Math in Action 2016 Grand Valley State University Saturday, 27 February Debbie Morrow Liaison Librarian – Math & Statistics University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transitioning to the Common Core: Changing the Definition of Mathematical Proficiency Patrick Callahan Statewide Co-Director, California Mathematics Project.
Advertisements

Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Putting Iowa AEA Online Resources to Work with the Iowa Core Karen Appleton Iowa AEA Online Facilitator.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
How to… Critically Evaluate Information Resources!
Effective Math Questioning
Reference and Research
1 The Development of Language Arts Apr By Dannikia Davis Heather Howard Kim Krachinsky
Library Resources for Common Core State Standards in Physical Education How to Teach P.E. and E.L.A. at the Same Time.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
Evaluating Information The CRAAP Test When you search for information, you’ll easily find a lot of it…but is it good information? That’s up to you to.
Discourse and Mathematics: Get Connected! Rosann Hollinger and Bernard Rahming Milwaukee Public Schools April 27, 2012 NCTM Annual Meeting Philadelphia.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
Writing and Reasoning in Mathematics Constructing Viable Arguments August 22, 2012 Patrick Callahan Co-Director, California Mathematics Project.
Bridging Math Practices Summer Workshop Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Day 3.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
CCSS: Types of Writing.
Is that site good enough to cite?
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
Standards: Common Practices & Iowa Core. How do you like to learn? Think about about you favorite or most impactful learning experience. What was it about.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
Standards of Mathematical Practice.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics What science teachers need to know.
STANDARDS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS & LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES, SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS Taking a Closer Look Inside the Common Core 1.
Digital Citizenship Lesson 3 Collective Intelligence.
Grade 8 – Writing Standards Text Types and Purposes (1b) Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Support claim(s) with.
CM 104: Unit 4 Seminar Dr. Laurie Novy. Welcome! Seminar reminders: during presentation, keep side chat to a minimum; if you get booted out or lose audio,
Introduction to Website Evaluation Patricia Heeter EME6415.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
The CRAAP Test Your guide to website evaluation Ms. Mitchell Ms. Mitchell English 9H.
Writing Informative Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a substantive.
1 TEXT-BASED SYNTHESIS WRITING: INFORMATIVE / ARGUMENT OPINION NARRATIVE Silver Shores Elementary.
Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites.
ELACC7W1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
Credible Sources? Do you believe everything you read on the Internet?
Presented by Heather Sparks, NBCT 2009 Oklahoma Teacher of the Year June 4, 2012.
La recherche Un guide. Une bonne source? ACCURACY: There are no regulations, standards, or systems in place to ensure that information on the web is correct.
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
What is Mathematical Argumentation? Madelyn Colonnese (UConn), Sarah Brown (Manchester PS) Megan Staples (UConn) Jillian Cavanna (Michigan State University)
Implementing the Common Core State Standards Monday, January 23rd - 4pm EST Deconstructing the Common Core Standards: Analyzing for Content, Level of Cognition.
The CRAAP Way to Evaluate Credibility AP Capstone Research Mr. Linton.
More Than Mistakes (construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of
Research Research Project Bukowski & McKnight. How will research help you? Buying a phone Buying new sneakers Buying a car Going on vacation Health information.
Winston - Salem / Forsyth County Schools ELA Module Two: Writing.
Suzan Skaar, South High School Library Media Specialist.
Going Deeper with Practice and Content
Evaluating Sources.
The Library and Credible Research
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
Narrative Writing Grades 6-12
Do Now: January 21, 2015 Sentence Composing Tools: Adjective Clause Take Notes: -What is an adjective clause? Provide multiple examples -What’s the difference.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Using Credible Internet Sources
Evaluating Sources.
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
The CRAAP Test.
Web Evaluation The C. R. A. A. P. Test.
Safe and Effective Web searchING
Evaluating Information
Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites Have them name some things, make a list on the board of why.
Evaluating Websites Using CRAAP 
Searching for Information Without Losing Your Cool!
Use the CRAAP Test to Evaluate Information
The CRAAP Test Your guide to web site evaluation
Evaluating Internet Resources
Speech 101 Ms. Lewallen.
Evaluating Websites The CRAAP Test: Don’t Surf the Net Without It! CRAAP Test: Meriam Library  California State University, Chico.
CRAAP.
Presentation transcript:

Math in Action 2016 Grand Valley State University Saturday, 27 February Debbie Morrow Liaison Librarian – Math & Statistics University Libraries, GVSU

Introductions Who are you? What do you teach? Do you make any kind of “researched assignments”? What do you want your students to understand about “information”?

CCSS.Math.Practice.MP3CCSS.Math.Practice.MP3 Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. Mathematically proficient students understand and use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously established results in constructing arguments. They make conjectures and build a logical progression of statements to explore the truth of their conjectures. They are able to analyze situations by breaking them into cases, and can recognize and use counterexamples. They justify their conclusions, communicate them to others, and respond to the arguments of others. They reason inductively about data, making plausible arguments that take into account the context from which the data arose. Mathematically proficient students are also able to compare the effectiveness of two plausible arguments, distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed, and—if there is a flaw in an argument—explain what it is. Elementary students can construct arguments using concrete referents such as objects, drawings, diagrams, and actions. Such arguments can make sense and be correct, even though they are not generalized or made formal until later grades. Later, students learn to determine domains to which an argument applies. Students at all grades can listen or read the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments. CCSS Math Practice standards

CCSS English Language Arts >> College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Writing Research to Build and Present Knowledge: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.7 Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.7 CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.8 Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.8 CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.9

Getting interdisciplinary:

WY/s1600/Screen+Shot at PM.png Getting real-life: 21 ST CENTURY 4 C’ S COMPETENCIES  Communication  Collaboration  Critical Thinking  Creativity

Finding stuff (“sources”) … … in your school’s library/media center: Grandville H.S. - Library Media Center + Kent ISD systemLibrary Media Center Allendale Public Schools - Media Center Research & Study Tools Research & Study Tools Holland Public Schools - Student Links: Media Center Library Catalogs + Muskegon ISD systemMedia Center Library Catalogs

Finding stuff (“sources”) … … out on the Web: MeL Homework Help, part of the MeL Teens gateway MeL Homework Help PBS Learning Media Wikipedia Google site:.[domain]

Evaluating “stuff” You can find something about just about anything out on the Web … … but is it any good??

Evaluating “stuff” Let’s see how well you do! go to: “The True Cost of Owning a Car”

Evaluating “stuff” Query a potential source before you decide to use it. Is it good enough? C urrency R elevance A uthority A ccuracy P urpose

Evaluating “stuff” – apply… …the CRAAP Test!

Thank you for your attention! --Debbie Morrow GVSU University Libraries

Currency the timeliness of the information When was the information published or posted? Has the information been revised or updated? Is the information current or out-of-date for your topic? Are the links functional?

Relevance the importance of the information for your needs Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? Who is the intended audience? Is the information at an appropriate level? Have you looked at a variety of sources before choosing this one? Would you be comfortable using this source for a research paper?

Authority the source of the information Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? What are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? Is there contact information, such as a publisher or address? Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?

Accuracy the reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the content Where does the information come from? Is the information supported by evidence? Has the information been reviewed or refereed? Can you verify any of the information in another source? Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? Are there spelling, grammar, or other typographical errors?

Purpose the reason the information exists What is the purpose of the information? Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?