2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: MEPRS and the Performance Based Assessment Model (PBAM) Speaker: Richard Meyer Session: W-4-1430-1520 UNCLASSIFIED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Quality Management Control (DQMC) Program
Advertisements

Building a Healthier Prince George’s County Rushern L. Baker, III County Executive PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT UPDATES FROM THE PGCHEZ Pamela.
1 Updated Rates for Outpatient Medical Affirmative Claims (All times are Eastern Standard) Dial in: (866) Participant code: December 4:
1 Commonwealth of Virginia Executive Branch Strategic Planning, Service Area Planning, and Performance-Based Budgeting Agency Strategic & Service Area.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference 1 Title: Where the Care Is, Ain’t, and Might Oughta Be Session: R
HCAHPS and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (Hospital VBP) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Redirection of 1991 Realignment Los Angeles County.
2 Evolution of MHS RVUs Development of MHS RVUsDevelopment of MHS RVUs System Specific RVUsSystem Specific RVUs Future of MHS RVUsFuture of MHS RVUs QuestionsQuestions.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: How to Pull DD 2570 Data and What It Means Session: W
Navy Data Quality Management Control Program (DQMCP) DQMCP Conference Navy Breakout.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Health Budgets & Financial Policy 1 Briefing: DQ Statement Roundtable Date: 25 March 2010 Time: 1010–1200.
Calculating & Reporting Healthcare Statistics
Data Quality Management Control (DQMC) Program DQMC Program Review List for FY 2012.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: Opening Remarks Session: T-All-0730.
MHS Business Planning Update “Translating Strategy into Action” Tri Service Symposium 13 July 2006 MHS Business Planning Workgroup.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: Metrics Reporting System Session: T
Data Quality Management Control Program
The Evolution of the Physician Compensation Plan: Volume to Value
VA/DoD Sharing Agreement Database
Solution Overview for NIPDEC- CDAP July 15, 2005.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference 1 Title: Questionable Data – Potential Impact (of Your Data on Various Programs and Metrics) Session: T
Prospective Payment System:
VA/DoD Sharing Conference - Creating Value for Veterans, Active Duty and Taxpayers VA/DoD Joint Datamart October 19, 2011.
1 Commonwealth of Virginia Executive Branch Strategic Planning, Service Area Planning, and Performance-Based Budgeting Agency Strategic & Service Area.
Day Weighted Resident Rosters New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services AND July-August 2010.
Internal Management Controls Tri-SERVICE MEPRS CONFERENCE 28 August 2007.
From Registration to Accounts Receivable – The Whole Can of Worms 2007 UBO/UBU Conference 1 Briefing: Fishing for Data Quality Date: 20 March 2007 Time:
2010 UBO/UBU Conference 1 Title: MEPRS Tools: Six Sigma MEPRS Management Metrics (S2M3) Session: M and M
DMHRSi ORGANIZATIONS LCA DATA ELEMENTS, ERRORS AND REPORTING Presented by Jeanie McCleary 27 July 2010.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Health Budgets & Financial Policy Briefing: Strategic Plans for UBO Date: 24 March 2010 Time: 0800–0850.
3M Health Information Systems APR-DRGs: A Practical Update.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: DQ Guidance DQ – UBO/UBU Data in EAS Session: W
Navy Performance Based Budget (PBB) Indices January 2008 BUMED (M8) POCs: BUMED PA&E (M81) LCDR Matt Bouma, MSC, (202) , DSN 762 Mr. Robert Willis,
Health Budgets & Financial Policy 1 CY2008 Outpatient Itemized Billing (OIB) Rate Package Release July 1 st at 0800, 1600 & 2100 EDT Dial in:
Financial Reporting (Overview & EFIS Users). 2 General Reporting Requirements  Reporting requirements are outlined in the 2011/12 Child Care Business.
Quality Economical Care Quality, Economical Health Services: Navy Medicine will continue to provide the finest, cost-effective health services in the world.
Data Quality Management Program FY 06 Changes. Outline Introduction DQ Review List & Commander’s Statements DQ Data Submission Schedule.
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
“Medically Ready Force…Ready Medical Force” Data Quality Management Control (DQMC) Program DQMC Program Review List for FY 2016.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Health Budgets & Financial Policy 1 Briefing: Painting The Auditing Picture Date: 23 March 2010 Time: 1400–1450.
Navy Performance Based Budget (PBB) Update December 2007 BUMED (M8)
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Navy Medicine DQMC Breakout Session FY11 DQ Guidance and FY12 Preview.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: Medical Affirmative Claims (MAC) Billing – Army Session: W
Health Budgets & Financial Policy 2009 UBO/UBU Conference 2009 UBO/UBU Conference Where the Pieces Come Together Date: March 31 Time: 1010 – 1200 Briefing:
1 Prospective Payment System (PPS) Program Review and Evaluation Health Budgets and Financial Policy OASD(Health Affairs) Data QualityFeb 2009.
National Enrolment Service (NES) Overview October 2015 – June 2016.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: MEPRS and the Performance Based Assessment Model (PBAM) Session: W UNCLASSIFIED.
PAYMENT BY RESULT STATUS REPORT Heleno Ferraz Senior Project Specialist Mental Health PbR & Outcome.
1 Prospective Payment System (PPS) Program Review and Evaluation Health Budgets and Financial Policy OASD (Health Affairs) Data QualityMay 2008.
Financial Data. TMA / WISDOM Excerpt 2 MEPRS = Medical Expense and Performance Reporting System Costs, workload and FTEs Summary data only MEPRS Business.
Managing Overseas Care in TCI-
Data Quality Management Control (DQMC) Program DQMC Program Review List for FY 2012.
Health Budgets & Financial Policy 1 MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH CARE FUND (MERHCF) Presented to: Data Quality Management Conference.
Health Budgets & Financial Policy 1 MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH CARE FUND (MERHCF) Presented to: Data Quality Management Conference.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
Personnel Perspective – DQ Checks. Executing with Precision Timely, Complete, & Accurate Submission of EAS IV Data System Access Source Data EAS IV Input.
TRI-SERVICE MEPRS CONFERENCE HOW TO ANALYZE AND IDENTIFY OUTLIER AVAILABLE FTE DATA IN OUTPATIENT ‘B’ ACCOUNTS Presented by Burma Barfield, Nicole Meyers,
MEPRS Data Sources and Differences: EAS IV Repository vs. M2 Herb Escobar Axiom Resource Management
Translating Strategy into Action Tri-Service Business Planning Process.
Performance Based Adjustment Model (PBAM) PBAM Basics UNCLASSIFIED November 2012 Management Division Resource Management U.S. Army Medical Command.
MEPRS Data Sources & Applications: EAS IV Repository vs. M Tri-Service MEPRS Conference Lansdowne, VA Herb Escobar
Background and purpose
Title of the Change Project
Track x – xxx day – Title: Where the Care Is, Ain’t, and Might Oughta Be Speaker: Todd Gibson, Maurine Tapscott Session: R
Title: MEPRS Tools: MEPRS Early Warning & Control System (MEWACS)
Hassan El Solh, MD CMO, AUBMC Director July 10, 2017
The University of Delaware Higher Education Consortia
Herb Escobar SRA International, Inc.
Translating Strategy into Action to Manage the Business
1115 Demonstration Waiver Extension Summary
Presentation transcript:

