revision 16 September 2015.
WF on CQI Table for eMTC ZTE, Sony, Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung… R GPP TSG RAN WG1 #83 Anaheim, USA, 15th – 22nd November, 2015 Agenda item
Doc.: IEEE /0079r1 Submission September 2015 Andrew Myles (Cisco)Slide 1 Discussion of issues related to EN revision 16 September 2015.
WF on MCOT and CWS for LBT priority classes
WF on Regulation and MCOT
LTE Measurement Monitor and Trace (MMT) Application.
WF on SIB1bis Transmission
WF on LAA DL Multi-Channel LBT
3GPP2 LTE Workshop SEOUL, Korea, 27 th– 28 th June GPP LTE Status Status Source Source 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman ETSI TC MSG Chairman.
Proposal for NB-IoT single-tone only UE
Way forward on RAN2 aspects of multiple PRB operations
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
WF on UE capability signaling for FD-MIMO Class B LG Electronics, Intel Coorporation, NTT DOCOMO, Qualcomm 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #84 R St Julian’s,
Clarification of the scope of the study on latency reduction techniques for LTE 3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #71RP-16xxxx Göteborg, Sweden, March , 2016.
3GPP TSG RAN WG2 meeting #92 Nanjing, China 23-27, May 2016 R
WF on Supporting different Numerologies in a NR carrier LG Electronics, [Huawei, HiSilicon, Panasonic], 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #85R Nanjing,
Overview of open issues in
Offline discussion on remaining details on RRM measurements
WF on Bandwidth Part for DL common channel
WF on RA-RNTI design 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting NR#3 R1-171xxxx
Offline Discussion on remaining details about RACH Procedure
WF on UL Transmission for Difficult Band Combinations in LTE-NR DC
Draft WF on single Tx switched UL
Single Tx switched UL DRAFT 3GPP RAN #77 September , 2017
WF on single Tx switched UL
RACH configuration ZTE, Sanechips R1-171xxxx
Proposals on remaining issues on search space
3GPP RAN1 #90 meeting summary on LAA Enhancements
WF on Beam Indication for Beam Management
WF on NB-IoT Radio Link Monitoring Performance Test Procedure
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #90bis
R : SRS Enhancements for LTE-A
WF on remaining open items for allowing 1Tx transmission in LTE-NR DC
WF on Beam failure recovery
WF on SS Block Index Reporting through RACH Procedure
Way forward on cell identification in NR
Proposal for defining requirement of LTE BHH TRP/TRS
3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #67 Shanghai, China, 9 – 12 March, 2015
WF on transmit diversity for DFTsOFDM
Samsung, KT Corp., NTT DOCOMO, Verizon, [ZTE], [CATT], [Intel]
WF on beam reporting CATT, Intel R1-17xxxxx
WF on Beam-Related Indication
WF on CSI timing offset for PUSCH
Shanghai, China, April 11-15, 2011 Source: Qualcomm Incorporated
WF on Radio Link Monitoring in NR
Motorola Mobility, Lenovo, …
WF on UE mandatory channel bandwidth for NR bands
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
WF for 4Rx CA 256QAM(1/2 layer) and 3/4 layers tests in Rel-14
Motivation for WI on "LTE-based V2X Services"
Way Forward on Coexistence Evaluation Methodologies for LAA
WF on LTE-NR DC with UL coexistence
WF on 4Tx UL Codebook For CP-OFDM
WF on UL Beam Management
WF on UL Beam Management
WF on CB-group based retransmission
WF on LTE-NR Coexistence
3GPP RAN1 status on NR-Unlicensed
3GPP RAN1 status on NR-Unlicensed
3GPP RAN1 status on NR-Unlicensed
Status of NR-U - Wi-Fi coexistence
Jing Sun, Qualcomm Incorporated Rapporteur of Rel.16 NR-U Work Item
Presentation transcript:

WF on MCOT limit Signaling and Modifying LBT type Ericsson, … 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #85 R1-16xxxx Nanjing, China 23 rd – 27 th May 2016 Agenda item: Document for decision

Background Agreement:  For the DL and UL transmissions occurring on the same channel, an eNB starting the DL transmission based on a Cat 4 LBT with a given MCOT, can share its channel occupancy with its UEs such that the total transmission duration by the eNB and UEs does not exceed the MCOT limit.  A channel occupancy is started with a DL transmission after CAT4 LBT.  UL transmissions within a channel occupancy scheduled by a single UL grant or by multiple UL grants shall be contiguous if they can be scheduled contiguously o Note: If the UL transmissions within a channel occupancy cannot be scheduled contiguously, then there can be gaps between the UL transmissions o Note: There can be gaps due to LBT failures at the UE between the UL subframes in which transmissions occur o Note: There can be gaps for 1 or 2 symbols between the scheduled UL subframes within an MCOT  Any gap between two consecutive transmissions that is larger than 25 µs shall not be counted towards the MCOT limit.  [Agreement: An LBT based on a 25 µs CCA can be performed for any of the new UL transmission within the MCOT limit.] and shall take place immediately prior to the UL transmission. o Note: A UE performing Cat. 4 LBT for a new UL transmission as part of the channel occupancy initiated by the eNB is not precluded  The eNB shall schedule such that the duration of all scheduled transmissions shall be counted towards the MCOT; however the LBT duration is not counted towards the MCOT.  Within a channel occupancy, any gap between non-consecutive DL transmissions shall be counted towards the MCOT limit.  FFS multiple transitions between DL and UL within a channel occupancy, and the associated detailed behavior (e.g. allowed gaps and how gaps are counted towards MCOT)  FFS: Whether scheduling the same UE can be done in non-consecutive or only in consecutive subframes within a channel occupancy  A channel occupancy may be started with a UL transmission after CAT4 LBT by the UE.  No two channel occupancies whether they are initiated by the eNB or initiated by UEs served by the eNB can overlap in time

Background DL UL U Cat. 4 LBT A : Tx starting time after Cat 4 LBT MCOT= 3 ms Cat. 4 LBT MCOT limit=3 MCOT limit=2 MCOT limit=1 DL UL U B : Tx after Cat 4 LBT MCOT= 3 ms Cat. 4 LBT MCOT limit=4 Trigger 25µs LBT A : Tx after Cat 4 LBT MCOT= 3 ms MCOT limit=3 MCOT limit=2 MCOT limit=1

Proposal MCOT limit=x as a non-negative integer is signaled in the C-PDCCH of a DL subframe where MCOT limit = x in subframe “n” indicates that – any UL transmission from SF#(n+x) and onwards corresponds to Cat 4 LBT; AND – any UL transmission after the transmission in SF#n until SF#(n+x-1) can be performed based on CCA of 25 us LBT; The LBT procedure for any UL subframe in SF#n to SF#(n+x-1) for which the eNB had already indicated to be Cat. 4 LBT, can be switched to an LBT based on 25 µs CCA if an MCOT limit of value x is detected in C-PDCCH in SF#n