CMOS Pixels Sensor Simulation Preliminary Results and Plans M. Battaglia UC Berkeley and LBNL Thanks to A. Raspereza, D. Contarato, F. Gaede, A. Besson,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Advertisements

Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
LCFI physics studies meeting, 28 th June 05 Sonja Hillertp. 1 Report from ILC simulation workshop, DESY June Aim of workshop: preparation for Snowmass;
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
LCFI Physics Studies Meeting, 22 nd November 2005Sonja Hillertp. 0 Response to presentation of our plans  very positive response to talk on LCFI vertex.
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
D. Peterson, “TPC Digitization and Reconstruction: Noise ”, LCWS07, DESY, 30-May TPC digitization and track reconstruction: efficiency dependence.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
LCFI Collaboration Meeting, RAL, 6 th March 2007Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 WP 1 – Simulation and Physics Studies Overview of recent progress LCFI Collaboration.
LCD Simulation News Norman Graf ECFA Workshop ECFA Workshop Montpellier, Nov. 14, 2003.
ALCPG Simulation Status and Plans ECFA LC Workshop, Durham Sep. 2, 2004 Norman Graf (SLAC)
ALCPG Simulation Status and Plans ACFA LC Workshop, Taipei Nov. 10, 2004 Norman Graf (SLAC)
Monolithic Pixels R&D at LBNL Devis Contarato Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory International Linear Collider Workshop, LCWS 2007 DESY Hamburg, May.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
SiD Tracking Simulation: Status and Plans Richard Partridge for the SiD Tracking Group Vancouver Linear Collider Workshop July 19-22, 2006.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
ILC VXD Review, Fermilab, October 2007 Ariane Frey, MPI für Physik DEPFET Vertex Detector Simulation and Physics Performance Ariane Frey for the DEPFET.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
ILC Vertex Tracker From Instrumentation R&D to Physics Benchmarking A LNBL and UC Berkeley Program in collaboration with Purdue U, INFN Padova and INFN.
Silicon Sensors for Collider Physics from Physics Requirements to Vertex Tracking Detectors Marco Battaglia Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
CEA DSM Irfu 20 th october 2008 EuDet Annual Meeting Marie GELIN on behalf of IRFU – Saclay and IPHC - Strasbourg Zero Suppressed Digital Chip sensor for.
Status report on the Asian Solid State Tracking R&D March 31, 2003 M. Iwasaki University of Tokyo.
1 Report to Simulation Meeting 20 May, 2004 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK.
SiD performance for the DBD Jan Strube CERN. Overview Software Preparation (CERN, SLAC) Machine Environment (CERN, SLAC) Tracking Performance (C. Grefe)
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
GLD Intermediate tracker task list Configuration & software Silicon Sensor Electronics Support structure H.J.Kim, Kyungpook U. for intermediate tracker.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
1 Using Jupiter and Satellites Akiya Miyamoto KEK Jan 2006.
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort FCAL Clustering Meeting 24 June 2015 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics.
Pixel Sensors for a Linear Collider from Physics Requirements to Beam Test Validation M Battaglia UC Berkeley and LBNL with P Denes, D Bisello, D Contarato,
FPCCD Vertex detector 22 Dec Y. Sugimoto KEK.
Tracking and Vertexing with a Thin CMOS Pixel BeamTelescope and Thin Ladder Studies M Battaglia JM Bussat, D Contarato, P Giubilato, LE Glesener, LC Greiner,
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
G. BrunoOffline week - February Comparison between test- beam data and the SPD simulations in Aliroot G. Bruno, R. Santoro Outline:  strategy of.
Contributions from T Baltz, A Djouadi. The Higgs Sector of the LCC4 Point LCC4 Benchmark LCC4 point in A 0 Funnel region Benchmark point defined in cMSSM.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Plans for a Simulation Study of the Magnetic Field Requirements of the LC TPC February 2006, ILC TPC Analysis Jamboree, DESY Christian Hansen University.
Digitization and hit reconstruction for Silicon Tracker in MarlinReco Sergey Shulga, Tatiana Ilicheva JINR, Dubna, Russia GSU, Gomel, Belarus LCWS07 30.
Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4.
Calorimeter Simulation Infrastructure Norman Graf Arlington ‘03.
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
 Background at CLIC and Requirements on Time Stamping Marco Battaglia UC Berkeley, LBNL and CERN Jean Jacques Blaising LAPP, Annecy and contributions.
GE1/1-III GEM Cluster Size and Resolution Studies with the FNAL Beam Test Data Aiwu Zhang, Vallary Bhopatkar, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology.
Monolithic Pixel R&D at LBNL M Battaglia UC Berkeley - LBNL Universite' Claude Bernard – IPN Lyon Monolithic Pixel Meeting CERN, November 25, 2008 An R&D.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Highlights from the VTX session Marc Winter & Massimo Caccia R&D reports: – DEPFET (M. Trimpl) – CCD (S. Hillert) – UK-CMOS (J.Velthuis) – Continental-CMOS.
NA62 Collaboration Meeting – Anacapri 1 September 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Goals and requirements 1 st flexible geometry version Next geometry version development Conclusions and outlook A realistic and flexible VTX geometry in.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Requirements and Specifications for Si Pixels Sensors
AIDA Alignment Package
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Clustering-based Studies on the upgraded ITS of the Alice Experiment
Presentation transcript:

CMOS Pixels Sensor Simulation Preliminary Results and Plans M. Battaglia UC Berkeley and LBNL Thanks to A. Raspereza, D. Contarato, F. Gaede, A. Besson, M. Winter

Sensor Simulation and Data Analysis in MARLIN Implement sensor simulation ( PixelSim ) and cluster analysis ( PixelAna ) in Marlin and interface to LCIO beam test data ( PixelReader ) Sensor simulation developed in Java/JAS for CCDs and in C++/Marlin for DEPFET sensors, detailed simulation study of CMOS pixels needed; Analysis setup allows to analyze test beam data and validate simulation response on real data, estimate effect of changes in geometries and characteristics and obtain realistic digitized simulation of full physics events and overlayed backgrounds; Use VXD01 5-layered Vertex Tracker geometry in Mokka (50  m thick Si sensor)  (see D. Grandjean talk); Present sampling of preliminary results and plans for future simulation and validation activities at LBNL.