2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: MEPRS and the Performance Based Assessment Model (PBAM) Speaker: Richard Meyer Session: W UNCLASSIFIED

Background Data and Sources Reports EAS Data Use Agenda Slide 2 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

PBAM is a financial and budgeting model designed to assist the Army MEDCOM in putting it’s strategic vision into action by linking budgets with outputs and outcomes – Periodic adjustments to current and future year budgets based on performance in key strategic areas – Promotes healthcare capacity and access to care Payments are based on changes in workload generated – Enhances quality clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction Payments based on how well we take care of our patients – Promotes efficiency and data quality Bonuses and penalties based on how resources and information are managed Slide 3 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Beginnings Evolution Background Slide 4 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Beginnings – Development began in 2005 Development team consisted of administrative and clinical staff – “Shadow” year in 2006 No Financial adjustments made but data available for review – Full implementation in 2007 Evolution – PBAM had undergone many updates and refinement with more expected as the model matures Slide 5 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED Background

Evolution of PBAM Background Slide 6 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Web based – HTTP Secure access protocol – Reports are published from the web using Microsoft Excel – No special programs required by end-users CAC access – CAC are required for access – Specific users identified – Uses Active Directory to validate access permission – Eliminates user name and password requirements All reports available to all users – Allows for peer comparison Report availability – New reports monthly with all historical reports maintained for review – Published at Medical Command, Regional Command, Parent DMIS, and child DMIS levels Slide 7 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED Access

Sources and uses Data Cycle Slide 8 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED Data and Sources

Sources and Uses EAS – FTEs / Provider availability data M2 – Workload: RVUs, RWPs, and Mental Health Bed days MHS Population Health Portal – Evidence Based Practice: HEDIS and Action List Army Provider Level Satisfaction Survey (APLSS) – Patient Satisfaction & Access to Care Other – External Contract: ORYX metrics Data and Sources Slide 9 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Data Cycle Uses a 12-month rolling data set Model Year: August through July – Aligns the most complete 12-month data set with the Fiscal Year July data available at the end of September Data is processed and the July reports are published in October – First report is August, the final report is July PBAM baseline set using the July report – The July report is the final report of the year – Used as part of the budgeting process for the following year – 12-month data set that does not change once established – Follow-on year is compared to this data to make financial adjustments PBAM Monthly Reports – Reports are titled based on the based on the final month in the data set Example: September 08 through August 09 data is used to publish the August 09 report – Budget modifications are made by a comparison of a the current rolling-12 to the established baseline Data and Sources Slide 10 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Three Primary Reports – Capacity – Quality – Administrative Two Summary Reports – Financial – Workload Reports Slide 11 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

