RCUK International Funding Name Job title Research Councils UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
Advertisements

The Brookes Student Learning Experience Strategy.
Excellence with Impact Declan Mulkeen January 2011.
The Newton Fund Research and Innovation for Growth and Prosperity.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
NMP-NCP meeting - Brussels, 27 Jan 2005 Towards FP 7: Preliminary principles and orientations… Nicholas Hartley European Commission DG Research DG Research.
Review of different stakeholders needs in relation to Joint Assessment of National Strategies and Plans (JANS) Preliminary Findings IHP+ Country Teams.
The Newton Fund Research and Innovation for Growth and Prosperity.
LIFELONG LEARNING PROGRAMME & FORTHCOMING PROGRAMME.
An Introduction to Framework 7 Gill Wells, Senior EU Consultant.
Newton – Al-Farabi Partnership Programme RL Workshop February 13, 2015, AlmaU.
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Royal Society Industry Fellowships Scheme Dr Donna Lammie, Senior Manager, Grants.
Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council.
INCO GTN meeting, Paris, 21/10/2010 Activities of International Cooperation Capacities Programme INCO-LAB & INCO-HOUSE activities Philippe Froissard Deputy.
REGIONAL REPRESENTATION IN BRUSSELS Securing effective working on the European Agenda Jeremy Howell Economic Development and European Policy Consultant.
AHRC and Interdisciplinarity Wendy Matcham Portfolio Manager Creative Arts and Digital Humanities 23 September 2014.
Writing Impact into Research Funding Applications Paula Gurteen Centre for Advanced Studies.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Erasmus Mundus ( ) Presentation by Marie-Hélène Vareille Deputy Head of PPCA Tokyo EC Delegation 3 November 2009.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
Page 1 RCUK : PATHWAYS TO IMPACT WHAT IT MEANS AND WHAT TO DO NOW Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development CREDO workshop May 2011.
AHRC’s Postgraduate Programme Professor Lyn Pykett The Higher Education Academy Event – The Future of the Taught MA in English [date] 2008.
Grant Opportunities for PhD’s General introduction into European and Dutch research grants PROUT-meeting, February 9 th 2011 by dr. Esther Stiekema, Academic.
Research in the Global Society Ian Diamond ESRC. THE RESEARCH COUNCILS Arts and Humanities Research Council Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research.
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Date: in 12 pts Erasmus+ Joint Master Degrees (JMDs)
Lessons learned and benefits of multi-stakeholder food security and nutrition governance Deborah Fulton Secretary, CFS.
Knowledge Exchange and Impact in the AHRC Susan Amor Head of Knowledge Exchange Conny Carter Impact and Policy Manager University of Exeter 7 April 2011.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
International Opportunities for Schools The British Council The United Kingdom’s international organisation for educational opportunities and cultural.
December_2009 Partnership building. December_2009 Partnership building within the partnering process COREGROUPCOREGROUP FORMAL LAUNCH $ $ $ $ $ cost centre.
Land Governance and Security of Tenure in Developing Countries White paper of the French Development cooperation LAND POLICIES AND MDGS IN RESPONSE TO.
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Directorate of Academic Affairs and Registrar Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) Annual Institutional Report (AIR) Reporting Period: 1 January –
Demand Management: Progress and Issues Gary Grubb Associate Director of Programmes AHRC
The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Funding (EPSRC)
Why to become a partner of URBACT August Title of presentation I Sunday, 06 March 2016 I Page 2 What is URBACT URBACT is a European exchange and.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Research Impact Sarah Hall Research Impact Strategy and Policy Manager.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
Horizon 2020 Overview Jerome de Barros NCP Health.
RCUK International Engagement Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Global Challenges Research Fund & ODA
Global Challenges Research Fund. UK Aid Government commitment to spend 0.7% of Gross National Income as Official Development Assistance (ODA) Four strategic.
The European Transport Research Alliance - ETRA Prof. G. A. Giannopoulos Chairman, ETRA.
Research Councils UK and the research funding landscape Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
Sectoral Approach to Skills Development
Ust-Kamenogorsk, 9 September 2016
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
Name Job title Research Councils UK
Dr Kieran Fenby-Hulse & Dr Rebekah Smith McGloin
Equality and Diversity in Research
Strengthening Australia’s Education Engagement with Latin America
Sabrina Iavarone Senior User Services Officer
Brussels, 15 September 2009.
Meeting Quality Standards when working in collaboration
THE independent evaluation office of Undp Independence, credibility and use IPDET, 30 June 2014 Indran A. Naidoo Director.
The British Academy UK national academy Learned society Grant-giving body.
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Presentation transcript:

