Mapping Formal Methods to NASA Capability Needs Connecting the Dots Dr. Michael Lowry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trusted Computing in Government Networks May 16, 2007 Richard C. (Dick) Schaeffer, Jr. Information Assurance Director National Security Agency.
Advertisements

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy 2. Constellation Overview Ken Davidian Lead, Commercial.
CS 325: Software Engineering January 13, 2015 Introduction Defining Software Engineering SWE vs. CS Software Life-Cycle Software Processes Waterfall Process.
1 Architecture and Planning Strategies for Addressing Radiation, Space Weather, and Space Climatology Impact on NASA Missions Study Sponsor - NASA Office.
VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.
Software Engineering 1 Evolutionary Processes Lesson 11.
SERC Achievements and Program Direction Art Pyster Deputy Executive Director November, Note by R Peak 12/7/2010: This presentation.
November 17, 2004Planning Meeting for HCMDSS Workshop Breakout Session 2(II): Development Summary W. Rance Cleaveland II, PhD CEO, Reactive Systems Inc.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Design of a Certifiably Dependable Next- Generation Air Transportation System Stephen A. JacklinMichelle M. Eshow Michael R. LowryDave McNally Ewen Denny.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
Strategic Directions in Real- Time & Embedded Systems Aatash Patel 18 th September, 2001.
Aerospace Engineering By Patrick Ferrell. Aerospace Engineering is the main branch of engineering concerned with the research, design, development, construction,
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Process: A Generic View n A software process  is a roadmap to building high quality software products.  provides a framework for managing activities.
Conference Planning Subcommittee Accomplishments over the past year SciTech 2014  4 IS Sessions with 18 papers  Improvement from 3 sessions in 2013 &
May Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies only Symmetric Multimodal Interactive Intelligent Development Environments Dramatic reduction.
Assurance techniques for code generators Ewen Denney USRA/RIACS, NASA Ames Bernd Fischer ECS, U Southampton.
Technology Input Formats and Background Appendix B.
Command and Data Handling (C&DH)
Advanced Technology Center Slide 1 Requirements-Based Testing Dr. Mats P. E. Heimdahl University of Minnesota Software Engineering Center Dr. Steven P.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
ESA/ESTEC, TEC-QQS August 8, 2005 SAS_05_ESA SW PA R&D_Winzer,Prades Slide 1 Software Product Assurance (PA) R&D Road mapping Activities ESA/ESTEC TEC-QQS.
1 Description and Benefits of JWST Commanding Operations Concept TIPS/JIM Meeting 17 July 2003 Vicki Balzano.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Slide 1V&V 10/2002 Software Quality Assurance Dr. Linda H. Rosenberg Assistant Director For Information Sciences Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA
Page 1 Reconfigurable Communications Processor Principal Investigator: Chris Papachristou Task Number: NAG Electrical Engineering & Computer Science.
Second GPM Applications Workshop 9-10.June Partners in the GPM Constellation Second GPM Applications Workshop 9-10.June.2015.
Verifying Autonomous Planning Systems Even the best laid plans need to be verified Prepared for the 2005 Software Assurance Symposium (SAS) DS1 MSL EO1.
Verifying AI Plan Models Even the best laid plans need to be verified Margaret Smith – PI Gordon Cucullu Gerard Holzmann Benjamin Smith Prepared for the.
Conference Planning Subcommittee Accomplishments over the past year SciTech 2015  13 IS Sessions (56 Papers, 2 Invited Panels)  4 IS Sessions with 18.
MXJ: Model-Centric, Safety- Critical Java for Exploration Matthias Anlauff Kestrel Institute, Palo Alto, CA
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
MAPLD 2005/254C. Papachristou 1 Reconfigurable and Evolvable Hardware Fabric Chris Papachristou, Frank Wolff Robert Ewing Electrical Engineering & Computer.
NASA Use Cases for the Earth Observation Sensor Web Karen Moe NASA Earth Science Technology Office WGISS-26 Boulder,
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
Aviation System Capacity Frank J. Aguilera National Aeronautics & Space Administration.
A Prescriptive Adaptive Test Framework (PATFrame) for Unmanned and Autonomous Systems: A Collaboration Between MIT, USC, UT Arlington and Softstar Systems.
Intelligent Systems Software Assurance Symposium 2004 Bojan Cukic & Yan Liu, Robyn Lutz & Stacy Nelson, Chris Rouff, Johann Schumann, Margaret Smith July.
Near Real-Time Verification At The Forecast Systems Laboratory: An Operational Perspective Michael P. Kay (CIRES/FSL/NOAA) Jennifer L. Mahoney (FSL/NOAA)
High Confidence Software and Systems HCMDSS Workshop Brad Martin June 2, 2005.
August 2003 At A Glance The IRC is a platform independent, extensible, and adaptive framework that provides robust, interactive, and distributed control.
ADASS the Planning and Scheduling Perspective Roadmap: - How planning and scheduling fits in at ADASS - ADASS planning and scheduling posters and presentations.
Markland J. Benson, Computer Systems Manager, White Sands Complex, (575) , Technology Infusion of CodeSonar into the Space.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
Robotics & Autonomy Test Facility Workshop 28 th February 2012 Dr Derek J. Bennet Robotics.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
Intelligent Systems TC Welcome 2014 AIAA Intelligent Systems Workshop.
Mars Exploration Rover Machine Using Java Technology Presented by k.Pranusha k.Ishwarya.
CIMA and Semantic Interoperability for Networked Instruments and Sensors Donald F. (Rick) McMullen Pervasive Technology Labs at Indiana University
INCOSE IW12 MBSE Workshop 15 INCOSE (MBSE) Model Based System Engineering Integration and Verification Scenario Ron Williamson, PhD Raytheon
1 Creating Situational Awareness with Data Trending and Monitoring Zhenping Li, J.P. Douglas, and Ken. Mitchell Arctic Slope Technical Services.
Where Formal Methods Might Find Application on Future NASA Missions On-Ramps for Formal Methods.
1 Ontological Foundations For SysML Henson Graves September 2010.
Please fill in my session feedback form available on each chair. SPSCairo Welcome.
Mapping Formal Methods to NASA Capability Needs Template Slides.
National Goals and Objectives
Short Contribution Title Goes Here
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
Towards Standards for Goal-Based Operations
The Future in Space.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Intelligent Systems Software Assurance Symposium 2004
Short Contribution Title Goes Here
Systems Engineering for Mission-Driven Modeling
<insert title> < presenter name >
“Life of a Physicist at NASA”
Presentation transcript:

Mapping Formal Methods to NASA Capability Needs Connecting the Dots Dr. Michael Lowry

Breakout Session Goals NASA technology roadmaps ex.html ex.html Provide input to fill out technology roadmaps with math-based approaches to software and system engineering that enables capabilities for future missions. Canvas FM community on needed data to target R&D towards NASA software and systems. Steps towards a community letter to NASA engineering, technology, and mission decision makers.

Breakout Session Organization Provide input to session leads to fill out powerpoint templates. Session leads present 10 minute summaries Thursday morning after keynote. Grounded in NASA mission directorate’s future missions. Aviation: Cesar Munoz and Kristin Rozier, Sanjai (Classroom) Human Space: Johan Schumann and Teme Karsai (Plenary) Robotic Space: Michael Lowry, Oksana, Michael Whalen (Classroom)

Template Slides Map Research to Technology Candidate New Technology Candidate Intermediate Milestones for Capability and/or Technology New Capability Description Data needed for Research

Civil Aviation 1968,1978, today IFR Quotas JFK8084 O’Hare LaGuardia6076 Newark6070 Wash Nat60 64 United States Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 Alfred Kahn

Civil Aviation 2035 UTM < 400’UAS in National Airspace

Aviation Breakout Seed Relevant roadmaps: TA15, TA11 Safety-wide system assurance Enabling Assured Machine Autonomy for Aviation (2035 need date) – Capability to fully certify and trust autonomous systems for National Air Space operations. – Example technology: compositional reasoning for early lifecycle software development. – Challenge – verification of non-deterministic algorithms.

Human Space Exploration-Apollo

Apollo 11 LEM Descent Anomaly

Mars Science Lab – 14 minutes of terror Disciplined use of Static Analysis 25% of EDL modules checked with SPIN requiring manual instrumentation Feb CACM

Human Mars Roadmap Technology Need Date 2021: Crewed to Near Earth Asteroid 2027: Crewed to Mars Orbit, Moons

Human Space Breakout Seed Relevant roadmaps: TA4, TA11,TA6,TA7 Capabilities: Smart Habitat, Autonomous Mission Operations, Complex Adaptive Systems Technologies: – V&V tools for autonomous planning, scheduling – V&V tools for Integrated system health mgmt – Enable in-flight real-time V&V for highly reconfigurable systems

Robotic Space SOA: remote joy-sticking and mission control for science operations. SOA: critical sequences – EDL and Orbit Insertion – require years of development and V&V. SOA: Science opportunities – subject to light-time delay to identify and retarget.

Future Missions: Autonomous and Automated

Robotic Space Breakout Seed Relevant roadmaps: TA4, TA11, TA8, TA5 Capabilities: Autonomous and Automated mission operations, Opportunistic Science Technologies: spec languages, code generation – V&V tools for automated autonomy – V&V tools for opportunistic and hazardous science where there is no viable Safing mode. – V&V for radiation tolerant hardware and software. – V&V for machine learning in uncertain environments.

Template Slides Map Research to Technology Candidate New Technology Candidate Intermediate Milestones for Capability and/or Technology New Capability Description Data needed for Research

Map Research To Technology Candidate Capability Name Technology Candidate (existing or new) Research Program, project, or paper with reference Short Description How it contributes to capability Metric contribution (qualitative or quantitative) Needed follow-on work and time frame

New Technology Candidate Capability name Technology description State of the Art (metric) End Goal for achieving capability

Intermediate Milestones Capability Name End Goal and Time Frame Intermediate Milestone(s) – Description – Time Frame

New Capability Capability name and description Missions that are enabled or enhanced Rationale Time frame (date needed) State of the Art

Data Needed for Research Artifact description (architecture, software/system design, software code, test results, telemetry). Benefit of having NASA artifact versus surrogate.