The first of three primary reports for PBAM. The report shows actual performance as compared to the performance targets and provides adjustment information for the Ambulatory, Inpatient, and Inpatient RVU performance sections as well as an Allied Health Coding Error Correction. Also included in the report is an OCONUS Partnership Agreement adjustment, a Veterans Administration Workload valuation, and a payment for workload performed in civilian facilities. Workload Capacity (Product Line Summary report) Slide 12 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Workload Capacity Ambulatory Section Inpatient Section Work Performed in Civilian Facilities & Coding Error Correction Adjustments Summary Slide 13 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Quality The second of three primary reports for PBAM. This report provides information and payment amounts for Evidence Based Practice (HEDIS and ORYX), Patient Satisfaction, Inpatient Professional Services Rounds. Slide 14 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Quality IPSR Quality Summary Patient Satisfaction Evidence Based Practice Action List &HEDIS ORYX Slide 15 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Administrative Performance The third of three primary reports for PBAM. The report provides information and payment amounts for administrative processes. – MEPRS Timeliness – SIDR Completion, SADR Completion, SIDR Timeliness – Coding Accuracy for E&M, CPT, and ICD-9 codes. Slide 16 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Administrative Performance MEPRS Penalty MAPR Summary SIDR/SADR Metrics CARA Metrics Slide 17 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Provide a summary view of the workload data from the Product Line Summary Report and provides baseline data for comparison for each of the four workload components. – Provides Baseline and performance target comparisons – Displays workload for “Top-3” and “Bottom-3” workload performers as compared to the baseline Workload Summary Slide 18 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Workload Summary Summary Ambulatory Performance Summary Inpatient Performance Summary RWPs & MHBDs Inpatient RVU Performance Summary Slide 19 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Provides a roll-up view of financial adjustment information from the Product Line Summary, Quality and Administrative reports. – Cumulative and individual month values – Displays the sub-components of each report Financial Summary Slide 20 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Financial Summary Net Reporting Period Adjustments Combined Adjustments EBP Earnings Workload Earnings Other Quality Adjustments Administrative Adjustments Slide 21 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

MEPRS Timeliness Ambulatory Targets EAS Data Use Slide 22 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Information found on the MAPR MEPRS Timeliness – PENALTY ONLY – Applies a $10/FTE penalty for each delinquent monthly MEPR report – MEPR is delinquent 45 days after end of reporting month; DoD standard. – Penalties not recoverable MEPRS Timeliness Slide 23 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

1 st Check: – Yes / No – 45 days Additional checks – Yes / No Total Available FTEs – All skill types – Excludes Dental and Vets – Average of most current 12 months MEPRS Timeliness Slide 24 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Example using one MTF from FY09 The below MTF fell 2 months behind for 4 periods resulting in a $165.6K penalty Slide 25 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED MEPRS Timeliness

One component of the Product Line Summary Report Affects the Ambulatory portion only “B” MEPRS available FTEs – Excludes Interns, Residents, Skill Type 2 students, Dental, Vets, and Doctors of Pharmacy Possible issue: RNs identified as Skill Type 2 providers – Skill Type 2 providers are not discounted Ambulatory Targets Slide 26 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Use: – Establishing the RVU/Provider/Day Target MEPRS3 Health Policy and Services (clinical) Historical workload and FTEs Consultant review and input TSG approval Ambulatory Targets Slide 27 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Application: – Establishing Performance Targets Current Available FTEs RVU/Provider/Day targets Calculated Monthly and then summed – Example: FTEs x Target x 21 = a 1 month target – If a provider has a 15 RVU/day target then the monthly target is 315 RVUs (15 RVUs / day x 21 Days) for 168 hours of available time (1 FTE). – If the provider has 103 hours of available time recorded for the month then that provider is a 0.61 FTE (103 hours/168 hours) The RVU target for this provider is determined by multiplying the 0.61 FTE by the 315 RVU standard (0.61 x 315 = RVUs) Ambulatory Targets Slide 28 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Other Applications: – Filling for missing MEPRS due to Non-transmission Average of current 12 months to fill Average used to set performance targets – Filling “data holes” when MEPRS data has been transmitted FTE data without Workload – Uses Standard method for calculating the Target – Appears highly inefficient do to having FTE and no associated workload Workload without FTE data – No FTEs to set Target – Target is set using Workload +5% Ambulatory Targets Slide 29 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Evaluating time reporting with PBAM Ambulatory Targets What do these mean to you? Slide 30 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED

Questions? Slide 31 of 32 UNCLASSIFIED