RCUK International Funding Name Job title Research Councils UK

Why we fund international collaboration By engaging internationally we: widen the scope of research enhance the experience of researchers enable participation in large-scale research increase the impact of research address global issues gain access to unique data promote the UK as a research destination

RCUK International Strategy Increase RCUK influence in international strategy and policy development Promote and facilitate excellent research collaboration Enhance the value and impact of research through international collaboration Show RCUK commitment to key global responsibilities –E.g. poverty, environmental degradation, disease

RCUK presence overseas UK Research Office (UKRO) (established 1984 and located in Brussels, to promote UK participation in EU programmes - first European Country to do this) HEI and counterpart subscribers RCUK China (2007) RCUK US (2007) RCUK India (2008)

Role of the Overseas Teams Gather intelligence on the strategic and research priorities of major overseas funding agencies and institutions Build partnerships with overseas funding agencies to align strategic priorities and set the scene for sustainable joint research programmes Help to overcome institutional barriers and to form productive relationships with the research base Increase the RCUK presence and work with other UK stakeholders in-county to promote UK research and its impact

Funding international collaboration Developing Research Links Stage 1First Links – funds to cover the travel and subsistence costs for short-term visits or workshops. Stage 2A Broader Relationship – once a relationship is established, researchers can apply for funds to extend and broaden this relationship. Funding International Research Collaborations Stage 3Pilot Studies – where relationships are more mature RCUK supports researchers wishing to carry out pilot research. Stage 4Sustainable Interactions – activities that support transnational collaboration. Funding for international collaboration may be embedded in the activities of RCUK programmes and Research Council institutes or as part of the UK’s contribution to specific multilateral organisations.

RCUK runs a number of schemes that foster international collaboration including: BBSRC Partnering Awards - BBSRC runs a number of Partnering Awards to allow UK researchers to work with colleagues in China, Japan, India and the USA. AHRC International Placement Scheme – offers postgraduate students and early career researchers short term fellowships at a number of overseas research institutions such as the Library of Congress. Example: Developing Research Links

What can researchers apply for? Researchers can also apply for funding to support international collaboration as part of a research grant: Travel Equipment Overseas project partners Visiting Researchers Pathways to impact MRC and ESRC allow overseas coinvestigators

How research is funded The Research Councils fund research on a competitive basis employing independent, expert peer review The peer review processes employed are designed to be sensitive to the different needs and cultures that exist within the academic community Responsive mode and directed modes Multidisciplinary proposals Collaborative joint calls

Generic review process Applications submitted electronically Applications checked and peer reviewers selected Applications reviewed Proposer may also respond to reviewer assessment Panel meets to discuss projects and recommend fund/reject (or re-submit) Applicants informed Funding decision taken

Funding international joint research RCUK aims to keep decision-making as simple as possible and to ensure that projects are assessed under a single peer review system, avoiding ‘double jeopardy’ – the risk that a proposed joint project will be approved in one country but not in another There are three main approaches when developing a joint process: –Lead agency –Call secretariat –Shared peer review

1) Submission A single application is submitted to the lead agency, call secretariat or both agencies. The agencies: –agree the scope of the call –develop a single call document –agree common guidance for the assessment by peer reviewers

2) Peer review Lead agency approach – one agency is responsible for the administration of the call. They receive the applications and coordinate the peer review process according to their normal administrative procedures. The partner nominates reviewers. Call secretariat – here proposals are submitted to one agency, the call secretariat but are processed according to the administrative procedures set up specifically for that call. Peer review may be shared with the partner funding agency. A single joint proposal is submitted to both agencies and both undertake the peer review. Reviewer comments are shared between the agencies.

3) Panel meeting When there is a lead agency the proposals are assessed at an appropriate panel meeting, organised by the lead agency. Panel members suggested by the partner agency may be invited to join the panel. Alternatively a joint panel may be set up specifically to consider the proposals for that call. The panel includes members selected by both agencies. A joint panel is usually necessary if there is a separate call secretariat or if both agencies have conducted the peer review.

4) Funding decision Whether proposals are considered by an established panel or one that has been set up especially for the joint call, the agencies decide collectively how many proposals to fund based on the panel’s recommendations. Each agency will usually fund only their national element of successful joint proposals: i.e. the costs of the UK institution are met by RCUK and those of the partner institution by the overseas funding partner. Grants are provided by each agency according to their normal terms and conditions.

Example: Lead agency Proposal reviewed by independent reviewers Funding decision taken Proposal reviewed by panel Researcher in UK is funded Researchers wishing to carry out a joint project submit one proposal Application submitted to RCUK, the lead agency Panel members suggested by FAPESP may join the panel meeting Researchers from FAPESP, the partner country suggests reviewer(s) Researcher based in Brazil is funded This is an example of a lead agency agreement between RCUK and FAPESP

Questions? Thank you