CMOS Pixel Data Implementation in LCIO VtxRawData class implemented in LCIO :

Sensor Simulation Develop sensor simulation starting from VTXDigiProcessor written by A. Raspereza as Marlin package; Define pixel geometry and epi-layer thickness according to chip to be simulated, treat diffusion coefficient as free parameter, accounting for inter-pixel coupling, and adjust to fit cluster size, interface to PixelAna provides TrackerPulse and TrackerRawData data; Standalone Geant 4 beam test simulation for ALS and BASEF setup; Use SimTrackerHit points of impacts from Mokka model energy loss fluctuations with G4 ;

Cluster Reconstruction PixelAna starts with TrackeRawData (pulse height and initial noise and pedestal), flags noisy pixels, updates noise and pedestal values, performs cluster search and generate TrackerHit data: Seed Threshold Add Threshold 1 st Algorithm: set two S/N thresholds for seed and additional pixels to be added to cluster; 2 nd Algorithm: set S/N threshold for seed pixel and add fixed matrix of neighbor pixels. Characterize cluster shape in terms of pixel multiplicity projected over major and minor cluster axis. CED event display of beam test data

The LBNL LDRD-Chip 1 LDRD-Chip 1 : first test structure developed at LBNL, part of ongoing LDRD pixel project for the ILC: simple 3T pixels, analog output, 3 matrices with 10 x 10  m 2, 20 x 20  m 2 and 40 x 40  m 2 pixels; Produced in Spring 05 in AMS 0.35-OPTO process, estimated 10  m epi-layer, characterized at LBNL ALS 1.5 GeV e - beam: = 15 (see also D. Contarato talk); Simple structure useful for comparing response of different pixel geometries.

Pixel Configurations and Data Sets ChipPixel Size (  m) Epi-layer (  m) BeamEnergy (GeV) LDRD-110 e-e- 1.5ALS LDRD-12010e-e- 1.5ALS LDRD-14010e-e- 1.5ALS Mimosa 51714e-e- 1.5ALS Mimosa 51714e-e- 3.0DESY Mimosa 51714e-e- 6.0DESY Mimosa - CERN Several test beam data sets converted into LCIO format and used for validation of pixel simulation:

Cluster Pulse Height, Cluster Size Cluster Pulse Height 1.5 GeV e - beam Cluster Pulse Height 6 GeV e - beam Cluster S/N 1.5 GeV e - beam Cluster Size 6 GeV e - beam Cluster reconstruction: 1 st Algorithm

Cluster Pulse Height, Cluster Size Cluster reconstruction: 2 nd Algorithm Fraction of Total Charge in Cluster vs. Nb. of Pixels Cluster Pulse Height peak vs. Matrix Size Seed 3x33x3 5x55x5

Single Point Resolution ChipPixel Size (  m) Data (  m) Simulation (  m) LDRD LDRD LDRD Mimosa Determine single point resolution for single tracks using charge center of gravity with no magnetic field; Compare single point resolution from simulation to data using beam for Mimosa 5 and focused Laser scan for LDRD-1 :

Single Point Resolution Single Point resolution vs. track polar incidence angle for Mimosa 5 shows only minor effect in z: Single Point resolution vs. Signal-to-Noise ratio for LDRD-Chip 1 20  m pixels:

Impact Parameter Resolution Determine preliminary impact parameter resolution for different pixel geometries using VTX-only hits and simple helix fit on single e - tracks: =  m Pixels 10  m Pixels e - beam

Pixel Response to Inclined Tracks Study response to inclined tracks in terms of cluster size and cluster shape for different pixel sizes; Started validation of simulation results with beam test data for LDRD and Mimosa 5 chip on 1.5 GeV e - beam at ALS; Cluster size change controlled by ratio of epi-layer thickness and pixel size and is modest for typical values. Signal scaling as ~ cos  verified on Mimosa5 on 120 GeV  beam test data by Strasbourg group;

Pair Background 120 GeV  - Hit Pair e - Hit Study pairs generated with GuineaPig program for TESLA 500 GeV parameters and tracked through VXD01 using Mokka

Pair Background Significant difference in cluster size and cluster shape for low momentum e- from pairs, compared to high energy e - may be useful for identifying and rejecting background hits in pattern recognition; Cluster Size Beam test using tunable energy e - beam (50 MeV-0.5 GeV) from LOASIS plasma accelerator facility at LBNL planned for Summer and Fall 06 to validate simulation results. 1.5 GeV e - Pair e -

Sensor simulation and validation within Mokka+Marlin framework started, from code developed by A. Raspereza; Refine simulation and reconstruction, compare systematically with beam test data of various test structures, document and release as MarlinReco packages; Initiate systematic program of simulation validation: Low energy e - at LBNL accelerators; High energy p require plans of beam tests at CERN and/or FNAL; Extend studies from single tracks/VTX only to full benchmark processes with full LDC (and possibly SiD) tracking; Setting up VTX and physics simulation group at LBNL, aim at collaborating with other interested groups.